[HN Gopher] Kodi 19.0
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Kodi 19.0
        
       Author : danfritz
       Score  : 86 points
       Date   : 2021-02-21 08:45 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (kodi.tv)
 (TXT) w3m dump (kodi.tv)
        
       | hermitcrab wrote:
       | Kodi is great. But each time I have upgraded it some things have
       | improved and somethings have stopped working. Currently the guide
       | doesn't show which items are being recorded and there doesn't
       | seem to be any way to stop series record. But I am too scared to
       | upgrade in case it breaks everything!
        
         | covidthrow wrote:
         | Check the Kodi wiki for the plugins you use.
         | 
         | Chances are most don't work in the new version and you'll be
         | left with everything you're used to broken.
        
       | 2Gkashmiri wrote:
       | it does not have an appimage. does it?
        
       | faitswulff wrote:
       | I just want to stream media from my main computer to my devices.
       | Does Kodi cover this use case?
        
         | Nullabillity wrote:
         | Yes.[0] You just need to share it from your main computer over
         | whatever protocol you prefer, and add it to the Kodi library.
         | 
         | If you're talking about streaming _from_ Kodi, both the
         | official web interface and Yatse[1] support that. Yatse will
         | even update the Kodi library metadata based on it.
         | 
         | That said, if streaming _from_ Kodi is your primary use-case
         | then Kodi is probably not a good fit. It doesn 't really have a
         | headless mode, and it'd be more efficient to just access the
         | file share directly. Universal Media Server might be more up
         | your alley then.[2]
         | 
         | [0]: https://kodi.wiki/view/File_sharing
         | 
         | [1]: https://www.yatse.tv/
         | 
         | [2]: https://www.universalmediaserver.com/
        
         | stryan wrote:
         | Probably not, Kodi is designed more as a client. I think the
         | classic setup is installing it on a HTPC or Raspberry Pi under
         | the TV and it plays files either locally on it or from a NAS.
         | 
         | If you want to stream stuff checkout Jellyfin or Plex.
         | 
         | EDIT: To give more context since people are downvoting; yes you
         | can theoretically stream from Kodi using various other apps,
         | but it doesn't do any transcoding by default and isn't a strong
         | choice. Quite frankly, I've also never gotten it to actually
         | work but perhaps that's just me.
        
           | faitswulff wrote:
           | Thanks!
        
         | Blackthorn wrote:
         | Yes, I do it with dlna (upnp).
        
         | nkg wrote:
         | I have tried a few software, but I ended up using nginx with
         | the directive "DirectoryIndex". It allows you to browse a
         | folder from you main computer with a browser, you click some
         | media, streaming starts, nothing fancy. :)
        
       | whalesalad wrote:
       | Do people use this kind of software for anything other than
       | piracy? Serious question.
        
         | noja wrote:
         | It's a video player.
        
         | jokethrowaway wrote:
         | Mainly use it to watch YouTube
        
         | kyriakos wrote:
         | There are legit uses but I must admit piracy is the main one.
         | On the other hand some activities are legal depending where you
         | live.
        
         | aidenn0 wrote:
         | I use it via libreElec for my set top box.
         | 
         | I have ripped my entire Blu-ray collection to mkv, and also
         | watch disney plus and Netflix on it.
        
         | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
         | Kodi is a media center for playing whatever media you already
         | have, even if it is your own rips or your own purchased
         | downloads. Kodi was already a popular application for years
         | before someone decided to sell prepackaged devices running Kodi
         | that included a third-party pirate-streaming plugin.
        
           | kyriakos wrote:
           | Even if you don't use any plugins for streaming pirated
           | content a lot of people use it as a player for downloaded
           | torrents or streaming from seedboxes.
        
           | dogma1138 wrote:
           | I've used kodi since it was XBMC, "backups" was always its
           | main focus, the amount of content available as a DRM free
           | download is extremely limited and if we are realistic the
           | amount of people that do their own rips form movies they own
           | can probably fit in a movie theatre.
           | 
           | Kodi never went full on popcorn time but it's pretty useless
           | for anything but a large and quite likely pirated media
           | collection.
        
