[HN Gopher] The Real Book
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Real Book
        
       Author : mpweiher
       Score  : 455 points
       Date   : 2021-04-08 10:34 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (99percentinvisible.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (99percentinvisible.org)
        
       | dhosek wrote:
       | Back in the 90s, one of my friends excitedly declared that she'd
       | managed to get her hands on an illegal real book. At her birthday
       | party, I found myself at the piano playing requests from it, but
       | I wasn't familiar with the convention used in the book to write,
       | e.g., C- for Cmin and I had assumed that the dash meant a
       | diminished rather than minor chord. I had some really weird
       | harmonizations coming out of that.
        
         | whimsicalism wrote:
         | I've had the exact same experience... There were a few early,
         | illegal Real Books that had songs you couldn't get ahold of
         | from the licensed versions.
        
       | MrGando wrote:
       | The real book is actually full of egregious mistakes and
       | philosophically speaking is quite questionable. There's a
       | significant body of great Jazz musicians (eg: Yotam Silberstein)
       | who avoid the book at all costs. My teacher -who's part of
       | Yotam's quintet- is also very careful with the book and tries to
       | avoid it.
        
         | cjohnson318 wrote:
         | On any list of "Jazz for Beginners" you'll see Blue Bossa, and
         | right off the bat, in the fourth measure, The Real Book has an
         | unlikely Bb7 chord. Most jazz musicians I've spoken with use
         | the changes Cm7 / Cm7 / Fm7 / Fm7 for the first four measures,
         | instead of The Real Book's Cm / Cm / Fm7 / Bb7. I'm not sure
         | how that Bb7 got there, or how it's stayed there after 50
         | years, but there it is.
        
       | wazoox wrote:
       | Why did you change the title?
        
         | MauranKilom wrote:
         | It's possible that the word filter for titles that HN uses
         | removed the "real". But yeah, whatever the cause, the result is
         | bad.
        
           | noneeeed wrote:
           | Especially as 99 Percent Ivisible have a book out, which is
           | what I thought this was going to be about.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | HN's debaiting software did. We changed it back.
         | 
         | Submitters: if HN's software edits a title badly, you can
         | override that by clicking 'edit'. Just please don't restore
         | clickbait.
        
       | Rochus wrote:
       | There is a great potcast at the bottom of the page worth
       | listening to, with even more interesting information than in the
       | article. So many people were using the Real Book for years
       | without knowing who actually compiled and typeset all these
       | wonderful scores.
        
       | krigs wrote:
       | what is the real book?
        
         | krallja wrote:
         | Try reading the very first paragraph:
         | 
         | << It has a peach-colored cover, a chunky, 1970s-style logo,
         | and a black plastic binding. It's delightfully homemade-looking
         | --like it was printed by a bunch of teenagers at a Kinkos. And
         | inside is the sheet music for hundreds of common jazz tunes--
         | also known as jazz "standards"--all meticulously notated by
         | hand. >>
        
       | caseyross wrote:
       | I can't help thinking that this story is a fantastic example of
       | the free market at work. Two college kids use their insight to
       | spot a market need that the "big guys" missed, and create a
       | wonderful, useful product that becomes a smash hit.
       | 
       | Of course, when I say "the free market", I'm talking about the
       | one where good ideas can be shared and copied freely --- not the
       | one populated by sheet music landlords, whose laws were flouted
       | every step of the way for great public benefit.
        
         | Joker_vD wrote:
         | "But how is that a _market_ if things are shared and copied
         | _freely_? No, there must be property rights and strict
         | enforcements and protection of those rights, and ideally the
         | more property one has, the more their rights are protected: so
         | that small and ineffective market participants can be forced
         | out easier, that 'd allow for arriving at economies of scale
         | quicker which will improve things for everyone, yes, even for
         | those whose property was reassigned to better owners".
        
       | mh8h wrote:
       | Saw the title, and thought it is going to be about what Erdos
       | referred to as The Book, in which God keeps the most elegant
       | proof of each mathematical theorem.
        
         | FabHK wrote:
         | Incarnated as the wonderful _Proofs from THE BOOK_ by Martin
         | Aigner and Gunter M. Ziegler.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_from_THE_BOOK
         | 
         | > During a lecture in 1985, Erdos said, "You don't have to
         | believe in God, but you should believe in The Book."
        
       | cecida wrote:
       | I love 99% Invisible.
        
       | Udo_Schmitz wrote:
       | Didn't know about the legal implications. A bunch of Real and
       | Fake Books were readily available at the music library in Germany
       | I frequented in the 80s. I'd bet they're still available now.
        
       | pthreads wrote:
       | When I was learning to play the saxophone my instructor had an
       | old copy of the Real Book. The transcriptions of songs by some of
       | the jazz legends would blow my mind. I thought the people being
       | able to transcribe those were geniuses (still do). They had no
       | sophisticated software to help them. It was all done manually by
       | listening to countless hours of recordings over and over again.
       | All those chord changes, harmonies, the extra fast tempo...
       | 
       | That also reminds me of Phil Schapp. He used to run (probably
       | still does) a radio program at Columbia University. Most
       | astonishing encyclopedic knowledge of jazz!! Have a listen
       | sometime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Schaap
       | 
       | Edit: Added Wikipedia link.
        
         | biggieshellz wrote:
         | No sophisticated software, but you could take a turntable and
         | play a 33 1/3 RPM record at half speed (16 2/3 RPM) and that
         | would drop the recording by an octave but keep the notes the
         | same.
        
           | bori5 wrote:
           | Another way was put stacks of coins on the LP to slow it down
        
         | jpitz wrote:
         | I've spoken to a few professional arrangers, and I always ask
         | "How many times did you have to listen to that to write it
         | down?"
         | 
         | "Just once."
         | 
         | Genius indeed. Or 10,00 hours. Or both.
        
