[HN Gopher] How much total throughput can your wi-fi router real...
___________________________________________________________________
How much total throughput can your wi-fi router really provide?
Author : giuliomagnifico
Score : 72 points
Date : 2021-03-26 18:15 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.smallnetbuilder.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.smallnetbuilder.com)
| jeffbee wrote:
| It doesn't matter how fast any of these routers is. There's no
| way I'm buying any of them until they lose their buggy,
| vulnerable management endpoints and get automatic, managed
| firmware rollouts.
| comeonseriously wrote:
| I won't buy them because they look stupid. There's absolutely
| no need for them to look like a star wars ship or a bear trap.
| jeffbee wrote:
| The aesthetics, including the stupid names, have kept me away
| from all asus products lately. I don't care how good the "ROG
| Maximus XIII Extreme Glacial" is. I am not buying anything
| with that name.
| kortilla wrote:
| > and get automatic, managed firmware rollouts.
|
| You mean shit locked into a proprietary cloud service that
| delivers you new vulnerabilities at arbitrary times?
| dsr_ wrote:
| Run Debian stable on your routers. Use APs as dumb APs.
| yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
| Are there truly dumb APs? Because I'm really not fond of
| having Debian in the network core but the actual APs running
| unpatched proprietary garbage firmware either (especially if
| that's the part handling wireless security).
| sliken wrote:
| Dunno, define "dumb". Ubiquiti APs run linux, you can get a
| shell, but generally the APs are pretty simple and managed
| by their management util, which you can run somewhere on
| your network. The APs don't control the router, don't
| write/change firewall rules, and generally just focus on
| reliably handling wifi duties.
|
| So you could build yourself a router, run OpenWRT, pfsense,
| or whatever floats your board to control which packets go
| where, and which ports are visible from where. The APs do
| not need access to the internet, and generally anything
| sensitive going over the network should be encrypted
| anyways.
|
| I'd consider a router I control the OS and configuration of
| with a ubiquiti AP (or 3) more secure than the usual router
| configured by some corporation or running a bunch of wifi
| binary blobs.
| bawana wrote:
| ubiquiti dream machine with a ap ac pro?
| throwawaysea wrote:
| Out of curiosity does some company benchmark other types of
| commercial networking devices like this? Things like load
| balancers, DDoS protection, switches, etc.? How do businesses
| shop for such products without having a standard measure from an
| independent third party?
| PragmaticPulp wrote:
| > How do businesses shop for such products
|
| Businesses are more interested in reliability, security, price,
| details of the warranty, support contracts, and other details
| that don't show up in benchmarks.
|
| If performance is key, they buy samples and test in their
| workload. Or at the enterprise scale, they might get loaner
| units from their vendors to evaluate. Benchmarks rarely tell
| the full story for unique workloads.
| Jonnax wrote:
| Kinda feels like you copy and pasted Oracle's official
| justification for disallowing benchmarks of their database.
| westurner wrote:
| netperf and iperf are utilities for measuring network
| throughput: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iperf
|
| It's possible to approximate the
| https://dslreports.com/speedtest using the flent CLI or QT GUI
| (which calls e.g. fping and netperf) and isolate out ISP
| variance by running a netperf server on a decent router and/or
| a workstation with a sufficient NIC (at least 1Gbps).
| https://flent.org/tests.html
|
| `dslreports_8dn`:
| https://github.com/tohojo/flent/blob/master/flent/tests/dslr...
|
| From https://flent.org/ :
|
| > _RRUL: Create the standard graphic image used by the
| Bufferbloat project to show the down /upload speeds plus
| latency in three separate charts:_
|
| > _`flent rrul -p all_scaled -l 60 -H address-of-netserver -t
| text-to-be-included-in-plot -o filename.png`_
|
| In 2021, most routers - even with OpenWRT and hardware-
| offloading - cannot actually push 1 Gigabit over wired
| Ethernet, though the port spec does say 1000 Mbps.
| kjjjjjjjjjjjjjj wrote:
| wifi is shitty. If you need throughput and low latency, just use
| ethernet.
| glogla wrote:
| You're right, especially now when 10G Ethernet swiches with
| SPF+ ports can be had relatively cheaply thanks to Mikrotik,
| but sometimes people need both throughput and mobility.
