[HN Gopher] Silent Running: The sci-fi that predicted modern crises
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Silent Running: The sci-fi that predicted modern crises
        
       Author : bobkrusty
       Score  : 168 points
       Date   : 2021-02-21 12:25 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | fossuser wrote:
       | I've been thinking about The Machine Stops a lot since the start
       | of covid, it's wild that it was published in 1909.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops
        
         | tjr225 wrote:
         | > The two main characters, Vashti and her son Kuno, live on
         | opposite sides of the world. Vashti is content with her life,
         | which, like most inhabitants of the world, she spends producing
         | and endlessly discussing secondhand 'ideas'.
         | 
         | Woah. I'm literally doing that right now...
         | 
         | > Those who do not accept the deity of the Machine are viewed
         | as 'unmechanical' and threatened with Homelessness.
         | 
         | What!? This is insane. Thanks for sharing.
        
         | emayljames wrote:
         | How Unmechanical of you.
         | 
         | Seriously though, wow that is unbelievable how it was written
         | then.
        
       | BruceEel wrote:
       | Reminder that there's a fantastic analysis of the film over at
       | Centauri Dreams : https://www.centauri-dreams.org/2019/02/01/in-
       | wildness-is-th...
        
       | dleslie wrote:
       | Another overlooked gem from this era is "Dark Star".
       | 
       | The dreary psychological effects of prolonged confinement in
       | closed quarters seem particularly poignant today; and the dispute
       | and argument with Bomb is a delightful foreshadowing of the
       | frustrations of dealing with advanced, yet imperfect and inhuman,
       | artificial intellegences.
       | 
       | And yes, the beach ball alien was intendedt be humorous; and yes,
       | the closed-quarter panic in narrow vent shafts was inspirational
       | on later science fiction movies.
        
         | radicalbyte wrote:
         | Ty Franck (co-write of The Expanse) and Wes Chatham (Amos in
         | The Expanse) talk about this in their new postcast, well worth
         | a listen if you like sci-fi :)
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/c/TYandThatGuy
        
         | john-tells-all wrote:
         | Dark Star is wonderful!
         | 
         | Also:
         | 
         | - it's the first movie by horror movie legend John Carpenter
         | 
         | - it was co-written by Dan O'Bannon, who also wrote "Alien"
        
           | rotexo wrote:
           | I feel like the beach ball sub-plot in that movie is a
           | practice-run for Alien. Not to mention the parallels between
           | the conversations with bomb and Ash.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | rcurry wrote:
           | I love how the the origin of the terrifying duct scene in
           | Alien was the guy chasing the beachball through the ducts in
           | Dark Star. All those guys were waiting for was a proper FX
           | budget.
        
       | eggy wrote:
       | My father took me and my brother to see it at the movies, and I
       | remember me and my brother crying and my Dad consoling us. We
       | were 8 and 7 at the time. I haven't seen it since!
        
         | Procrastes wrote:
         | Right there with you. At the time it was the saddest thing I'd
         | ever seen. It's stuck with me all these years.
        
       | Joeboy wrote:
       | Love the film, but am bothered by how nonsensical the decision to
       | nuke the domes was. The linked piece explains it as "cost
       | cutting", which I don't remember from the film but anyway, how is
       | nuking something more economic than leaving it unnuked?
        
         | drcode wrote:
         | The existence of the craft could arguably obligate the
         | corporation to incur ongoing expenses for upkeep.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | In retail you see stock intentionally damaged and thrown out.
           | It's to prevent brand damage or some such crap.
           | 
           | Stuff like this happens with excess food too. https://sixfoot
           | journalism.wordpress.com/2016/05/27/kathmandu...
        
           | adrianmonk wrote:
           | When my city opened a new airport, they had plans to
           | redevelop the old one for other uses. I remember hearing
           | that, in order to stop people from fighting to keep the old
           | airport around, the city quickly destroyed a section of the
           | runways with dynamite. Supposedly this would make it cost-
           | prohibitive to try to use it as an airport again.
        
         | jonathankoren wrote:
         | TBF it was meant to be nonsensical.
         | 
         | If you need an analogy, think of unsold books. They get their
         | covers torn off so they can be reported as "destroyed", and
         | then be issued a refund. (You'll sometimes see a message
         | warning you about purchasing paperbacks without front covers in
         | books.)
         | 
         | In the movie American Airlines made an insurance claim, or made
         | some other claim of loss on the trees, and so they now have to
         | destroy them.
        
         | codewritinfool wrote:
         | Well yeah, but it goes even deeper than that, IMO, since the
         | domes could have just stayed on Earth. Why launch them into
         | space and return them later? They're terrariums with all of the
         | life support and lighting that they need.
        
           | imglorp wrote:
           | If you're making a backup ecosystem, you want it off planet
           | in case the primary meets a nuke, asteroid, virus, etc. You
           | could also park it in a stable solar orbit so it gets the
           | right sun for its biostuff.
           | 
           | It seems there's no point sending it to deep space unless
           | you're going to transplant it all on a new planet.
        
