[HN Gopher] Mischa's Cursed Webring
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mischa's Cursed Webring
        
       Author : bwooster
       Score  : 69 points
       Date   : 2021-03-05 16:49 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (cursed.lol)
 (TXT) w3m dump (cursed.lol)
        
       | eat_veggies wrote:
       | on the topic of web rings, check out this little webring I built
       | for github profile readmes a few months back:
       | 
       | https://octo-ring.com/
       | 
       | Here's what the widget looks like on your profile -- there are
       | some _wild_ markdown table hacks to make the buttons individually
       | clickable: https://github.com/veggiedefender/
        
       | emayljames wrote:
       | All behold the latest in web design:
       | https://www.cameronsworld.net/
        
         | antihero wrote:
         | This is actually a thing of beauty.
        
       | sidpatil wrote:
       | Also of interest:
       | 
       | https://www.cameronsworld.net/
       | 
       | https://wiby.me/
        
       | muybasado wrote:
       | Interesting project, however it seems it has a certain bias
       | against a peculiar demographic, unfortunately this isn't
       | surprising at all. Culture war permeates everything.
        
         | bwooster wrote:
         | Submissions welcome!
        
           | muybasado wrote:
           | Petty.
        
             | dookahku wrote:
             | Why are you salty?
        
               | bartread wrote:
               | Suspect they think it's edgy to waste everybody's time by
               | making oblique reference to some perceived slight. I
               | can't work out what the problem is either.
               | 
               | muybasado: Please, either speak plainly and explicitly
               | or, if you're unwilling to do so, remain quiet.
        
               | antihero wrote:
               | It is in the nature of the right wing crank to portray
               | themselves as the victim despite usually being the
               | perpetrator.
        
         | hc-taway wrote:
         | Could you expand on this? I can't figure out what you're
         | getting at.
        
         | SamBam wrote:
         | I really didn't understand this comment, and you didn't expand,
         | so I assumed that it must have been something obvious and I was
         | too insensitive to notice. So I did a survey of the first 20
         | sites it gave me and try to categorize by
         | "demographic/culture." Here's what I got:
         | Unknown (math, science etc) 6         Asian 4         Christian
         | 2         Middle America  2         Goth 1         Democrat 1
         | Irish 1         EU 1         Swiss 1         English 1
         | 
         | So... I'm still in the dark. I guess Asians are
         | overrepresented? But that included several different countries
         | (I could only wrote Korea and China before I started
         | categorizing them together).
         | 
         | Or maybe you decided they were making fun of your demographic
         | in particular, and confirmation bias led you to see only that?
         | Are you seeing "culture war" where there isn't any, or am I
         | still blind?
        
           | htkyoholk wrote:
           | You should look at what's missing from you list.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | pdx6 wrote:
       | Cursed indeed. I am enjoying the web 1.0 insanity of the Atari
       | parts maker for 8-bit machines. Somewhere there is a person still
       | making a bit of cash from 1985 tech.
       | 
       | https://cursed.llolo.lol/best-electronics-ca.com/
        
         | unwiredben wrote:
         | Best Electronics is a pretty amazing place. Here's an interview
         | with the guy who runs it:
         | https://ataripodcast.libsyn.com/antic-interview-5-the-atari-...
        
       | RGamma wrote:
       | Love this, there's so much personality in these. No JS cruft, no
       | cosmetics, no filler, just cool (and weird) vibes.
       | 
       | How far the web strayed from this, it's a shame really. The soul
       | has left :/
        
         | nexthash wrote:
         | I would disagree - the Web hasn't strayed, it's just gotten
         | bigger. A lot more people on for a variety of reasons. If you
         | look closely, you can still find creativity. For example,
         | search up "digital gardens"
        
       | geocrasher wrote:
       | Working in web hosting, I've hosted many sites like this and had
       | to deal with some of the people who've made them. And I have to
       | say that while it's fun to point and laugh at the websites, there
       | are a few of these in the ring that are borderline troubling. It
       | is clear that their authors are suffering from some serious
       | mental illnesses and at the very least some major delusions.
       | 
       | I recall a case years ago where I hosted a site for someone who
       | appeared to be a paranoid schizophrenic. They called in one day
       | complaining that we'd moved one of their HTML tables to the left
       | by a few pixels. Another one was a website by somebody who was
       | "exposing" their local municipality for doing things like
       | charging for water and "illegally incarcerating" the website
       | owner, who viewed their stints in a mental hospital as an attack
       | to their freedom.
       | 
       | On the other hand, Lings Cars made it on this webring, and it's
       | well deserved. That site is awesome and horrible at the same
       | time, and it's designed to make us gawk at it for fun.
        
         | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
         | At what point does appreciating content produced by the mental
         | ill become exploitation of them? Gene Ray was clearly mentally
         | ill, but few had any qualms about enjoying the WTF quality of
         | the Time Cube website.
         | 
         | Some of the classic twentieth-century art by outsider artists
         | like Adolf Wolfli was in large part the consequence of their
         | illness, and yet it is appreciated nevertheless, so couldn't
         | the same persist today for the mentally ill's analogous
         | creations on the internet?
        
           | geocrasher wrote:
           | I think the main difference is whether what they are putting
           | out is something beautiful and artistic, or... not. You do
           | make an interesting point that I had not considered however.
           | At what point does it stop becoming the ramblings of a mental
           | patient and start becoming art? I don't know. But I do know
           | that the sampling of what I saw on is web ring wasn't art ;)
           | 
           | Edit: It becomes art when the person creating it declares it
           | as art. Otherwise it's just sad. Thank you @mulmen for
           | brining this point out.
        
           | mulmen wrote:
           | Surely intent matters? If a person claims to be an artist
           | then we can appreciate their art. If a percon claims to be an
           | investigative journalist but actually doesn't understand the
           | concept public utilities then I'm not sure we should treat
           | that as entertainment.
        
             | geocrasher wrote:
             | Yes I agree with this.
        
         | jstanley wrote:
         | > who viewed their stints in a mental hospital as an attack to
         | their freedom.
         | 
         | In fairness, this _is_ an attack on their freedom.
        
           | samatman wrote:
           | Indeed.
           | 
           | I don't have a better solution, but there has to be a better
           | treatment for paranoid schizophrenia than kidnapping them,
           | strapping them to a bed, transporting them in a windowless
           | vehicle to a location they've never been, forcibly drugging
           | them, and letting them wander around with other psychotics
           | for a couple days.
        
       | CDSlice wrote:
       | I'm not really sure what's so "cursed" about this website?
       | http://www.hytechshotz.com/default.asp
       | 
       | The website design is pretty bad but based off of the OP saying
       | "most of them are really deep and demonstrate some sort of
       | twisted brain that was behind each site" I'm not really sure why
       | this one is on the list.
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | Overlooking the ol' bezel trick,
         | 
         | High saturation text on a black background does not cancel out
         | the overuse of high saturation colors. This looks like a flyer
         | for Hempfest 2021.
         | 
         | (Why do pot smokers enjoy higher saturation than the rest of
         | us? Has anyone studied this?)
        
         | dookahku wrote:
         | Maybe like finding a Prada store in the middle of nowhere near
         | marfra Texas... Either it's a cover or an artwork, or possibly
         | someone That twisted at Prada headquarters decide that it was a
         | good location
        
           | guerrilla wrote:
           | Apparently that's just an art installation
           | 
           | https://inspiredimperfection.com/adventures/prada-marfa/
        
         | mattnewton wrote:
         | Some of these sites are just dope, like this 3d graphing
         | software site https://cursed.llolo.lol/dpgraph.com/
         | 
         | But have hideous design :D
        
           | tonyarkles wrote:
           | As it turns out, these are real sites that got scraped.
           | http://www.dpgraph.com/index.html works, and it looks like
           | the software is free to download now. I'm too much of a
           | chicken to try though...
        
             | bwooster wrote:
             | A lot of these sites don't support HTTPS, so they can't be
             | iframed without being mirrored
        
           | hinkley wrote:
           | I can't recall the last time I made a noise opening a web
           | page.
           | 
           | This one sounded somewhere between a hiccup and vomiting.
           | Kind of a 'Hulp!'
        
         | hc-taway wrote:
         | I'd say that one gets in for having photos with "2019-2020", so
         | clearly still being updated, but for feeling so very much like
         | it's from 1999. Choosing to lead with an unremarkable aerial
         | photography shot, and something about the saturation in the
         | images, is _so_ 1990s, not just the design. @aol.com contact
         | email. The name is reminiscent of  "icy hot stuntaz". The whole
         | package is very special.
        
         | bpierre wrote:
         | I don't see how any of these is cursed really. I think it is
         | fair to assume that most of these websites are the product of
         | work and passion from individuals having put some time and
         | effort into it.
         | 
         | One can perceive them as ugly, outdated, funny, or even
         | pointless (I don't, but it's not the point). But using a domain
         | like cursed.lol and a vocabulary like "twisted brain" or
         | "fucked up shit" (OP's comment) is a bit too much on the side
         | of the mockery / disrespect / immaturity and doesn't belong
         | here IMO.
        
