[HN Gopher] Parkinson's gene may impair how new neurons are made...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Parkinson's gene may impair how new neurons are made throughout our
       lifetime
        
       Author : gmays
       Score  : 68 points
       Date   : 2021-03-24 17:10 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.sheffield.ac.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.sheffield.ac.uk)
        
       | unfamiliar wrote:
       | There's basically no more information in the article than in the
       | headline.
        
         | WWWWH wrote:
         | There a link to the (open access) paper, so if you want the
         | grizzly details they're all there for you.
        
       | gwerbret wrote:
       | "Parkinson's gene may impair how new neurons are made throughout
       | our lifetime."
       | 
       | This title is rather misleading, as the neurons relevant to
       | Parkinson's disease are generally _not_ made at all, after birth.
        
         | phcordner wrote:
         | First line of the abstract of the paper:
         | 
         | >Recent evidence suggests neurogenesis is on-going throughout
         | life but the relevance of these findings for neurodegenerative
         | disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) is poorly
         | understood.
        
           | aantix wrote:
           | I've been taking magnesium l-threonate and l-theanine before
           | bed, I seem to have more dreams and more intense dreams. I've
           | seen both linked to neurogenesis.
           | 
           | Is Mg deficiency part of the issue? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
           | gov/books/NBK507269/#_ch17_Low_Mg_a...
        
             | ipaddr wrote:
             | Mg threonine/ate usually is taken in the morning because it
             | crosses the brain barrier causing an active response. I can
             | see why you have active dreams. Try changing your mg type
             | for less active nights.
        
           | gwerbret wrote:
           | They are misrepresenting the state of knowledge in that
           | field. It has indeed been known -- since the 90s -- that
           | there is ongoing neurogenesis in the human brain after birth.
           | However, it is also well-known that these new neurons are
           | produced in regions of the brain that are not relevant to
           | Parkinson's. The specific neurons that are lost in this
           | disease, from a region of the brain known as the substantia
           | nigra, are not normally replaced by ongoing neurogenesis.
           | 
           | (I say "not normally" because redirecting neurogenesis to
           | supply new neurons to the substantia nigra, as a treatment
           | for Parkinson's disease, has been an ongoing area of research
           | for decades.)
           | 
           | Note also that this research study was done with zebrafish,
           | whose neurobiology is dramatically different from humans.
        
             | phcordner wrote:
             | This is also addressed in the paper:
             | 
             | "Zebrafish are a particularly valuable tool to study
             | neurogenesis in vertebrates. Basal levels of neurogenesis
             | occur at higher levels than in mammals, and additional
             | proliferative zones are found throughout the brain"
             | 
             | In the zebrafish model, which yes, is different from the
             | human brain, the researchers specifically demonstrate that
             | neurogenesis is occurring in dopaminergic regions
             | throughout life:
             | 
             | "... we demonstrate that ascending TPp DA neurons and
             | local-projecting PVO neurons, but not magnocellular
             | ascending DA neurons, are each generated into adulthood in
             | wild type animals at a rate that decreases with age."
             | 
             | PINK1 deficiency slows the rate of the generation of DA
             | neurons in zebrafish. Following this result, they then
             | turned to the question of applicability to human systems by
             | testing PINK1 deficiency on a culture of human midbrain
             | organoids and successfully showed that this gene
             | downregulated the size these organoids reached,
             | demonstrating that this gene has an effect on neurogenesis
             | of human dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra.
             | 
             | "Isolated observations in animal models of PD always raise
             | concerns about the applicability of any results to human
             | patients with this condition. However, the observation of
             | impairment of DA neurogenesis in a PINK1-deficient, human
             | tissue derived organoid model confirmed the initial
             | observations."
        
               | gwerbret wrote:
               | > demonstrating that this gene has an effect on
               | neurogenesis of human dopaminergic neurons from the
               | substantia nigra.
               | 
               | But there is _no_ neurogenesis of human dopaminergic
               | neurons in the adult substantia nigra.
               | 
               | To create the organoid model, they used fibroblasts to
               | generate induced pluripotent stem cells, and then
               | differentiated these into neurons in culture. As an
               | experimental model, this is fine, but it is not
               | particularly indicative of actual human biology.
               | 
               | The most you could probably infer from this paper is that
               | IF there were dopaminergic progenitors in the human
               | substantia nigra (there aren't), they MIGHT respond this
               | way if you deleted PINK1.
        
               | phcordner wrote:
               | In neurobiology, human in vivo studies are prohibitive
               | from a cost, logistical, and ethical standpoint. But to
               | anyone who can successfully parse a neurobiology paper
               | this is assumed knowledge.
        
               | drewblaisdell wrote:
               | > But there is no neurogenesis of human dopaminergic
               | neurons in the adult substantia nigra.
               | 
               | For my own understanding: how can we confidently assert
               | that this is true?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-24 23:00 UTC)