             | forty wrote:
             | You can have a DVD reader plugged to it and I also have a
             | DVB-T adapter to watch TV. There are also emulators to play
             | games nowadays (how legal that is most likely depends on
             | the country you are in).
        
         | dogma1138 wrote:
         | Probably not, unless you create backups of Blu-ray movie you
         | buy the legitimate use of Kodi and Plex is questionable, Plex
         | at least offers streaming channels.
         | 
         | I'm still waiting for a decent service to centralize all
         | available content amongst my streaming providers Apple TV seems
         | to only work with Amazon Prime atm.
         | 
         | I would pay for a service that does this, bonus points if they
         | can also tie in an automatic vpn to bypass goeblocks so you'll
         | have access to the entire library of a given provider
         | regardless of your location.
         | 
         | I tried building one at some point but no provider offers a
         | decent API to get that data and scraping them was too hard and
         | Netflix makes it very hard to do.
        
           | zodiakzz wrote:
           | Your waiting is pointless for a device as walled as an Apple
           | TV because such an app won't be allowed on a FAANG app store.
        
             | easton wrote:
             | It doesn't need to be, Apple is building that app. In fact,
             | they already have it on there, the only notable holdout for
             | the centralized progress/search functionality is Netflix.
             | Hulu, HBO Max, Disney+ and Prime are there already.
             | 
             | https://www.apple.com/apple-tv-app/
        
               | dogma1138 wrote:
               | Apple-TV only shows me prime video, I also have Disney+
               | and Netflix, it seems that Disney+ is supported based on
               | their site but not Netflix.
        
           | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
           | Some of us use it for watching legally recorded OTA
           | broadcasts.
        
         | mopsi wrote:
         | I use it as a media player for screens in a retail store. Runs
         | nicely off a Raspberry PI.
        
         | r_singh wrote:
         | I tried to use it to build a dynamic digital signage solution
         | for the medical industry and it was a nightmare.
         | 
         | I persisted and wrote a plug-in that pulled data from a file
         | that was updated with an API. I was impressed at first, but
         | soon, the inconsistency of the experience on different
         | platforms killed it for me.
         | 
         | Ultimately it was easier to run Android on an Odroid and use
         | React Native to build an app.
         | 
         | I got the use-case all wrong though. A good use case is running
         | Netflix on a Pi.
        
         | covidthrow wrote:
         | Yes. My wife and I have a strict "pay for what you consume"
         | policy in this house.
         | 
         | I'm a former "industry" professional, so I have the utmost
         | respect for people being compensated on whichever end they
         | process/release material we prefer. (Usually Blu-ray, but
         | sometimes digital if we can't find Blu-rays.) In fact, it's so
         | important to us that we have only a handful of pre-owned
         | movies/TV; all stuff we can't buy new.
         | 
         | Obviously it's a bit of a legal gray area to rip Blu-rays we
         | purchased, but we don't do anything that would prevent content
         | creators/platforms from receiving compensation. We don't
         | format-shift (i.e. If we have a DVD, we don't obtain an HD
         | version) and only rarely platform-shift (i.e. download a Blu-
         | ray if we've only purchased the streaming rights) if that's the
         | only option.
         | 
         | Legally shady but ethically sound stuff we do:
         | 
         | - torrent TV shows that we own the same-resolution discs for
         | (it's faster than ripping/transcoding hundreds of hours of
         | video)
         | 
         | - torrent TV/movies we've purchased effectively-lifetime
         | licenses for (willing to remove if for a good ethical reason a
         | platform revokes said license; hasn't happened yet though)
         | 
         | - pre-download Blu-rays we order if it'll take some time to get
         | here
         | 
         | - torrent the very limited number of broadcast TV shows we
         | record and strip ads from (this is probably the most
         | questionable thing we do, ethically)
         | 
         | Far as music, most platforms at this point allow some form of
         | non-DRM download, so we generally don't do anything unusual. We
         | use several unauthorized plugins for our music streaming
         | services, but do not download/keep anything we haven't
         | purchased.
         | 
         | We absolutely _do not_ "preview" stuff. If we want to
         | "preview", we rent the movies and watch them there. If we
         | choose to purchase, we may torrent, but generally just wait to
         | rip.
         | 
         | No doubt we're in a minority, but Kodi is an invaluable way for
         | us to consume our ethically-sourced content. (Even our
         | children's friends seem to have ethics with this stuff, i.e. if
         | they "gift" some MP3s to a peer, they'll also give them a gift
         | card so they can purchase that content. Not sure how common it
         | is, but I certainly don't remember doing this during the early
         | days of CD ripping and Napster.)
         | 
         | I don't have a huge problem with some people fudging a little
         | more than we do, but take great offense at people who use it
         | simply for the pirating plugins.
         | 
         | I don't, for example, take much issue with people geo-shifting
         | stuff they can't otherwise obtain. (The content creator is
         | still in the same $0 profit situation their publisher put them
         | in.) But stuff like Popcorn Time is really not cool for pretty
         | much anyone except people who can't obtain the content for
         | whatever reason.
         | 
         | Make of it what you will. But guns don't kill people; _people_
         | kill people.
        
