[HN Gopher] Mozilla, Tor Join Calls to Oust Richard Stallman fro...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mozilla, Tor Join Calls to Oust Richard Stallman from Free Software
       Foundation
        
       Author : CharlesW
       Score  : 32 points
       Date   : 2021-03-24 22:16 UTC (44 minutes ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.fastcompany.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.fastcompany.com)
        
       | underseacables wrote:
       | Once you have been painted with the scarlet letter of cancel
       | culture, you may never return to before, and will your mistakes
       | will haunt and people will hound you for it, for the rest of your
       | days.
        
         | konjin wrote:
         | Never apologize, always double down.
         | 
         | It's the only way to win against these people.
         | 
         | It's amazing how they squirm when you start digging into their
         | lives.
        
       | mark_l_watson wrote:
       | As a very liberal person, I have to say that I am disgusted by
       | cancel culture. Disgusted.
       | 
       | This is so harmful to society, and is a dark path that the left
       | has taken in my country. To put it plainly, my political party
       | has turned into whinny little people.
       | 
       | People should lose their jobs over things like sexual or any type
       | of harassment but when I read Stallman's actual comments last
       | year, I thought that it was very clear that he was only defending
       | his friend, who was dead and couldn't defend himself.
        
       | flyinglizard wrote:
       | When the pendulum swings the other way on cancel culture, we will
       | miss the old days of subtlety and taking things in context.
        
       | crazypython wrote:
       | Here's a satirization of the open letter:
       | https://medium.com/@ultralux97/stallman-must-be-removed-a306...
        
       | konjin wrote:
       | What's Mozillas market share like again?
       | 
       | Taking advice from losers is terrible idea.
        
         | wmf wrote:
         | Higher than GNU/Linux.
         | 
         | Update: Market share isn't really my point. Mozilla makes a
         | browser used by millions of people while the FSF mostly
         | reminisces about the old days. If Mozilla is a loser then the
         | FSF is already dead by comparison.
        
           | konjin wrote:
           | Not really: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share
           | 
           | Firefox is irrelevant. Which explains why they support things
           | like this.
           | 
           | If you can't win by building better software you can win by
           | bullying anyone else who does.
        
             | kinghajj wrote:
             | https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
             | 
             | Last I checked, ~4% is greater than <1%.
        
               | asabjorn wrote:
               | Linux dominates in the server space [1]:
               | 
               | * In 2021, 100% of the world's top 500 supercomputers run
               | on Linux.
               | 
               | * Out of the top 25 websites in the world, only 2 aren't
               | using Linux.
               | 
               | * 96.3% of the world's top 1 million servers run on
               | Linux.
               | 
               | * 90% of all cloud infrastructure operates on Linux and
               | practically all the best cloud hosts use it.
               | 
               | Although you are correct its windows desktop competitor
               | has a low market share, there has been some shift towards
               | Linux derivates such as Chromebooks that captured 10%
               | market share in Q4 2020 and 5.3% in 2020 overall [2]
               | 
               | [1] https://hostingtribunal.com/blog/linux-
               | statistics/#gref [2]
               | https://www.geekwire.com/2021/chromebooks-outsold-macs-
               | world...
        
               | djohnston wrote:
               | Wait android isn't linux? Not a mobile dev, just always
               | thought it was linux..
        
               | pratikss wrote:
               | GNU/Linux is not limited to Desktop. It's magnitudes more
               | relevant than Mozilla.
        
               | hjiofdgojhi5489 wrote:
               | Linux is _the_ server /embedded/supercomputer OS. It is
               | "relevant". I'm not sure RMS had much to do with that.
               | 
               | Posting from Firefox on Linux, ~4% does not make
               | something "relevant".
        
               | restingrobot wrote:
               | You're looking at market share among consumers. Check
               | server marketshare and come back.
        
               | konjin wrote:
               | You should check better:
               | https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-leading-
               | enterprise-li...
        
       | gentleman11 wrote:
       | The page won't load but my "free articles this month" still go
       | down every page load
        
         | gennarro wrote:
         | Same. I can't read the article at all.
        
         | bcrescimanno wrote:
         | The article itself is fairly generic. A rehashing of why
         | Stallman was out in the first place, noting that he was
         | recently re-appointed, and some quotes about why he shouldn't
         | be involved.
         | 
         | See the Open Letter / Petition here for more details:
         | 
         | https://rms-open-letter.github.io/
        
         | samizdis wrote:
         | There's a copy archived here about 20 mins ago:
         | 
         | https://archive.is/s9Ikp
        
       | nameTheJew1488 wrote:
       | fucking jews
        
       | exyi wrote:
       | It just seems to be article about this tweet:
       | https://twitter.com/mozilla/status/1374513444838199304
       | 
       | and this petition: https://rms-open-letter.github.io/
        
       | quineoa wrote:
       | Comments in this thread represent what's wrong with the industry.
       | 
       | The article references sexual harassment, the commenters care
       | about market share.
       | 
       | Did you know it's important to hold people accountable more, the
       | more power they have?
       | 
       | It's one thing if you disagree, but making it about "winners" and
       | "losers" and not about victims is how we ended up creating toxic
       | workplaces.
        