| bobbean wrote:
| Have you considered sometimes people are in a situation where
| that might not be reasonable?
| glogla wrote:
| I heavily recommend for everyone who wants to make correct
| decisions about Wi-Fi hardware to read this page:
| https://www.duckware.com/tech/wifi-in-the-us.html
|
| The author visibly knows their stuff and goes into channels, ac,
| ax, 2x2, 4x4, MU-MIMO, beamforming, etc in great detail.
|
| But the summary of what I took from that is the times when
| consumer routers were bad are mostly over.
|
| Modern high performance Wi-Fi has a lot of radio magic, so your
| two-antenna laptop can talk to two antennas of router via two
| multipath-propagated spatial streams while the router uses its
| two more antennas to form directed beams and get more signal so
| more range and speed.
|
| All of that needs a lot of signal processing magic, and is
| heavily proprietary and patented, so at the moment it won't work
| well on non-blob firmware and drivers. And even small
| manufacturers have trouble here - in pure Wi-Fi performance,
| Mikrotik would be behind Asus or Netgear or something, even if it
| has more features and more professional interface.
|
| Of course, you only need to care about that if you need local-
| network performance or you internet connection speed approaches
| Wi-Fi speeds, otherwise it doesn't really matter.
| infogulch wrote:
| I bought a MicroTik hap-ac3 router with RouterOS for $100 which I
| hope will arrive soon. I like how explicit and clear microtik is
| about their products, but this would be my first one. Anyone else
| use microtik or routeros before?
|
| https://mikrotik.com/product/hap_ac3
| throwaway888abc wrote:
| Good investment, rock solid stability and performance.
|
| Installed dozen over years and can say only positive things
| about. Also, very flexible with configuration.
|
| One headache less.
| sliken wrote:
| More so than Ubiquiti? I looked at both and ended up with an
| Edgerouter and AP. Generally I prefer to keep my wifi and
| routers separate.
| KozmoNau7 wrote:
| I've got a hAP ac2 and while it is a bit more involved to set
| up than your average consumer router, it also exposes a _lot_
| of advanced functionality that you can really get into.
|
| I'll be adding one or two APs and managing them with CAPsMAN
| when we move to a larger house. IMO it beats Ubiquiti's
| offerings on functionality, but is behind on polish.
| rektide wrote:
| Really hoping Smallnetbuilder is back in the game, reviewing
| routers. Used to be an invaluable site but not a lot of updates
| these days.
|
| On another topic, pretty devestating that OpenWRT runs on only
| one of these routers, the slowest/oldest one, the Netgear
| Nighthawk X4S aka the R7800, which dates back to 2016.
| ciceryadam wrote:
| While it's not OpenWRT, but I'm running this on my RT-AC86U:
| https://www.asuswrt-merlin.net/
| zokier wrote:
| I wonder what it would take to get plain Debian to run on the
| device. OpenWRT made lot more sense when routers had like
| 8/16M of flash and not lot more RAM, but these big modern
| routers are far more powerful so bigger OS shouldn't be as
| much of a issue
| yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
| IIRC, that _specific_ line doesn 't have OpenWRT for the
| same reason that proper Debian support is unlikely:
| important parts of the networking hardware are only
| supported by closed blobs, and I _vaguely_ recall there
| even being redistribution limitations on those blobs, which
| is why merlin builds exist but not openwrt.
| rektide wrote:
| I'd like an in the know response, but Broadcom-based
| systems (yes the Raspberry Pi cpu folk) have been utterly
| unusable by OpenWRT & other Linux users for almost half a
| decade.
|
| The original WRT54G, for which OpenWRT is named, shipped
| with a Broadcom brcm47xx chip[1]. But something changed in
| the last decade, and Broadcom has been unsupportable,
| unusable, & there is no community, no folks putting their
| own Linux onto Broadcom based systems for a long time now.
| I would love to know the specific details, to know what
| happened. But the status quo is that Broadcom is the worst
| villian, is unsupportable, that nothing they do is
| generally usable by hackers & Linux users, and that any
| router with a Broadcom cpu in it is utterly unusable.
|
| It's worth mentioning that the Broadcom wifi drivers on
| Linux have been a constant tussle & difficult. For the
| longest time the MacBook's worst area of support when
| running Linux was the wifi drivers, owing to Broadcom's
| dis-support.