           | tjr wrote:
           | I would think definitely some 10,000 involved. I have done
           | transcriptions for years, but not very frequently. I don't
           | have 10,000 hours, but I have more hours today than I did 20
           | years ago. And I'm definitely better at it. Ive reached the
           | point where some music I really can just hear and write down,
           | but there's still plenty that I need to work at meticulously.
        
           | dhosek wrote:
           | I had the misfortune of having a friend in high school who
           | could listen to something and transcribe it. I remember at
           | band camp watching him with a cassette player and manuscript
           | player transcribing an instrumental break from a Chicago
           | song. He'd play a couple seconds, score it out, then play a
           | couple more seconds until he was done.
           | 
           | I say misfortune because I assumed this was a binary thing:
           | you either could do it or you couldn't, and I was in the
           | latter category. Later in life, I found that it was a
           | learnable skill (probably what did more than anything else
           | for me in developing my ear was being part of the cathedral
           | choir and doing a lot of sight singing in harmony) (another
           | aside, having done a lot of church music over the years, it
           | was interesting to see the level of musicianship of the
           | cathedral choir, and I was in the larger amateur group rather
           | than the smaller professional group--where in most church
           | choirs, each section would have their part played at the
           | piano and they'd sing it back, the cathedral choir would have
           | all four parts played together at the piano and everyone
           | would sing back in harmony. The professionals didn't bother
           | with the piano part and just sight-sang everything, including
           | some really tricky harmonies, like having the sopranos sing a
           | high F against an E minor chord in the lower voices.) At my
           | peak, I was able to work on writing music while walking
           | without any instrument and come home and transcribe what I'd
           | written including all the harmonizations. I've lost some of
           | that skill from lack of practice in the years since and I had
           | to use Capo to recover the chord progression of a piece I
           | wrote where I couldn't remember one of the chords in the
           | middle 8.
           | 
           | So bottom line, there are some people for whom this comes
           | naturally but it is absolutely a learnable skill.
        
             | JoshCole wrote:
             | This is true of other skills that seem magical. One that
             | stands out to me as being learnable, but often seen as
             | magical, is 'savant like' memory capabilities.
             | 
             | People assume that these people have different minds and
             | that is how they have such incredible recall, but the truth
             | is our memories are really strong when the recall is a
             | spatial query and the object being recalled is encoded
             | well. People mistake their short term memory for their
             | actual memory and they often don't do the work of encoding
             | and decoding their thinking to improve its compression
             | properties. This leads to the impression that our memory
             | capabilities are much worse then they are.
             | 
             | If you properly encode the memory into a spatial context
             | you can have rather incredible feats of memory. It just
             | takes work to do the proper encoding and decoding and the
             | creation of spatial contexts in which to store the things
             | you want to remember.
             | 
             | That happens often with things that seem magical. Edward
             | Tufte had an amazing observation about magic that really
             | sticks with me: magic is an art of misinformation wherein
             | the objective is to hide the work that was done. Oftentimes
             | magical things are things which take a lot of work, but
             | that work is hidden.
        
         | zimpenfish wrote:
         | > They had no sophisticated software to help them.
         | 
         | Which is a shame because they sometimes make bad
         | transcriptions...
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFWCbGzxofU is a deep dive by
         | Adam Neely into "Girl From Ipanema" covering how "The Real
         | Book" neutered the blues countermelody because ... someone just
         | didn't write it down in the 70s and everyone learns it from TRB
         | now.
        
           | GavinMcG wrote:
           | Thanks for sharing that! What a great dive into the
           | particulars--way beyond my music theory knowledge, but still
           | accessible.
        
           | leephillips wrote:
           | This video is absolutely fascinating. Thank you!
        
           | lc9er wrote:
           | Guitar tab sites always had the same problem with bad
           | transcriptions. Fortunately, there's a whole generation of
           | musicians that do fairly accurate "how to play" series on
           | YouTube.
        
             | alexilliamson wrote:
             | IMO Ultimate guitar has really great tabs for most
             | reasonably popular songs. The ratings don't seem to be
             | gamed as much as other sites as well. It's _almost_ good
             | enough to forgive all the shady UX patterns all over the
             | site.
        
               | achn wrote:
               | The current version of this website is so shaddy and
               | specifically geared to destroy the original concept of
               | tabs being easy to copy and edit. This website is now the
               | antithesis of where it started. It is a perfect example
               | of everything that is wrong with the modern web.
        
           | fortran77 wrote:
           | The software that helps is the ability to play and replay any
           | part of the track, or slow things down a bit. The
           | "transcription" is usually done by someone who knows music...
        
           | biggieshellz wrote:
           | Same thing with Blue Bossa. The syncopation in the original
           | is completely missing in the Real Book chart, and now every
           | high school jazz musician learns it the Real Book way and
           | runs it into the ground.
        
             | whimsicalism wrote:
             | If you're just straight up reading from The Real Book and
             | not listening to the records, you're playing yourself.
             | 
             | I was also lucky to have a piano teacher who would correct
             | the wrong stuff in the real book for me.
        
       | bonthron wrote:
       | When I was a teenager, my music teacher always had a copy of the
       | Real Book around. I went to a local music store and was looking
       | through their music books when one of the employees asked, 'is
       | there something I can help you find?' When I said the Real Book,
       | he said, 'oh, we don't keep that out here'... he disappeared for
       | a minute and came back with a copy from the back room. At the
       | time, I felt like I had been admitted into a secret club.
        
         | mtalantikite wrote:
         | I have a very clear memory of taking the subway to a random
         | music shop in Boston near Berklee as a teenager that an older
         | musician friend had told me about that had Real Books in the
         | back. Went up to the counter and when I asked for it the person
         | working there got real quiet, asking me what key I needed it
         | in, and then ducked into the back to grab it. I think it was
         | something like $45, which was a lot for 15 year old me in the
         | 90s at the time. It definitely felt like a secret club! I
         | loaned it out to a drummer friend in college and never got it
         | back, I should ask him if he still has it.
        