           | paulie_a wrote:
           | That's not legally shady, that is just plain illegal
           | 
           | Now personally I dont pay attention or care about copyright
           | infringement. I commit plenty myself and gave done so for
           | decades. I also pay plenty on services and such for content
           | 
           | I'll continue to commit copyright infring and purchasing
           | media. But I am not going to pretend it's just legally shady,
           | it's illegal, I know it and just don't care
        
           | tom_mellior wrote:
           | You seem to torrent a lot. Do you do it without seeding?
        
             | covidthrow wrote:
             | We do not torrent a lot. I was outlining the ways in which
             | we "bend the rules" when we do. 90-95% of our digital
             | collection is self-ripped.
             | 
             | And no, we do not seed or even upload. That can make it
             | difficult to obtain stuff sometimes (bad/low reputation)
             | but we'll hop proxies if we need to.
             | 
             | And before you ask, we don't feel bad about leeching. It's
             | one thing if someone else wants to contribute to piracy,
             | but I'm not willing to myself. This is a mode of
             | convenience, not necessity. The likelihood that we would be
             | contributing to someone with similar ethical principals is
             | pretty low, so we're thankful to the folks that provide,
             | but could take it or leave it.
        
           | darknavi wrote:
           | Do you still watch your physical media? Your "pay for what
           | you consume" policy jives with me but I will virtually never
           | watch a physical Bluray.
           | 
           | I wish it was easier to buy DRM free digital media directly
           | from the people who make it. I don't like the ewaste of
           | buying something on a medium I never intend to use and I'd
           | rather pay the creators directly instead of having every
           | person in the physical goods chain take a cut of their
           | profits.
        
             | covidthrow wrote:
             | We sure do! We've had server outages/maintenance, vacation
             | travel with a self-imposed no-distracting-technology policy
             | where we still wanted to do family movie nights, and of
             | course as gifts. We also limit the children to our own
             | library, but they do not have unfettered access at night,
             | so if they want to watch something in their room to fall
             | asleep to, they are allowed 1 or 2 discs at a time.
             | 
             | We've got philosophical/psychological issues with the
             | unending smorgasbord of streaming services, so the children
             | aren't allowed to use those alone for the most part. They
             | have full access to our family library, but they often
             | prefer the discs for some reason. (Our oldest has a DVD she
             | watches frequently and refers to it as "retro".)
             | 
             | We've got external SSD drives with our favorites (since a
             | few server-downtime left us wanting something more
             | convenient--we keep most of our 3+ year old discs in a
             | fireproof safe), but new stuff is often watched by the kids
             | on disc.
             | 
             | And before you ask, no, the safe isn't "for the discs".
             | It's just large enough to have plenty of room for them in
             | CD cases, and that's a pretty reasonable backup in case of
             | disaster. Not sure I understand why some of our friends
             | happily show off $80,000 worth of Blu-rays or $100,000
             | worth of vinyl in their living rooms. I'd hate to have to
             | recreate our collection, so why bother if we can easily
             | protect it?
        
