[HN Gopher] Show HN: Call a Dev - Pay Stack Overflow users $1/mi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Call a Dev - Pay Stack Overflow users $1/min for live
       programming help
        
       Author : mcadenhe
       Score  : 155 points
       Date   : 2021-02-22 16:59 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (calladev.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (calladev.com)
        
       | bcoughlan wrote:
       | Cool idea. Where I work it would be much more useful to use it to
       | find someone who can consult on specialised knowledge rather than
       | programming problems. For example we are working on a disaster
       | recovery architecture at the moment. This whole area is new to us
       | so I'm reading a lot about it, but I know that an hour long
       | discussion with someone with expertise in that area could save us
       | months of time and tens of thousands in costs. It would be great
       | if the platform could hook me up with those kinds of people.
        
       | wwww4all wrote:
       | My current hourly rate breaks down like this. I make adjustments
       | every 6 months.
       | 
       | 15 years professional experience + 5 years experience in latest
       | specialized tech stack + 1 hour = $200 dollars/hour for contracts
       | longer than 6 months. Hourly rate is higher for shorter term
       | contracts.
       | 
       | My rate is more cost effective than not delivering the solution.
        
         | atleta wrote:
         | How/where do you manage to charge this kind of rate? Are you
         | contracting clients directly or through some agency? Also, is
         | this for on premise or remote work? You take on full projects
         | or augment existing teams?
        
       | A12-B wrote:
       | "Work from home Be your own boss Set your own schedule"
       | 
       | I've heard this one before. Next you'll get the state of
       | california to classify me as an employee.
        
       | zoba wrote:
       | Relatedly, if you would like help fighting procrastination you
       | may benefit from me as an accountability coach. It's just me
       | personally helping folks stay accountable to their goals with a
       | couple of calls for a couple of hours every week. I'd be
       | delighted for you to sign up. More info here: https://coding-
       | pal.com/
        
       | armadsen wrote:
       | This interesting to me. I spent the last 4 years teaching
       | programming full time, and also have a decently high SO
       | reputation. I've recently gone back to full time software
       | development, and miss teaching. The main problem is that at $0.75
       | / min, it's not worth my time. I generally have at least one
       | contract side job making several times that much, and I'm not
       | unusual in that respect.
        
       | robertlagrant wrote:
       | It costs $1/minute, and pays $0.75/minute. What is this site
       | charging 25% for supplying?
        
         | sjburt wrote:
         | Matchmaking, promotion.
        
       | m00dy wrote:
       | Do I need to install software in my computer to use this platform
       | ?
        
       | dlevine wrote:
       | This sort of reminds me of Airpair. Does anyone know what
       | happened to them? Any learnings there?
        
       | atleta wrote:
       | Not unlike codementor, though the landing page maybe has a bit
       | different value proposition. There they offer mentoring, this one
       | looks more like specialized problem solving. But, of course, the
       | two overlap strongly. E.g. on codementor quite a few of my
       | sesssions were about looking into and helping to solve specific
       | issues.
       | 
       | Those are actually pretty high adrenaline situations, at least in
       | the beginning, because you only have a few minutes to grasp
       | what's going. Or at least it feels like so and at least you need
       | to start showing signs of understanding the problem. It was
       | pretty fun (and stressful, in a positive way) in the beginning.
        
       | whobar wrote:
       | Reminds me of "The Knowledge", pitched on Dragon's Den (UK's
       | shark tank) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf4zNLxJZnY
        
       | lettergram wrote:
       | I used to offer tutoring for C, Go and Python programming for
       | $50/hr.
       | 
       | I can't tell you the number of people who asked me to do work on
       | for their day job... I would always accept at $100/hr.
       | 
       | Almost every week I'd max out my 15 hours I'd set aside for
       | "tutoring". So beyond that I'd charge $200/hr, and I'd still get
       | people for both tutoring and day job style work lol
       | 
       | $1/min is a fair price, but if you're good you can make a lot
       | more
        
         | 908B64B197 wrote:
         | What did they ask you?
         | 
         | Did you get to clone their entire code repository?
        
         | padthai wrote:
         | This is fascinating to me. Is there any particular kind of
         | profile that hired you as a ghostwriter? Do these people know
         | how to do their work and decide to outsource it or they have no
         | clue and just got lucky in the interviews?
        
           | daniellarusso wrote:
           | There was a story about a developer from IBM that hired
           | somebody, and was only discovered because the inbound VPN IP
           | was from a different country.
        
             | branon wrote:
             | I would like to read this story!
        
               | MattGaiser wrote:
               | https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-21043693
               | 
               | Not the same one in all likelihood though.
        
               | 908B64B197 wrote:
               | That's a failure from the dev and management.
               | 
               | Being able to find and get repeatable good results from
               | contractors across the globe and manage them is a skill
               | in itself.
        
       | mritchie712 wrote:
       | nice, I use codementor, so I'm in your target market. Do you have
       | devs signed up?
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | Thanks for taking a look! A couple have connected their S/O
         | accounts so far. Launched it today so not much action yet.
         | 
         | Do you use codementor as a mentor or as a mentee?
        