           | bewareandaware wrote:
           | I thought they were all in the same key! I got mine because
           | someone gave it to me. Then later I gave it to someone.
        
       | hoprocker wrote:
       | The Real Book, often considered the Real Inaccurate Book.
        
       | blueboo wrote:
       | The Real Book is a great and weird learning tool. It's a rite of
       | passage in jazz education to realise that your favorite tune
       | isn't actually how it was written in the Real Book. Miles Davis
       | didn't get it wrong -- the Real Book did! And just like that, you
       | have your first bit of secret jazz knowledge...
       | 
       | There are also some dated, now-seemingly-bizarre choices that
       | were included. These quickly become in-jokes among folks boning
       | up on classic tunes. "Should we do Speak No Evil, Ceora,
       | or...General Mojo's Well-laid Plan?"
       | 
       | My favorite weirdness is the creative harmonisation of late 60s
       | free jazz. The chords offered for "Orbits" are quite cool but
       | very much the transcriber's imagination.
       | 
       | Yes, it's inadequate and flawed if it's the only resource
       | offered. But it's no gatekeeper, it's a gate-opener. I prefer to
       | see it as an invitation to dig deeper. Someone practicing
       | "Billy's Bounce" might gaze in disbelief at "Some Skunk Funk".
       | What's going on with the mixed meter in this Charles Mingus guy's
       | tunes? And thus it facilitates our going out to discover more
       | styles, more players, more music.
        
         | biggieshellz wrote:
         | To be fair, General Mojo's Well-Laid Plan is from "Duster" by
         | Gary Burton's band with Larry Coryell, which is considered to
         | be one of the first fusion records and was really influential
         | at the time.
        
           | tjr wrote:
           | Gary Burton was also a Berklee local, as were composers of
           | many of the other seemingly obscure selections. Those tunes
           | probably were in fact "standards" in that time and place, and
           | through _The Real Book_ , likely achieved more prominence
           | than they would have otherwise.
           | 
           | I find it curious though that _General Mojo_ didn 't make it
           | in to the Hal Leonard "6th Edition". I find it hard to
           | believe that they couldn't secure the rights; did they just
           | deem it too obscure? For trying to recreate the old book,
           | seems like an unfortunate loss. Those tunes gave the book
           | part of its character.
        
         | skybrian wrote:
         | I never saw the original Real Book. I bought the _New Real
         | Book_ from Shel Music and it seems pretty good? (I mostly don
         | 't play jazz and bought it out of curiosity.)
         | 
         | For beginners I recommend starting with _The Real Easy Book_
         | which has some simpler tunes, mostly blues-based.
        
       | barrenko wrote:
       | Since this is HN, any advice for someone wanting to get from
       | basically zero music knowledge to reading and playing jazz stuff?
       | Let's say keyboard or guitar.
       | 
       | I do know some music theory from elementary / high school.
        
         | cjaybo wrote:
         | I've played both piano and guitar for over a decade, at what
         | I'd consider to be a relatively advanced hobbyist level. I
         | enjoy playing jazz, but I'm not so sure anyone would enjoy
         | listening!
         | 
         | For me, lots of theory concepts "click" more easily on the
         | piano. I think it's partially a visual thing -- on a keyboard
         | things like intervals are visually apparent (how many keys are
         | between these two notes), whereas it requires a bit more mental
         | overhead to conceptualize the same things on a guitar
         | fretboard.
         | 
         | I greatly prefer to discover and play around with new musical
         | ideas on the keyboard first for this reason. Others' mileage
         | may vary!
         | 
         | As far as resources go, I'm a fan of Mark Levin's "The Jazz
         | Theory Book". It starts with basic theory then works through
         | more advanced concepts.
        
           | leetcrew wrote:
           | I think you're probably right, but I do think guitar has one
           | ease of use advantage over piano. scales and chords are
           | "moveable" on guitar in a way they are not on piano. once you
           | learn, say, the c major scale on guitar, you can just slide
           | it up a fret and you have a c# major scale. same pattern and
           | muscle memory. to do the same on piano, you have to actually
           | keep track of what is sharp/flat in the scale. ideally you
           | would develop a good understanding of the circle of fifths
           | either way, but you don't necessarily have to on guitar.
           | 
           | maybe it makes no difference and I just feel this way because
           | I've spent more time with guitars than pianos. when I sit
           | down in front of a piano, I can't escape the feeling that
           | it's biased towards c major.
        
         | kaoD wrote:
         | Go back to the fundamentals first.
         | https://www.musictheory.net/lessons Learn this by heart then
         | learn it again!
         | 
         | Best lessons ever for Music Notation and Music Theory 101. Just
         | keep in mind this is for the "western common-practice period",
         | not some kind of intrinsic property of music.
         | 
         | Then watch a lot of Adam Neely, learn on
         | https://www.justinguitar.com/ if you play guitar, and just
         | devote lots of hours to the many, many, many free resources on
         | the internet (which now you will be able to search for, since
         | you will start to know the unknown unknowns).
         | 
         | See you in a few years, the self-taught way is long but
         | rewarding. Have fun!
         | 
         | EDIT: Also, remember learning both horizontally (theory) and
         | vertically (play the damn tunes!) It's easy to fall into the
         | unidimensional growth trap.
        
         | analog31 wrote:
         | I'm a part time working jazz bassist. Agreeing with the others,
         | my advice is to first just learn to play, but make sure you
         | experience both reading and playing by ear. The latter you can
         | start at any time by listening to recordings and trying to sing
         | the tunes. In fact, when someone says they are struggling with
         | playing a tune, a teacher will often ask: "Did you try to sing
         | it first?"
         | 
         | You can find teachers who focus on jazz. Let them know your
         | intentions. Make sure they force you to play melodies in
         | addition to chords, and to read from standard notation in
         | addition to tabulature.
         | 
         | Eventually you should look for a beginner jam session. In my
         | locale, before the COVID, there were multiple jam sessions at
         | different times and places, but one of them was deliberately
         | organized as a learning session for beginners. It was hosted by
         | some local jazz educators, and they may even have gotten some
         | sort of grant for it.
         | 
         | A good thing about guitar or piano is that you can function in
         | a rhythm section before you are fully up to speed as an improv
         | soloist. The same is true of the bass.
        