         | Bayart wrote:
         | There's a surprising number of people who archive and read from
         | NAS/server their physical media. I've always been tempted to
         | believe it was nothing more than a cope-out to justify the
         | existence of software that facilitates mass piracy (because I
         | myself don't see the point of it for anything else than analog
         | media), but it seems to be at least a very active niche.
        
         | parrellel wrote:
         | It's a nice interface for a media pc / diy dvr, and having
         | searchable metadata is nice. I'd have it set up right now but
         | they are terrible with plugin compatibility between versions,
         | and the hacks various people have done to provide front-ends
         | for legitimate streaming services are touch-and-go.
         | 
         | The blatant piracy angle does seem to be the bigger market at
         | this point.
        
       | clircle wrote:
       | Kodi is very awesome, but never worked well for me. This bug
       | rendered it unusable. Hope it has been or can be fixed.
       | 
       | https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=344992
        
       | NortySpock wrote:
       | I've been enjoying Kodi 18 "Leia" as both a NAS video client for
       | the TV and as a game system emulator.
       | 
       | Multiplayer arcade games from the early nineties have been
       | especially well received when we have company over... Cadillacs
       | and Dinosaurs, and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles work great as 2-3
       | player brawlers.
       | 
       | Raspberry Pi 3 is great for the sprite-based graphics but
       | basically can't keep up with 3D graphics; no big deal though as
       | long as you respect that limitation.
       | 
       | I'll keep an eye on Kodi 19 Matrix and see if I spot a compelling
       | reason to update.
        
       | alibert wrote:
       | If anyone has free time and is willing to, I think the Kodi team
       | is looking for Android developers as the Android version is
       | unmaintained.
       | 
       | https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=360369&pid=3012332#...
        
         | jahlove wrote:
         | ugh, I suppose that's why the android TV (shield TV) version
         | feels so unpolished?
        
         | izacus wrote:
         | That explains why there's no actual support for AndroidTV
         | services and background refresh.
        
         | ur-whale wrote:
         | Why would you want to run Kodi on Android when you can run it
         | on Linux ?
         | 
         | Not trying to be snarky, really want to understand.
        
           | kyriakos wrote:
           | Cause there are hundreds of cheap android TV boxes one can
           | buy which don't run Linux. Also kodi for android runs on
           | amazon's fire sticks and Googles new chromecast (the Google
           | tv one)
        
           | covidthrow wrote:
           | Many people have Android TV on their TVs, or boxes like
           | Nvidia Shield.
           | 
           | While a Raspberry Pi is a pretty simple way to get Linux/Kodi
           | on the TV, getting it to _integrate_ well is a whole other
           | story. (Remotes, CEC, other services like Netflix, etc.)
           | 
           | I'm your typical Linux hacker of 20 years, but even I
           | switched from Raspberry Pi to Nvidia Shield a couple years
           | ago because the pain of using and maintaining it is so much
           | lower for an interface that should be as simple as "pick and
           | play".
        
             | pjmlp wrote:
             | Android TV already has apps that do a much better job than
             | Kodi, so the question remains.
             | 
             | To pick one of your examples, Netflix has its own app.
        
               | covidthrow wrote:
               | Netflix has a better app to use the Netflix service, but
               | it's totally useless for our own collection.
               | 
               | Kodi is easily the best game in town to consume self-
               | hosted media. Or, at least navigate it.
        
           | boudin wrote:
           | I run it on an Android TV. I'm thinking of plugging small
           | device running Linux though, like a raspberry pi because my
           | tv (a sony from 2015) is not maintained anymore as the last
           | update introduced a huge amount of bugs (the tv can't play a
           | lot of h264 videos, h263 videos doesn't work at all).
        
             | bonzini wrote:
             | This is why my next TV will just be a 43" monitor, not
             | anything "smart". After all that's how I am using my
             | current TV set, which does not even have a DVB tuner. Since
             | modern TVs are effectively computers that are controlled
             | with a remote control, I might as well use a real computer
             | and manage myself the software that it runs.
        
           | heyitsme wrote:
           | Just to add what others said, could also run it on android
           | tables. Sadly, the linux-running tablet options aver very
           | limited.
        
