[HN Gopher] Sleeping octopuses may have dreams, but they're prob...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Sleeping octopuses may have dreams, but they're probably brief
        
       Author : gmays
       Score  : 92 points
       Date   : 2021-03-29 14:58 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | DickingAround wrote:
       | They are practically aliens to us, having such a very long ago
       | common ancestor. We can learn a lot about ourselves by studying
       | this alien species and that convergent evolution they have with
       | ours (e.g. sleep). A good, deeper book on this is "Other Minds".
        
       | dvh wrote:
       | It's been a while since I have parakeet but I think birds also
       | dream.
        
       | rodcoelho wrote:
       | Not to shoot down the findings but anyone with a dog knows that
       | other sentient creatures also dream
        
         | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
         | Not once is it claimed that they are unique in this ability,
         | infact the first line of the article:
         | 
         | > Octopuses have alternating periods of "quiet" and "active"
         | sleep that make their rest similar to that of mammals, despite
         | being separated by more than 500 million years of evolution.
        
       | stuntkite wrote:
       | How this is being reported annoys me. I read the abstract of the
       | paper. I do not believe the scientists studying this take such a
       | surprised perspective, but are studying extremely technical
       | specifics. I get the need to push the paper out to get some
       | clicks but science journalism needs to be better.
       | 
       | "May dream!" Sheesh. I don't have a dog anymore, but I've had a
       | couple that clearly dream. I have several cats that also clearly
       | dream. I suspect my leopard geckos dream because they definitely
       | take a lot of naps. I'm all for this type of study and it appears
       | to be rigorous and interesting. I also believe cephalopods have
       | complex social, spatial, and possibly symbolic dreams like humans
       | have that cats and dogs may not have. But if it sleeps, it
       | dreams.
       | 
       | The idea that humans are so far from animals that we can't allow
       | them complex lives full of the same wonder that we allow
       | ourselves is a stupid separation that inhibits understanding and
       | reporting that doesn't equate animal and human consciousness is a
       | stepping stone to determining which humans are human, which
       | historically has worked out poorly.
       | 
       | A human exclusive understanding of consciousness is a great way
       | to never be able to talk to our resident or extra-planetary dream
       | having compatriots. The article isn't explicitly surprised, but
       | it really is worded like a feigned surprise when it could be
       | framed in a less annoying way.
       | 
       | Maybe I just need a nap.
        
         | r00fus wrote:
         | On one hand I agree that the human-exceptional bias that seems
         | to pervade society is sad, and we should be over it given how
         | well we know our pets.
         | 
         | On the other hand, it's nice to see more news exposure of views
         | that animals _are_ similar to humans.
         | 
         | On the gripping hand, there's a reason for this bias - it's
         | inherent part of human (and possibly animal) nature - to
         | justify our superiority. It's also useful for certain groups in
         | power to keep these biases strong.
        
         | DethNinja wrote:
         | Agreed, also to add I got a dog and a hamster and I'm 99% sure
         | even my hamster dreams regularly.
         | 
         | I think humanity is making a mistake by thinking there is a
         | huge difference between consciousness of other animals and
         | humans.
        
           | SV_BubbleTime wrote:
           | I had a biology professor I college quite adamant the dogs
           | definitely did not dream. _"Their brains aren't complex
           | enough"._ I asked if he had any pets, he said no. That was
           | the end of that conversation for me.
        
         | the_local_host wrote:
         | I think it would be fairly shocking to find that something like
         | dreaming would evolve in two species whose most recent common
         | ancestor didn't dream.
         | 
         | To have two non-closely related species implement sophisticated
         | cognition in a way that overlaps so much suggests that
         | intelligence and consciousness, or at least the kinds that we
         | experience, doesn't or can't take a wide variety of forms.
         | 
         | It's not surprising that a dog dreams; there's a dog analogue
         | for most human things, right down to the eyebrows. But an
         | octopus? Wow.
        
