[HN Gopher] Do What Makes the Best Story
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Do What Makes the Best Story
        
       Author : tosh
       Score  : 52 points
       Date   : 2021-03-05 17:26 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (amasad.me)
 (TXT) w3m dump (amasad.me)
        
       | neonological wrote:
       | The best stories are fiction. From books, to movies, to resumes.
        
       | kodah wrote:
       | Some important context that I think that's missing here is that
       | Amjad is the founder of repl.it
       | 
       | My participation in the start up ecosystem has been strictly as
       | an engineer and advisor. What I've observed of founders and early
       | leaders over the years is that they don't live in reality and
       | this often by necessity. What people see from the outside is
       | these strong, pervasive, bulletproof personalities that are
       | leading, changing our way of thinking, and changing our way of
       | life - often in a meta-sense very rapidly. These people, like
       | anyone else, doubt themselves and are quite often doubted by a
       | majority of people they come into contact with. Ordinary people
       | in the face of such doubt and opposition would likely fold to
       | this feedback; thinking something along the lines of, "The
       | majority of people tell me this is a fruitless idea" and move on
       | with some momentary pause. Start up founders can't afford such a
       | luxury. Peoples money, jobs, and futures lie in their hands and
       | their continued interest of chasing this dream. _Something_ has
       | to fuel that mentality and when I read a piece like this it
       | speaks to me in the way I observed what those founders had to
       | tell themselves every day just to get through the day.
       | 
       | One of my mentors, who also came from the startup ecosystem,
       | recently reflected, "Great engineers deal in reality because
       | reality can be defined, measured, and acted upon but perception
       | matters too. That is the struggle of every great engineer." Amjad
       | isn't wrong, he's just a founder, and he deals in reality but
       | also has to dabble in perception.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | picodguyo wrote:
       | >Notice how the most successful startups in the world all have
       | remarkable genesis stories.
       | 
       | I like this article and philosophy, but I had to scoff at this
       | point. I've seen too many startups invent their remarkable
       | genesis story to create a convenient narrative. The truth is
       | usually mundane and largely/entirely money-driven.
        
         | Fricken wrote:
         | All we did was evolve from apes, but for much of that we were
         | telling ourselves that we were in fact diving beings of light
         | temporarily ensconed in corporeal flesh. History suggests that
         | it's a winning formula.
        
       | jeffreyrogers wrote:
       | "There are good stories and there are good decisions"
       | 
       | I think most people want to be somewhere in the middle. Unless
       | you have a very high risk tolerance or are trying to be a writer
       | you probably don't want to optimize for stories. If you wanted to
       | optimize for good decisions you'd probably be an actuary and
       | marry a woman you met at church.
       | 
       | Edit: I am genuinely not sure why this is being downvoted.
        
         | lupire wrote:
         | The weird stereotyping isn't appreciated.
        
           | jeffreyrogers wrote:
           | Fair enough.
        
       | timwaagh wrote:
       | not a bad approach, just make sure its not the 'how did he die'
       | kind of story.
        
       | iujjkfjdkkdkf wrote:
       | I see this advice as mostly mapping to "get out side of your
       | comfort zone", "do something everyday that scares you", "the
       | definition of insanity is doing the same thing every day and
       | expecting something to change", "you miss 100% of the shots you
       | don't take" and so on. Overall it's good advice, only by trying
       | new things and stirring the pot are we likely to get somewhere
       | better.
        
       | questionforya wrote:
       | I don't necessarily agree with this advice but I have a question
       | that's related.
       | 
       | How do you get really good at telling stories?
       | 
       | I've done a lot of cool stuff in my life but usually don't do
       | into much detail because when I tell them it usually falls flat.
        
       | pingpongchef wrote:
       | Somewhat good advice, but with a caveat. While a good narrative
       | is generally helpful, results still matter. Case in point, a team
       | that ships quickly but also has crunch time can craft a story
       | about heroic devs staying long hours to ship a product, but this
       | is not better than doing things right the first time to avoid
       | crunch
        
       | secfirstmd wrote:
       | This article is total startup mumbo jumbo navel gazing. The
       | start-up cultural thing about making the leaders tell their story
       | and make that a whole part of the package has become tedious.
       | 
       | The best story? Oh please, many people work in things were they
       | acquire incredible stories and for various reasons (security,
       | privacy, humbleness etc.) will never be able to tell anyone.
       | 
       | But you know what, that's fine, once they are happy with what
       | they have done themselves. Do what makes you happy.
        
