[HN Gopher] Georgian African American newspapers from 1886-1926 ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Georgian African American newspapers from 1886-1926 now available
       freely online
        
       Author : DoreenMichele
       Score  : 175 points
       Date   : 2021-03-20 07:33 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blog.dlg.galileo.usg.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blog.dlg.galileo.usg.edu)
        
       | artembugara wrote:
       | A bit off-topic but I recently wrote a blog post about how you
       | could get historical online published news articles:
       | 
       | https://blog.newscatcherapi.com/an-ultimate-list-of-open-sou...
        
       | jollofricepeas wrote:
       | It's interesting to see the difference in how African Americans
       | were depicted and covered.
       | 
       | It is well-known that the "white" press of that time often
       | demonized its black citizens and escalated tensions that helped
       | prolong the period of white terrorism, voter suppression and
       | lynching throughout the Reconstruction period.
       | 
       | - https://tulsaworld.com/news/tulsa-race-massacre-1921-tulsa-n...
       | 
       | - https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article247928045.html
       | 
       | This sadly continues even today both in the US (to a lesser
       | degree) and internationally.
       | 
       | We see similar treatment of minorities in the Chinese press (Hong
       | Kong residents, Uyghurs) and in the US conservative press about
       | migrants and immigrants.
        
         | rexpop wrote:
         | > This sadly continues even today both in the US (to a lesser
         | degree) and internationally.
         | 
         | To a lesser degree? I am inclined to believe that this[0]
         | Vietnamese-language paper publishing an entirely fabricated
         | story about Black men (and representing a photograph of
         | tragically murdered Ahmaud Arbery to identify a fictitious
         | perpetrators) was intended to prey upon the incredulity of
         | Vietnamese-Americans.
         | 
         | 0. https://tuoitrexahoi.vn/truy-na-4-ke-da-mau-cuop-
         | hiep-2-me-c...
        
       | cambalache wrote:
       | Are the journals made by White people called "Georgian European
       | American"? Why white must be the vanilla and default and every
       | other option must be exotic/spicy/different so it requires an
       | additional qualifier?
        
         | pessimizer wrote:
         | I think it would be a lot clearer if they did. I'd love if they
         | renamed the years of segregated baseball "White Major League
         | Baseball" or started calling it "The White Constitution of the
         | United States."
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | White is a complicated term. Definitely before the 1920s, it
         | wasn't necessarily European, because it excluded, for example,
         | non-Protestants like the Irish, Italians, and Russians.
        
         | cocacola1 wrote:
         | I don't think 1886-1926 Georgia was known for its willingness
         | to include Black people at major, lily-white newspapers.
         | 
         | https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeo...
         | 
         | > Georgia's toll of 458 lynch victims was exceeded only by
         | Mississippi's toll of 538. During the 1880s and 1890s,
         | instances of lethal mob violence increased steadily, peaking in
         | 1899 when twenty-seven Georgians fell victim to lynch mobs.
         | Between 1890 and 1900 Georgia averaged more than one mob
         | killing per month.
        
       | ceratin6 wrote:
       | How should one distinguish Georgia as U.S. State vs. eastern
       | European country?
       | 
       | It's one of the few contextual proper names I've not ever seen
       | have to be differentiated, though it seems it would need to be
       | when speaking to a global audience.
       | 
       | For that matter, as an author, under what circumstance should you
       | need to differentiate, if all audience is global?
       | 
       | Is it adequate to assume that since Google filters and has been
       | filtering content by language for years, that Georgia in search
       | results and relevant pages is almost always the Georgia they
       | seek?
        
         | fortran77 wrote:
         | Well, in the context of "Georgian African American" I didn't
         | have any trouble. I'm surprised you did, as the other Georgia
         | isn't currently, and has never in the past, been "American"
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | gt_grc wrote:
         | I've lived in Georgia (the U.S. state) my whole life, and when
         | I read "Georgian" as an adjective, I usually assume it means
         | Georgia the country. People here typically use "Georgian" only
         | as a noun to refer to a resident of the state. In adjective
         | form, you usually just hear "Georgia" (e.g., Georgia coast,
         | Georgia pines).
        