         | biggieshellz wrote:
         | I'm going to give different advice from the other person. Start
         | out getting some basic technique and reading ability, but when
         | you want to play jazz stuff, it's really a language. Learn by
         | imitating -- transcribe (by ear) and play other people's solos
         | and try to get the articulations, dynamics, rhythms, and so
         | forth exactly right. Train your ear -- learn to hear the
         | different chord colors (major/minor/dominant/diminished/half-
         | diminished) and degrees of the scale.
         | 
         | A lot of this can be self-taught, but it really helps to have a
         | mentor, and lessons can really be helpful. That's what I did
         | when I initially learned in high school. Go on your own until
         | you hit a roadblock or get stuck in a rut, then take a lesson.
         | 
         | Also, don't forget that jazz is a communal activity. After you
         | achieve some base level of competence, you really need to start
         | playing with other people, and preferably other people who are
         | better than you are.
        
       | mooneater wrote:
       | I love my Real book, for me its a lifetime worth of music.
       | 
       | Though I consider its versions as vanilla, it would be cool to
       | see a real bebop version.
        
       | squarefoot wrote:
       | Does it also contain the drumming part scores?
        
       | 7357 wrote:
       | What is the Real Book? (a jazz shibboleth)
       | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD0e5e6wI_A)
        
       | analog31 wrote:
       | I'm a bassist. I got my Real Book in 1982. I was already playing
       | in the high school jazz band, but as a suburban kid, I had zero
       | exposure to things like jam sessions and live jazz performances.
       | Nobody had taught me how to learn harmonies from recordings, so I
       | was kind of lost. The Real Book gave me a way to follow recorded
       | tunes and grasp what the players were doing. Later on, being able
       | to play from "lead sheets" enabled me to play with musicians who
       | were a lot better than me, and was really how I learned to play.
       | 
       | But eventually, I was hauling a ton of fake books to every gig.
       | About 20 years ago, I was running late, and decided to leave my
       | fake books behind. And I survived. I had memorized most of the
       | tunes that were played regularly in my locale, and forced myself
       | to learn the rest by ear, on the bandstand.
       | 
       | So I tell people that the two best things I've done for my jazz
       | playing were: Getting a Real Book, and getting rid of my Real
       | Book. Today, those tunes are hopelessly overplayed, and I prefer
       | finding bands to play with, who are willing to venture off the
       | beaten path, with less familiar tunes or especially original
       | material.
        
         | gooseyard wrote:
         | hah I had the same problem, finally about two years ago I
         | decided it was time to ween myself off the book. A guy in my
         | area has a small school which is largely focused on getting
         | players off-book with the top couple hundred standards. It's
         | definitely a slow process at first, but what I think is
         | remarkable is how (even setting aside the blues or rhythm
         | changes tunes) how much faster memorizing new tunes goes once
         | you've done 50 or 60.
         | 
         | I think that I had assumed, perhaps partly because of the
         | existence of the book, that while memorizing pop or rock songs
         | is relatively easy, permanently memorizing standards with a lot
         | of changes was not a realistic thing, but now I know that its
         | really more that the problem space is just larger for
         | standards, and its just a matter of exploring that space for a
         | while that you get familiar enough that you can listen and
         | guess your way through tunes you're shaky on. Now, the book
         | seems like more trouble than its worth on gigs because it takes
         | a lot of my limited cycles to stare at it. But boy did it take
         | a while to get to that point!
        
           | analog31 wrote:
           | I've learned that the changes are actually relatively
           | forgiving. Many of the fake book changes are different from
           | the harmonies that were used when the tunes were show and
           | popular tunes.
           | 
           | Also, even if you're a rhythm player, tunes are a lot easier
           | to memorize if you learn melodies. And that helps in two
           | ways. The first is just having a better grasp of the tune,
           | and the second is that if you're unsure of the changes, you
           | can improvise directly from the melody.
           | 
           | Granted, as a bass player I can get away with not knowing all
           | of those 7ths, 9ths, etc. "I solemnly swear to play the root,
           | the whole root, and nothing but the root, so help me Dusty
           | Hill."
        
         | bsder wrote:
         | > Today, those tunes are hopelessly overplayed
         | 
         | Which is, in fact, the point.
         | 
         | You can't "jam" over a tune that everybody doesn't know
         | forwards, backwards, and sideways.
         | 
         | I do agree that it would be nice if musicians added something
         | from the latter half of the 20th century to "standards".
        
           | analog31 wrote:
           | Jamming over a tune that you don't know is called "faking."
           | That's a skill unto itself. ;-) But I think it's also a skill
           | worth learning.
        
       | zwieback wrote:
       | I had the original Eb version but later bought the licensed C
       | version. Some of my favorite tunes disappeared, now I understand
       | what happened. Great article.
       | 
       | I remember learning to play classics but also just enjoyed
       | reading along with stuff I had no chance of learning myself.
        
       | cousin_it wrote:
       | Someone should make an online "real book" for electronic music
       | production, with a bunch of popular beats and instructions for
       | how to reproduce them in a DAW. Does such a thing exist?
        