           | scrollaway wrote:
           | I use codementor as well, as a mentor primarily. Got a lot of
           | clients through them, including longer-term clients for my
           | consultancy.
           | 
           | Immediate feedback: If you want me to sign up, 75C//min is
           | too low, and you do need a mechanism to raise rates. My
           | standard codementor rate is $2.25/min (and goes up to $3/min
           | on some specialized skills).
           | 
           | Feel free to email me if you want some feedback/video chat. I
           | was on hackhands back when it still existed. I'm a sucker for
           | these types of platform. I especially love getting clients
           | looking for actual coaching/mentoring, not just debugging.
        
             | mcadenhe wrote:
             | Awesome! Thanks for the feedback and the offer!
        
           | mritchie712 wrote:
           | I've done both, but mostly I use it to speed up the debugging
           | of JS issues.
           | 
           | I'd consider adding a GIF or video of the flow to connect
           | with a dev.
        
             | mcadenhe wrote:
             | Yea things are always a lot faster when you have someone
             | who can tell you exactly what you don't know.
             | 
             | The main difference with Call a Dev is the lack of friction
             | for the devs who need help, and the devs who need work. You
             | just post your question and if someone can help, you'll get
             | a ping with a link to their S/O profile. If you like what
             | you see, you accept the ping and the call starts.
             | 
             | A video is a good idea, I'm putting one together now.
        
               | mritchie712 wrote:
               | Good luck!
               | 
               | DevOps is another area you could focus on. A lot of
               | people think it's fun to learn programming, but very few
               | want to learn devops (e.g. why does this work locally,
               | but not on AWS?). People will def pay to solve devops
               | problems quickly (source: I've done it many times).
        
       | paulie_a wrote:
       | So pay someone else to use google?
        
         | blackbear_ wrote:
         | No, pay someone to read the first google result to you. A large
         | part of stackoverflow questions are like this honestly.
        
       | the_jeremy wrote:
       | Interesting idea, but doesn't seem competitive for Americans to
       | ever respond, if you only pay them $0.75/min after the first
       | minute and the experts have to search for questions they want to
       | answer, meaning there is guaranteed unpaid time between calls.
       | 
       | A potentially interesting option would be to offer tiers based on
       | stack overflow reputation, and to ensure that a developer has
       | reputation from the desired tags.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | hntrader wrote:
       | Interesting idea.
       | 
       | When I use Fiverr to hire a dev, I often have to contact multiple
       | prospective devs to figure out that their skills are a match for
       | the problem I'm trying to solve. I'll chat to 5 (all who
       | advertise python) and give a one line intro about the problem,
       | and it's immediately clear than only 2 can or wish to do it. E.g
       | if I need someone who specifically knows the Selenium package.
       | 
       | Do you have a similar mechanism that can help to match the right
       | dev with the right customers?
       | 
       | Also, $1/minute is more expensive than Fiverr. For my quick
       | projects I would still use Fiverr due to the cost savings. I'd
       | expect to fork out $60 for a two hour project there. On the other
       | hand, others here are saying that it's too low for their hourly
       | rate. Some price flexibility might be a good idea?
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | Devs ping any problems they feel capable of solving. They can
         | ping with 2 messages, either they KNOW they can help, or they
         | THINK they can help.
         | 
         | Once you receive a ping you can vet their S/O profile and if
         | you like what you see you can start the call.
         | 
         | It's not so much for contract work or to complete tasks or
         | projects like fiverr is. It's about getting personalized help
         | with code your struggling with.
        
         | jtth wrote:
         | what are you building that you are soliciting development labor
         | from fiverr and think $30/h is appropriate for anyone on earth
         | involved in programming
        
           | hntrader wrote:
           | Ad hoc scraping tool for something experimental that I didn't
           | want to do myself. Would've taken me 2x as long as the dev I
           | hired since I haven't done that before. Quality wasn't so
           | important, I just wanted the output of the scraper on a
           | specific site for a one off thing.
           | 
           | $30/h is a typical rate for a dev on Fiverr, I've been very
           | happy with the value I've gotten from it.
        
             | AlchemistCamp wrote:
             | Why are you dictating the language they use, then? It just
             | shrinks the pool and increases the odds you're missing out
             | on a simpler way to do it.
             | 
             | If they delivered a working scraper using Ruby or
             | JavaScript or even a 3rd party service, the output would
             | have been the same.
        
           | daniellarusso wrote:
           | I am guessing scraping, if using Selenium, Python, and hiring
           | folks via fiverr.
        
       | new_guy wrote:
       | This is a fundamentally broken model.
       | 
       | You get a good developer they fix the issue in a minute get $1.
       | 
       | You get a not-so-good one they take all day and bankrupt you.
       | 
       | You have an expectation mismatch, you pay the developers for
       | their _value_ not their _time_.
       | 
       | Better to have a model like Quirky did, $80 flat rate or
       | something and obviously filter out the bad developers on sign up.
        
         | atleta wrote:
         | The problem is, that no one can give you (or themselves) a
         | reasonable estimate on how much it will take (and thus how much
         | it should cost) to fix an issue in an unknown codebase.
         | 
         | The mismatch is easily done away with by adding ratings to the
         | system. So much so, than on similar platforms, if you are
         | unlucky and run into a hard issue/prick customer (or some
         | combination of this) too early then it can ruin your chances
         | forever. (It does matter a lot whether you get your 1 out of
         | 100 3* ratings as the first one or the 100th one.)
        