           | croshan wrote:
           | I can't find the article saying that the most recent common
           | ancestor between humans and octopi doesn't dream. I think
           | that'd be quite hard to prove, since that species is likely
           | extinct.
        
             | fikama wrote:
             | From what I remember Our common ancestor lived 500 milion
             | years ago. It was rather a realy simple creature. With not
             | many neurons and I think this is some kind of estimation.
             | Of course we can't be sure but we never can be sure.
             | 
             | I hope you can understand me my english isn't very good
        
               | kkylin wrote:
               | Cephalopods are protostomes
               | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protostome), vertebrates
               | are deuterostomes
               | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterostome). I'd think
               | with our current understanding of bilaterian evolution,
               | one would expect the last common ancestor to be something
               | relatively simple (a worm-like animal?) with a
               | rudimentary nervous system.
               | 
               | But, not a biologist. Happy to be corrected!
        
               | adrian_b wrote:
               | The protostomes are a monophyletic group, i.e. they
               | include all the descendants of some animal that lived a
               | short time before the beginning of Cambrian, probably
               | around 550 million years ago.
               | 
               | On the other hand the deuterostomes might be or might not
               | be a monophyletic group, it is not known yet with
               | certainty, so it is still possible that the word
               | "deuterostomes" might be invalid, if there exists no such
               | group.
               | 
               | The name "deuterostomes" is used for the ensemble of 2
               | groups, the chordates (including us) and a group composed
               | of echinoderms and hemichordates (Ambulacralia).
               | 
               | These 2 groups share one character present in their
               | ancestors, the existence of some openings that connect
               | the pharynx with the exterior (e.g. the ears in humans or
               | the gills in fish).
               | 
               | However, there is a chance that this character also
               | existed in the ancestor of the protostomes, but it was
               | then lost, in which case it would not be a proof of a
               | closer relation between chordates and
               | echinoderms+hemichordates.
               | 
               | The ancestor of the protostomes and the ancestor of the
               | chordates both had a rather complex nervous system, while
               | the ancestor of the echinoderms+hemichordates had a much
               | simpler nervous system, similar to that of many of the
               | cnidarians (but even some jellyfish have a more complex
               | nervous system than that).
               | 
               | If it will be proven in the future that in fact the
               | protostomes are more closely related to the chordates
               | than the echinoderms(+hemichordates), then their common
               | ancestor would already have had a complex nervous system.
               | 
               | In this case, the similarities between octopuses and
               | mammals, while still greatly increased by convergent
               | evolution, would be far less surprising, because there
               | would be much more features of the nervous system that
               | would be inherited from the common ancestor.
               | 
               | While there are many genetic similarities between
               | echinoderms+hemichordates and chordates (i.e. us), most
               | of those are also present in cnidarians, so they must be
               | older than the separation between chordates and
               | protostomes. The chordates retained them but the
               | protostomes lost those features, so they are not a
               | definitive proof of relationship.
               | 
               | Which is the closest relative of the chordates is one of
               | the most important questions of the animal phylogeny and
               | there are chances that the answer that was believed true
               | for more than a century is in fact wrong.
               | 
               | The correct answer to that question has consequences
               | mainly for understanding the evolution of the nervous
               | system and for the applicability of some things that we
               | can learn about the brains of protostomes (like the
               | octopuses) to our own brain.
        
               | DFHippie wrote:
               | Yes, this last common ancestor has humans and octopi
               | among its descendants, but also limpets, clams, and sea
               | squirts. If it also dreamed, if dreaming isn't a product
               | of convergent evolution, that is also amazing.
               | 
               | Your English is excellent, by the way, what little of it
               | I've read.
        