           | BurningFrog wrote:
           | Yeah, had it said "Georgia" instead I would not have had the
           | same confusion OP had.
           | 
           | I guess it's one of those unspoken rules we don't know we
           | know.
        
           | abrowne wrote:
           | Agreed, as an midwestern American. Hearing "Georgian", I
           | would think of the country, then the Georgian era (especially
           | regarding architecture) and only then the state.
        
           | js2 wrote:
           | I wrote this elsewhere as an expanded form of my other
           | comment here:
           | 
           | In the pictured headline, if "Georgian African American
           | newspapers" is using "Georgian" as a demonym, then it means
           | newspapers published by African Americans from Georgia.
           | 
           | But if the headline is using "Georgian" as an adjective, then
           | lacking hyphenation, it's ambiguous whether it means
           | newspapers published by African Americans from Georgia /or/
           | newspapers published in Georgia by African Americans.
           | 
           | We rarely use the adjectival form of U.S. states ("Georgia
           | Peaches", not "Georgian Peaches"), so I found the headline a
           | little garden path and initially started parsing it as if it
           | were referring to the country of Georgia.
           | 
           | Then, right below the headline, the text reads "Georgia
           | African American newspapers" which isn't ambiguous and means
           | newspapers published in Georgia by African Americans. That's
           | confirmed by the rest of the article.
           | 
           | Of course, the African Americans in question were likely also
           | from Georgia, so to be pedantic, it's Georgian African
           | American Georgia newspapers.
           | 
           | (I doubt any African Americans from Georgia emigrated to the
           | Russian Empire at the time, otherwise we could be talking
           | about African American Georgian Russian Georgia newspapers
           | ... or something.)
           | 
           | Anyway if I were the headline writer, I think I would have
           | used "African American Georgia newspapers..."
        
         | Macha wrote:
         | As someone in western europe, if it's non-US media it's
         | probably Georgia the country, which is merely mentioned
         | "rarely" as opposed to "only in us election week". If it's US
         | media, it's probably Georgia the state. That said, countries
         | are generally considered more important, so if it's not obvious
         | you're talking about the US, I think the onus would be on
         | people referring to Georgia, USA to specify.
         | 
         | Most countries are just not interested in internal divisions of
         | other countries so it doesn't come up often. Just like I don't
         | have the need to distinguish Munster (Ireland) and Munster
         | (Germany) even though the latter often loses its umlaut in
         | English text, or run into confusion between Northern Territory
         | (Australia) and Northwest Territory (Canada). And the English
         | language isn't short context sensitive words in other areas
         | too, the most frequent example being "read" vs "read".
        
           | JackFr wrote:
           | So imagine my surprise when staying with friends of my wife
           | in Munster, they had never heard of Muenster cheese. They
           | assured me that it must come from Munster in Ireland because
           | Americans commonly confuse the two. But I was not convinced
           | because the 'ue' in the spelling indicated a transliteration
           | from 'u'. It was pre-Wikipedia, but luckily our hosts had a
           | copy of 'Das grosses Buch vom Kase' which let us know we were
           | both wrong. Apparently there is also an Alsatian village
           | named Munster with a distinctive cheese recreated by
           | emigrants to the US.
        
             | azepoi wrote:
             | In the EU the Munster cheese you'll find is generally from
             | Alsace, it's protected (PDO).
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | DoreenMichele wrote:
         | I did think about that issue. In this case, the word _Georgian_
         | is immediately followed by the phrase _African American_ in the
         | title. That should be sufficient to make it clear it 's the US
         | state we are talking about, not the country.
        
           | js2 wrote:
           | I found it a little garden path. I think "African American
           | Georgia newspapers from..." is slightly clearer.
           | 
           | That slightly alters the meaning by not using the demonym:
           | newspapers published by African Americans from Georgia vs
           | newspapers published in Georgia by African Americans.
           | 
           | I guess you could also go with African American Georgian
           | Georgia newspapers to be explicit that it's newspapers
           | published in Georgia by African Americans from Georgia.
           | 
           | Sorry, I guess I have Georgia on my mind now.
        