       | naebother wrote:
       | Yeah, no.
        
       | munk-a wrote:
       | Do you have any guarantees about how quickly a response will come
       | in? I'm a bit concerned that the low payrate to the dev means
       | that you're likely to miss higher skilled respondants. The payout
       | isn't high enough to justify going FT on it and it feels like
       | it'd be unreliable to try and pickup questions here and there
       | when you happen to be available.
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | Thanks for the question! Your concern is justified. There are
         | no guarantees. The only thing for certain is that if you don't
         | get a ping within 60 minutes then your question will be
         | deleted.
         | 
         | It's kind of a chicken/egg problem where there aren't enough
         | questions because I don't have enough people to answer them,
         | and there aren't enough enough people to answer them without a
         | steady supply of questions to keep them busy.
         | 
         | I'm reconsidering the pay rate after reading a few of the
         | comments here.
        
       | banana_giraffe wrote:
       | I'm sure there are people that will do this, but I view it as
       | particularly grueling work. If I want to work an 8 hour day to
       | pay the bills, I need to work 8 hours at top efficiency since I'm
       | always being watched, and on top of it, be social in different
       | calls all day.
       | 
       | Some of my best problem solving us while I'm out for a walk
       | letting my mind wander. This is very much not for me.
       | 
       | Oh, on top of this, I'm sure the dispute process after spending
       | say two hours trying to do something and failing for whatever
       | reason is going to be _fun_.
        
       | sscarduzio wrote:
       | I like the concept, but you can't pay the same proce for all
       | developers.
        
         | terse_malvolio wrote:
         | Or for all problems!
        
         | robertlagrant wrote:
         | You don't - with this model you pay less for better developers.
        
       | Ragnarork wrote:
       | The idea looks interesting, but a couple things of note that make
       | me kinda wary:
       | 
       | - $0.75/min is $45/h and it's awfully cheap for what's ultimately
       | consulting work
       | 
       | - 1 free minute in each call, call ends if no payment source is
       | connected: what about people that would keep getting those one
       | minutes? I know it's not much, but for some problem it might be
       | enough if not to solve it, at least to get input that could lead
       | to resolution.
       | 
       | I still like the idea because I feel strongly about stackoverflow
       | pushing for solving everyone's issue instead of someone's, which
       | often end up solving barely anyone problem as solutions provided
       | are way too generic. The added effect is also that the community
       | has devolved into a hot mess that will close so many questions as
       | dupes even when they're not.
        
         | munk-a wrote:
         | The free minute sounds like a really good idea to me - there
         | might be twenty seconds or so of introduction which younger
         | folks will tend to view as unnecessary time-wasting and older
         | folks will tend to view as necessary pre-connection and the
         | free minute allows these greetings to go uncharged and be
         | mostly uncontroversial. I think it both counters the greeting
         | time and also serves as a pretty good PR move. Also, if I can
         | answer your problem in less than a minute then you didn't even
         | google it.
         | 
         | I am sure a bunch of these sorts of questions will roll in and,
         | if you're trying to continuously get answers within the free
         | minute you're probably going to end up accidentally paying them
         | a good portion of the time.
        
           | unanswered wrote:
           | > Also, if I can answer your problem in less than a minute
           | then you didn't even google it.
           | 
           | And so the person who has to field this call shouldn't get
           | paid?
        
             | munk-a wrote:
             | Actually looking at the model setup by the site for
             | contractors to grab questions on a voluntary basis - I
             | sorta doubt anyone would actually take your question.
             | 
             | The site design is pretty opaque so I imagined you had some
             | SMEs out there that a call in would be automatically
             | connected to but the contractors can view a list of
             | questions and pick and choose ones they think they're a
             | good match for.
             | 
             | I think that makes it a valid question to the site
             | designers if there should be either:
             | 
             | 1. Some level of payment for the first minute of calls to
             | make sure those dumb questions get answered
             | 
             | 2. Some feedback mechanism for contractors to mark specific
             | calls as googleable and for the site to send back a "Did
             | you try googling it buddy?" response via email (though in
             | much more diplomatic terms)
             | 
             | It sounds like this service might actually struggle with
             | questions that are too easy - I'm also really wondering
             | about the unpaid research time potential. Will it be a faux
             | pas on this service to call up the client at the point
             | where you think you know the answer reasonably well but may
             | need to do some on-the-phone research for their specific
             | details or would the expectation be an expert ready to
             | answer your question specifically for the Sun Sparc 8
             | architecture?
        
               | unanswered wrote:
               | Presumably it works like the rest of the gig economy: if
               | anything goes wrong, _caveat contractor_
        
       | ryanSrich wrote:
       | Why not use Upwork? I've found very good devs on Upwork to help
       | me for an hour or two. They make $200-$400 for basically just
       | talking me through something on zoom call.
        
