[HN Gopher] The Browser - WorldWideWeb Next Application (2019)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Browser - WorldWideWeb Next Application (2019)
        
       Author : karlzt
       Score  : 80 points
       Date   : 2021-04-03 13:24 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (worldwideweb.cern.ch)
 (TXT) w3m dump (worldwideweb.cern.ch)
        
       | oefrha wrote:
       | Discussed at the time:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249373
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Along with an assortment of smaller threads:
         | 
         |  _The Browser - WorldWideWeb Next Application_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25013103 - Nov 2020 (8
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _The Browser - WorldWideWeb NeXT Application_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24955122 - Oct 2020 (1
         | comment)
         | 
         |  _CERN 2019 WorldWideWeb Rebuild_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24939929 - Oct 2020 (6
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _WorldWideWeb_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19494518
         | - March 2019 (1 comment)
         | 
         |  _CERN 2019 WorldWideWeb Rebuild_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249373 - Feb 2019 (44
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _CERN 2019 WorldWideWeb Rebuild: 2019 rebuilding of the
         | original NeXT web browser_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19183316 - Feb 2019 (1
         | comment)
        
       | teddyh wrote:
       | Something they missed, which was a feature i found notable when I
       | first used NeXTSTEP, was that all text was selectable, _even in
       | dialog boxes_ ; useful for copying and pasting messages, etc. But
       | here in this web app, they seem to have gone out of their way to
       | make all text _non_ -selectable.
        
         | tempodox wrote:
         | I can select text, both on the landing page and in the
         | WorldWideWeb browser. Using Safari on Mac. Are you on mobile?
        
           | teddyh wrote:
           | No, desktop. For example, in the menu, click on Info > /
           | Panel... I can't select anything in that window, whereas if
           | this was real NeXTSTEP, you'd be able to select any text,
           | even the text with a gray background.
        
       | cyberlab wrote:
       | What's this? Some sort of 98.css[0] type thing that mimics an
       | oldskool browser's UI? Because the site is vague on what the UI
       | elements are supposed to be for.
       | 
       | [0] hhttps://jdan.github.io/98.css/
        
         | genezeta wrote:
         | > What's this?
         | 
         | From the site:
         | 
         | > In February 2019, in celebration of the thirtieth anniversary
         | of the development of WorldWideWeb, a group of developers and
         | designers convened at CERN to rebuild the original browser
         | within a contemporary browser, allowing users around the world
         | to experience the rather humble origins of this transformative
         | technology.
        
         | SllX wrote:
         | Imitation NeXTSTEP actually, to imitate the original operating
         | system WorldWideWeb was released on.
         | 
         | Your confusion is understandable though and you don't deserve
         | to be buried for it. Win95 and by extension Win98 and later did
         | take some uh, inspiration, from NeXTSTEP.
        
         | mattowen_uk wrote:
         | Wow. I don't want to be churlish but you should know your
         | internet history. 'WorldWideWeb'[1] was the client application
         | co-developed by Tim Berners-Lee and is the original 'Web
         | Browser'. When you click on the top right button on the linked
         | site, you are shown an interactive copy of WorldWideWeb running
         | on a emulated NextStep[2] desktop.
         | 
         | ---
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldWideWeb
         | 
         | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXTSTEP
        
           | avodonosov wrote:
           | Thank you. I thought that's just an article about the NeXT
           | browser. Now I noticed the button.
        
           | caslon wrote:
           | Not...quite. It's not an emulated NeXTSTEP desktop or
           | WorldWideWeb itself. It's just a tribute to it. They made a
           | blog post on how they made it a few years ago, if I recall
           | correctly. It's just some UI chrome on top of some
           | Javascript.
        
       | kkoncevicius wrote:
       | This image appears when clicking on the last white circle on the
       | bottom of the page: https://worldwideweb.cern.ch/images/wow.jpg
       | 
       | I am not familiar with the history of the web, maybe someone can
       | comment about who is the person in the image.
        
         | billyjobob wrote:
         | That is a photo of Jeremy Keith [https://adactio.com] who was
         | part of the team involved in this effort:
         | https://worldwideweb.cern.ch/colophon/
         | 
         | [Copied from mxuribe at
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19263365 ]
        
       | SeanLuke wrote:
       | All of the window title bars and the menu title bar are utterly
       | wrong in design and format. What's going on with that? That's not
       | at all how WWW.app looked. Why would this page intentionally
       | change them?
        
       | karmakaze wrote:
       | Ah good memories--NeXTSTEP looks so clean. I always liked how the
       | keyboard shortcuts merely show a lowercase (for Ctrl+letter) or
       | uppercase letter (for Ctrl+Shift+letter).
        
         | saagarjha wrote:
         | [?] is implied, of course.
        
       | saagarjha wrote:
       | As mentioned below, this is a webpage styled to look like the
       | WorldWideWeb app, rather than it running in emulation. If you
       | decide to try the latter (Previous is a good way to do it) you'll
       | find that in recent years servers have stopped responding to
       | WorldWideWeb at all, which is kind of sad. TLS is of course a no-
       | go, but even on plaintext HTTP many servers these days will
       | immediately respond with a 400 and drop the connection if they
       | don't like what they see. Just a couple years ago I could point
       | WorldWideWeb at my personal website and it would render it mostly
       | coherently, but at some point GitHub Pages decided to stop
       | serving those requests because they don't have an HTTP version
       | number. I guess it's just a casualty in the march towards newer
       | web standards as people forget the existence of older browsers.
        
         | userbinator wrote:
         | I believe it lacks the Host: header, which means sites with
         | virtual hosting (the vast majority of them) instead of a
         | specific IP won't work.
        
           | saagarjha wrote:
           | It does, but in that case GitHub at least scrapes together a
           | proper 404.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-03 23:01 UTC)