|
| I hope some day Broadcom stops being such a dark side
| impossible company. But there've been no points of hope
| that I've seen in the last decade. It's just gotten worse.
| Maybe it's us, maybe we haven't tried hard enough to see
| what access we might be able to get, maybe Qualcomm has
| become the main OpenWRT, Debian, &c running chip because
| it's what folks knew worked, because the long history of
| Atheros (who Qualcomm bought) being moral & good folks, who
| understood the relevance & importance of support, and we
| just haven't tried hard enough to force access to Broadcom,
| and that's on us. But right now, the status quo is,
| Broadcom chips are all useless to the world, aside from
| whatever software comes on them, and whatever software &
| support you get out of the box. A lot of people are very
| sad about this, and I recommend also being sad about this.
|
| https://openwrt.org/toh/linksys/wrt54g
| ethbr0 wrote:
| Doesn't OpenWRT have a similar problem to Coreboot?
|
| In that they need technical specifications and currently-closed
| source firmware, in a low-margin business, where providing
| those is last on most companies' priorities?
|
| Or at least, those are needed to enable the latest-and-greatest
| in a direct hardware path.
| zokier wrote:
| I don't think the situation is as bad as coreboot: Both the
| vendor firmwares and OpenWRT are Linux based so there is
| already some base for compatibility. And OpenWRT is not fully
| objected to blobs in drivers, so they don't need necessarily
| go digging down every smallest detail. Finally e.g. Asus has
| been publishing their firmware "sources" (containing
| gazillion blobs) so you don't need to do full blackbox
| reverse-engineering to reuse stuff there. There is this whole
| asusmerlin project repackaging the Asus firmwares:
| https://github.com/RMerl/asuswrt-merlin.ng
|
| Ultimately lot of the issues fall down on Broadcom and
| Qualcomm being what they are and not even trying to upstream
| their drivers and other bits.
|
| I don't know if we ever will see another wifi chipset that
| will have as good and long support as ath9k.
| mfkp wrote:
| I've found this site incredibly useful for router reviews
| lately (and much more trustworthy than all the SEO-optimized
| review websites): https://dongknows.com/
| r1ch wrote:
| I refuse to use anything that doesn't support OpenWRT these days.
| The stability of a modern kernel, drivers and usermode can't be
| beat. While ax support is still a ways away, many ac devices
| support OpenWRT. I have the $70 wAP AC access point from mikrotik
| giving me ~400mbps TCP throughput at 2x2, WPA3 and zero buffer
| bloat and a $50 hEX which does routing/firewall, wireguard,
| network adblock and encrypted DNS.
| sliken wrote:
| I get it, but seems WAY easier to have an opensource friendly
| routing running a linux kernel (with OpenWRT or similar), then
| push the hard parts to an access point.
|
| That way you can get 4x4 MIMO, 802.11ac, 802.11ax/wifi-6, etc
| and when there's a new version you don't have to replace your
| router to get it. Doubly useful if any future needs might
| include needing a second AP.
| r1ch wrote:
| I admit I was very tempted to go with a proprietary AP, the
| TP-Link EAP660 HD for example looks amazing. However all my
| client devices are 2x2 and only my PC supports 802.11ax at
| this time, so I don't mind waiting a bit longer for possible
| OpenWRT support. My fiber caps at 500mbps so I'm only really
| missing ~100mbps over Wi-Fi, if I had gigabit service I'd
| probably have gone with the TP-Link.
|
| I also strongly agree with delegating routing / wireless to
| different devices, having a PoE AP offers so much flexibility
| for positioning so you get better coverage.
| sliken wrote:
| Heh, years ago I got a ubiquiti NanoHD, it rebooted every
| few weeks for a few months. Then Ubiquiti shipped a new
| patch for it mentioning stability improvements and it's
| been rock solid since.
|
| I just moved into a larger house and after some research
| decided to skip the $99 Ubiquiti 2x2 wifi6/802.11ax and get
| the $179 4x4 Ubiquiti wifi6/802.11ax, just received it this
| week and haven't installed it yet.
|
| PoE is also REALLY useful for cameras, hoping my 8 port PoE
| switch does well with 2 APs, and 5 cameras.
| sam_lowry_ wrote:
| Does wAP AC support OpenWRT?