             | DoreenMichele wrote:
             | That's good feedback. I also stumbled a bit on the word
             | _Georgian_ and I am originally from Georgia.
             | 
             | To me, that calls to mind _Georgian architecture_ , not
             | _stuff from the state of Georgia_.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgian_architecture
             | 
             | But the reality is that HN has some guidelines concerning
             | titles (plus a character limit). So I did the best I could
             | within the constraints as I best understand them, but I
             | will certainly keep your remarks here in mind for any
             | future titling challenges.
        
               | StavrosK wrote:
               | > That's good feedback. I also stumbled a bit on the word
               | Georgian and I am originally from Georgia.
               | 
               | WHICH GEORGIA?! I swear people in this thread are writing
               | specifically to make the rest of us mad :P
        
               | js2 wrote:
               | The one with the Tybee bomb.
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | ceratin6 wrote:
           | There may have been African Americans or at least some of
           | African heritage in Georgia of eastern Europe during that
           | time period[1] and a little later[2].
           | 
           | [1]- https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/black-
           | prese...
           | 
           | [2]- https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/black-skin-red-
           | land-a...
        
             | Macha wrote:
             | Right, but I would bet that even today African Americans
             | make up a very small miniority of people of African
             | heritage in the country of Georgia and African Americans
             | were certainly not numerous enough there in the 1890s to
             | have their own newspapers.
        
             | selimthegrim wrote:
             | This is not wrong if you consider Abkhazia part of Georgia.
             | There are definitely recorded African descent families
             | speaking Abkhaz and pictured in Abkhaz clothing. You are
             | being unfairly downvoted.
             | 
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abkhazians_of_African_desce
             | n...
        
               | fortran77 wrote:
               | Are they American ex-patriots?
        
               | selimthegrim wrote:
               | No but their going to America was not out of the realm of
               | possibility if they had Russian documents. I'm just
               | saying it's not as facially impossible as it sounds
        
               | pessimizer wrote:
               | I've noticed that in desperately searching for the polite
               | term to refer to local black people, a lot of Europeans
               | and Asians accidentally and humorously land on "African-
               | American."
        
         | easytiger wrote:
         | Georgian to me especially in this context originally meant the
         | period.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgian_era
        
       | williesleg wrote:
       | They weren't all from Africa. They're called Negroes back then.
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | AI is going to take over the world they say, but we still don't
       | have an easy to use and free high end OCR available.
       | 
       | Australia's Trove is getting humans to translate them!? -
       | https://trove.nla.gov.au/help/become-voluntrove/text-correct...
       | 
       | Anyway, very cool, the world needs more of these out of copyright
       | newspapers online. History has been lockup up by historians for
       | to long.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | Are you sure we don't have decent OCR today? I just pulled out
         | a pen, wrote "Pie for breakfast" with my non-dominant hand so
         | it looks like trash, then I scanned it with Google Translate
         | (on an obsolete iPhone, almost in the dark) and it picked it up
         | perfectly. It seems dramatically better than the state of the
         | art 20 years ago.
        
           | rufus_foreman wrote:
           | Where can I get something like that that I can use as a
           | library in my own program? I don't care if costs money or is
           | open source, just that it works.
           | 
           | The closest I can find is Tesseract which was developed in
           | the '80s, and for handwriting it gets maybe two thirds of the
           | letters right. Doesn't work on cursive.
           | 
           | I want something that gets 99 point something right and works
           | on cursive, that I can use as a library, offline. Plus flying
           | cars, and a pony.
        
           | dec0dedab0de wrote:
           | google translate is proprietary, not free.
        
         | yorwba wrote:
         | > we still don't have an easy to use and free high end OCR
         | available
         | 
         | There is Tesseract: https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract
         | 
         | > Australia's Trove is getting humans to translate them!?
         | 
         | Your link clearly refers to _correcting_ an existing
         | transcription:
         | 
         | "While viewing digitised newspaper and gazette articles, you
         | may notice that the text transcript doesn't always match the
         | text in the article. You have the power to fix this by editing
         | the transcript to match the article text."
         | 
         | Most likely they used OCR software to generate the initial
         | transcript, but allow users to correct the OCR output because
         | they know the software is not perfect.
        