           | xook wrote:
           | This is it. I was expecting something qyestionable, or even
           | mildly awful. Instead, they are quaint, and full of life.
           | They are outdated only because of current UI trends, not
           | because they are objectively outdated.
           | 
           | I miss the soul and work that went into sites of the 1990s
           | where it was dense information with a point, not thousands of
           | pixels filled with nothing.
        
           | kid-icarus wrote:
           | Respectfully disagree. I take delight in observing these
           | artifacts, it's unfortunate you cannot.
        
             | bpierre wrote:
             | Sorry if my comment wasn't clear, I actually do enjoy
             | browsing these websites. My concern is about the mocking
             | tone I perceive from OP and the webring curator (not sure
             | it's the same person).
        
               | kid-icarus wrote:
               | I don't know how many of the cursed sites you've visited,
               | but in addition to rudimentary styling, some of the sites
               | contain some rather disturbing content.
               | 
               | Hence the "fucked up shit," and "twisted mind," comments.
               | I don't think they are inappropriate or disrespectful.
               | 
               | I don't think tone policing is appropriate or beneficial.
        
           | JasonFruit wrote:
           | Exactly my feeling: this is the opposite of the hacker-in-
           | the-best-sense appreciation for things done out of passion
           | and personal dedication, even when they're strange or
           | seemingly useless. This tears down without offering anything
           | better.
        
       | bwooster wrote:
       | Source: https://github.com/revmischa/cursed-webring
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | There's something very charming about these 90's style web-pages,
       | content aside.
        
       | analyte123 wrote:
       | Doing crazy things with CSS, including animations, has never been
       | easier or more consistent between browsers, and yet creativity in
       | web design has gone down practically to zero these days. I blame
       | mobile, where nobody can seem to escape from the "responsive
       | column of blandly styled content" paradigm.
        
         | johnfn wrote:
         | My theory for why this is is that in the past when the web was
         | arcane and challenging to learn to develop, this actually acted
         | as a filter for people who had a special sort of intellectual
         | curiosity and passion to really push through and make what they
         | wanted to make. It's great now that the web is so broadly
         | accessible, but now no such filter exists, so truly creative
         | sites are fewer and further between.
        
         | jgalt212 wrote:
         | yes, blame the SEO mantra of "mobile-first" which has poisoned
         | products that are "mobile-rarely".
        
         | cosmodisk wrote:
         | I think I had enough "creativity" from webdesign. Video
         | backgrounds, fading,or reappearing text sections, absurd colour
         | schemes,or overengineered SPAs. I'd happily trade all that
         | shiny wrapping paper into something a bit more boring and
         | consistent.
        
       | beaconstudios wrote:
       | Had to throw http://durgasoft.com/ 's hat into the ring too for
       | the garish web design subset.
        
         | emayljames wrote:
         | Bleach my eyes
        
         | sidpatil wrote:
         | It's like the Ling's Cars [1] of Java and Python software
         | development.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.lingscars.com/
        
           | simplecto wrote:
           | I heard via LinkedIn she sold the business. I hope the
           | character remains.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | DiggyJohnson wrote:
       | This is extremely well done. Academically, I look forward to any
       | attempt at criticizing this project. It's a tricky thought
       | experiment.
        
         | prox wrote:
         | What is it exactly? There is no editorial to go with this. I
         | love the time machine feel though. Hello tables!
        
           | bwooster wrote:
           | I've been trying to make a list of "cursed" websites - some
           | of them are really deep and vast and demonstrate some sort of
           | twisted brain that was behind each site. Some are just
           | bizarre. Most have cursed vibes. You can spend hours on a lot
           | of them just digging up fucked up shit.
        
             | prox wrote:
             | Cool, going to check it out later!
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | joemi wrote:
         | If 'cursed' is derogatory, then it seems unfair/mean to call
         | sites cursed just for not keeping up with current web design
         | trends. Shouldn't we be better than that?
        
           | andrewflnr wrote:
           | Not exactly. "Cursed" in modern slang is more like something
           | weird and unsettling in a way that's probably funny and may
           | or may not actually be bad.
        
       | tempodox wrote:
       | Wow, the greatest website of the '90s that never was, it even has
       | a Catsape browser embedded somewhere. Found that by coincidence
       | -- clicking around in this thing can have surprising results. It
       | is also the first site that managed to get me this warning from
       | Safari: " _This webpage is using significant energy. Closing it
       | may improve the responsiveness of your Mac_ ". I recommend the
       | site for its entertainment value but make sure your battery is
       | charged!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-05 23:01 UTC)