[HN Gopher] A joyless trudge? No, thanks
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A joyless trudge? No, thanks
        
       Author : thinkingemote
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2021-04-03 12:24 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | ulisesrmzroche wrote:
       | "It is only ideas gained from walking that have any worth."
       | --Nietzsche
       | 
       | Check out "the Philosophy of Walking". A lot of great thinkers
       | saw "going for a walk" as something central to their practice.
       | But this article doesn't mention any of that, how much our modern
       | world was shaped by walkers.
       | 
       | edit: lol downvotes
        
       | globular-toast wrote:
       | All I can say is I hope she enjoyed writing this pointless
       | article as much as I enjoy my pointless walks.
        
       | underseacables wrote:
       | I lived in Australia for a year and very much enjoyed the walk to
       | the bus stop each day. So many colorful birds, meeting people,
       | everything was always interesting. Perhaps because I was in a
       | different country, but gosh it was fun.
        
         | unixhero wrote:
         | Australia is fucking great. A shame about their draconian
         | immigration VISA laws.
        
           | gonzo41 wrote:
           | Just be rich, that's the trick. Like mastercard, being rich
           | works everywhere too. :P
        
           | pestatije wrote:
           | Nah. Come here for study, work part time, find sponsor,
           | you're done!
        
             | unixhero wrote:
             | Well I did. One degree. Then another. A sponsor will lets
             | your ass survive for 5 years, maybe 10 if you get an
             | extension on your sponsorship. Then you're out. Forget your
             | old life, because you're going back wherever you came from.
             | "In fact we don't care, just get out of our borders."
        
               | nicbou wrote:
               | It's the same in most countries isn't it? My presence in
               | Germany still depends on my ability to pay taxes.
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | Lots of folks butt-hurt that somebody doesn't share their
       | enthusiasms. But honestly, my favorite hikes are to a cabin,
       | where I _stay for several days_. Some of us don 't enjoy the same
       | things. I identify with the author.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | simonebrunozzi wrote:
       | If you don't like walking, do something else... But let walkers
       | be walkers.
       | 
       | I personally love walking, and am doing more and more of it
       | ("thanks" to Covid and my current personal situation). I'm
       | happier. I'm healthier. I have more time to wander with my mind
       | and think about things that can only surface in my mind while
       | walking.
        
       | maxrev17 wrote:
       | The Guardian really couldn't get any worse could it. Article for
       | the sake of an article. Yes I'm British, walking is exploration
       | and time to think, to socialise. I don't understand the
       | motivation of someone, like the author, to live in a country they
       | clearly dislike.
        
         | Veen wrote:
         | The Guardian certainly does get worse than this article. It's a
         | light and humorous look at a British cultural quirk from an
         | outsider's perspective. I quite enjoyed it. We should think
         | ourselves lucky it's not yet another tedious exploration of
         | how, for example, hiking is racist and we should all be
         | ashamed.
        
         | Neil44 wrote:
         | Every time you think you've seen Peak Guardian...
        
         | dtf wrote:
         | There's "We should celebrate walking in Britain now more than
         | ever" [1] from the Daily Telegraph if that's more your bag:
         | 
         |  _" At 9pm, with only the faintest glow left in the west, the
         | birds stopped singing. Venus blazed and, as darkness deepened,
         | others joined: Arcturus, Procyon, the Plough. A breeze riffled
         | ink-black trees. Bats swooped. Something scuttered in the
         | hedge. I knew exactly where I was; I'd walked this circuit of
         | country lanes many times, and since lockdown almost daily. But
         | I'd never done it at night. This time I wasn't just walking
         | with my legs; I was walking with every pore, every nerve. ..."_
         | 
         | Could almost be written by Boris himself.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/unite...
        
           | maxrev17 wrote:
           | Equally pointless.
        
         | conistonwater wrote:
         | Isn't it some kind of an opinion fluff piece in the "Lifestyle"
         | section?
        
         | morsch wrote:
         | I like how it goes on and on and on. Aimlessly, like the walks
         | she dislikes.
         | 
         | Looking forward to the next article on how she doesn't like
         | sushi. Having fish and chips? A joy. A good Bouillabaisse? A
         | delight! But raw fish with soy sauce and rice? Thanks, but no.
         | Ok.
        
         | binbag wrote:
         | It's a humorous piece. Take it less seriously.
        
           | maxrev17 wrote:
           | It isn't funny though lol, just pointless. Certainly not
           | worth posting to HN. Maybe I'm missing some super high-brow
           | wit here...
        