       | tppiotrowski wrote:
       | I worked on a startup that received seed funding to tackle this.
       | I helped build the platform (using Twilio video) and then
       | answered the first $5000 of calls. Things I learned:
       | 
       | - Many entry level programmers at big companies (think Walmart
       | Labs, Target, Goldman Sachs, etc) are too scared to ask
       | managers/team for help. If you work for a large company, make
       | sure new hires feel safe asking questions and seeking help or
       | they will seek it elsewhere.
       | 
       | - The really hard questions they're willing to pay $240 an hour
       | for have too much context for you to grasp. They want you to
       | replace their ORM layer or tell them why their 600 line test case
       | is not working.
       | 
       | - Getting customers is not too hard by poaching them from Stack
       | Overflow, Reddit, CodeMentor.
       | 
       | - Developers make good money working full time and idly sitting
       | at their desk part of that time. Here you only get paid for
       | active time and the idle time in-between will kill your salary.
       | Your motivation has to come from helping other people and
       | watching them grow, not from $$$.
        
         | atleta wrote:
         | Yeah, the idling thing, or looking from the other side, the on-
         | demand expectation pretty much kills it. Or makes it hard to
         | organize.
         | 
         | I used to be active on CodeMentor a few years ago, and the bad
         | thing for these problem solving kind of requests is that they
         | are usually prompt requests. Now working remotely, in theory,
         | you can be available almost any time, the problem is, that
         | after a while you just feel like not wanting to leave what you
         | do. At least not on a short notice.
         | 
         | Agreed upon mentoring sessions that can be scheduled work a lot
         | better from this regard.
         | 
         | Actually, when I joined codementor, I was working on a startup
         | that offered psychology consulting in a similar way. (And one
         | of the reasons me joinging codementor was to get first-hand
         | experience of the dynamics of such a service.) Our
         | psychologists didn't like either that they had to be around and
         | that they had a lot of non-meaningful inquiries. (Similar to
         | what you see on codementor.)
        
           | tppiotrowski wrote:
           | There's also the awkward feeling of not being able to solve
           | the problem and still charging something. I actually
           | preferred "tipping". I solve your problem and then you pay me
           | instead of running a timer.
        
             | atleta wrote:
             | Well, on codementor you can give a refund. And that would
             | erase the session (and the rating, if you received one)
             | from your history. I think it's better than tipping.
             | Tipping, at least to my European ears, sounds like this
             | voluntary thing as opposed to paying for a service.
             | 
             | BTW, what happened to your service? Or, probably better to
             | ask, how far did you get and why did it fail?
        
       | sidpatil wrote:
       | This reminds me of the premium-rate 1-900 numbers back in the
       | day. I specifically remember seeing one of them which offered
       | tips and strategies if you were stuck in a video game.
       | 
       | I would definitely love to try this out at least once. I could
       | see it being helpful.
        
         | easton wrote:
         | Nintendo had something like this in the days of the NES:
         | https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/nintendo-h...
        
           | blackrock wrote:
           | I recall seeing a video of the Nintendo support center, where
           | people (kids) would call up for video game help. And these
           | game wizards would help them step through the game.
           | 
           | I would've never thought that was a thing, much less a little
           | career while it lasted. But it provided some jobs to people,
           | whose purpose was to just play a bunch of Nintendo video
           | games.
           | 
           | I don't have the link, but maybe someone can find it on
           | YouTube somewhere.
        
             | awad wrote:
             | The Deja Vu feeling was bothering me. Luckily found it
             | pretty quickly..."High Score" Episode 2 on Netflix has the
             | most footage of what you're talking about.
             | 
             | Not quite the video, but if you don't have Netflix, this is
             | publicly available:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKAf8eXuh9s
        
               | blackrock wrote:
               | Ah yes, this was it. Good find!
               | 
               | I'm surprised it grew up from 6 to 400 support staff
               | working on this. This would've been a fun job as a
               | teenager.
        
             | artificial wrote:
             | I worked at the Redmond WA Nintendo of America location.
             | You'd get qualified to do the game support lines. The
             | starting was on setup and installs. There was a 4 week
             | onboarding program teaching you how to easily look up
             | things inside of their custom help database. The database
             | would have model numbers and give pointers on identifying
             | the input select. Identifying the equipment usually
             | involved the son/daughter since they could get behind the
             | entertainment center.
             | 
             | Super Agents were the ones who answered both support lines
             | and used a different part of the same db program. There was
             | some AS400 looking terminal for subscriptions, ticketing,
             | and creating shipping labels for say Pokemon game carts
             | that died. People naturally abused this and would send wood
             | blocks. The desks had TVs and game systems and tons of
             | issues of Nintendo Power magazines.
             | 
             | The floor was huge, hundreds of people grouped in by
             | "streets" named after characters. The cubes were in
             | clusters of six. I recall the game testers, they were in a
             | different area, playing and playing one part trying to
             | replicate issues or discover them. Sounds soul crushing.
             | The neat thing were the marketing displays, like the units
             | that would be installed at stores or showing the old card
             | games Nintendo started with. The employee store was neat,
             | getting that gold controller or other games was a breeze.
             | There was an indoor lounge full of arcade cabinets, usually
             | the cheats listed on the sides and one of the corp guys
             | would geek out on Robotron 2084 and get a score so high it
             | would reboot. Good times.
        