           | acdha wrote:
           | Tesseract is great in certain situations but a lot comes down
           | to having a robust preprocessing pipeline and a correction
           | flow. I wrote about this a few years back:
           | 
           | https://chris.improbable.org/2014/3/17/content-search-on-
           | a-b...
           | 
           | https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2014/08/making-scanned-
           | conte...
           | 
           | Basically the big problems are getting the content deskewed
           | (even a slight rotation will cause accuracy to plummet, which
           | is a problem if there was page curl or a flaw in the original
           | printing process), breaking text into clean segments (non-
           | trivial in newspaper layouts), and dealing with noise from
           | dust or content from the other side of the page bleeding
           | through. The collection I've worked the most with
           | (https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/) also had a lot of
           | problems due to many collections having been scanned from
           | microfilm first. Tesseract 4 is better but in my testing you
           | aren't going to see revolutionary improvements without
           | investing in tooling to identify segments and clean them up
           | before passing them to Tesseract.
           | 
           | Since that entire collection is public domain and freely
           | available for download
           | (https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/data/ or s3://ndnp-
           | batches), researchers have used various ML tools on it and
           | that definitely looks promising but is not a silver bullet by
           | any means. There are some trained files available here along
           | with a large public S3 dataset:
           | 
           | https://news-navigator.labs.loc.gov/
        
           | aaron695 wrote:
           | Tesseract makes me feel like we've gone backwards in 20
           | years.
           | 
           | I know there have been improvements, and probably impressive
           | ones, but they are not being implemented in any sort of
           | unison in anything easy to use.
           | 
           | If computers can't even read newspapers, which only have a
           | certain amount of fonts and letters/words to chose from how
           | can we think they can do much else.
           | 
           | Test of -
           | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/151059024
           | 
           | Tesseract starts really well here but then stops after a few
           | lines. No idea why, it just frustrates me.
           | 
           |  _" FEMALE PIRATE LEADER. HONG KONO, Sunday. After no sign of
           | activity in Bias"_ - Then Stops.
           | 
           | Trove is below and doesn't get much.
           | 
           |  _" FEMALE PIRATE LEADER. HOHCrKOiro. SanOV. After
           | twiigiiJofswUTlty In >>>> Xay far ? jux. pirates, lei br a
           | woman, aged 28, EagUA tpio^K, attacked the JspaBMe steaiktr
           | TM1 Slant ? betwsan jbaojr and"_
           | 
           | ABBYY Finereader is OK -
           | 
           |  _" FEMALE PIRATE LEADER BOKO KOHO, Sunday, After no ties of
           | activity la Bin Bay for a year. pirates. lad by a woman, aged
           | 28. English speaking attacked the Japanese steamer"_
        
           | guepe wrote:
           | I used tesseract for something that sounded extremely simple:
           | OCR a date tag and a few characters identifying a large list
           | of photos. The tag is of very high quality, white over black,
           | a 6yo would read it flawlessly. I had to use the "old"
           | tesseract (the new one uses ML), probably because the ML-
           | based one was "inventing" characters or swapping them, and
           | could not reliably identify numbers. Even with the old
           | solution, I had to resize, apply some filters and was barely
           | reaching 99% recognition. For something extremely clean ! So
           | we have ways to go...
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | tamaharbor wrote:
       | Reading through the front pages, one would never know this was an
       | 'African American' newspaper, as it is no different from any
       | other. It is quite racist to even mention that fact that it is
       | 'African American'.
        
         | mrzimmerman wrote:
         | You may not be familiar with US history, but it was an
         | extremely segregated society back then with many lynchings
         | occurring for any black people who stepped out of line. Black
         | Americans frequently had to make parallel systems just for
         | their communities since they were often not served by services
         | run by white Americans.
         | 
         | So in this case the skin color of the people who created these
         | newspapers is an important historical contextual point.
         | Additionally, it's simply a fact of the matter being discussed
         | and as such it isn't racist to mention a basic fact.
        
       | ku-man wrote:
       | Wonder why black Americans chose to be called "African
       | Americans". As far as I know, black Americans have zero interest
       | in Africa.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-20 23:02 UTC)