         | jontutcher wrote:
         | Not what you asked, but a digital version of the current Real
         | Book does exist and makes common appearances on band stands!
         | https://www.irealpro.com/
        
         | squeaky-clean wrote:
         | Other commenters have mentioned books with beats and patterns
         | in them. While we're at it, here is a great one for classic
         | (and not-so-classic) synthesizer sounds. "Welsh's Synthesizer
         | Cookbook"
         | 
         | https://www.synthesizer-cookbook.com/
        
         | indigochill wrote:
         | Syntorial is a comprehensive hands-on introduction to
         | subtractive (IIRC?) synth programming (not DSP programming, but
         | fiddling knobs like you would in a typical commercial soft
         | synth), including add-ons specifically for popular commercial
         | soft synths like Massive. Their forum also encourages people to
         | share synths they hear in popular music and help each other
         | recreate the sound.
         | 
         | They also produce Building Blocks, which is all about music
         | theory and composition and teaches some basic beats (and, more
         | importantly, I think, how to think about beats so that it
         | becomes easier to recreate ones you hear from scratch).
        
           | uxcolumbo wrote:
           | Both are by the same creator - great resource:
           | 
           | Building Blocks - https://www.audiblegenius.com/
           | 
           | Syntorial - https://www.syntorial.com/
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | biggieshellz wrote:
         | They had them for Minimoogs, where you could buy a book of
         | patches with the control settings to get different sounds,
         | including those from some popular songs:
         | http://www.synthzone.com/midi/moog/minimoog/MINIMOOG%20PATCH...
         | 
         | But that doesn't convey the melody/harmony/rhythm, only the
         | sound design.
        
         | hrnnnnnn wrote:
         | Not quite what you're asking for, but it's really good.
         | 
         | https://makingmusic.ableton.com/
        
         | flycaliguy wrote:
         | Attack Magazine has a section called Beat Dissected which
         | teaches sub-genre beat making.
         | 
         | https://www.attackmagazine.com/technique/beat-dissected/
        
           | Slow_Hand wrote:
           | Will second. This is about as granular and well put-together
           | as I've seen for teaching electronic beat-making.
           | 
           | It's sometimes hard to do this because oftentimes in
           | electronic music the sound or technique can rely on a quirk
           | of the specific synth or sample. Attack do a great job
           | considering.
        
         | JoeyJoJoJr wrote:
         | Yes! I am surprised there isn't a definitive source for common
         | sequencer beats and grooves.
        
           | emmanueloga_ wrote:
           | not a definitive resource but recently learn about the pretty
           | cool https://hiphoptranscriptions.com/
        
           | matthewh806 wrote:
           | There are some older books like:
           | https://www.amazon.co.uk/Machine-Patterns-Leonard-
           | Publishing... which is just tabulating lots of common rhythm
           | patterns from a wide number of genres.
           | 
           | and some more modern ones like: https://op-
           | forums.com/t/pocket-operations-a-portable-book-of...
           | 
           | Neither of these are online though and would be well suited
           | to it I agree.
           | 
           | A quick search also came up with: http://808.pixll.de/ which
           | has drum patterns uploaded by users for popular songs
        
             | JoeyJoJoJr wrote:
             | I already have the Pocket Operations book - it's great.
             | Thanks for those other links.
        
         | matthewh806 wrote:
         | There is a book called "The Theory and Technique of Electronic
         | Music" written by Miller Puckette (creator of Max / Pure Data
         | visual programming languages). That is quite heavy on the
         | mathematical side though - really is more like the title
         | suggests the theory underlying the DSP.
         | 
         | Ableton have some online content like
         | https://learningmusic.ableton.com/ which is laid out in chapter
         | form and uses https://tonejs.github.io/ for browser synthesis /
         | sequencing etc
        
           | cousin_it wrote:
           | That's more like textbooks though. I was talking more about a
           | tune by tune cheatsheet. That would probably involve some
           | shorthand notation (does that exist?)
        
             | matthewh806 wrote:
             | yeah, fair point about the Miller Puckette book - that is
             | indeed a full on textbook.
             | 
             | Check some of the Ableton chapters a bit more closely
             | though - https://learningmusic.ableton.com/make-
             | basslines/good-life.h... is this not something like you're
             | referring to? Has a grid with the midi notes in place
             | arranged just like you'd see in a DAW. I think they have an
             | exporter for the MIDI into ableton as well
        
               | [deleted]
        
         | borepop wrote:
         | Attack Magazine put out a book called The Secrets of Dance
         | Music Production, which has some fairly good "beat starter"
         | breakdowns of how a 16-step beat would be sequenced different
         | styles of electronic music, such as deep house, tech-house,
         | trance, etc. https://store.attackmagazine.com/products/the-
         | secrets-of-dan...
        
       | mberning wrote:
       | If you like music nerd stuff you should check out Rick Beato on
       | YT.
        
         | matthewh806 wrote:
         | Also if you like having a person with an inflated ego stuff his
         | awful opinions down your throat you should check out Rick Beato
         | on YT
        
           | justsignedupnow wrote:
           | I like him for the storytelling. He reminds me of my primary
           | school teacher, fond memories, who always turned any subject
           | into personal anecdotes, gently opinionated, slightly
           | inflated and imaginative. Rick's generation perhaps among the
           | last who grew up on low bandwidth media and loads of
           | storytelling all day long among everyone.
           | 
           | His music theory approach is useless. It's just a checklist
           | of terms that fit into his particular grid that day. No one
           | wrote any worthwhile pop or rock songs with theoretic
           | emphasis, ever.
        
           | miobrien wrote:
           | Examples of his awful opinions and ego? I've watched him
           | occasionally over the years but haven't noticed this.
        