             | znpy wrote:
             | Yup, I too wondered how it ended on the front page
             | nonetheless
        
             | maxrev17 wrote:
             | The chuff is this downvoted? Haha
        
         | bengale wrote:
         | Purple articles are from the lifestyle section. They're not
         | really meant to be hard hitting news or anything.
        
       | throwawayboise wrote:
       | Reminds me of the "walking meetings" one my former PMs used to
       | like to do. One of several reasons I quit that job.
        
       | conistonwater wrote:
       | > _Running outdoors had all of walking's problems, but faster,
       | and with sweat._
       | 
       | The Japanese (I don't know if this is true or not but I heard
       | it's a true fact) have a term called _forest bathing_ , meaning
       | to spend time surrounded by greenery soaking up the views. If you
       | run, you can soak in twice as much greenery per unit of time.
        
         | morsch wrote:
         | I don't know that it's in the spirit of forest bathing to apply
         | this kind of efficiency mentality to it...
        
         | jniedrauer wrote:
         | This is one of the reasons I took up trail running. It's hard
         | to disconnect for very long when working at a startup. But
         | after a few years of training, I can cross entire mountain
         | ranges in a day and see things I would never otherwise be able
         | to see.
        
       | binbag wrote:
       | I'm British and I found the article funny and relatable. I'm sick
       | to death of aimless walks.
        
         | pitspotter wrote:
         | Clearly you are a golfer.
        
         | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
         | It's not the aimlessness. Real British walks are rarely
         | aimless. They're often mapped and planned.
         | 
         | It's more the fact that apart from three weeks a year, British
         | weather is relentlessly miserable.
         | 
         | So a "walk" - always in the country, because no one walks in
         | cities - means shivering joylessly around an obstacle course of
         | mud, rain, fog, marshy ground, drizzle, sleet, and snow.
         | 
         | For reasons I have never understood, this is considered a fun
         | thing to do.
        
           | downut wrote:
           | From "The Birth of The Modern" by Paul Johnson:
           | 
           | "So people walked, women as well as men. When Keats went on
           | his tour of Scotland in 1818, he went by public coach as far
           | as Lancashire and on foot thereafter. Worsworth, his sister
           | Dorothy, and Coleridge began a similar Scottish tour together
           | on foot, Coleridge branching off by himself at Stirling and
           | continuing for nearly 300 miles until there was nothing left
           | of his shoes. Dorothy Wordsworth, with a friend or relative,
           | regularly walked from Penrith across the Pennines and moors
           | to visit the Hutchinsons near Halifax. Hazlitt would walk
           | from London to his writing base at Winterslow in Wiltshire.
           | His first wife Sarah, while waiting for her Scottish divorce
           | in Edinburgh, walked a total of over 200 miles to vist places
           | of interest. Painters were great walkers, too, like the
           | 'Ancients',who walked from London to see their friend Samuel
           | Palmer on the Kentish coast at Shoreham, or Michael Angelo
           | Rooker, who spent his summers 'pedestrian excursions, 18
           | miles a day.' So were musicians: The young Richard Wagner,
           | despite his short legs, walked from Dresden to Leipzig and
           | back. Saving money was one motive, seeing nature another,
           | exercise a third. When the painter John Hoppner stayed with
           | the nautical Duke of Clarence at Petersham, he was taken off
           | every day after dinner for 'a walk of 10 or 12 miles."
           | 
           | No mention of the weather. I have more than once on
           | reflecting on this passage wondered at the quality of their
           | shoes.
           | 
           | [edited some egregious typos]
        
             | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
             | Whenever I hear stories of the 19th-century great English
             | walks, I can only assume that that was a much more tolerant
             | era where people could stop and sleep in the open air, or
             | successfully ask random local people for a night's shelter.
             | Today, England is so hostile to travelers who aren't able
             | to stop at formal accommodation every night, that bicycle
             | tourers have to be very stealthy when free camping (as
             | compared to Scotland, where free camping is still allowed).
        
               | binbag wrote:
               | Yeh I'm actually Scottish (I previously said I was
               | British - it's context dependant ;). I always find the
               | English rules around private land quite funny. Camping
               | when cycling or walking in Scotland is way less
               | stressful. Just find a remote plot and set down. In
               | England every footpath has a notice beside it saying you
               | really ought to stop for a moment and feel very grateful
               | that the Lord Such and Such allowed you passage.
        
         | fartcannon wrote:
         | The worst is when the walk has achieved its natural climax and
         | mercifully you're on your way back home, and someone suddenly
         | suggests a new route to explore some unknown space adding
         | unknowable length to the death march.
         | 
         | Even worse is camping. Once youve trudged to a treeless brown
         | spot in the middle of the woods, set up a tent you're left with
         | nothing to do. So what do you do? You walk.
        
