[HN Gopher] Chaos Strikes Global Shipping
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Chaos Strikes Global Shipping
        
       Author : donmcc
       Score  : 67 points
       Date   : 2021-03-06 16:57 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | Shank wrote:
       | As soon as the pandemic started, airmail services stated to shut
       | down. Normally, airmail packets "hitch a ride" on commercial
       | airliners already making the trip. But when those ceased, airmail
       | service stopped. So what happened? All of the pending airmail got
       | switched to "surface mail," which is code for shipping on a boat.
       | I had several packages go from an ETA measured in days to an ETA
       | measured in weeks and months.
       | 
       | I imagine that the whole thing cascaded from that. Online orders
       | that would normally take a plane trip got redirected to the
       | surface, and then the pipeline kept backing up. Until the world
       | is connected and back to normal, bottlenecks like this will
       | probably still exist.
        
       | cwwc wrote:
       | > Every container that cannot be unloaded in one place is a
       | container that cannot be loaded somewhere else.
       | 
       | Never thought of it in this sense as a zero-sum game -- but it
       | does make a lot of sense why this is pushing the stock up for
       | companies like Triton International.
        
         | baybal2 wrote:
         | That's the rationale for building "megaports." Few giant
         | automated ports save on ships having to hop around smaller
         | ports to unload few containers.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | js2 wrote:
       | > Since they were first deployed in 1956, containers have
       | revolutionized trade by allowing goods to be packed into standard
       | size receptacles and hoisted by cranes onto rail cars and trucks
       | -- effectively shrinking the globe.
       | 
       | If you want to know more about this, there's a pretty good book
       | on it: _The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World
       | Smaller and the World Economy Bigger_
        
         | thatguy0900 wrote:
         | https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/52/hodes.php another
         | interesting article in the same vein, about the importance of
         | pallets
        
       | xyst wrote:
       | if businesses would not abuse cheap labor that china and other
       | third world countries offer, we wouldn't be in this mess (or at
       | least it wouldn't be as impactful)
       | 
       | besides labor costs, it doesn't make sense that an item that is
       | bought in from X company with an HQ in Y country has to be
       | manufactured in Z country and shipped thousands of miles to the
       | consumer.
       | 
       | the amount of carbon generated from our reliance on third world
       | countries must be ridiculously high, and wasteful.
        
         | missedthecue wrote:
         | Not sure why the word "abuse" was the first one out of your
         | vocabulary. Asia is much better off thanks to expanded trade
         | with the West, and the West has likewise benefited greatly.
        
         | MrBuddyCasino wrote:
         | "regions with low wages should not be permitted to increase the
         | amount of available jobs and therefore increase the standard of
         | living by shifting production there, this will <insert magic
         | here> make things better"
        
       | cmehdy wrote:
       | Interesting that the conclusion has to do with the type of
       | consumption, because as I was reading the article I was unable to
       | figure out whether there had been an increased consumption or
       | "just" a lack of availability of containers and workers. But the
       | article ends with:
       | 
       | > Some experts assume that as vaccinations increase and life
       | returns to normal, Americans will again shift their spending --
       | from goods back to experiences -- reducing the need for
       | containers.
       | 
       | Beyond masks, is it really the case that consumption of goods
       | dramatically increased? Is it only a North America issue? A US
       | issue?
        
         | x86_64Ubuntu wrote:
         | The article talks about dockworkers and truck drivers falling
         | ill and quarantining, as well as what Americans spend their
         | money on has changed. Instead of spending money on going out,
         | we are spending it on home focused items, specifically ones
         | that are shipped and made in China.
        
         | thesumofall wrote:
         | Working in shipping. No, it's the same in Europe and partially
         | also elsewhere. People shift spending from services to home
         | office equipment, furniture, electronics, ...
        
       | WJW wrote:
       | I have been watching too many Warhammer 40k videos on youtube and
       | completely misunderstood the title of this article at first
       | glance.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ampdepolymerase wrote:
       | Where's Flexport when you need them? Weren't they supposed to
       | disrupt this space?
        
         | walrus01 wrote:
         | compared to the size of entities like COSCO and Maersk,
         | flexport has no clout, scale or ability to "disrupt" anything.
         | 
         | turns out that disrupting things in software is easier,
         | disrupting physical things in the real world that are heavy and
         | cumbersome, more difficult.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-06 23:02 UTC)