             | dharmon wrote:
             | For the record I generally like Beato's channel. I suspect
             | part of what you dislike is a result of the YouTube-
             | ification of his videos. Making everything amped up, strong
             | opinions, etc. Watch some videos from 5 years ago. There
             | are no "wow!"s in response to every line in a song, more
             | nuanced opinion, etc.
             | 
             | Unfortunately, though, he's been a little more clickbait-y
             | of late. For example his "rant" videos, which are both very
             | clickable and don't have copyright claims like most his
             | videos. I expect to see more of these going forward now
             | that he knows he can rant for 30 min, cut it down to 10
             | min, post it, and make $10k from ad views.
             | 
             | The "What Makes This Song Great?" series is wonderful. If
             | for no other reason where else are you going to here
             | isolated tracks from your favorite songs? But I somewhat
             | suspect he was trolling his viewers with doing one on
             | "Since You Been Gone" a few weeks ago. I enjoy the song and
             | am happy to crank it up and dance with my kids, but the
             | production / arrangement is typical Dr. Luke blandness. But
             | of course I still watched the whole video, waiting for him
             | to "break kayfabe". :)
        
             | Galanwe wrote:
             | I share the same feeling as parent post.
             | 
             | The video where they sit down listening to various string
             | gauges and nod at the obvious tone change comes to my mind.
             | I'm 99% sure they would not see any difference in a blind
             | test.
             | 
             | He also has plenty of videos about his past, his
             | achievements, very opinionated tastes about what is good,
             | etc. I find it quite annoying and over self centered.
        
               | justsignedupnow wrote:
               | Agreed on the blind test prediction.
               | 
               | However, electric guitarists are placebo addicts and if 4
               | nice men spent a 20 minute internet video agreeing on
               | something one of the bearded guys from ZZ Top maybe once
               | said, some guitarists will play along with a little bit
               | more ease in their hearts.
        
             | matthewh806 wrote:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFaRIW-wZlw
             | 
             | He doesn't really understand electronic music in my
             | opinion. I find these sweeping statements about how "x
             | ruined y" to be extremely lazy. Especially when it comes to
             | comments about computers and music from these traditionally
             | rock-ist people
        
               | tonystride wrote:
               | Totally agree, needing to groove or follow harmony in
               | some ways is a limited way of thinking about music. And
               | my job is to teach people how to groove and follow
               | harmony! One of my favorite types of music is electro
               | acoustic because it is soooo far from the ideas of
               | western music, probably most similar in formal structure.
               | That being said Radio Head's 'Amnesiac' is a superb
               | example at bringing together the extended sonic pallets
               | of electro acoustic in a main stream setting. What are
               | some examples where you feel technology has enhanced
               | traditional music forms?
        
               | matthewh806 wrote:
               | Yeah, Radiohead are a great example indeed of bringing
               | these two worlds together. Kid A is another amazing one
               | from them.
               | 
               | When you say "traditional music forms" what do you mean
               | specifically? I'm trying to avoid going down a rabbit
               | hole of references which answer the wrong question :D
               | 
               | My answer to any question would change day to day really,
               | especially at the moment as I'm finding lots of new and
               | interesting ways to think about and approach production.
               | Last night I was watching this:
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VspVQiG6hj8 (most well
               | known as the artist Rrose making pitch black techno)
               | which presents such a simple idea for creating an
               | interesting drone sound using resonance alone & without
               | any actual audio input.
               | 
               | I think a lot of the early IDM people like Aphex Twin,
               | Autechre etc in their music have really used technology
               | to push music beyond its traditional forms. And you have
               | people like Oval that go with this kind of idea of "the
               | medium is the message" (https://archive.aec.at/media/asse
               | ts/b3d9569953edbc479d2a7bf6...) marking CDs to create
               | glitches etc and surfing through filestystems to create
               | microsamples
        
               | tonystride wrote:
               | yeah 'traditional music forms' was a poor choice of
               | words, guess I meant western music, or modern popular
               | styles.
               | 
               | I really love synthesis & IDM but I tend to gravitate
               | more towards soundscape compositions that are made of
               | samples that have been abstracted to varying degrees. For
               | example here's a piece I made that loosely follows Sonata
               | form but has very little harmony or rhythm. Made
               | completely of samples from an outside field and my living
               | room. https://soundcloud.com/anthony-nagid/the-reality-
               | sculptor-st...
               | 
               | Thanks for the essay, I'll put that in my que! There's a
               | book I really like on 'The Art of Sound Organization'
               | that got me into these styles.
               | https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Art-Sound-
               | Organization-...
        
       | aphextron wrote:
       | This is the problem with modern jazz. Treating it as some kind of
       | canon is the antithesis of what it was in the first place. It's
       | tantamount to writing down a conversation between two ancient
       | philosophers and repeating it ad nauseum, expecting some new
       | insight. Keith Jarett wasn't concerned with the stuff Art Tatum
       | had done. Miles Davis wasn't trying to build on Louis Armstrong's
       | rendition of _Wonderful World_. They were both exploring new
       | spaces and trying desperately to _break_ from the past to
       | discover new forms. The mindless repetition and riffing on
       | standards is why jazz has died as a relevant genre of music, and
       | is seen as something that corny old men in suits listen to while
       | sipping whiskey and feeling refined. Jazz used to be _the cool
       | sound_ because it was the avant garde, not some pretentious
       | collection of standards written by dead people.
        
         | p_j_w wrote:
         | If you're not familiar with what those old philosophers said
         | and how their arguments work, you're liable to make yourself
         | look like a fool when you tread old ground not realizing it's
         | old. Similarly with Jazz, if you wanna be avant garde, you
         | should have some idea of the body of work that's come before
         | you. A lot of the best musical rule breakers were classically
         | trained and knew their shit.
        