           | xbmcuser wrote:
           | You can use streaming apps on the same device not so with
           | linux. On Kodi android you can even get 4k hdr netflix with
           | the input steam addon.
        
           | sosuke wrote:
           | Easy to install and use on several Android TV boxes out
           | there. NVIDIA Shield perhaps?
        
         | covidthrow wrote:
         | I've gotta say, this was the most irresponsible Kodi release
         | yet.
         | 
         | It's never been _fun_ to upgrade Kodi (something inevitably
         | breaks), but this is by far the worst upgrade of all. And now
         | to find out that the _automatically updated_ version that
         | showed up on my Android TV is _unmaintained_..?! That takes the
         | cake.
         | 
         | Even though Python 2 was set to EOL with _6 years_ warning (12
         | if you count the original timeline), Kodi didn 't announce a
         | change until last summer, I believe. So of course the vast
         | majority of completely useful, basic utility plugins weren't
         | updated, there was no enforced transitional upgrade path, and
         | now we're stuck with an unmaintained Android version that
         | contains this massive codebase change and 80% broken plugins.
         | 
         | Don't get me wrong, I'm very grateful for all the work the Kodi
         | devs do. It's an immensely helpful program and by far the most
         | used in my house. But this whole thing reeks of bad decisions.
         | 
         | There are no doubt going to be a significant number of issues
         | found once plugins are upgraded (how can you tell the new
         | system is stable enough for release when there are so
         | exceedingly few plugins that work anymore?), and Android users
         | are indefinitely in the dark as issues arise.
         | 
         | This version didn't _have_ to be pushed out to Google Play, and
         | knowing there was no maintainer makes such a choice hugely
         | irresponsible.  "We had to upgrade from Python 2.6 in case
         | there are CVEs in the now defunct version!" makes sense. But
         | now we have an unmaintained version in Android that broke
         | everything, so if there are CVEs... guess who's not getting
         | them? (Granted, it's sandboxed, so I'm not sure the concern
         | makes a lot of sense on Android, but still.)
         | 
         | The Python 2/3 netsplit has been such a thorn for so long, so I
         | can't entirely blame the Kodi devs. And it's not like a Kodi
         | 18/19 netsplit would be a "good" idea. But this automatic,
         | breaking change with no warning and no maintainer is seriously
         | bad form.
         | 
         | "We're lucky we got the final Android 19 Matrix build out at
         | all," is definitely not how I see it. "Lucky" would be Android
         | users missing this very broken upgrade until they got all their
         | ducks in a row and maybe more plugins are updated.
         | 
         | (And the whole, "well fix it/maintain it yourself," is a pretty
         | poor response to bad project management in a project of this
         | size, in case anyone is so inclined to suggest that. I maintain
         | enough other OSS right now, thank you.)
         | 
         |  _walks off stage_
        
           | romanvm wrote:
           | It was announced in January 2018 that Kodi 19 will move to
           | Python 3 so addon devs had plenty of time.
        
             | covidthrow wrote:
             | Thank you for clarifying that.
             | 
             | After my Kodi 19 broke, I went searching for some
             | discussion on the plugins I use. Pretty much every
             | discussion I saw where the dev of the broken plugin
             | acknowledged the transition did so during last summer.
             | 
             | Not sure if it was just coincidence, or if Kodi said,
             | "look, y'all, we're moving forward! Get on it!"
             | 
             | That makes this release a little better. Still doesn't make
             | releasing a known-unmaintained version on a platform more
             | palatable, though.
        
           | hedora wrote:
           | I wonder how hard it is to move a big codebase like this off
           | of python to a language where programs have a longer half
           | life.
           | 
           | Alternatively, has anyone considered creating an LTS python
           | version? Back in the old days, debian's perl maintainers
           | effectively did this for a subset of cpan, and it worked
           | well.
        
             | beagle3 wrote:
             | Python 2.7 was the previous LTS version: it lived for 8
             | years IIRC, of which 5 weren't originally planned.
             | 
             | Even LTS versions get sunset at some point.
        