         | nyolfen wrote:
         | the sexual harassment was asking women at conferences on dates
        
         | restingrobot wrote:
         | >The article references sexual harassment, the commenters care
         | about market share.
         | 
         |  _Alleged_ sexual harassment. Granted I don 't know the whole
         | story, but it doesn't seem like there has been anything more
         | than accusations. I don't think its right to fire someone based
         | on heresay. Once he is proven to have crossed the lines, then
         | I'm all for holding him accountable. Until then, I think people
         | should keep the pitchfork in the shed.
         | 
         | Also I'm not defending his commentary, but people are entitled
         | to their own opinions.
        
         | datavirtue wrote:
         | There aren't any threads in this post yet. LOL
        
       | datavirtue wrote:
       | What did Stallman do specifically? Why is it always so hard to
       | find out what someone actually said or did when they are being
       | cancelled?
        
         | bcrescimanno wrote:
         | The Open Letter site itself has an Appendix that includes
         | specifics:
         | 
         | https://rms-open-letter.github.io/appendix
        
         | lukasb wrote:
         | Start here: https://selamjie.medium.com/remove-richard-
         | stallman-appendix...
        
         | orra wrote:
         | Stallman seems to have a history of being manipulative and
         | sexually harassing women. https://selamjie.medium.com/remove-
         | richard-stallman-appendix...
         | 
         | He also has some troubling views that _at best_ make him an
         | inappropriate spokesperson.
         | 
         | https://rms-open-letter.github.io/appendix
        
           | crazypython wrote:
           | Here's a satirization of the open letter:
           | https://medium.com/@ultralux97/stallman-must-be-
           | removed-a306...
        
         | kbelder wrote:
         | By being vague, they can give the slightest missteps immense
         | gravity.
        
         | konjin wrote:
         | He was (((white))) and a black student needed a scalp for her
         | future career.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | geofft wrote:
         | Many things, over many years. The free software community was
         | deeply unhappy with him for a long while. Here's a subset:
         | 
         | http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2019/10/15/fsf-rms.html
         | 
         | https://wingolog.org/archives/2019/10/08/thoughts-on-rms-and...
         | 
         | https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/52587.html
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25193674
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21000374
         | 
         | The immediate pressure for him to resign was a media firestorm
         | over his Epstein comments, but that wouldn't have done anything
         | had he not already lost the support of the free software
         | community by then.
        
       | yellowapple wrote:
       | Glad to see that Mozilla refuses to tolerate neurodiversity.
       | Socially awkward people deserve to be permanently ostracized from
       | society, am I right? I'm proud to use a web browser developed by
       | people who offer no quarter to autists, schizos, and the rest of
       | them loonies; if they wanted inclusion, they should just stop
       | being mentally unwell - it's all in their heads, after all! Thank
       | you, Mitchell Baker, very cool.
       | 
       | (/s, because on the Internet nobody knows you're a dog^W^Wbeing
       | sarcastic)
       | 
       | ...like, I ain't saying I like the guy or anything - he
       | definitely seems like someone I wouldn't enjoy interacting with
       | day-to-day - but I'm skeptical of the idea that having heterodox
       | opinions or being a bit of a stubborn ass should be a fireable
       | offense. If he was outright sexually assaulting people, or
       | abusing a position of power for sex, or something like that, then
       | sure, villainize the guy (and - better yet - pursue _criminal_
       | charges), but as it stands, it seems like his worse _actual_
       | offense was being a stereotypical socially awkward nerd.
       | 
       | But hey, if Mozilla doesn't want to associate with the FSF for
       | whatever reason, then that's their perogative. I'm sure they'll
       | stop using GNU and its components company-wide any day now.
        
       | kbelder wrote:
       | I want to like Firefox. It is at least a tolerable alternative to
       | Chrome.
       | 
       | But the Mozilla foundation just taints it. Every time they come
       | out with one of their sanctimonious PR releases they make me want
       | to have less to do with them. I think they've completely lost
       | their focus.
       | 
       | I end up bouncing between Chrome, Firefox, and Brave. Brave makes
       | me the happiest, but it's a minor player, and I'm worried about
       | it's long-term prospects.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-24 23:01 UTC)