[HN Gopher] Against Hickelism
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Against Hickelism
        
       Author : amrrs
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2021-04-04 21:35 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (noahpinion.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (noahpinion.substack.com)
        
       | retrac wrote:
       | I do wonder if there will ever be a reevaluation and integration
       | of the Soviet Union in Western thought, one free of the context
       | of needing to prove ourselves better than that system.
       | 
       | For all its horrors and atrocities, the Soviet economy grew, and
       | worked. Oh, not very well. But better than 0% growth. In 1910 the
       | average Russian was an illiterate peasant. In 1980 the average
       | Russian was a literate urban dweller with electricity and indoor
       | toilets on their floor with twice the life expectancy of their
       | great-grandparents.
       | 
       | This is, again, not intended as a defence of that monstrous
       | system. It can be condemned on purely moral grounds alone, in my
       | opinion. And it was not as efficient by most analyses, either.
       | Still, I bring it up because, as a counter-example, it
       | complicates both of the commonly made assertions mentioned in the
       | article: that poverty hasn't decreased in any meaningful sense,
       | and that the capitalist system is the only means of greater than
       | 0% growth in material production.
        
         | lupire wrote:
         | The Soviet economy improved early in 20th Century, as did most
         | thanks to industrialization, but by the end of the Cold War the
         | economy was largely an illusion outside of the military
         | spending. That's _why_ the Cold War ended -- non-
         | "revolutionary" leaders realized the Soviet Communist system
         | was an utter failure economically.
        
         | zozbot234 wrote:
         | Nobody is arguing that a market economy is always and
         | everywhere "the only means of above-zero growth". But just look
         | at the growth of Mainland China before and after the market
         | reforms by Deng. It's obvious that they've made a difference.
         | And Deng certainly had no need to "prove his system better"
         | than what was there before, on the contrary he stuck to the old
         | maxim: White cat, black cat, as long as it catches mice it's a
         | good cat.
        
         | wffurr wrote:
         | One might argue that the vastly increased computing power and
         | big data systems of today have made the Soviet central economy
         | more feasible than ever. Gigantic multinational firms generally
         | operate internally as a planned economy in and of themselves in
         | just such a fashion. This is often cited as a reason for firms
         | to grow in the first place; efficient allocation of capital and
         | resources within the firm.
         | 
         | The trick is to subject that system to democratic control in a
         | sustainable way.
        
       | lupire wrote:
       | Guardian is so predictable as a source of bad takes in its mad
       | rush for leftist credentials.
       | 
       | When Donald Trump was elected they saw dollar signs in becoming
       | the paper of leftist resistance.
       | 
       | And I say this as someone with rather left-wing economic beliefs,
       | pro-reparations, tax the rich, etc.
        
       | lupire wrote:
       | When people switch from barter to market (currency), does that
       | count as "making more money" and poverty reduction in these
       | stats?
       | 
       | Some getting a job as a cleaner but paying someone else to cook
       | their food, and paying for the commute, isn't a real improvement
       | in quality of life and reduction in poverty. Specialization and
       | economy of scale is great, but at the low end of labor skill,
       | "dollarizing" work at the expense of home economics and barter,
       | is a sham.
        
       | _Microft wrote:
       | You might also want to read this thread by Max Roser, the one
       | behind ,,Our World in Data" about why he is done with Mr. Hickel:
       | 
       | https://www.twitter.com/MaxCRoser/status/1378730932308471809
       | 
       | If you prefer blog-style formatted text over the Twitter UI, look
       | here:
       | 
       | https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1378730932308471809.html
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-04 23:00 UTC)