       | rebelshrug wrote:
       | I can see that story ending like this: "... and that's how our
       | startup failed."
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | There's something very Terry Pratchett about this - and there's
       | some truth to it, too.
       | 
       | I think we can reduce it to "be willing to take risks but don't
       | be insanely stupid."
       | 
       | Which doesn't sound as amazing, to be honest.
        
       | mettamage wrote:
       | I'll play along with the author. I haven't made my mind up
       | whether I think the author is right, but I'll play along, because
       | from that perspective I have a couple of things to note.
       | 
       | -----
       | 
       | > So next time you're faced with a tough decision, consider the
       | path that makes a more interesting story. If it turned out to be
       | the wrong decision to have made, you'd at least be fun at dinner
       | parties.
       | 
       | The issue is that a good story enhances the propagation quality
       | of a particular set of concepts that relate back to you in this
       | case. I daresay that the quicker you can make your story into a
       | meme, the higher that propagation quality will go -- attracting
       | all kinds of success for you in the process. There is however one
       | huge huge issue with this. It is devoid of ethics!
       | 
       | By that I am not saying it's evil. But it does mean it can be
       | used for evil purposes, and it has (e.g. Enron, vaporware
       | companies). Moreover, if you do not decide about the ethics of a
       | story, then you might risk that you're secretly going to lead a
       | very narcisistic life. It might be successful, but it ultimately
       | might not be the best you can do or the best you can be. I hear
       | you saying: "and you're supposed to tell what it is? You? A
       | random guy on the internet?"
       | 
       | I'm going to tell you what it is.
       | 
       | :)
       | 
       | Next to optimizing for story also optimize for: bringing the
       | future present _and_ optimizing for humanity as a whole. From
       | this perspective I think Elon Musk could be considered a role
       | model. His story is much cooler than any rock star has or also
       | much cooler than Tim Ferriss his story. Why? Because those
       | stories don 't add that much to humanity (Tim did have a couple
       | of things, but Elon is disrupting that part with Neuralink).
       | Stories like Bill Gates eliminating whatever disease ails the
       | planet is awesome, that he made Microsoft is a fun story, but
       | it's peanuts compared to his work of setting up a team that's
       | playing for a demi god.
       | 
       | Amazing stories have altruism towards humanity, without it things
       | can still sound cool but it will make us blindsided to simply
       | things that sound cool. Eventually that's not the best you can
       | be.
       | 
       | -----
       | 
       | Alright, that was me playing along. I'm still not sure what I
       | think of this concept, or my own opinion/story on the matter. I
       | feel the thinking is too heuristic-based, like something isn't
       | fully thought through. I can't put my finger on it. But it was
       | fun to play along, and from that perspective I'd vouch for more
       | altruism towards humanity and sci-fi awesomeness to be
       | incorporated into anyone's life story!
        
         | indigochill wrote:
         | I've been revisiting The Lord of The Rings lately, and
         | something that sticks out to me is that I'm especially enjoying
         | digging into the background lore. The reason being it all
         | fundamentally revolves around "one theme to rule them all": the
         | nature of good and evil.
         | 
         | To me, this thematic cohesion is what makes LotR a good story.
         | By the same token, when we look at stories of famous historical
         | figures (both those we consider ethical and those we don't),
         | the stories tend to distill some sort of theme from a person's
         | life.
         | 
         | By all means, it's good to be altruistic. But I think this is a
         | further distillation of what a good story is, and how it
         | pertains to the stories we tell about our history.
        
       | alexashka wrote:
       | I wonder if there'll come a time when people graduate to thinking
       | in tones of grey, rather than trying to boil life down to fortune
       | cookies, or if it's just limited by people's brains.
       | 
       | Take this for instance:
       | 
       | > Self storytelling is so essential for people that one of the
       | most effective techniques for treating depression and anxiety
       | boils down to "tell yourself better stories."
       | 
       | This is trivially false _and_ the author doesn 't seem to feel
       | any need to substantiate this wild claim. He's stuck in fortune
       | cookie world where you can just say shit, as long as it
       | feels/sounds good.
       | 
       | Hopefully the internet will expose fortune cookie thinkers to
       | people who actually use their brains for more than talking out of
       | their ass and it'll be a rude wake-up call. Of course brainless
       | people are on a holy crusade to ban speech that doesn't agree
       | with their idiotic ideology, so we'll see who wins out in the
       | end. If history is any indication - idiotic beliefs lose out in
       | the long run, but they sure can destroy a whole lot of lives for
       | centuries in the process.
        
