[HN Gopher] Vintage technology and why some people still use it
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Vintage technology and why some people still use it
        
       Author : open-source-ux
       Score  : 30 points
       Date   : 2021-03-12 19:20 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.co.uk)
        
       | jjav wrote:
       | I use a lot of technology I guess some would consider vintage. It
       | is not due to any specific preference for vintage or as a vintage
       | hobby. It's just that a lot of the older products are so much
       | better for the consumer.
       | 
       | It makes me sad because we have the technology and resources as
       | an industry to make so much better products than ever before, but
       | we just don't focus on quality for the consumer anymore. Can we
       | collectively care to do better?
       | 
       | Today main product design drivers are collecting usage data and
       | selling it to advertisers, enforcing dependency on cloud
       | services, preventing repairability and ownership (vs. ongoing
       | licensing). All these factors improve recurring revenue for the
       | producing company but all of them are anti-features for the
       | consumer.
       | 
       | All my cars are older and will forever be. No TV screen on the
       | dash to go bad, no integrated CAN bus making diagnostics and
       | repair a nightmare, no fly by wire nonsense. No phone-home
       | spyware or OTA update horrors. If a relay goes bad it's a
       | physical relay I can swap, easy. And so on, everything is
       | fixable.
       | 
       | I unpacked my old Wii to play with my son. All the games are on
       | DVD, so I own them, they won't disappear from the cloud, no
       | dependency on internet connectivity, no subscriptions to pay.
       | 
       | For music in the house I run many squeezebox devices. The server
       | is self-hosted and open source, no dependency on anything
       | external, no subscriptions or cloud service to be suddenly
       | cancelled.
        
       | cosmotic wrote:
       | How can a lossy compressed minidisc be "cleaner" than a lossless
       | CD or similarly lossy but higher bitrate and more efficiently
       | compressed digital file?
        
         | bayindirh wrote:
         | MiniDisc user here. It's for a couple of reasons.
         | 
         | First of al, ATRAC is a strange format. It's optimized for
         | perception as far as I understood it. It doesn't color sound
         | but can reproduce the dynamics and details very well. It's
         | important to understand ATRAC has quality levels: SP, LP2, LP4.
         | SP fits 80 minutes to a 80 minute MD. LP2 fits ~160 minutes,
         | LP4 fits ~320. SP is extremely detailed and transparent. LP2 is
         | really pretty good. LP4 is not good. Is not bad, but for
         | listening on the move. It's not suitable for joy-listening on
         | higher resolution systems. The deficiencies will be definitely
         | heard.
         | 
         | This sound quality has another reason. The DSP/DAC combo on MD
         | players itself. Earlier versions were called _Type-R_ ,
         | improved versions are called _Type-S_. Latter one can
         | reconstruct sound very impressively. It can make SP and LP2
         | sound really good. It also has a digital amplification section.
         | So, It 's only converted to analog at the latest stage. Result
         | is a very dynamic and clean sound. Especially if you convert to
         | ATRAC from CD or any lossless source.
         | 
         | My Hi-Fi (Sony CMT-HX3) also has a 35W version of that
         | DSP/Amplifier combo. It really sounds fantastic* with CD, MP3
         | and AC3. Didn't try ATRAC, but it won't disappoint I presume.
         | 
         | Sony's higher end systems and DSPs are a work of art. They
         | sound clean, crisp and detailed. They can sing through a pair
         | of good headphones or through 2x85W behemoths. This is why
         | they're timeless and regarded highly. With just Bass & Treble
         | settings, it beats a lot of presumably higher end portable
         | players.
         | 
         | A similar sound quality was present in Creative's Muvo^2. It
         | was plain enjoyable to listen. Apple's iPods famously use Burr
         | Brown DACs but, the sound was too flat and dull in the earlier
         | versions, lacking punch and energy. They fixed it after iPhone
         | 5.
         | 
         | TL;DR: Sony's DSP/DAC/Amp stuff makes any well designed audio
         | codec shine. ATRAC can store dynamics very well. This is why
         | being a Hi-Fi company pays in the portable space.
         | 
         | *: I have a more conventional, but vastly higher powered
         | system. This small guy is not a match for it, but for a small
         | hi-fi it really hits above its league. If you scale this design
         | up (to 80+ watts) with proper speakers, I'm sure that it'll
         | make a lot of more expensive systems sweat.
        
