[HN Gopher] The Design of Forms in Government Departments (1962)
___________________________________________________________________
The Design of Forms in Government Departments (1962)
Author : BerislavLopac
Score : 23 points
Date : 2021-03-20 14:29 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (design-of-forms.online)
(TXT) w3m dump (design-of-forms.online)
| mhdhn wrote:
| I don't think I've ever seen 'alphabet' used as it is here:
|
| https://design-of-forms.online/the-form-in-print/alphabets/
|
| What does it mean? A cross between today's "letter case" and
| "font style".
|
| Wonder if that's old timey English and/or old timey graphic
| design.
|
| Also love the old-timey copy-editor directions on the same page.
| jeffgreco wrote:
| Love these illustrations of a form being revised: https://design-
| of-forms.online/the-form-in-print/alphabets/
|
| And a nice selection of typefaces! Times Roman, Gill Sans, even
| Rockwell for some headings.
|
| edit: these are great too https://design-of-forms.online/the-
| form-in-print/rules/
| systemvoltage wrote:
| The art of making illustrations is almost lost now it
| seems(scroll towards the bottom): https://design-of-
| forms.online/evolving-a-design/make-up-of-...
|
| Contemporary illustrators are Adobe professionals who Dribbble
| their way through the design world, churning out Corporate
| Memphis: https://www.are.na/claire-l-evans/corporate-memphis
| [deleted]
| open-source-ux wrote:
| Fascinating. It has a formal tone of writing as you'd expect, but
| it's not too wordy. Wordiness is what you expect of printed
| goverment publications (even today). The principles are still
| sound. Naturally, it covers printed forms only.
|
| For comparison, here are the current GOV.UK recommendations for
| designing forms:
|
| https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/design/form-structure
| petepete wrote:
| Also worth linking to the design system here. The amount of
| care and attention that goes into the usability of every form
| element is mindblowing.
|
| https://design-system.service.gov.uk/
| abraae wrote:
| Not too wordy is a matter of opinion. While surprisingly well
| written and readable for a govt pub, I still find it's a little
| "wall of text" like.
|
| At a meta level, here's what the document itself advises about
| wordiness:
|
| > Avoid unnecessary words, e.g. the phrase 'In every case in
| which particulars are furnished' (eight words), can be reduced
| to 'When particulars are given' (four words): a phrase such as
| 'It should be noted that the obligation to furnish particulars'
| (ten words), is no less clear when reduced to 'The obligation
| to give particulars' (five words).
|
| In a modern, plain english style, these might be further
| chopped down to 'When provided' (two words) and 'Mandatory
| when' (two words).
| [deleted]
| NomDePlum wrote:
| Have to say I really like the layout and styling of the site.
| Super easy to read and navigate.
|
| Interesting content too.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-03-20 23:01 UTC)