         | throwaway98797 wrote:
         | Sounds like fortune cookie thinking works for some people.
         | 
         | Given your angry? tone it seems like your better way of
         | thinking isn't working. Unless you like sounding the way you
         | do.
        
           | zcw100 wrote:
           | I like the way he sounds. Sometimes anger is the correct
           | response.
        
       | aarreedd wrote:
       | > Self storytelling is so essential for people that one of the
       | most effective techniques for treating depression and anxiety
       | boils down to "tell yourself better stories."
       | 
       | This sounds a lot like what Jordan Peterson calls "Self
       | Authoring" https://www.selfauthoring.com/
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | titzer wrote:
       | It's not bad to have a few good stories at the end. But the
       | article is bullshit for the Instagram crowd. Sometimes you gotta
       | work your ass off just to get the thing done, story be damned.
        
       | brundolf wrote:
       | I wish I could truncate the last two paragraphs; I roll my eyes
       | when seemingly everything on this website gets reframed as advice
       | for startup founders (I know, I know, the site is literally run
       | by an incubator)
       | 
       | But I think the fundamental point about the human condition (we
       | are both subjects and writers of our own stories, and taking hold
       | of one's own story is key to finding happiness and fulfillment)
       | is very true and important
        
         | exolymph wrote:
         | To be fair, the writer is the CEO of Replit, a hot up-and-
         | coming startup (cliche description, I know, but it's true). So
         | it's understandable that the subject is on his mind, no?
        
       | breck wrote:
       | My friends uncle said to us when we were teens "boys, I know boys
       | like to do stupid things. Just make sure you don't hurt anyone
       | and only break the law if it's really funny so the judge will
       | laugh and go easy on you."
       | 
       | Another one I heard recently that I like: "If you ain't having
       | fun building it your users ain't gonna have fun using it."
        
         | strictnein wrote:
         | > "only break the law if it's really funny so the judge will
         | laugh and go easy on you."
         | 
         | A friend did just that. The judge read the arresting officer's
         | description of the event, making sure to clarify all the really
         | dumb/embarrassing stuff he did. Everyone in the courtroom
         | laughed at my friend (including the judge), and he ended up
         | just having to pay a fine + court fees.
        
           | I_Byte wrote:
           | If you don't mind, could you explain what happened?
        
             | dfee wrote:
             | That's about it. This is a "you must've been there to
             | believe it". Enjoy the anecdote and move on.
        
               | I_Byte wrote:
               | I did enjoy the anecdote. If the original commenter is
               | comfortable sharing the story I would also enjoy reading
               | that as well.
        
             | strictnein wrote:
             | Without going into full details:
             | 
             | You shouldn't poop in the road at 1am and then stop cars by
             | standing naked in the street about a mile from the police
             | station. The fun time ended when the next car he stopped
             | was a police car.
        
               | I_Byte wrote:
               | That's pretty funny! Thank you for sharing!
        
               | neonate wrote:
               | "Without going into full details"
        
               | breck wrote:
               | Thank you for not going into full details. ;)
        
       | Graffur wrote:
       | This strikes me as a teenager attitude - trying to look cool. If
       | your stories are great because you go out of your way to try make
       | those stories.. it's not that interesting to other people.
       | 
       | Being boring is seen as bad to teenagers but really, it's not
       | that bad.
        
         | aparks517 wrote:
         | I don't build my life around it, but I try to sometimes do
         | things that would have tickled my teenage self. I did sell the
         | loud, blue-with-green-flames 1988 Fiero that all the kids in
         | the neighborhood waved at. I still try to do cool stuff and
         | scare myself from time to time.
         | 
         | I agree it's not bad to be boring... but it's not the only
         | thing that /I/ want to be.
        
           | Graffur wrote:
           | That seems reasonable. I implied it was a bad thing to be
           | like a teenager but maybe that can be good too at times.
        