       | tomaszs wrote:
       | 10/10. It is a bullet proof success. Congrats from a top 2% SO
       | user who just joined
        
       | crazypython wrote:
       | Users with more than 2,000 reputation and/or at least one Gold
       | badge can give higher-quality help. I would either restrict the
       | site only to these users, or I would put them in a higher-quality
       | section. They would also get paid more, at least $1 per minute.
       | (It currently pays $0.75 per minute.)
       | 
       | I am an expert in Python and a deep Generalist with experience
       | across many domains and types of software.
       | https://stackoverflow.com/users/1459669/no%c9%a5%ca%87%ca%8e...
        
       | debarshri wrote:
       | This is cool from a Dev who needs help. It feels more like a
       | micro-consultancy or more like a call center model. It is really
       | bad from the Dev who takes the call. If I put myself in the
       | position of the Dev who takes the call, It is pretty crap. Let
       | say average call duration is 3 minutes, that means I have to take
       | 20 calls/hr. Thats 20 context-switches per hour. I have worked at
       | call centers, after first few calls in a day, people are just not
       | motivated enough to help. There is going to be mental fatigue for
       | the developer who is helping.
        
       | heavyset_go wrote:
       | I used to provide services like this, but at a much higher rate.
       | $60/hr is not competitive at all, especially if you're charging
       | by the minute without a minimum of at least one hour.
        
       | atarighat wrote:
       | It's a great idea. But this probably works best as a bounty.
        
       | e-clinton wrote:
       | I think it's a great idea, but it should cost at least $3/min or
       | more to get real talent to join. I'd pay top dollar if you can
       | also guarantee that they'll solve my issue.
        
         | euph0ria wrote:
         | +1
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | Thanks for checking it out! I could never guarantee that tho as
         | Call a Dev is mostly self-service from the standpoint of the
         | question asker and the question answerer. I wanted to reduced
         | friction as much as possible for both sides of the equation.
         | 
         | If you're willing to pay more money for more guarantee you
         | should check out codementor.io
        
       | MattGaiser wrote:
       | Is there a similar site where you can put a dollar bounty on a
       | solution for faster service? There have been SO questions where I
       | would have paid for faster attention.
        
         | dumbfounder wrote:
         | Google Answers tried this way back when for general search
         | related questions.
        
           | MattGaiser wrote:
           | I know Quora did as well.
        
         | repartix wrote:
         | Cool idea. I might work on this.
        
       | munk-a wrote:
       | A question here, it seems like the flow is:
       | 
       | 1. I post a question.
       | 
       | 2. Someone elects themselves as a candidate to answer that
       | question.
       | 
       | 3. I receive notification of the candidate and approve them
       | 
       | 4. A call happens
       | 
       | Do you have any idea around what sort of time lag would be
       | inherent in each step? Do you expect steps 1-4 to happen within a
       | half-hour window and thus be mostly instantaneous as far as phone
       | interactions go or could it go longer?
       | 
       | If you expect a quick response then I don't know if your rates
       | are high enough to keep people actively watching the question
       | board instead of checking in a few times a day - if not then I
       | think the usability of the product may suffer since scheduling
       | the call could become problematic. If I have a meeting in an hour
       | should I bother trying to set up this call or do I need to wait
       | until I have several free consecutive hours?
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | Ideally you'd post a question and get a ping within the first
         | few minutes. But there is a 1 hour max window for any question
         | to receive a ping. Once the ping comes through, if you decide
         | to accept it, then the dev has 60 seconds to answer the call.
         | 
         | As it stands, there isn't much supply of questions or devs to
         | answer them (just launched today with no early signups). I was
         | thinking one way to get around this would be to let devs
         | subscribe to email or text notifications when a questions is
         | posted with a specific tag.
        
           | munk-a wrote:
           | A diverse notification setup seems wise - otherwise yea, I
           | think solving the balancing problem is going to be an ongoing
           | struggle. The one hour limit sounds pretty wise!
        
       | ufmace wrote:
       | Site is down right now. I'm wondering if there's any mechanism to
       | verify the developer you're paying for help. If I'm going to be
       | paying, how do I know this person is actually knowledgable about
       | my problem domain and good at troubleshooting?
       | 
       | On the helper's side, since it's by the minute, it's not much
       | risk if the person is completely over their head and beyond any
       | reasonable help, you're still getting paid while you try to
       | figure that out. Except that the pay is somewhat low versus the
       | going rates for consulting work in the western world.
        
         | jcun4128 wrote:
         | Would think a feature would be rating from confirmed payments
         | by other users but that can be gamed too.
        
         | np_tedious wrote:
         | Stack Overflow rep/profile is probably a decent start
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | Interestingly today, I was posting an answer, and I added some
       | polite wordage to the bottom of what was a fairly dry post to
       | offer the [clearly new] user some encouragement. I'm also a
       | committer/developer on the project in question.
       | 
       | I was edited several times by non-contributors removing my desire
       | to be polite. What bothers me is that these words are being
       | attributed to me without my usual polite demeanor.
       | 
       | StackOverflow was pretty awesome at one point in time, but I'm
       | not providing free answers on the site anymore.
        