           | stuntkite wrote:
           | I fully admit that I didn't read the first line of the
           | article because I need a nap, but I stand by the fact that I
           | think all things that sleep dream. I would not be surprised
           | if we find out one day if we are around for a bit longer that
           | trees dream. They definitely sleep and I've heard them say
           | they make plans.
           | 
           | In all seriousness though, I like Douglas Hofstadter's
           | consciousness cone. If it is life, it has a mirage of
           | consciousness. I think his term "mirage" doesn't fully
           | illustrate the holographic nature of it, but I don't quite
           | have a better grip on it than that myself. If it has a rest
           | period likely where it sorts what it's done and turns that
           | into new patterns... well, that's a dream to me. I think we
           | will see dreaming things anywhere we find life in the cosmos.
           | I think it goes all the way down and is fundamental.
           | 
           | The results from this paper are very exciting to me in that
           | context. They illustrate my assumptions. I think it's
           | important research for sure. I watched octopus sleep and
           | change color in person at an aquarium in Seattle. A great
           | pacific octopus. I've also been there when they were awake
           | just before feeding and had one all wadded up watching me
           | through the glass waiting for their feeder. They are
           | incredible.
        
             | DickingAround wrote:
             | Do trees actually 'sleep'? Like they don't have neural
             | centers that we consider to be brain-like, that I know of.
             | Further, just defining the concept of sleep is a little
             | tricky and I'm not aware of anything like sleep-ish brain
             | waves, or not moving for a long period of time that we
             | consider sleep-like in trees.
             | 
             | So this idea of sleep evolving in two different species
             | whose ancestor didn't sleep is very interesting.
        
               | stuntkite wrote:
               | Trees definitely sleep nightly and hibernate in winter
               | [0]. Their root system and the mycelial network that
               | interoperates with them is astoundingly complex and looks
               | very similar to a brain as we faster moving life are
               | blessed with on top.
               | 
               | Here is a lady talking about some of Paul Stamets'
               | research. [1] I also recommend this talk by him. [2]
               | 
               | Mushrooms interacting with plant roots look similar to a
               | brain and we are just beginning to grok how deep that
               | goes.
               | 
               | [0] https://onetreeplanted.org/blogs/stories/trees-sleep-
               | night
               | 
               | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q0un2GPsSQ
               | 
               | [2] https://q.sustainability.illinois.edu/a-fungal-
               | estrangement/
        
               | everdrive wrote:
               | >Trees definitely sleep nightly
               | 
               | We're equivocating the term "sleep" here. Trees have a
               | nightly cycle, but it's not sleep in the sense that I go
               | to sleep at night.
        
               | vimacs2 wrote:
               | I don't necessarily buy that this is equivocating
               | anything. How else would you define sleep scientifically
               | other than as a nightly cycle that follows a circadian
               | rhythm and propagates metabolic and hormonal changes
               | throughout the body?
               | 
               | If you're trying to argue that it needs to have a "rest"
               | component to it, I would remind you that during night
               | time, trees do not photosynthesise and also the human
               | brain is not at all at rest during sleep in terms of
               | objective neurochemical activity. Consciousness is lost
               | (except even this is a hazy cut off thanks to dreams) but
               | there is a lot going on still in the brain and body.
        
               | tayo42 wrote:
               | How do you expect plants to photosynthesize at night
               | without light. I don't think that holds up
        
               | vimacs2 wrote:
               | That's a fair rebuttal, my bad. However, one thing that
               | plants do more during the night without any bio-
               | mechanical necessity attached to it is the release of
               | auxin which is the flora analogue to growth hormone, just
               | like animals do during sleep.
        
               | stuntkite wrote:
               | I guess you're catching up on the conversation. I don't
               | think you know that much about tree sleep.
        
               | musingsole wrote:
               | > So this idea of sleep evolving in two different species
               | 
               | You're assuming sleep comes after consciousness. Whatever
               | sleep and dreams are, it's entirely possible they are the
               | precursor to consciousness, not an evolutionary step off
               | of consciousness.
        