           | dcist wrote:
           | It's a mix of both. Musicians often want to seem like they
           | didn't take lessons and don't have in-depth knowledge of
           | music theory and old songs, but they often do (e.g., how many
           | guitarists don't admit they took lessons and want to make it
           | seem like they're just riffing but they mysteriously seem to
           | hit the chord tones on the changes and manage to play in
           | modes that work for a song). It's just not "cool" for a
           | musician to be knowledgeable about music theory and history.
           | I think every pursuit - not just music - is presented with a
           | challenge once it's been around for a while, it's no longer
           | new and unusual, and there exists a body of knowledge and
           | history. It becomes a large task to learn from past
           | performers and then try to innovate in your own way. Once a
           | body of knowledge becomes large enough, it's a big life-
           | consuming task just to get your head about the prior body of
           | knowledge before you're able to go out on your own and
           | attempt to innovate. I think the same thing is happening with
           | rock. The same could be said for philosophy itself -
           | philosophy used to be practical and applicable to everyday
           | people (see Greeks and Stoics, for example). Now, it's
           | largely confined to academia and extremely esoteric arguments
           | among a cloistered elite.
        
           | aphextron wrote:
           | >A lot of the best musical rule breakers were classically
           | trained and knew their shit.
           | 
           | Classical training is a different story. Musical theory is
           | endlessly useful to know. But jazz has been stuck in a
           | certain kind of sound for the last 40 years since those
           | people who actually _made it_ gave way to those who simply
           | _play it_. And now there 's just this idea of what jazz is
           | and ought to be, rather than treating it as what is was
           | originally; a complete break from the roots of the western
           | classical tradition into a wholly new art form informed by
           | the limitations of what they were leaving behind.
           | 
           | It's sort of a cargo cult situation, really. You have these
           | incredible artifacts left behind that came about as a result
           | of complex processes of intense effort and struggle, yet
           | those who inherited them act as if by imitating the same
           | thing, they will get the same results. It's completely
           | missing the point.
        
             | biggieshellz wrote:
             | "a complete break from the roots of the western classical
             | tradition into a wholly new art form informed by the
             | limitations of what they were leaving behind"
             | 
             | Wait, what? A whole lot of the western harmonic tradition
             | went right into jazz. The "standards" are Tin Pan Alley
             | songs from the first half of the 20th century. A lot of the
             | bebop harmony came straight out of Debussy and Ravel. Third
             | Stream music was an explicit synthesis of classical music
             | and jazz. Some of Coltrane's innovations came out of
             | Nicolas Slonimsky's Thesaurus of Scales and Musical
             | Patterns. The walking bass was in Baroque music (Bach).
             | While you cannot neglect the African side of it (rhythm,
             | the blues, improvisation) nor neglect that it was Black
             | people who put together the pieces and created the music,
             | saying that it was a "complete break from the roots of the
             | western classical tradition" is farcical.
             | 
             | And it's a tradition, not a cargo cult. There are still
             | people alive today who played with Miles Davis, Charlie
             | Parker, and so forth. I have played with some of them. They
             | tell stories, give advice, and pass on things that you
             | might not get otherwise. Before the advent of jazz programs
             | in colleges, the music was passed on via an apprenticeship
             | system, which is diminished but still extant.
        
             | analog31 wrote:
             | Even in jazz, there has always been an interplay between
             | old and new. During the jazz era, jazz was the sound of
             | popular music, meaning that a lot of work for jazz
             | musicians consisted of playing in dance bands that were as
             | locked into a sound as some jazz performances are today.
             | The jazz era didn't end with a bang, but had a very long
             | tail, resulting in me getting hired for the same kind of
             | work within my own lifetime. Everybody recognizes it for
             | what it is, artistically, but on the other hand there's
             | something to be said for making an audience happy.
             | 
             | Today, people approach jazz for different reasons, and of
             | course at different levels of proficiency. Jazz is old
             | enough to have a history and a canon, and the enjoyment of
             | exploring and preserving that history is a good reason for
             | some bands (hopefully not all of them) to exist. Given my
             | stature in the local music scene (not a first-call player),
             | a lot of my work is of that ilk. I approach it respectfully
             | but not with utter obedience. As a bassist, the instrument
             | that I play has undergone steady evolution, even post jazz
             | era, so that what I play on a "traditional" gig is informed
             | by the present as well as the past.
        
         | t_serpico wrote:
         | True, and the exact same thing can be said about classical
         | music. The average person needs some sort of framework to learn
         | the art form. And yes, this is more imitation than innovation,
         | but nevertheless can serve as a framework for musical
         | expression.
        
         | zamfi wrote:
         | _See also_ Monty Python.
         | 
         | Different crowd (fewer suits, less whiskey) but same
         | phenomenon: work deliberately created to be avant garde now
         | repeated as canon.
        
         | skybrian wrote:
         | Sheesh, it sounds like you are overly obsessed with being cool.
         | 
         | Learning songs written by other people is something every
         | musician does. There's nothing wrong with playing covers and
         | being able to play music that's familiar to your audience is
         | essential for many working musicians.
         | 
         | That doesn't mean you have to play old standards when you could
         | riff on newer music, but it also doesn't mean you _can 't_.
         | There's nothing wrong with reviving a tune written a long time
         | ago and putting your own take on it.
         | 
         | Music is not necessarily more enjoyable just because it's brand
         | new. It can be just as interesting if it's new _to you_ , and
         | there's plenty to explore.
         | 
         | https://xkcd.com/1053/
        
         | tempodox wrote:
         | But isn't that how it always goes? Things that were once avant-
         | garde become "standard" and the next avant-garde has to be
         | something different again. The same thing cannot stay avant-
         | garde forever.
        
           | cossatot wrote:
           | Back in the days when I was a teenager
           | 
           | Before I had status and before I had a pager
           | 
           | You could find the Abstract listenin' to hip-hop
           | 
           | My pops used to say, it reminded him of Bebop
           | 
           | I said, "Well, Daddy, don't you know that things go in
           | cycles?
           | 
           | Way that Bobby Brown is just amping like Michael"
           | 
           | -- Q-Tip, A Tribe Called Quest, _Excursions_
        
       | rocketpastsix wrote:
       | I have a stack of them in my office. The Real Book, the Real
       | Christmas Book, the Real Rock Book and more. They are awesome if
       | you can sight read and great as a learning tool.
        
