[HN Gopher] Texas woman sues Griddy after being charged $9,546 f...
___________________________________________________________________
Texas woman sues Griddy after being charged $9,546 for 19 days of
power
Author : alex_young
Score : 16 points
Date : 2021-02-27 18:49 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| bluefirebrand wrote:
| This is going to be very interesting to see the outcome of.
|
| On the surface level this absolutely does appear to fall under
| "Price Gouging during a crisis", but I suspect that the defendant
| here will claim it was more "The cost of delivering power to you
| at all was much higher than normal given the circumstances, the
| alternative would be leaving you without power at all"
|
| I don't have direct experience with Griddy but I was working with
| some people in Texas recently. One of them was on a Real-Time
| pricing schedule for his electricity. He could monitor his prices
| using a phone app down to to a very granular level, I think
| 15-minute intervals. It may have even been minute by minute
| adjustments.
|
| I think the existence of that sort of knowledge for the users
| might play into the decision of this lawsuit. If the claimant has
| a high level of transparency into their pricing over time and
| just were not paying attention and continued to use electricity
| as normal, they may not have much of an argument here.
| rsj_hn wrote:
| > On the surface level this absolutely does appear to fall
| under "Price Gouging during a crisis"
|
| No, no, no, no, this is absurd. You can't sue energy markets
| for "price gouging" when spot prices shoot up. Do you sue your
| broker for price gouging when there is a price spike in a
| stock? What about wheat? If you don't want to be exposed to
| spot pricing, don't play in the spot markets.
|
| This is why energy consumers are historically kept out of spot
| energy markets and instead get their energy from utilities. The
| utilities offer stable pricing but in exchange the long run
| price you pay is higher -- you are paying for that stability.
| The whole point of griddy is that instead of getting your power
| from a regulated utility which must get government approval of
| price hikes, you think you can do better by being charged
| market spot prices.
|
| It's true that market pricing is usually below the fixed prices
| charged by utilities but at the same time you bear the risk of
| spikes.
|
| Thus to call this "price gouging" is absurd as griddy does not
| choose prices administratively but passes on the spot price to
| their consumers. That's the whole point of griddy.
|
| These people signed up to be exposed to the market price in
| order to be free of stable pricing, as administrative pricing
| is higher, on average, than volatile spot pricing.
|
| They had no problem enjoying the cost savings when market
| prices were lower, but now they want to sue when market prices
| shot up? If you can't handle the volatility of spot markets,
| then don't sign up for services like griddy and go with regular
| utilities that have administrative pricing.
| [deleted]
| responsibility wrote:
| Play stupid games, win stupid prices.
|
| The plaintif gambled and lost. I have zero sympathy for her.
|
| To underline their culpability in the matter, the plaintif was
| warned and encouraged to switch providers. They failed to do so
| in a timely manner _and_ failed to reduce their energy usage.
|
| Pay up and quit bitching.
| throwaway69123 wrote:
| I can't find the link so sorry no source. However I did see the
| acquisition that it was the Texas regulator who was responsible
| for artificially pushing the price of power up. So not really a
| free market
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-02-27 23:02 UTC)