| r1ch wrote:
| Yes, though there are two hardware revisions - the newer
| model (2020 onwards) has a completely different chipset and
| no support yet (see comments at https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdat
| a/mikrotik/mikrotik_rbwapg-5hac...)
| rubatuga wrote:
| The MT7621 boards support OpenWRT, but IMO, they are a buggy
| mess requiring constant reboots, or freezes after long-hours of
| torrenting. Just because it runs OpenWRT, doesn't mean its
| stable. I'm testing out a WRT-1200AC, which has an ARM
| processor rivalling that of SBCs. I'll post about the long-term
| stability of the WRT-1200AC on my blog in a few months. You can
| find the WRT-1200AC for about $50 USD on ebay.
| r1ch wrote:
| I generally try to avoid anything with a Mediatek or Broadcom
| wireless chipset, Atheros seems to be the more stable of the
| bunch. My OpenWRT experience hasn't been entirely flawless -
| the switch on the hEX kept crashing until I found a forum
| post that said flow control was buggy, turned it off and it's
| been good since.
| [deleted]
| rasz wrote:
| ~$100 Xiaomi AX6000 does full 1600Mbit if you have fully capable
| client https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNIKJ4mGigI but firmware
| setup is in Chinese, and most likely contains some mandatory
| backdoors.
| secfirstmd wrote:
| Yeah not like those US backdoors...
|
| https://www.engadget.com/2016-08-21-nsa-technique-for-cisco-...
| yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
| I really wouldn't suggest cisco for home use, either, history
| of backdoors certainly being one of the reasons...
| sliken wrote:
| Is there a OpenWRT port for it?
| Youden wrote:
| > and most likely contains some mandatory backdoors.
|
| Is there any evidence behind this assertion or is it just the
| usual fearmongering and baseless speculation?
| 10000truths wrote:
| People who make these claims rarely have the knowledge to
| verify them. Anyone who genuinely wants to evaluate the
| security of a router can always run a packet capture or do a
| firmware scan.
| maccam94 wrote:
| What's a firmware scan? I believe that most router OS
| images and driver blobs are encrypted these days.
| nerbert wrote:
| A quick Google of "China cyber security law" should give you
| a hint.
| kevindong wrote:
| Reminder to take a step back and evaluate what you actually
| *need*. In my experience, software engineers tend to go overkill
| and buy the $300-400 prosumer routers that doesn't actually give
| them any tangible benefits over a normal $50-100 router.
|
| I live in a shoebox NYC apartment so a potato can give me pretty
| good service. The potato I picked was the TP-Link Archer A7 for
| $52 (at the time).
|
| My internet speed is ~280/~280 Mbps and I have successfully
| attained ~440 Mbps transfers speeds between my local file server
| (hard-wired) and my Macbook (over wifi). So the router is not a
| bottleneck to the internet from a wifi device.
|
| At any given point in time, I have ~15 devices connected to my
| router and it handles it great. My router supports band steering
| (i.e. the router and wifi device somehow jointly decide whether
| the device should be on the 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz band) so I get both
| great coverage and the best possible speeds at any given location
| in my apartment.
|
| I don't see the need (for myself, your needs will vary) to
| upgrade to a more expensive router.
| otabdeveloper4 wrote:
| I've sold every ISP-provided TP-Link I've had. The cheap
| "normal" routers crash _all the time_. Their firmware quality
| is worse than abysmal.
|
| Also, does your shoebox apartment have reinforced concrete
| walls? That would make everything much more difficult.
| gambiting wrote:
| I used to do exactly this, had a very expensive Linksys router
| until I discovered that I get higher WiFi speeds with the ISP
| provided BT HomeHub2 and just switched the Linksys off. And the
| coverage is pretty great too for the total cost of zero.
| drewg123 wrote:
| How about latency in the face of interference from other APs?
|
| I just went through a battle helping a friend who is a streamer &
| who lives in an urban setting with hundreds of ISP provided 2.4
| and 5GHz APs visible from her apartment. She had horrible
| glitching issues when live-streaming which I guessed were due to
| latency spikes when other APs were talking on the same frequency.
|
| I tried to research what routers support DFS, and settled on a
| Netgear AC3200 which they claimed supported DFS. However, we
| could never get it to select a DFS channel, and there was no
| mention of DFS in the firmware. After a week of useless Netgear
| "support", I just gave her an old TP-Link 5Ghz router I had
| laying around. It was running dd-wrt (or openwrt, I can't
| recall), and had no problem selecting a DFS channel.