         | nickkell wrote:
         | I agree about the humour, I even found it quite British! Maybe
         | the author is being assimilated without their knowledge, and
         | will soon become fond of aimless walks.
         | 
         | The people in the comments here seem to think this innocuous
         | article is a personal attack on them or their hobby, or that
         | people aren't allowed to have a good moan if they feel like it
         | (moaning being another great pasttime of the British).
        
         | babygoat wrote:
         | It's entirely optional, no? Surely you're no sick to death of
         | other people having them?
        
           | twic wrote:
           | In some circles, such walks are viewed as an axiomatically
           | good thing. You're expected to go on them, and to do so
           | enthusiastically. You could decline, or do so under protest,
           | but that would be seen as deviant.
           | 
           | I think the author is attacking the normalisation of such
           | trudging, rather than the trudging itself.
        
             | nickkell wrote:
             | Not sure why you're being downvoted. I would have hoped
             | that the introverted savants here would have more sympathy
             | for being forced to take part in social activities
        
               | babygoat wrote:
               | I've never heard of anyone being forced to take a leisure
               | walk.
        
             | ur-whale wrote:
             | >In some circles, such walks are viewed as an axiomatically
             | good thing. You're expected to go on them, and to do so
             | enthusiastically. You could decline, or do so under
             | protest, but that would be seen as deviant.
             | 
             | You just described my entire family.
             | 
             | The advantage of being surrounded by folks like this is I
             | get to exercise (as in "keep it in shape") my built-in
             | aversion to peer pressure daily.
        
             | babygoat wrote:
             | Normalization implies that there's something abnormal about
             | going outside for some light exercise, fresh air, and a
             | change of scenery. I enjoy those things but it's not hard
             | to abstain from other normal activities that I don't.
        
           | tinus_hn wrote:
           | In the Netherlands gyms have been closed for months and if
           | you complain the excuse is 'just go for a walk'. It's not
           | entirely optional if the only option for exercise is going
           | for a walk or (adventure!) a bike ride.
        
             | ncallaway wrote:
             | It's not the only option. You can do a wide variety of
             | exercise without a gym or equipment.
             | 
             | Body weight exercises are a great form of strength training
             | you can do anywhere with no equipment. You can replace
             | walks with runs, sprints, or interval training. If you have
             | an appropriate body of water near you, you can also go
             | swimming without going to a gym or pool. Start intervals of
             | boxing the air (if you haven't done it before, you'll be
             | shocked at how long 45s is while you're punching as quickly
             | as you can).
             | 
             | With a minimal investment, you can take up jumprope. An
             | excellent cardio exercise. Alternatively, grab a hula hoop,
             | and learn to hula.
             | 
             | There are tons of exercises you can do that aren't walking
             | or going to a gym. It's not a binary option.
        
             | helij wrote:
             | Push-ups, sit-ups and some aerobics is another option.
        
             | watwut wrote:
             | I doubt the lockdown rules say "only walk or bike".
        
               | tinus_hn wrote:
               | No, it's just the government wondering why the population
               | is becoming obese. You know, that risk factor that makes
               | corona ten times as deadly.
        
           | yellowapple wrote:
           | I think it's more the social pressure to engage in these
           | walks, in spite of one's preferences, that's more at issue.
           | At least that's how the article seemed to portray it.
        
       | jpcooper wrote:
       | The article's a bit of a troll piece, so I'm going to ignore it.
       | One of my favourite pastimes in London was picking somewhere on
       | the map I'd never been and just walking there. Sometimes just the
       | centre of a borough I hadn't been to before. Sometimes more than
       | 10 miles in one go. Canal routes, hidden pathways, a new park,
       | busy high streets. Lots of time to think or just watch.
       | 
       | I've been doing quite a bit of walking in Istanbul recently, but
       | I'm running out of options. Maybe someone can suggest some
       | interesting, out of the ordinary routes.
        
         | nicbou wrote:
         | You can start further out!
        
         | odiroot wrote:
         | > The article's a bit of a troll piece, so I'm going to ignore
         | it. One of my favourite pastimes in London was picking
         | somewhere on the map I'd never been and just walking there.
         | Sometimes just the centre of a borough I hadn't been to before.
         | 
         | This is how I approach travelling in general. Worked for me
         | very well in Milan, Barcelona and Rome. Probably wouldn't work
         | so well in less dense cities.
         | 
         | The best thing is casually stumbling upon something with a
         | historical significance.
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | You may be surprised that the article pretty much agrees with
         | you. That is, it states that walking is an excellent way to get
         | to where you want to go, or to explore new things. It's
         | basically just arguing that "circumambulation for
         | circumambulation's sake" is dull and boring.
        