               | stuntkite wrote:
               | Very concise. ^^ This guy dreams ^^
        
             | vimacs2 wrote:
             | While I agree that it's silly to pretend like dreams are
             | something exclusive to humans (especially considering that
             | our prefrontal cortex is largely deactivated during them
             | anyway), I think it can be misleading to categorise all
             | animals as having similar experiences to humans in their
             | dreams.
             | 
             | Take Dolphins for example. They need to keep one hemisphere
             | active at all times to keep themselves swimming and
             | breathing while the other rests so at some point in their
             | sleep, the hemisphere that's resting swaps over. This is
             | going to give their dreams a very different feel to ours,
             | possibly something in between a lucid and regular dream,
             | and those are fellow mammals!
             | 
             | Imagine how different the experience of even birds must be
             | never mind Octopuses which are 600 million years removed
             | from us in terms of evolution and have a neural structure
             | that is far more distributed than our own. Perhaps
             | individual octopi legs have their own separate stream of
             | consciousness distinct from the animal as a whole.
        
             | DiggyJohnson wrote:
             | Thank you for these pre-nap contributions. They are the
             | best things I've read all week.
             | 
             | If agreeing with you makes me eccentric then count me in.
        
           | xkcd-sucks wrote:
           | Emerging evidence suggests that basically everything has a
           | "sleep-like" state (lowered activity, periodic,
           | homeostatically regulated, increased arousal threshold,
           | necessary for good health).
           | 
           | In most things with good experimental models for learning and
           | memory, this sleep-like state supports formation of long term
           | memories, e.g. [0] in nematode worms and [1] in honeybees.
           | 
           | So really the rate limiting step is the discovery of how to
           | interrogate/characterize behavior, learning and memory in
           | weird little critters that don't sense or behave like
           | mammals.
           | 
           | Of course there is also the philosophical question re: qualia
           | of memory-reconsolidation-associated processes in sleep and
           | whether they feels the same to a human or nematode - Probably
           | not, as everything else probably feels pretty different to
           | them too! But from a behavioralist perspective they're pretty
           | much the same modulo the behavioral range of a human or a
           | worm.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.24.395228
           | v2.... [1] https://jeb.biologists.org/content/215/22/3981
        
         | monster_group wrote:
         | Agreed. I once read a "science article" on whales. The article
         | claimed "since whales are not humans, they cannot be lonely and
         | therefore..." blah blah. I closed the article, immediately
         | after I read that statement. Pretentiousness of humans is mind
         | boggling.
        
           | stuntkite wrote:
           | Like giant mammals that have something close to the internet
           | via aquatic sound transmission since before we got out of
           | trees can't be a beautiful and complex psychic profusion.
           | They must be chumps! These assholes didn't even invent money!
           | Something something Star Trek IV.
        
             | CameronNemo wrote:
             | If they had the internet before us, they could have just
             | skipped the metal and paper money steps and skipped right
             | to a group maintained ledger.
        
               | MauranKilom wrote:
               | Who says they didn't? Maybe it's so decentralized that
               | humans can't even see it!
        
           | Blikkentrekker wrote:
           | My problem is more so that "being lonely" or "dreaming" is
           | not something that has an actual definition.
           | 
           | In research, various different _ad hoc_ definitions may be
           | provided that are then measured, but these definitions run
           | apart in different research that deals with it, and so all
           | measure a different thing.
           | 
           | I once read research that defined "level of attractiveness"
           | _ad hoc_ as "the distance at which the participants place
           | their chairs next to each other when asked to sit next to
           | each other", ehh, yes well...
           | 
           | For the sake of research, dreaming in humans is often purely
           | defined as the stage of r.e.m. sleep, whatever the
           | experiences the human may tell might be.
           | 
           | The other problem is, of course, that very often, the _ad
           | hoc_ definition chosen, can very easily be so chosen in
           | support of the conclusion that the research wishes emerge.
        
         | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
         | I think you may need a nap. First line of the article:
         | 
         | > Octopuses have alternating periods of "quiet" and "active"
         | sleep that make their rest similar to that of mammals, despite
         | being separated by more than 500 million years of evolution.
         | 
         | The article is aware that cats and dogs and other mammals
         | dream. The fact that cephalapods, who are obviously very alien
         | compared to us, do is the new bit.
        
           | stuntkite wrote:
           | Fair. I am actually a dog and have not fully learned to read.
           | I apologize for my bullshit.
        
             | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
             | Is this a new paradigm that we've discovered? Software devs
             | are dogs and lawyers are cats (despite their insistence
             | they are not)?
        
               | stuntkite wrote:
               | Who told you I write software? The cats are definitely
               | liars.... I mean lawyers. Whatever, but they always get
               | me on technicalities.
        
       | erulabs wrote:
       | I fully believe that discovering the function of sleep and of
       | dreams will go extremely far to understanding the function of
       | consciousness. Evolutionary psychology ("genetic epistemology")
       | is increasingly becoming the most interesting thing I've ever
       | read about. Particularly the work of Jean Piaget. Everyone knows
       | plenty of animals dream, so I'm looking forward to having the
       | time to read the actual whitepaper here!
        
       | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
       | Do cephalapods dream of aquatic sheep?
       | 
       | Would this imply that dreams developed some 500 millions years
       | ago or that the different trees of the animal kingdom both
       | developed the ability?
        
         | xeeeeeeeeeeenu wrote:
         | >Would this imply that dreams developed some 500 millions years
         | ago or that the different trees of the animal kingdom both
         | developed the ability?
         | 
         | Cephalopods have much, much more complex brains than the other
         | mollusks (such as gastropods or bivalves), so the latter is
         | more likely.
        
         | scythmic_waves wrote:
         | Convergent evolution [1] is a pretty fascinating phenomenon!
         | Crazy to think it could happen for something as specific as a
         | brain process like dreaming. Though I guess we all sleep so
         | maybe it's not that crazy.
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution
        
           | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
           | It really is, especially considering how different the rest
           | of the organism turned out to be.
        
         | unfunco wrote:
         | Many trees/plants have dimethyltryptamine in them, the human
         | experience of taking that chemical is often described as being
         | close to dream-like, I'm not sure if it's relevant though.
        
         | cultofmetatron wrote:
         | not only did they convergently develop an eye similar to ours.
         | It lacks a major flaw that exists in the mammalian version.
         | Theirs has no blind spot!
        
           | tibbydudeza wrote:
           | We have color vision thanks our 3 types of cone cells (RGB)
           | while they only one type of cone cell so they see in black
           | and white.
           | 
           | Since they can change skin color to match their environment
           | there must be a way they can "see" color.
           | 
           | One theory says that their weirdly shaped pupils and brain
           | make up for this deficiency by figuring out the wavelengths
           | of the light in their environment by using chromatic
           | aberration effect.
        
       | phcordner wrote:
       | The human-octopus most recent common ancestor was an ancient
       | organism from hundreds of million years ago. It would have been
       | one of the earlier organisms to have bilateral symmetry and an
       | embryonic development characterized by the three germ layers we
       | have today.
       | 
       | If you have a dog and have been to the aquarium you're likely to
       | already intuit that octopuses do something that looks a lot like
       | sleeping and that animals all the way down the family tree have
       | periods of quiet and active sleep as well. The researchers here
       | use a combination of observational techniques to suggest that the
       | octopus sleep states observed are analogous to sleep in the
       | vertebrate.
       | 
       | The research paper as published does not explicitly mention
       | dreaming, rather it is one of a host of processes implied when
       | the researchers analogize the 'active sleep' behavior observed in
       | the octopus to animal REM sleep patterns. The conclusion spells
       | out the possible connection to the 'metabolic detoxification' and
       | 'cognitive processing' functions of vertebrate REM sleep but does
       | not state them definitively.
       | 
       | The general media news article and the research paper have some
       | slight differences because of their different intended audiences,
       | but litigating that divide is best left to those already doing
       | it: the esteemed scholars of the Dunning-Krueger Institute at
       | Wikipedia University.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | coss wrote:
       | I watched My Octopus Teacher and it really opened my eyes to how
       | smart they are. Watching the Octopus play with the fish
       | conducting a symphony was so beautiful to watch. Was on the edge
       | of my seat when it was evading the predator as well.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-29 23:01 UTC)