[HN Gopher] Developing an underwater robot to save people from d...
___________________________________________________________________
Developing an underwater robot to save people from drowning
Author : mayiplease
Score : 7 points
Date : 2021-03-08 20:15 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.fraunhofer.de)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.fraunhofer.de)
| qchris wrote:
| I think this kind of a system is extremely unlikely to be applied
| in practice, at least in the United States--it's just too costly.
| You can reasonably train a 16-year-old to be a lifeguard in less
| than 30 hours[0].
|
| Meanwhile, even the most basic of prosumer ROVs (remotely-
| operated underwater vehicles) like the BlueROV2 costs almost
| $3000[1], that that's without including the fancy computer vision
| tech and/or acoustics features that they're describing in here,
| which probably won't even be able to take advantage of the
| economies of scale for spare parts like thrusters, etc. That
| doesn't take into account the eventual maintenance costs,
| replacement, etc.
|
| There's some places where marine robotics offer benefits for
| replacing humans--deep sea diving, oil rigs, etc. But that only
| works because the cost of training and employing humans is so
| much higher, there's support equipment costs anyway, and the risk
| involved warrants it. I don't see any of those factors here
| making this likely.
|
| [0] https://www.redcross.org/take-a-
| class/lifeguarding/lifeguard...
|
| [1] https://bluerobotics.com/store/rov/bluerov2/
| jmercouris wrote:
| If it is using computer vision to detect a drowning person, why
| not just signal an alarm so people can help?
| danielfoster wrote:
| This is also a good idea. People might not always know what to
| do or be able to reach the person, but it couldn't hurt.
| mrec wrote:
| People who don't know what to do are in danger of being
| dragged under by the drownee.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-03-08 23:02 UTC)