       | kjhughes wrote:
       | You'll need some mechanism to raise rates to attract top
       | developers.
       | 
       | Even without the first free minute and time spent reading
       | questions, the most a dev could hope to earn with this service is
       | ($0.75/min)(60 min/hr) = $45/hr. Perhaps for students or devs who
       | barely meet the 100 rep minimum requirement, that might be
       | attractive, but for the experts who've written the best Stack
       | Overflow answers, that's likely to be a (small) fraction of their
       | bill rate.
       | 
       | Free contribution is rewarding as a means of helping.
       | 
       | Well-paid contribution is rewarding for the $$$.
       | 
       | Poorly paid contribution often loses both incentives.
        
         | dheera wrote:
         | What if there were really good devs on StackOverflow in
         | developing economies that were willing to take on $45/hr
         | consulting because their day job pays them $20/hr?
         | 
         | Just because Silicon Valley developers want $300/hr doesn't
         | mean the whole world regards that as a standard.
        
           | vsareto wrote:
           | Agreed, plus the day to day answering developer questions is
           | going to be a little more tame than if you were in a job
           | constantly putting out fires or maintaining a tight and
           | stressful schedule
        
         | tyingq wrote:
         | Seems like there's a good incentive not for the best
         | developers, but for the most patient ones. Since patience in
         | this case means more paid minutes.
        
         | blackrock wrote:
         | $45/hour is a good rate for Ukrainian developers, I think. Or
         | Philippines developers.
         | 
         | That's about USD $90,000/year.
         | 
         | This is good money, if you live remotely in a lower cost of
         | living, foreign country. But it's a mediocre salary in the
         | United States. You can barely pay your expensive rent with
         | $90k/year. Actually, you'd be at poverty level. And there is
         | zero possibility of affording a house with this salary. But you
         | might be able to eke by if you live in the less competitive
         | Midwest.
        
           | dstick wrote:
           | The only issue is billable hours - will these be 100%? If the
           | platform has that liquidity, then yes - if not, chasing
           | assignments and lowering prices leads to a race to the
           | bottom.
        
           | MattGaiser wrote:
           | The poverty line for a family of 4 is $26,500 USD. [0] Median
           | full time income in the USA is $35,977. [1]
           | 
           | 90,000 is well away from poverty.
           | 
           | [0] https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_Unit
           | ed_....
        
             | jcun4128 wrote:
             | 4 people? That's nuts I was making that washing plates as a
             | single person no dependents. I think maybe less actually
             | after taxes.
        
               | MattGaiser wrote:
               | You were probably making that in California though, not
               | WV or SC. Houses are less than a year of developer pay
               | there.
        
               | jcun4128 wrote:
               | I was in KS and I was just paid "highly" eg. $12+/hr
               | although I was multi-role
               | 
               | edit: maybe less was making $11-12/hr and not full time,
               | my math was off. I was freelancing on the side though
               | before I got into the industry but yeah $20K range was my
               | figure at that time eg. just over 3 years ago(it did
               | suck, I was mad broke).
        
           | hujo wrote:
           | I'm sorry, but this is an absurd statement. You can live very
           | comfortably the vast majority of places in the US on $90,000.
           | If you can't you're in one of the most expensive cities, pay
           | a huge amount of debt servicing, or simply have unreasonable
           | standards of what you think "necessities" are.
        
           | seabird wrote:
           | Wow, sometimes this site really needs to exit the
           | stratosphere and come back down to earth. I live in the
           | Midwest and you can comfortably pay a mortgage on a sizable
           | house, all utilities, all necessities, and still have a
           | shitload left over to play with on a salary like that. By no
           | means do you have to "eke by."
           | 
           | I think the issue is a lot less that the Midwest is less
           | competitive and a lot more that the cost of living in a West
           | Coast tech bubble is exorbitant.
        
           | drran wrote:
           | $45/hour can be $0 per year on SO. Adjust your expectations.
        
         | 908B64B197 wrote:
         | And to filter out who can answer questions.
         | 
         | 45$/h will attract a LOT of attention online. And not from the
         | folks who should be answering questions. Just look at what
         | happened with Hacktoberfest [0].
         | 
         | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24658052
        
         | crazypython wrote:
         | Exactly. My usual hourly rate is a minimum of $70/hour. (I only
         | recently became a freelancer, and am still learning to maximize
         | my rates- I suspect my current rate is a small fraction of what
         | I could earn.) The only thing this provides for me is a more
         | liquid/elastic way to earn money.
         | 
         | I can and do regularly solve problems that save people hundreds
         | of hours. I would gladly pay to have someone solve my technical
         | challenges that cost me hundreds of hours.
         | 
         | (I am an expert in Python and a deep Generalist with experience
         | across many domains and types of software.)
        
         | kop316 wrote:
         | I would also argue that possibly doing it per time may be the
         | wrong incentives.
         | 
         | I have had issues that took me several hours to try to debug,
         | only to have someone else show me how to fix it in under 2
         | minutes. So that dev gets paid $1, but I would easily pay much
         | more for the fix in that issue because of how much time I sunk
         | in it.
        