             | aparks517 wrote:
             | Fair enough. I think it just depends on what you're going
             | for :)
        
         | I_Byte wrote:
         | As a teenager myself I experience a lot of external pressure
         | from my peers, adults, and even the education system to not be
         | boring.
         | 
         | My friends don't want to hang out with someone who is boring.
         | Adults don't want to talk to a kid who can't show that they are
         | mature and can't provide experiences to back that up. Colleges
         | aren't going to admit a potential student who can't an tell an
         | interesting story.
         | 
         | There is too much incentive to not be boring in my current
         | environment.
        
           | notsureaboutpg wrote:
           | That's why it's a teenager attitude. Teenagers are building
           | themselves, everything is about them mostly. (nothing wrong
           | with that, it's the perfect time and place for that
           | attitude).
           | 
           | But once you're older, you want a companion, kids, strong
           | ties to family and friends, and then you realize it doesn't
           | really super matter that you're boring or not to the people
           | who hold the keys to your future (admissions officers,
           | teachers, professors, etc.), just that 5-10 people close to
           | you aren't bored by you.
        
         | brundolf wrote:
         | What's important is that your criteria is based on what _you_
         | think is interesting or worthwhile (or by your paraphrase,
         | "cool"), so that you personally are happy with your own story.
         | The mistake teenagers make is trying to optimize for the
         | definitions that _others_ have for those things.
         | 
         | (I say "mistake", but really it's just the natural consequence
         | of not yet having a clear sense of self, which is perfectly
         | normal at that age)
        
         | burntoutfire wrote:
         | > If your stories are great because you go out of your way to
         | try make those stories.. it's not that interesting to other
         | people.
         | 
         | It reminded me of something I've read about the attitude among
         | Math students at Oxford some decades ago - you were only cool
         | if you we've shown effortless brilliance. If, on the other
         | hard, you were working very hard to bring your math skills to a
         | remarkable level, you were basically a rube.
        
       | ascales wrote:
       | This is kinda an analog for doing the uncomfortable thing.
       | There's a certain amount of security in doing what's comfortable,
       | and if you can find happiness in that I think that's great. It's
       | all relative. I think it's less "be cool at dinner parties" and
       | more being happy with the path you've taken through life.
        
       | weeblewobble wrote:
       | I really dislike this advice, I think it encourages people to be
       | shallow and superficial. This quote from Parks and Recreation
       | captures it nicely
       | 
       | Ron (sitting down next to Leslie at the Senior's Ball):
       | Everything ok, Knope?
       | 
       | Leslie: My boyfriend is a lawyer, and he's smart and interesting
       | and there are a lot of things about him I really like. But he
       | acted like a real jerk today. I don't know, it's something about
       | the way he treats people or something.
       | 
       | Ron: He's a tourist. He vacations in people's lives, takes
       | pictures puts them in his scrapbook and moves on. All he's
       | interested in are stories.
       | 
       | Leslie: Ha.
       | 
       | Ron: Basically, Leslie, he's selfish, and you're not, and that's
       | why you don't like him.
        
       | carabiner wrote:
       | Just don't epic. An epic is usually the result of some short
       | sightedness or mistake.
        
       | superbcarrot wrote:
       | > If it turned out to be the wrong decision to have made, you'd
       | at least be fun at dinner parties.
       | 
       | Or you'll regret it for the rest of your life.
       | 
       | This advice only works for easily reversible decisions.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | notsureaboutpg wrote:
         | Yeah, the failed startup founders here probably don't
         | appreciate this approach from a guy whose every venture wound
         | up golden.
        
         | zemvpferreira wrote:
         | Hear hear. Don't risk throwing your life away to try and look
         | cool to other people.
        
         | Tarsul wrote:
         | "you'd at least be fun at dinner parties." could also be read
         | as "you'd be laughed at at dinner parties" (well, maybe not
         | even invited anymore). But I don't like to end my posting on
         | such a sour note... The more often you take risks the less
         | sensitive you are to failing. That's good.
        
       | bregma wrote:
       | It has taken me many decades, but I finally settled on this a my
       | main approach to life.
       | 
       | When it's all over, all you will have left is the story. Make
       | sure it's a good one.
        
       | nbzso wrote:
       | Success != Story | The article oversimplification is not
       | acceptable for me.:)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-05 23:02 UTC)