[HN Gopher] Straussian Reading (2017)
___________________________________________________________________
Straussian Reading (2017)
Author : gauchojs
Score : 16 points
Date : 2021-03-26 10:58 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (lacker.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (lacker.io)
| pmdulaney wrote:
| normal meaning that normal _reading_ would reveal?
| [deleted]
| mycologos wrote:
| Sounds nice if you can do it, but it also seems to require a deep
| familiarity with the author that is impossible, short of actually
| knowing them personally? This is what makes me nervous about
| anything "Straussian", in most cases it requires a lot of
| discipline to avoid just filling in gaps with what you yourself
| wish the author was saying.
| megameter wrote:
| In the Melzer _Philosophy Between the Lines_ book mentioned in
| the article, the author does a pretty throrough job of making
| the case that pre-modern philosophical writing defaulted to
| esoteric style, while in the modern era we default to exoteric.
|
| He does this by pointing to the allusions and references they
| use and the clear contradictions within them - often inversions
| of meaning from the original sources that are alluded to.
| Socrates makes these errors, as does Machiavelli. If you assume
| the errors are mistakes, the work's apparent conclusions become
| more shaky, but if they are intentional puzzles, the work gains
| additional meaning. We often use puzzles as teaching devices
| and writing isn't really different in that respect.
|
| It's not really _different_ from reading for literary subtext,
| it just applies that toolbox more widely. I believe it 's more
| useful for writing than for reading because esotericism makes
| it easy to encode something legible only to intended
| recipients. I would not expect to parse new wisdom from the
| utterings of a CEO, as in article's example, until I become
| familiar with corporate culture in general.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-03-27 23:01 UTC)