         | fnbr wrote:
         | Especially London, which has to be one of the world's great
         | cities to walk in.
        
           | thinkingemote wrote:
           | It really is a great city to walk in. Often walking is
           | quicker than taking the tube I've found.
           | 
           | One route (slower than the tube this time) I liked was
           | walking from the Thames near Charing cross to kings cross (or
           | was it Liverpool Street) following the line of an underground
           | river. It's remarkably quiet and not that long, maybe an
           | hour? At one point you can put your ear to a manhole cover
           | and hear the river beneath!
        
             | jpcooper wrote:
             | Was it the Kings Cross and the River Fleet?
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Fleet
        
               | thinkingemote wrote:
               | That's the one!
        
         | bartread wrote:
         | I don't know if it's _that_ much of a troll piece (remember, it
         | 's talking about the UK specifically). Going for a walk _to_
         | somewhere is fine. The article is bemoaning not really going
         | anywhere at all, which has been the substantial reality if you
         | 've stuck to the rules of not going outside your "local area"
         | (whatever the hell that has actually meant this entire time).
         | 
         | I live on my own and my bubble friends live about 12 miles
         | away, because that's the reality of living in what's basically
         | a dormitory village and working/socialising in town. I meet
         | them about once a week for a walk, but options are limited
         | because the county I live in isn't exactly known for its
         | extensive network of public footpaths.
         | 
         | The whole "local area" thing is doubly ludicrous because I have
         | to drive more than 5 miles to get to a supermarket. There _is_
         | a shop in the village but, whilst it 's OK for bits and pieces,
         | it's not sufficient for a full grocery shop.
         | 
         | Nobody's ever stopped me or challenged me for leaving the
         | village, which is overall a good thing because if they ever
         | tried I doubt I'd be very kind to them. I've stuck to the rules
         | for the last 12 months willingly enough but I'm getting
         | seriously fed up of it. I haven't seen my family since October,
         | including my nephew who recently celebrated his first birthday:
         | you don't get that time back.
         | 
         | Not forever will I tolerate living under rules that infringe
         | basic freedoms to a level that I doubt have been seen in Europe
         | since before the Iron Curtain fell, whatever the situation with
         | the virus or the vaccine might be.
        
         | dominotw wrote:
         | > One of my favourite pastimes in London was picking somewhere
         | on the map I'd never been and just walking there.
         | 
         | You would prbly have been dead by now if you did that here in
         | chicago.
        
         | drewcoo wrote:
         | > The article's a bit of a troll piece, so I'm going to ignore
         | it.
         | 
         | It's what we call "humor," actually. Ignorance of humor
         | acknowledged.
        
           | dTal wrote:
           | I read it with an increasing series of delighted chuckles;
           | it's a fine example of the kind of cultural observational
           | humor that Bill Bryson is so famed for.
           | 
           | And now I think I shall go for an aimless walk...
        
           | Veen wrote:
           | Actually, we call it "humour".
        
         | telesilla wrote:
         | When in a new city with plenty of time to see how it works I
         | pick someone who looks interesting and follow them, until they
         | get on what is clearly commuter transport. Or, in a city like
         | London, Amsterdam or Berlin you can follow someone on the
         | bicycle for extra long rides to new places. Another thing I've
         | done is look for a cafe on the other side of town and go
         | exploring. Of course, keeping safe means always being aware
         | where you are. As a woman it's always been heightened not to
         | find myself out after dark on foot for example.
        
           | tkgally wrote:
           | Once, around fifteen years ago, I had a day free at the end
           | of a short business trip to Seoul. I decided to explore the
           | city randomly. I got on the subway, rode a few stops, and
           | went up to ground level and walked around. I repeated this
           | several times.
           | 
           | Each area turned out to be interesting in a different way,
           | and I encountered things--a wholesale textile market, a maze-
           | like residential neighborhood--I never would have seen if I
           | had been following a guidebook.
        
           | Tomte wrote:
           | > Of course, keeping safe means always being aware where you
           | are
           | 
           | There is also the other side of the coin: if you do this,
           | make sure you aren't noticed.
           | 
           | Especially with women. Especially especially in the dark.
           | It's not nice to make other people feel threatened.
        
         | Footkerchief wrote:
         | Some semi-formal methods for this:
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9rive
        
           | jpcooper wrote:
           | Nice link. Will Self wrote a book called Psychogeography.
           | Haven't read it yet, although it sounds interesting:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychogeography_(book).
        
       | Klwohu wrote:
       | Why does HN allow Guardian submissions at all? What's next, links
       | to 4chan threads?
        