           | cosmotic wrote:
           | The DAC isn't part of the format; although I respect the
           | desire for a good DAC. I believe all lossy compression codecs
           | from the past 20 or 30 years are perception based; ATRAC may
           | have been one of the first ones, but it sure doesn't beat a
           | CD which has no loss at all, unless ATRAC/minidisc regularly
           | used higher bit depths than are supported by CDs. The sample
           | rate is already "perfect" (in that humans could never hear a
           | difference)
        
             | bayindirh wrote:
             | You're right however, the DAC can make or break the
             | resulting sound. If the DAC wouldn't be important, we
             | wouldn't have Wolfson, TI Burr Brown or other extremely
             | expensive units. Sony's DAC in this pipeline is like a
             | polish. It doesn't blemish the sound after all that
             | meticulous reconstruction.
             | 
             | On the paper and spectrogram, an SP ATRAC track is not a
             | match for WAV or FLAC, however it has all the ingredients
             | to saturate a high-resolution system and create an
             | enjoyable listening experience. Also it had enough
             | resolution to handle higher-end amateur mastering (in SP
             | mode) and general recording needs (in SP and LP2 mode).
             | 
             | While 44.1KHz is perfect mathematically, 48KHz and 96KHz
             | can create a smoother sound. That needs higher end
             | equipment to hear clearly, but the smoothness is definitely
             | there.
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | It was mastered from a higher quality source? There could also
         | be errors in the CD mastering, like setting the gain too high
         | and chopping off the top of the song just to make the whole
         | thing "louder". The digital files may have been taken from the
         | CD since nobody can be bothered to go back and find the masters
         | anymore.
        
           | cosmotic wrote:
           | The two issues you referenced are also applicable to
           | minidisc.
        
             | bayindirh wrote:
             | MiniDisc doesn't brick-wall-compress the sound. Instead, it
             | uses automatic gain to prevent clipping while recording
             | from line-in. ATRAC encoding is also devoid of any
             | compression.
             | 
             | MD players generally have VU meters, and you can observe
             | your music, since they generally have recording
             | functionality and used in studio and/or interviews, getting
             | sound as transparent as possible is the aim.
             | 
             | Fun fact: Portable MD players are generally called
             | "Portable MD Deck" by Sony to signal it's not a mere player
             | but an audio equipment. Most MD decks contain indexing and
             | primary tools for chopping a record to tracks and tagging
             | them.
        
           | TacticalCoder wrote:
           | > The digital files may have been taken from the CD since
           | nobody can be bothered to go back and find the masters
           | anymore.
           | 
           | All my music collection is FLAC files, bit-perfectly ripped
           | from my CD collection. So, sure, they're digital files,
           | compressed, but lossless. It is, for all practical purposes,
           | just as good as a CD (as long as my external DAC is as good
           | as the CD players' built-in DAC).
           | 
           | The original CD may have been badly engineered but that's
           | another topic.
           | 
           | 3 000 CDs fits in more or less 1 TB in lossless (but
           | compressed) CD quality (just to give an idea of how tiny it
           | is using modern storage standards).
           | 
           | Some people only use FLAC as archives but these files are so
           | tiny in this day and age that I don't bother converting the
           | FLAC to mp3s: I sent directly the bitperfectly ripped FLAC
           | files to my DAC / stereo setup.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | css wrote:
       | Vintage technology is often far more repairable than modern. My
       | turntable and all the equipment I use with it included schematics
       | and booklets with information about how they operate. Even cars
       | used to be like this, but that has mostly been lost in the
       | interest of operational simplicity.
       | 
       | Almost all of my old household appliances included schematics,
       | but new stuff only includes operational instructions. It makes me
       | sad we have lost this culture of tinkering.
        
       | bangonkeyboard wrote:
       | I maintain a clutch of pre-iOS 7 devices to remind myself what
       | good design was.
        
         | hc-taway wrote:
         | Agreed that iOS7 was a big UX downgrade. It went from being the
         | only OS I'd be halfway-comfortable turning older tech-
         | illiterate relatives loose on, to yet another OS that would
         | leave them confused and lost much of the time. Discoverability
         | and intuitiveness plummeted with 7.
        
       | 0xdeadbeefbabe wrote:
       | Physicists still use those vintage laws of motion. I still use
       | this vintage keyboard layout.
        
         | jjav wrote:
         | And these vintage A/C outlets and power cords.
         | 
         | Imagine if we had to rewire the house and all appliances with
         | the frequency of USB connector changes!
        