|
| Since then, her streams have been nearly perfect.
|
| I just wish DFS was a feature these reviews tested
| nullc wrote:
| Do you like bufferbloat?
|
| Fixating on throughput benchmarks is how you get bufferbloat.
| pitaj wrote:
| I assume bufferbloat will affect your latency, right? Is there
| really a tradeoff between latency and throughput?
| amarshall wrote:
| The negative effect of bufferbloat is indeed increased
| latency. But bufferbloat is a specific scenario--latency may
| be low when throughput is low even if the network path is
| susceptible to bufferbloat.
| nullc wrote:
| > Is there really a tradeoff between latency and throughput?
|
| Assuming that the path under test latency is small to begin
| with, increasing buffering from reasonable to large to absurd
| generally provides a tiny and rapidly diminishing throughput
| increase.
|
| Part of the reason bufferbloat exists is because of norms in
| equipment testing focusing on throughput (esp for single/few
| tcp streams) and drops while ignoring other effects.
| colordrops wrote:
| You can measure bufferbloat and adjust appropriately if your
| router supports it.
| ronnier wrote:
| I've stopped buying consumer routers for my home and instead buy
| small dual gig network x86 boards and put OpenWRT on it. OpenWRT
| is super nice now. Clean simple UI. Does everything I need, is
| open source and I have access to the entire system. Extremely
| happy with it.
|
| I graph my data in/out with grafana. When a new IP or MAC shows
| up on my network I get a push notification on my phone (I wrote a
| small script to do this). Really great to have options to do what
| I want. Also it runs wireguard.
| artificialLimbs wrote:
| "...push notification..." Using Twilio?
| jjeaff wrote:
| Probably something like pushbullet or pushover.
| kevindong wrote:
| Not OP, but my preferred push notification provider is IFTTT.
| Their API for sending a push notification to my iPhone is
| just amazingly simple.
|
| Basically set the trigger (the "if this") to an incoming
| webhook and set the action (the "then that") to be sending a
| notification.
|
| https://ifttt.com/maker_webhooks
|
| https://ifttt.com/if_notifications
| ronnier wrote:
| I use "Home Assistant" as my home automation hub and I send
| an HTTP request to its API (this is local on my network) and
| it has native push notification support.
|
| https://www.home-assistant.io
|
| https://companion.home-
| assistant.io/docs/notifications/notif...
| sigjuice wrote:
| Which x86 boards would you recommend for this? Thanks!
| c0l0 wrote:
| I recently reviewed my (imho absolutely recommendable) pick
| here: https://johannes.truschnigg.info/reviews/2021-01_fwbox/
|
| Hth :)
| sliken wrote:
| Looks pretty awesome, was hoping for at least three 2.5
| Gbit ports though. Know of a variation with 2.5Gbit ports?
|
| Hardkernel has a J4115 Celeron (10 watt max tdp) board with
| max 32GB ram (two sodimm slots), and 2 x 2.5Gbit ports.
| They also have a 4 x 2.5Gbit board you can add. So
| relatively low power, 6 x 2.5Gbit ports, plenty of ram for
| running any network services you want.
|
| No idea how well OpenWRT or similar would be supported
| though.
| ronnier wrote:
| There's a ton of options. But I'm using this one ...
|
| https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B086MK4YB8
|
| It also has a SIM slot so you can fallback to LTE if your
| main internet goes down.
|
| I should mention. This doesn't have wifi. I buy distinct
| access points that are POE powered. For those, i use the
| WAX-610.
| maccard wrote:
| That's $450, plus tax plus labour for a wifi setup. It's a
| really hard sell compared to google mesh wifi pick for
| anyone other than a die hard fan
| ronnier wrote:
| There are definitely cheaper ways. But it's a hobby and I
| enjoy it.
| maccard wrote:
| Cant argue with the hobby aspect!
| zokier wrote:
| Wifi is the Achilles heel here. For example as far as I can
| google, that device has quite old Intel Wifi chipset which
| means 802.11AC only and no AX, firmware blobs, and worst of
| all apparently no AP mode support on 5GHz(!!!??). So not
| the best choice as a (wireless) router.
