[HN Gopher] Grice's Maxims of Conversation
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Grice's Maxims of Conversation
        
       Author : EndXA
       Score  : 32 points
       Date   : 2021-03-17 11:23 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (effectiviology.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (effectiviology.com)
        
       | ellipsisfrog wrote:
       | Grice was a god tier philosopher of language. Best known for
       | this:
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicature#:~:text=An%20imp....
        
       | playdead wrote:
       | Software people with philosophy backgrounds (there are a lot of
       | us!) will be quick to note that Grice did not intend these to be
       | understood as rules of thumb for regular people. But if it gets
       | ordinary citizens interested in philosophy of language, theories
       | of rationality, or game theoretic ideas about convention (cf.
       | David Lewis), then I don't mind some innocent misappropriation.
        
       | blintz wrote:
       | > While these maxims were originally meant to describe how people
       | intuitively communicate, they can be used to actively guide the
       | way you communicate in various situations.
       | 
       | This isn't something I'd endorse doing often. Grice was making a
       | descriptive statement about the linguistic pragmatics of human
       | conversation; he was absolutely not saying that this is how
       | people 'should' speak. Reversing the principles like this turns
       | them into listicle fodder instead of the rather insightful
       | framework for understanding pragmatics that they are.
       | 
       | A parallel exists in linguistic syntax. The goal of linguistic
       | syntax is to describe which sentences are recognized by speakers
       | of a language as grammatical, rather than prescribe some notion
       | of 'correct' grammar. If you take syntactic descriptions and
       | interpret them as rules, you are profoundly missing the point -
       | see "Don't end your sentences with a preposition!" nonsense.
       | 
       | There's more reading on Grice's maxims in their original,
       | descriptive linguistics/social science context is here:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle
        
         | neolog wrote:
         | > This isn't something I'd endorse doing often.
         | 
         | Why not? They seem like helpful principles.
        
           | istinetz wrote:
           | I think particularly for autistic people that struggle to
           | pick up the implicit rules of the game, they can be useful.
        
             | neolog wrote:
             | Are there situations where it would be harmful to follow
             | these rules?
        
         | philwelch wrote:
         | > This isn't something I'd endorse doing often. Grice was
         | making a descriptive statement about the linguistic pragmatics
         | of human conversation; he was absolutely not saying that this
         | is how people 'should' speak.
         | 
         | Advice is directional, not absolute. If someone struggles with
         | correctly identifying and adopting the shared interpersonal
         | protocols most people use in society, a documented, descriptive
         | guide to those protocols can be used as a guide.
         | 
         | Even if Grice's project was to document and model the set of
         | rules that "everyone" implicitly knows and follows, if you're
         | not a part of that "everyone" and you struggle to reach
         | understanding when communicating with others, maybe Grice's
         | maxims can explain what you missed.
        
       | awillen wrote:
       | I love Grice's Maxims because they're something virtually all
       | speakers intuitively understand and follow whether they've heard
       | of them or not.
       | 
       | Where they're really useful, though, is in identifying when
       | people are being deceptive or misleading. It happens all the time
       | with politicians taking stuff out of context - "My opponent said
       | xyz is true, which is terrible!" when the reality is that your
       | opponent said xyz is true only when abc happens, they've violated
       | Grice's Maxim of Quantity.
       | 
       | Oftentimes people get tripped up when they're speaking to someone
       | who is saying things that are technically true but feel
       | misleading, but they're unable to really pinpoint what's wrong
       | with them - a lot of the time it's because the other speaking is
       | violating the the Maxims of Quantity or Relation. If you can
       | identify that, then it's a lot easier to figure out what the
       | other person is doing (and to try to understand why they're doing
       | it).
        
       | SN76477 wrote:
       | When I was training people in sales, this is the first thing I
       | would talk about.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | If curious, past thread:
       | 
       |  _Grice 's Maxims_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18458332 - Nov 2018 (10
       | comments)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-17 23:01 UTC)