       | madaxe_again wrote:
       | It's really hard to see an MP3 player from 2010 as "vintage
       | technology in use" when there are PDP-11s still in use in nuclear
       | power plants. Hell, I seem to recall there's some plumbing
       | company in the US that still uses a 1940s IBM electromechanical
       | tabulator for their accounts.
        
         | neuralRiot wrote:
         | >there's some plumbing company in the US that still uses a
         | 1940s IBM.
         | 
         | Maybe not to that extreme but you'd be surprised how many
         | industrial machines still running on early OSes and even with
         | CRT monitors. If it's not broken don't fix it.
        
       | rbanffy wrote:
       | I was thinking about it the other day. We got a C64 Maxi (a full-
       | sized C64 emulator) and my 8yo daughter loves some of the C64
       | games and was exploring a little bit the BASIC environment and
       | realizing she can make a machine do her bidding by telling it
       | what to do. I feel that screen time on it is far less worrying
       | than on YouTube or Roblox.
        
         | prionassembly wrote:
         | I thought Roblox was a Minecraft-like with building aspects to
         | it?
        
           | jandrese wrote:
           | Roblox games tend to be stuffed full of microtransactions,
           | which is really annoying as a parent because kids eat that
           | stuff up.
        
           | sokoloff wrote:
           | It's an open game similar in some ways to Minecraft, but the
           | amount of pre-canned games means it's more likely for a kid
           | to lazily consume rather than work towards creating. (In a
           | way that's slightly worse than Minecraft, IMO.)
        
           | mhh__ wrote:
           | Its hard to explain, but minecraft is more like an oliver
           | postgate program like Bagpuss or the Clangers compared to one
           | of the newer kids animated TV shows were stuff is exploding
           | all the time.
        
           | chaostheory wrote:
           | It does. While it is more powerful than Minecraft's creation
           | side (and your child programming in Lua has an
           | entrepreneurial motivation for Roblox bucks which translates
           | to real dollars), the downside is that it feels more separate
           | from Minecraft's creative side, which is baked into the
           | gameplay itself
        
         | Aldipower wrote:
         | Similar thing here. I even got a real C64C with games on
         | floppies. My young daughter loves Giana Sisters, like me back
         | in the days. Now a got another one. But with the fire button on
         | port II defective. I repaired it on my own by replacing the
         | according chip. What a great feeling. And the living retro
         | scene is helping a lot! C64 forever!
        
           | clcaev wrote:
           | Do they have corresponding books where you can type in the
           | programs, building it progressively?
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | I still run my Carver stereo and Dahlquist speakers all day every
       | day I bought back in 1981 or so. Connected to it is my Technics
       | SLQ2 turntable I bought new in the disco era. But the only time I
       | use that is to rip a vinyl, snap crackle pop and all. The stereo
       | gets its signal from a LAN music server.
        
       | unkoman wrote:
       | I can now afford the high end tech of a bygone era which is leads
       | to high end products that do not break as they have survived for
       | over 30 years.
        
         | MarkusWandel wrote:
         | I love older high-end technology. For a couple of decades my
         | stereo receiver was a Sony STR-7800SD. Absolute top of the line
         | from the late 1970s, built like a tank, and component level
         | repairable (the one time it needed fixing - a custom Sony part
         | no less) parts were still available two decades after the thing
         | was new.
         | 
         | Got it at a garage sale for a song in the early 1990s.
         | 
         | Given away since. I don't do stereo components any more, just
         | listen with bluetooth headphones from a smartphone like
         | everyone else.
        
       | rootsudo wrote:
       | I've been buying older macbook pros and am pleasantly surprised
       | how easy they were to repair and service.
       | 
       | They still are great machines today if your main usage is an ide,
       | browser and video.
       | 
       | Don't get me wrong, I love my new mbp, but, I don't see any true
       | difference in daily usage besides weight, and screen resolution.
        
       | taylodl wrote:
       | If it works and fits your needs then why not continue using it?
        
         | grishka wrote:
         | Imagine the world if most software developers were thinking
         | like that in regard to their technology choices. That would've
         | been a good world. A world where software uses hardware to its
         | full potential.
        
           | bayindirh wrote:
           | I agree. After seeing demoscene and high performance
           | computing, I refuse to accept "hardware is cheap, network is
           | reliable" mentality, and using the latest and coolest stuff.
           | 
           | Even a small amount of extra effort in the correct places
           | makes a lot of difference.
           | 
           | I still use Eclipse, btw.
        