       | stereoabuse wrote:
       | I had no idea this history! My Bb copy for trumpet must have been
       | from the first year of legitimate production. Always enjoyed
       | reading this handmade comic-sans-y notation and have fond
       | memories of my high school trio playing extended version of Red
       | Clay.
        
       | kinleyd wrote:
       | This was a great read!
        
       | h2odragon wrote:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samizdat
       | 
       | Illegal sheet music, underground comics, the "Anarchist's
       | Cookbook" and similar... long tradition.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | I don't know if that analogy holds. A fake book is
         | indispensable for working dance bands who want to play at
         | banquets or whatever where someone will request songs the band
         | hasn't played before. The Anarchist's Cookbook is just for
         | teenagers to download and feel like they are sticking it to the
         | man. There are not, to my knowledge, a whole lot of practicing
         | anarchists.
        
           | h2odragon wrote:
           | Good point. a closer analogy might be found in that body of
           | knowledge i would call "telecom bullshit"; the arcane private
           | standards that start to happen whenever you get near anything
           | carrier or cell phone type stuff. I'm largely ignorant of it,
           | but there is a library of data there thats certainly
           | "encumbered" and still necessary.
           | 
           | The minutiae of building codes; plumbing and electrical
           | specifically, are such a body of knowledge without a
           | corresponding bible. There's the apprenticeship "how its
           | done," which implies "around here, where we know what the
           | inspectors like"; in many places the inspectors have never
           | seen a copy of the codes they're supposed to be enforcing.
        
           | capableweb wrote:
           | > The Anarchist's Cookbook is just for teenagers to download
           | and feel like they are sticking it to the man
           | 
           | It does contain instructions on how to manufacture some
           | smaller types of explosives and other goodies, so it's not
           | completely useless. It was also initially released before the
           | internet, and since the creation of the internet, lost a bit
           | of it's usefulness of course.
           | 
           | > There are not, to my knowledge, a whole lot of practicing
           | anarchists.
           | 
           | Maybe not where you live, but anarchism lives on across the
           | world and you can find practicing anarchists inside most
           | states around the world today, some groups bigger than
           | others, CNT and FIJL being probably some of the bigger ones
           | today.
        
       | anotheryou wrote:
       | I always loved the handwriting :) So consistent, so charming.
        
       | ehnto wrote:
       | As much as it is criticized for being used to gatekeep in the
       | jazz scene so to speak, it is nice to have somewhat of a
       | reference for competency. Music is so subjective that when you
       | are teaching yourself it can be hard to know if you are heading
       | in the right direction.
       | 
       | Music is all about utilizing shared language, and I feel The Real
       | Book was just a way to add some depth to the expected knowledge
       | base in a certain scene. Kinda like software patterns.
        
       | hoytech wrote:
       | Fascinating! It's sort of similar to "bootlegged" guitar tabs on
       | alt.guitar.tab newsgroup and OLGA. There was lots of legal action
       | by publishers and a lot of the content is now lost, or at least
       | not easily accessible online anymore.
       | 
       | ...except for an archive of the classical tabs, selflessly
       | maintained by one guy:
       | 
       | https://www.classtab.org/index_old.htm
       | 
       | Don't tell anyone!
        
         | sixstringtheory wrote:
         | > 2900 classical guitar tabs in plain text format
         | 
         | > Use a maximum of 80 characters a line so that the tab prints
         | out ok
         | 
         | > An 9MB downloadable zip file is available of the whole site
         | 
         | The fact that I had an upwelling of joy reading those lines on
         | a nice, plain webpage just goes to show how far we go to lock
         | down and bloat up so many things these days. Thanks for
         | linking! The scrolling versions of the tabs are neat as well.
         | 
         | > do NOT use the 'Tab' character for spacing
         | 
         | I had no idea the "tabs vs spaces" debate raged in other
         | corners of the universe...
        
         | ed25519FUUU wrote:
         | I'm feeling uneasy because I know there's a whole generation of
         | "one-person" shops which run these important websites. I hope
         | they have a transition plan in place for the inevitable.
        
           | lupire wrote:
           | Archive.org to the rescue
        
           | anchpop wrote:
           | Yeah. I got nervous so I downloaded the site and put a mirror
           | up on IPFS: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmWG7VPMwC6T1PCp5G77AjrLCJMr
           | mSQshYovf3i...
           | 
           | It's not perfect, because if he updates his site my mirror
           | won't necessarily be updated, but hopefully it's better than
           | nothing. I'm pinning that on two seperate computers so it
           | should have some resiliency, but if someone else wants to pin
           | it too that'll do a lot for keeping it up.
        
             | ed25519FUUU wrote:
             | Thank you for doing the good work.
        
       | ybbond wrote:
       | ahhh, good old days.
       | 
       | back when I was in elementary school, my big bro was learning
       | jazz and taught me music (still do, but my progress is slow).
       | 
       | then he went to university. by the end of semester he came back
       | home brought some chunky books printed on 70gsm paper. he give
       | some to my cousins
       | 
       | the blog's hero image reminds me of that book. one of them is
       | still in my house's storage.
        
       | iaresee wrote:
       | I can still remember going to Kinkos with a friend's copy of the
       | real book in 1996 to make a copy of my own and get it spiral
       | bound.
       | 
       | Not only did you get the charts, but you got their notes. And the
       | notes of anyone before them from the book's lineage.
       | 
       | Still have. Still use it.
        
       | birgitt wrote:
       | I think we had a few copies of this in my high school's jazz band
       | (the director of the movie Whiplash was from the same band). I
       | played the flute so had inch thick folders of handwritten music
       | transposed from the tenor sax or trumpet parts.
        
       | allknowingfrog wrote:
       | In case anyone missed it, this article is just the text summary
       | that goes along with an episode of 99% Invisible. It's my
       | favorite podcast, and I would encourage any HN fan to check it
       | out.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-08 23:00 UTC)