[HN Gopher] Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis restores high-resolu...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis restores high-resolution responses
        
       Author : finphil
       Score  : 62 points
       Date   : 2021-03-19 17:59 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
        
       | tandr wrote:
       | ELI5 anyone? Is this an artificial retina that so many people
       | would benefit from? If so, does it connect to an optical nerve?
        
         | est31 wrote:
         | In the retina, there are photoreceptor cells that take in light
         | and emits excitatory signals to other cells in the retina that
         | then do some basic pattern recognition and send the signal to
         | the brain (Some of this pattern recognition is re-done in the
         | brain but that's not really relevant in this instance).
         | 
         | You can excite neurons by giving them electric pulses via
         | electrodes.
         | 
         | Some people are blind because their photoreceptor cells can't
         | convert light into electric pulses (Retinitis pigmentosa).
         | These people can be helped by artificial implants that do this
         | conversion step, like the one proposed here. The device is
         | split into little compartments and when light reaches one of
         | them, the compartment converts the light into an electric
         | signal, with an electric contact right on the cell. There seems
         | to be no amplification involved, it's only living from the
         | energy of the light. The tissue then gets that signal and
         | processes it as vision. Cool, isn't it?
         | 
         | Disclaimer: not an expert, so correct me if I'm wrong.
        
           | tandr wrote:
           | Thank you! Do you know how does it connect hardware to a
           | "wetware"? "Just plug the nerve into this socket"?
        
             | devindotcom wrote:
             | In older retinal prosthesis work it was a microelectrode
             | array, basically dozens or hundreds of tiny electrodes
             | piercing the retina and running a current. In this case the
             | dots turn light into current so when you shine a light on
             | them they activate the retinal cells near them.
        
       | devindotcom wrote:
       | This is a really cool approach - I covered it yesterday and
       | here's the EPFL news post as well.
       | 
       | https://techcrunch.com/2021/03/18/quest-for-prosthetic-retin...
       | 
       | https://actu.epfl.ch/news/retinal-implants-can-give-artifici...
       | 
       | Still lots and lots of work to do but it obviates the issues with
       | previous retinal implants that you basically needed to run a
       | cable into the eye. In retrospect photovoltaics are obvious
       | because that's more or less how the eye works in the first place.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | elric wrote:
         | This is one of those great ideas that seems obvious in
         | retrospect. I hope it pans out. I was wondering how this
         | stimulated the optic nerve, but it seems like it doesn't do so
         | directly, but rather it interacts with the existing retina?
        
           | devindotcom wrote:
           | Yeah, this would be for blindness that's upstream from the
           | nerve, for instance an opsin deficiency or something that
           | makes the light-sensitive cells in the retina not work. The
           | underlying (actually overlying since the retina is kind of
           | inside-out) nervous network might still function fine, it
           | just doesn't have an input. The photovoltaic dots would
           | create a very small localized charge that would stimulate the
           | higher-level cells rather than the rods and cones.
        
       | krastanov wrote:
       | This is amazing! I have not finished reading it, but I wonder
       | whether they are already thinking about human augmentation. I
       | have average vision, but would love to be able to see infrared
       | and UV thanks to an implant.
        
         | wongarsu wrote:
         | We are still a good way off replicating the resolution of the
         | human eye in an implant, and generally we have a hard time
         | matching the impressive dynamic range of our eyes. Give it
         | another 20 years.
         | 
         | Until then something that converts infrared and UV to the
         | visible range is a lot more reachable (whether that's an
         | implant like an intraocular lens, simple contact lenses, or
         | just eye drops)
        
         | kiba wrote:
         | I love the idea, but there may be privacy implications. It
         | reminded me of learning about cameras that can accidentally see
         | through clothes that manufacturer had to to recall to remove.
        
         | ampdepolymerase wrote:
         | You already can (if you are willing to be a clinical trial
         | guinea pig). There are nanoparticle eye drops that enables
         | that.
        
           | krastanov wrote:
           | Could you elaborate or give some links?
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | mrkstu wrote:
             | An article about it working in mice:
             | https://newatlas.com/nanoparticle-near-infrared-
             | vision/58686...
             | 
             | Assume that they are now doing human trials.
        
       | superkuh wrote:
       | As someone with progressive retinal tearing this is great news.
       | I've been reading about methods of turning interneurons into
       | photoactive elements using simple chemicals injected into the eye
       | but this seems a lot more straightforward.
        
       | ben1040 wrote:
       | As someone who stands a decent chance of developing age related
       | macular degeneration 30 years from now, I love any and all news
       | like this.
        
       | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-19 23:00 UTC)