|
| That being said, I don't know what Wifi chipset would be
| really good option right now.
| sliken wrote:
| Would just handle routing and wifi separately. Ubiquiti
| has a wifi-6 AP for $99 (2x2) and a "LR" version with 4x4
| for $179. Then you can add whatever router you want and
| not have to worry about what next years wifi standard is.
| bentcorner wrote:
| Depending on your bandwidth needs an old laptop + switch can
| suffice (using vlans and a one-armed router approach).
|
| I currently have an EdgeRouter-X running openwrt and are
| relatively happy with it. I think I could eek more bandwidth
| out of it but honestly I'd rather not fiddle with it.
|
| I have some Unifi AC-Pro access points and am pretty happy
| with those.
|
| Combined router/access points devices are the networking
| equivalent of TV/VCR combo devices.
| amarshall wrote:
| I don't use OpenWRT (just a plain-old Linux distro), but
| PCEngines APU2 is pretty cheap and fast enough to run on a 1
| Gbps WAN connection.
|
| https://pcengines.ch/apu2.htm
| jacob019 wrote:
| I second this recommendation. Using one for a business.
| Added an LTE card to it for backup. Running Debian, very
| stable, low energy usage, more than enough power for
| gigabit routing, VPN, and some server proceses. Booting off
| of a real mSATA SSD, much better than eMMC.
| DrPhish wrote:
| Also chiming in on this: I've been running OpenBSD on
| dozens of PC-Engines boxes for over a decade (first Alix
| and then APU2), usually as a full-on firewall HA pair with
| CARP/pfsync. The APU2 is VERY capable, hardware-wise, and a
| bargain at the price they sell it. I've had flash memory
| die, but never had hardware fail otherwise.
|
| I've also done wireless deployments with APU2 and a wifi
| card, and the range was not great. Things also might be
| better with better antennas, or under Linux where drivers
| are likely more mature. I've never run anything but OpenBSD
| on them.
| minimaul wrote:
| You may struggle if your ISP requires PPPoE, but otherwise
| this is a great pick :)
| dmos62 wrote:
| Initial investment and ongoing energy costs are probably quite
| different though, right?
| yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
| Initial investment sure, but ongoing maintenance shouldn't be
| any worse; you just run updates every now and again.
| rektide wrote:
| > I've stopped buying consumer routers for my home and instead
| buy small dual gig network x86 boards and put OpenWRT on it.
|
| I hugely support the idea (or just using Debian), but what a
| sad sad sad sad sad state of affairs there is with trying to do
| this!
|
| There's the most limited, tiny, miniscule amount of wifi add-on
| cards one can buy with decent chipsets. Consumer offerings with
| consumer-targetting chips have never worked well for me
| (terrible performance with multiple clients, huge multi-second
| drop outs, low max client limits), and I spent years trying
| hard to make something work. The market feels basically reduced
| to one company, Compex, making PCIe & m.2 addons[1] one can
| maybe perhaps buy, that do a decent job, and their availability
| is somewhat scarce, and prices are pretty high.
|
| Imo DIY ought be such a commonsense straightforward alternative
| to these fancy routers. Alas it seems almost impossible to do,
| short of scrounging for some expensive, demanding Compex chips,
| and hoping the open source drivers are up to snuff (they're not
| always). And Compex prices have gone up and up and up. Their
| modern 4x4 m.2 card is $400[2], but hey, at least it's possible
| to buy something: without this card, we'd have nothing. Oh, and
| that card doesn't have x86 drivers available for it, only
| drivers for Qualcomm platforms.
|
| [1] https://compex.com.sg/wifi-module/
|
| [2] https://www.arrow.com/en/products/pn02.7/compex-systems-
| pte-...
| sliken wrote:
| Hrm, I need a few more ports. I want at least four ports.
|
| Think OpenWRT would work well on something like this:
| https://www.hardkernel.com/shop/odroid-h2plus/
|
| It's pretty low power (TDP 10 watts or so for the CPU), pretty
| fast (for a router), max 32GB ram, and has an expansion board
| for 2.5Gbit x 4 on top of the 2.5Gbit x 2 on board.
|
| Was hoping to hook up two desktops and a NAS with 2.5Gbit, then
| run GigE for cameras, Roku, etc.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-03-26 23:03 UTC)