       | buttscicles wrote:
       | I enjoyed the article. I do think the author should take up
       | photography though, if only to give those aimless walks a purpose
       | :)
        
       | cjbenedikt wrote:
       | For a better understanding:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_from_a_Small_Island
        
       | newdayrising wrote:
       | There are many pleasure walkers here who seem to be so upset at
       | the guile of someone who dares criticize their beloved pastime
       | that they completely missed the point of the article. The
       | author's issue is with walking "culture" that encourages walking
       | _for walking 's sake_. In other words, walking that ignores
       | surroundings and is more concerned with either the concept of
       | walking or an interior journey where surroundings are just a
       | backdrop to encourage thinking. I completely agree. These type of
       | walkers aren't walking to see nature or observe new surroundings,
       | they're walking to just "be". It reminds me of running hikers or
       | mountain bikers that blow past you on beautiful hiking trails
       | oblivious to the beauty around them. Walking or hiking to these
       | people is more about the personal narcissistic pleasure they can
       | wrench out of their surroundings rather than being receptive and
       | "taking in" the beauty of nature. It's about "running" or
       | "walking" and consuming views. I actually prefer Instagram hikers
       | over runners. At least the Instagrammer is looking for beauty to
       | share with others. The runners, pleasure walkers and mountain
       | bikers are blazing over nature, the rest of you be damned.
        
         | globular-toast wrote:
         | I think this all boils down to "why do you like what I don't
         | like?"
        
       | bot41 wrote:
       | A really useless article. Walk or don't walk, it doesn't really
       | matter. The author suggests doing some HIIT training with friends
       | instead... It just doesn't make sense to compare the activities.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | long but enjoyable piece from back in February
        
       | babygoat wrote:
       | I can't stand the thought of lifting weights. So I just don't do
       | it. It's never crossed my mind to write a 5000 word essay about
       | it.
        
         | brudgers wrote:
         | Until now?
        
         | Rendello wrote:
         | > A cucumber is bitter. Throw it away. There are briars in the
         | road. Turn aside from them. This is enough. Do not add, "And
         | why were such things made in the world?"
         | 
         | -- Marcus Aurelius
        
           | danaliv wrote:
           | Just want to thank you both for the delightful irony of these
           | comments.
        
             | Rendello wrote:
             | I'm no Stoic ;)
        
         | ricc wrote:
         | People try to write just about anything today for "content".
        
       | diimdeep wrote:
       | You are welcome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plogging
        
         | sdwr wrote:
         | Lovely, thanks.
        
       | poopypoopington wrote:
       | One of my favorite things in the world is going for a long walk
       | or bike ride and listening to a good podcast. I would love to do
       | that in the places the author is moaning about.
        
       | loloquwowndueo wrote:
       | It's a fun read but I concur with other commenters about it being
       | a sarcastic rant about something the author doesn't enjoy
       | (probably because they are doing it wrong - also surprised a
       | Canadian would complain about not having the right shoes given
       | the "no bad weather, only bad clothing" mantra Canadians live by.
       | ).
        
         | ckdarby wrote:
         | I'm Canadian, I don't think I've ever heard another Canadian
         | say that mantra and it does make sense to some degree.
         | 
         | There is absolutely "bad weather" because I don't think anyone
         | will call -30/-40C plus wind in the middle of winter as "good
         | weather".
        
           | claudiulodro wrote:
           | It's actually a Scandinavian mantra. Basically something moms
           | tell their kids to make them go outside and play regardless
           | of weather.
        
           | loloquwowndueo wrote:
           | I have heard Canadians say it - so it's your anecdata vs. my
           | anecdata :)
           | 
           | Thanks to the replier who helpfully pointed out the saying
           | originated in Scandinavia.
        
         | goatinaboat wrote:
         | _It's a fun read but I concur with other commenters about it
         | being a sarcastic rant about something the author doesn't
         | enjoy_
         | 
         | It's the Guardian. The thought that anyone, anywhere might
         | enjoy something means they want it banned.
        
       | siliconc0w wrote:
       | I enjoy hiking (what we call it in the states) but I don't always
       | have the time or access to an ideal trail without a lot of
       | travel. To 'hack' around this I use a weighted backpack (a.k.a
       | ruck sacking) and either just wander interesting neighborhoods or
       | hit the easier nature walks/trails. After about an hour you kinda
       | get similar physical exertion and the feeling of a longer hike
       | without the time or trudge costs. I still like to do some 'real'
       | hiking when I can but rucking is a nice way to squeeze in a
       | little outside time when I can.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-03 23:02 UTC)