       | DubiousPusher wrote:
       | One of my personal favorites. Practically a prehistoric "IoT"
       | censor at this point. It needs access to your wifi and an email
       | address. No apps, no flows, no unsupported platform nonsense.
       | 
       | https://www.amazon.com/Zircon-Leak-Alert-Contactor-Pack/dp/B...
        
       | schnevets wrote:
       | When lockdown-related stresses got to me, I found a lot of
       | comfort in my old Nintendo DS Lite. I never saw the appeal of
       | retro game collecting, but that combination of comfortable
       | design, good battery life, and gentle screen display was exactly
       | what I needed to ignore the doom scrolling and stresses triggered
       | my more modern technology.
       | 
       | I have been tempted to get an emulator console, but they all have
       | brighter, higher resolution screens and shorter battery lives, so
       | I don't actually know if I'll get in the same "flow". Maybe I'll
       | reassess after I finish this stack of JRPGs (which may take a
       | decade).
       | 
       | Once everything became "connected" (around 2010), obsolescence
       | became inevitable. That Psion5 or Zen Stone can remain timeless
       | because they will never sync a contact list or download a patch.
       | The owners know what they do, and seem confident that they will
       | not fail.
        
         | illwrks wrote:
         | I picked up a WiiU in 2018 but never really gave it much
         | attention until lockdown. Wii Sports was a good bit of
         | entertainment at times with my family, but I spent many nights
         | playing Mario kart online with strangers, or playing Zelda
         | Breath of the Wild and a few others. Being in lockdown is
         | frustrating but the opportunity to explore a digital world and
         | engage with other people online is a good distraction.
        
         | T-hawk wrote:
         | I've been doing what you describe with emulator consoles during
         | the lockdown as well. I got the NES and SNES classic versions,
         | and they do indeed have that same effect for me. I use them on
         | a TV with no other computer or cable hookups, and it's
         | perfectly comfortable to get into the flow of the game with no
         | doom-scrolling temptations or other distractions.
        
       | uncledave wrote:
       | I have quite a lot of vintage test and radio equipment. It's
       | cheap, completely dangerous and unreliable and fun to fix. I
       | couldn't be happier playing with it.
        
         | the_only_law wrote:
         | I have a lot of retro telecom equipment (mostly WAN line
         | analyzers tbf) and I guess you could call a lot of it cheap,
         | but a lot of it is curiously expensive too.
        
           | uncledave wrote:
           | Very cool. There's some of that curiously expensive stuff in
           | here too. My oscilloscope and plug-ins cost about $70k new. I
           | paid $200 for it :). It's amazing that stuff I couldn't
           | afford I can now
        
             | WalterBright wrote:
             | I found my analog oscilloscope at a pawn shop for $40.
        
               | pm215 wrote:
               | I think that's about what I paid for my analogue storage
               | scope (it works by long-persistence phosphor on the tube,
               | it's very neat though obviously not very practical these
               | days; has a handful of valves in it as well as the CRT
               | proper).
        
               | mhh__ wrote:
               | I'm always jealous of Americans, you just don't get
               | scopes in the skip here (UK).
        
               | uncledave wrote:
               | UK here. Mostly cancelled this year but best place to get
               | scopes are radio rallies
               | https://rsgb.org/main/news/rallies/
        
       | bullen wrote:
       | How you can write an article about old hardware without
       | mentioning the C64 is beyond me.
       | 
       | Today there are more scene releases for C64 than for any other
       | device, including PC.
       | 
       | AFAIC Apple 1 & 2 where just prototypes for the final 8-bit
       | computer with SID (audio) and VIC2 (graphics) chips that blew
       | everything else away until 16-bit!
        
       | rchaud wrote:
       | The best thing about old school tech was a feeling of permanence.
       | Pop a cassette out of the walkman, and it'll pick up where you
       | left off.
       | 
       | If you wanted to make a mixtape, you had to record each song one
       | by one in your CD-Cassette combo boombox. The last Walkman I
       | owned was in 2001. After that it was all discman players and non-
       | iPod MP3 players.
       | 
       | I still have relatively strong memories attached to each of them
       | as they were permanent fixture on my person prior to smartphones
       | arriving. I've tried to recapture it on my Neocities page here:
       | https://bad-mood-rising.neocities.org/mp3.html
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-12 23:01 UTC)