           | mlyle wrote:
           | Like the old saw goes:
           | 
           | The Graybeard engineer retired and a few weeks later the Big
           | Machine broke down, which was essential to the company's
           | revenue. The Manager couldn't get the machine to work again
           | so the company called in Graybeard as an independent
           | consultant.
           | 
           | Graybeard agrees. He walks into the factory, takes a look at
           | the Big Machine, grabs a sledge hammer, and whacks the
           | machine once whereupon the machine starts right up. Graybeard
           | leaves and the company is making money again.
           | 
           | The next day Manager receives a bill from Graybeard for
           | $5,000. Manager is furious at the price and refuses to pay.
           | Graybeard assures him that it's a fair price. Manager retorts
           | that if it's a fair price Graybeard won't mind itemizing the
           | bill. Graybeard agrees that this is a fair request and
           | complies.
           | 
           | The new, itemized bill reads....
           | 
           | Hammer: $5
           | 
           | Knowing where to hit the machine with hammer: $4995
        
             | slt2021 wrote:
             | you know that some developers intentionally add "time bomb"
             | bugs and introduce bugs that trigger after certain period
             | of time - just so that they knock it off with the hammer in
             | one minute an justify their "maintenance support" contract.
             | 
             | there was a story about one european company and an Excel
             | spreadsheet with VBA code that would stop working after 3
             | months and a developer who would "unlock" it for another 3
             | mo if he has a maintenance contract
        
               | Wowfunhappy wrote:
               | Well, don't get caught then I guess.
               | 
               | https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/12/contractor-
               | admit...
               | 
               | > On Monday, David A. Tinley, a 62-year-old from Harrison
               | City, Pennsylvania, was sentenced to six months in prison
               | and a fine of $7,500 in the scheme.
        
               | erhk wrote:
               | You sound like the manager in that story looking for a
               | way to mark down the fee
        
               | judge2020 wrote:
               | The original PaaS!
        
               | ASalazarMX wrote:
               | Except you have to bring your own platform too! BYOPaaS?
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | I liked what another commenter said about adding tiers for devs
         | with higher S/O rep. So if the dev has a higher rep, they can
         | make more $ per minute. Something I'll look into adding.
         | 
         | I don't think anyone is going to make much money off of it
         | starting out since I don't have a large supply of questions
         | coming in yet, but there are a lot of underemployed devs out
         | there who would be happy to make an easy $15 bucks an hour just
         | googling answers for people and telling them what to do.
         | 
         | I think a lot of poorly-received questions on S/O are the
         | result of people not knowing where to look for their answer, or
         | being intimidated by reading the docs or source code. So they
         | post the questions hoping someone can guide them.
         | 
         | Call a Dev isn't a competitor to S/O. S/O is a wiki. Call a Dev
         | is basically Clippy in human form that you pay per minute.
        
         | Solvitieg wrote:
         | I'm not sure I agree.
         | 
         | Stackoverflow pays $0/h and attracts great answers and OSS pays
         | $0/h and attracts great developers.
        
           | debaserab2 wrote:
           | > Stackoverflow pays $0/h and attracts great answers
           | 
           | Eh...
        
           | armadsen wrote:
           | Yep, and I happily spend a fair amount of my free time
           | working on open source, as well as personal projects that I
           | don't make any money from. I'm also currently helping a
           | friend of mine learn to code just for fun and to give back.
           | But when I do contract work, I expect to be paid well. If you
           | said, "well, I'll pay you $10 / hour, and that's way better
           | than what you get for this open source you work on!", I'd not
           | only not do the job, I'd be insulted.
        
           | xboxnolifes wrote:
           | Covered
           | 
           | > Free contribution is rewarding as a means of helping
        
           | GVIrish wrote:
           | This is true, but it illustrates a key dynamic. For most
           | people, as soon as you put a dollar value on a task that
           | someone may have done for free or for fun, you have now
           | fundamentally changed that relationship.
           | 
           | If someone is doing something for only the intrinsic
           | motivation, putting a dollar value on it changes it to an
           | economic calculation. The person may still do it for money,
           | but they're more likely to only do a level of effort
           | commensurate to the economic reward. Whereas if they're doing
           | things for intrinsic reasons they may be willing to do _more_
           | work.
           | 
           | There are a couple of behavioral economics experiments that
           | bear this out. The Soma Experiment from the 70's gave
           | participants a puzzle game to solve, and measured how long
           | they tried to solve it. One group of participants was paid
           | for their time, the other wasn't. The paid group on average
           | spent less time trying to solve the puzzle than the group
           | that wasn't paid. There are a couple of other experiments in
           | that vein, but the common thread is that intrinsic motivation
           | can be more powerful than economic rewards in multiple
           | contexts.
           | 
           | So someone might be willing to contribute some code to OSS
           | for free, but if you ask them to develop some code for $30/hr
           | they might pass.
        
         | andrei_says_ wrote:
         | > Free contribution is rewarding as a means of helping.
         | 
         | > Well-paid contribution is rewarding for the $$$.
         | 
         | This is crucial. Changing incentives changes the social
         | contract and relationship and does that irrevocably.
         | 
         | I recommend Dan Ariely's book Amazing Decisions on this topic.
         | 
         | Example: You don't pay for the thanksgiving turkey dinner at
         | your inlaws' and if you did that's be rude no matter the
         | amount.
         | 
         | If you give your neighbor some fruit from the tree in your yard
         | that's one kind of relationship. If next year you try to sell
         | it that's a very different one. Transitioning from one to the
         | other is significant.
         | 
         | Lastly, financial incentives kill generosity. The giver now
         | starts to worry if they're providing too high of a value.
        