         | randcraw wrote:
         | It makes perfect sense as a politically-motivated decision.
         | Some excuse was devised to destroy the pods, thus ending the
         | debate forever of whether the Earth might one day return to a
         | green space.
         | 
         | It also forced Dern's character into action, since he would
         | have to return to Earth since his job of caring for the pods
         | was about to end.
         | 
         | The film reminds me somewhat of 'Interstellar' -- a once
         | verdant world going dark and expelling the hero.
        
         | pohl wrote:
         | Our present situation is also pretty nonsensical, though.
         | (There's no wealth on an uninhabitable planet.) Yet, here we
         | are, stampeding towards the crisis. So, if you squint, Silent
         | Running predicted that, too.
        
       | xbryanx wrote:
       | This movie does not hold up. This is the second time I've seen
       | this touted as an unheralded classic. Watch it if you need a nap!
       | Phenomenally boring and ham handed.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | I think it can be simultaneously a classic, especially in
         | historical context, and very heavy-handed. It's a good film but
         | it's also one I'm not in a big hurry to rewatch.
        
           | usrusr wrote:
           | Between the almost annoying seriousness of 2001 and the
           | irresistible madness of Dark Star, Silent Running is in an
           | very difficult spot where it's almost impossible to win
           | anything beyond honorable mention for trying.
           | 
           | But once you've sat through Tarkovsky's Tokio driving
           | sequence in a cinema those three all seem kind of superficial
           | (my opinion, and probably mine alone. And I'm not sure that
           | it would survive a re-watch of Solaris, it's been a while)
        
         | JohnJamesRambo wrote:
         | My girlfriend and I discovered it and watched it and enjoyed
         | it. But we were screaming at the tv at how nonsensical it was.
        
       | kwhitefoot wrote:
       | > "These robots, often treated by critics as little more than a
       | cute addition, "
       | 
       | That's really odd. When I saw the film all those years ago Huey,
       | Dewy, and Louie seemed to me to be essential supporting
       | characters.
        
       | gjkood wrote:
       | The two things that endeared me to this movie:
       | 
       | 1. The theme song; Joan Baez's "Rejoice in the sun"
       | 
       | 2. Huey, Dewey and Louie, the little Robots that assist Bruce
       | Dern's character Lowell in maintaining the space ship.
       | 
       | I always take the trouble to show my kids Joan Baez songs on
       | YouTube so they don't feel that good music only started with
       | their generation :). Oh what a beautiful voice!
        
       | nightfly wrote:
       | I watched Silent Running last year after learning the Steam
       | Gardens area in Super Mario Odyssey was based on it.
        
       | lovelyviking wrote:
       | Douglas Trumbull | Silent Running (1972) | the making of
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xtsNdLj1F4
        
       | boredpandas777 wrote:
       | I watched this mesmerizing sci-fi in my childhood in the early
       | 80s, nearly a decade after its original release. It left an
       | indelible mark on my psyche and it might be the reason why I hate
       | the "system" so much.
        
         | tomcam wrote:
         | Aren't you consuming this site, which is funded by one of their
         | biggest venture capital companies in the world, on a machine
         | created by "the system", and probably working for a company
         | that is part of "the system"?
        
           | mikestew wrote:
           | If your point was something other than "complains about air
           | pollution, but still breathes the air", it went right over my
           | head.
        
             | pineaux wrote:
             | I bow to you, you say it in the most simple of words.
        
           | pineaux wrote:
           | So, let me get this right: the only way you are allowed to
           | critique the system is to make yourself irrelevant by
           | becoming a techno-luddite, turning your back to society,
           | disconnecting and disappear into the woods to live of the
           | grid and self sustaining? All the critics must shut up
           | because they don't have an alternative (although if they give
           | an imperfect alternative you probably wouldn't deem it
           | feasible). This is bullshit and self serving.
           | 
           | It's like saying you aren't allowed to hate petrol cars
           | because you use a petrol car. The concept of technology being
           | solely the domain of capitalist is ludicrous. The invention
           | of technology is not bound to our economic system. This is a
           | presumption that is not based on history nor empirical
           | evidence.
           | 
           | So critique of the system is something that can be done even
           | if you like technology.
           | 
           | I would think someone who identifies with hackers would
           | understand this.
        
           | hh3k0 wrote:
           | I mean, yes but also: https://i.kym-
           | cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/330/819/e47...
        
           | TomSwirly wrote:
           | The name of this very old idea is Mr Gotcha - "We should
           | improve society." "And yet you participate in society.
           | Gotcha!"
           | 
           | https://thenib.com/mister-gotcha/
           | 
           | Needless to say, this "argument" is completely false.
        
       | ttt0 wrote:
       | Another cool one is "Event 201".
        
       | m463 wrote:
       | I loved silent running. (Except I always thought Bruce Dern
       | wasn't the best casting choice. He always seemed to have too bold
       | of a personality for a lower-key scifi movie)
       | 
       | They're right about 2001 stealing the spotlight for that time
       | period though.
        
       | muterad_murilax wrote:
       | Ugh, send this forgettable piece of crap to the trash compactor
       | already!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-21 23:01 UTC)