[HN Gopher] The Buddhist history of moveable type before Gutenbe...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Buddhist history of moveable type before Gutenberg (2016)
        
       Author : krig
       Score  : 43 points
       Date   : 2021-04-09 07:01 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (tricycle.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (tricycle.org)
        
       | benjohnson wrote:
       | This article missed the point. Gutenberg didn't invent metal
       | movable type and that's not why we remember him. He invented
       | making a repeatable casting method with appropriate alloys for
       | metal type that had accurate enough uniform dimensions that he
       | could to use a wine press mechanism to press paper onto the
       | uniform surface.
       | 
       | The molding method he made was astounding clever and went far
       | beyond using basically metal coin minting process that has
       | existed for thousands of years around the world.
        
         | dbt00 wrote:
         | Gutenberg's place in history is as the man who ushered in the
         | printing press and commodity publishing in the west. Whether or
         | not he was the first ever to do it isn't relevant to that
         | history, but I do think knowing that other people were onto
         | similar ideas is interesting. Just like in 100 years the iPhone
         | will be "the first smartphone", and people will learn about
         | blackberries and palmpilots in random little "did you know"
         | snippets...
        
           | jlg23 wrote:
           | Or it's the place in history of a man who provided a tool
           | that allowed dissemination of "heretic" ideas, thus enabling
           | reformation.
        
           | mymythisisthis wrote:
           | He was interrupted printing the Bible, the Pope asked him to
           | print indulgences. Indulgences were sold, to raise money for
           | the Papacy. Enter Martin Luther and the Protestants
           | Reformation.
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | It's like the arguments that Edison didn't invent the
         | lightbulb. Other inventors had made glowing wires before. But
         | Edison's great insight was to pass high voltage but low current
         | through the filament (previous inventors used low voltage and
         | high current). Edison also used an effective vacuum machine to
         | prevent the filament from burning.
         | 
         | The result was a _practical_ light bulb, one that lasted more
         | than moments, and did not consume vast amounts of power.
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | It's a little more complicated, lightbulbs where very much a
           | useful thing before Edison and several other improvements
           | occurred from 1802 to Edison's 1879 patent and the actual
           | breakthrough of a cheap bulb reaching 1200 hours occurred
           | after that patent. Warren de la Rue for example had an
           | efficient and long lasting design that was simply to
           | expensive for mass production. Henry Woodward is arguably the
           | first inventor of a practical bulb using carbon rods in
           | nitrogen filled bulbs, though his business failed and he sold
           | the patent to Edison.
           | 
           | Critically, it was really electric infrastructure more than
           | the physical bulb design that resulted in GE's success. Arc
           | lamp's had become very popular for street lighting through
           | the 1870's, which really set the stage for lighting
           | alternatives.
        
         | hoophoop wrote:
         | > that's not why we remember him
         | 
         | 99% of people believe that he single-handedly invented the
         | press with movable type. Ask around.
        
       | bumbada wrote:
       | The travels of Marco Polo(1300) talks about books in China so
       | cheap that people could actually buy them as they are made from
       | woodblocks.
       | 
       | But "cheap" here is not the price of a book today. A book
       | requires someone spending at least a year writing it, specially
       | in the past, with very bad lighting after sunset or in bad
       | weather. That usually meant a book costing the equivalent of a
       | car today, or even more expensive.
       | 
       | Chinese books were cheap compared to buying a car but way more
       | expensive than today. And very few books could justify the
       | investment of creating the woodblocks.
       | 
       | Gutenberg probably got the idea from Marco Polo,woodblock was
       | already used for graphics in Europe, but added his knowledge with
       | metal working and invented an alloy that expands as it cools
       | down. That is extremely rare in metals, almost all of them
       | contract.
       | 
       | That unique property gave Gutenberg type its incredible quality.
       | 
       | Also, Gutenberg knowledge of metal made him create a method that
       | let you recreate the type very easily again and again when the
       | type wears out.
       | 
       | And then he added the concept of the press and the distributor of
       | ink that were taken from other professions like olive oil and
       | wine makers(something as old as Romans in Europe).
        
         | agumonkey wrote:
         | was the expanding easy to control ? seems to me naive eyes that
         | expanding on cooldown would lead to graphical issues too.
        
       | a11r wrote:
       | The timing is interesting. According to the article, one of the
       | reasons this did not succeed more broadly was due to the large
       | number of characters in the script adapted from the chinese
       | writing system. The invention of Hangual a couple of centuries
       | later did bring to Korea a script with dozens of letters instead
       | of thousands. If the modern script was invented first, perhaps we
       | would be crediting Korea as the birthplace of the printing press.
       | 
       | edit:fixed typo
        
       | selimthegrim wrote:
       | - Uyghurs were Manichaeans too
       | 
       | - pretty sure the neighboring Tangut (Western Xia) had printed
       | books too (maybe courtesy of the Uyghurs?)
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auspicious_Tantra_of_All-Rea...
        
         | sammalloy wrote:
         | It seems the difference is that the Korean Jikji (1377) is
         | considered the oldest extant book printed with movable metal
         | type, while the Tangut book (1139?) found in China is the
         | oldest extant book printed using wooden movable type.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-09 23:01 UTC)