           | etothepii wrote:
           | A girlfriend's mother once asked to pay me after fixing her
           | computer.
           | 
           | I said a bottle of wine will be fine. (I'd just turned 18)
           | 
           | She said no I insist.
           | 
           | I said well my rate is PS100 an hour and it took three hours.
           | 
           | She chose to give me a bottle of wine.
        
             | erhk wrote:
             | Is 18 the drinking age in this story?
        
               | pugz wrote:
               | Given the currency (PS), I suspect so.
        
       | xtracto wrote:
       | I love it, and I think $45 USD an hour is great (it comes to
       | $7,200 USD a month) which is great for the part of the world I am
       | in.
       | 
       | My worry is about the payout, which apparently requires Stripe.
       | Personally I would be happy to receive payment in some crypto
       | (even a stablecoin), or Paypal. But having to setup a stripe
       | account seems overkill for me.
        
       | nichch wrote:
       | Interesting. I always envisioned a site where more experienced
       | devs could help out newer ones with mock interviews or coding
       | prompts to help quantify self taught coding skills.
       | 
       | I just realized services like this would probably fit the bill if
       | they also offered code reviews.
        
       | _lemur wrote:
       | Many comments highlight the issue of verifying developers. Did
       | you think of leveraging Github Sponsor program?. Developers can
       | be verified via github profile and paid through the same
       | platform.
       | 
       | [1]: https://docs.github.com/en/github/supporting-the-open-
       | source...
        
         | mcadenhe wrote:
         | Right now devs are verified through S/O and it seems to fit the
         | bill nicely because then you can vet the person's history of
         | answering questions.
        
       | kodah wrote:
       | $1/min seems like a very arbitrary threshold. That means, that
       | you as a developer, need to be making no more than $60/hr for
       | your expertise. Following Indeeds hourly to salary conversion
       | that means that if you make over $124,800/yr then you are
       | actively losing value for each minute you spend in this
       | ecosystem.
       | 
       | That may be as intended. In certain states you may never make
       | more than that, in others you may (almost) always make more than
       | that.
        
         | A12-B wrote:
         | Who is making 125k p/y that needs a second job??
        
           | kodah wrote:
           | In a high cost of living area that would most certainly be
           | the case. Usually these devs will get room mates and do other
           | cost cutting activity to compensate but I imagine they'd be
           | the ones most economically drawn to this solution other than
           | other underpaid parts of the world.
        
       | Closi wrote:
       | Considering the questions tab currently includes "What the fuck
       | is this?" and "Why is my butt full of poop?" I am going to assume
       | they will turn off anonymous posting soon.
        
       | notyourday wrote:
       | Answering questions for money even at $1/min is fine _if_ the
       | payouts work like clock work. I 'm not seeing anything that
       | indicates to me how that part works. That's the only USP. The
       | rest is just another non-liquid information market
        
       | ricardobayes wrote:
       | What a great idea. My advice to the OP is to get a few questions
       | going. I made a similar site for remote work ads but I only had
       | like 2-3 ads on it, expecting the users to fill it up. Well
       | pretty much the initial feedback was that users felt it was a
       | pre-launch/scam site because there was nothing on it. Look up how
       | reddit was started. It took a long time even for them before
       | actual users started to post.
        
       | xwdv wrote:
       | This is a profoundly inefficient way to make money. Since you
       | can't really serve multiple people simultaneously there's no
       | opportunity to apply leverage to your work, every dollar you earn
       | has to be 1 to 1 effort, and because the rates are so low very
       | few skilled devs will spend focused time on this.
       | 
       | You must raise the rates.
        
       | fabian2k wrote:
       | I'd guess that the people at Stack Overflow might have an issue
       | with someone using their name in this way. It should probably be
       | clearer that this is entirely unaffiliated.
       | 
       | 100+ reputation on SO is also a ridiculously low bar, it's almost
       | meaningless. Not that any amount of reputation by itself is a
       | sure indicator, but 100 really doesn't mean anything at all.
       | 
       | This kind of site also requires a pretty large critical mass to
       | work, you don't just want a bunch of random SO users willing to
       | participate, but you need the right users with experience in the
       | right tags to match to the requests in a reasonable timeframe.
       | 
       | There's a good reason Stack Overflow doesn't allow people to pay
       | for answers, people already cheat enough for meaningless internet
       | points, this will get much worse with real money on the line.
        
         | erhk wrote:
         | You can get 100 rep on stack overflow by getting high rep in
         | any other stack exchange site. By knowing a lot about tabletop
         | games I could sign up.
        
         | hiimtroymclure wrote:
         | I am a junior dev with ~400 reputation. Trust me you dont want
         | my help lol!
        
         | notretarded wrote:
         | Most of the higher rated accounts have their cred built up from
         | asking good questions rather than good answers.
        
       | avipars wrote:
       | You need a way to report posts ...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-22 23:00 UTC)