             | covidthrow wrote:
             | Both Lua and Ruby--very embeddable scripting languages--
             | have had excellent track records of forwards compatibility.
             | (Usually requiring extremely simple changes if that.)
             | 
             | Python went the way of Perl 5/6 (though to a much lesser
             | extent) with their upgrade and broke several fundamental
             | language features.
             | 
             | To this day, I still don't understand the aesthetic reason
             | people seem to prefer Python over something like Ruby. I
             | get all the institutional reasons (Python was adopted by
             | academia), and I get the performance reasons (Python used
             | to be much faster), but with the exception of scientific
             | stuff, the library support is pretty darn identical between
             | the two languages.
             | 
             | And, at least among the few people I taught Ruby to that
             | had previous Python experience, every single one said, "oh,
             | this is a _lot_ easier to understand /use."
             | 
             | Obviously, opinions are like... well. But my very humble
             | opinion of Python is that its reputation is undeserved, is
             | _not_ as intuitive as a pseudocode language as Ruby is, and
             | frankly I think the really painful, protracted transition
             | from Python 2.6 to 3 is more a product of people who really
             | only understand 1 programming language not wanting to
             | change. (I see it as the modern BASIC.)
             | 
             | But I'm not here to start a flame war. Just saying there
             | are other reasonable languages that are easy to learn and
             | much more stable than Python's 2/3 transition.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | dchuk wrote:
       | Has anyone migrated from Plex to Kodi who can weigh in on whether
       | it was worth it? I have a solid little raspberry PI based home
       | media streaming & download setup, with Plex as the central media
       | app, but I've been curious about if kodi is wholesale better in
       | some regards.
        
         | covidthrow wrote:
         | We use Emby Server to maintain watch status sync and various
         | not-Kodi-friendly devices in our house. The TVs use Emby
         | through Kodi because of Kodi's superior interface and
         | processing.
         | 
         | Kodi 19/Matrix broke that, however, so now we're just streaming
         | directly from the NAS until it's resolved on Emby's end.
         | 
         | While the 2 experiences are nearly identical, we like the per-
         | user/other device stuff that Emby brings in. (As well as
         | outside-the-home streaming when we travel.) If you don't need
         | or care about that stuff, just pulling from a central data
         | store works very nicely in stand-alone Kodi.
         | 
         | The Emby and Plex apps are trash compared to Kodi if you care
         | about flexibility/customization.
        
         | colordrops wrote:
         | I couldn't figure out how to bypass logging into Plex with the
         | latest version, so I dumped it and moved to Jellyfin which is
         | fully open source. It does all I need, including having both
         | Roku and Android apps, and supports DLNA so I can stream to
         | various devices around the house. Don't miss Plex at all.
        
           | kyriakos wrote:
           | Unfortunately there's no support for Samsung tizen TVs which
           | is keeping me on plex
        
             | dexterdog wrote:
             | Samsung TVs are so horrible with spyware that it is best to
             | keep them off the network and use an attached device like a
             | Shield or Roku. This is also true with most other "smart
             | TVs"
        
               | kyriakos wrote:
               | I understand the spyware part but one thing i noticed is
               | that i dont get any ads which a lot of people I saw
               | complaining about online. I think ads are location based
               | and i'm outside their zone.
        
         | Vaslo wrote:
         | I use both. Plex is better for the less technical members of my
         | family. I burned all my wife's Workout DVDs and she uses it
         | with ease. For HDR movies I prefer Kodi. My understanding is
         | that plex transcodes from the originating machine where as Kodi
         | will transcode on the machine that receives it - so the HDR
         | films get transcoded on a machine with a graphics card.
         | 
         | For some systems they come as simple apps you can just fire up,
         | or you can have the separate apps load up. Not hard to switch
         | between them.
        
           | oefrha wrote:
           | Transcoding on the receiving end doesn't make sense to me. If
           | you're trying to save bandwidth, transcoding on the receiving
           | end is obviously pointless. If you're transcoding just to
           | play an unplayable codec, well, why not just get a better
           | player that supports the codec? What am I missing?
        
             | Nullabillity wrote:
             | Kodi doesn't do any transcoding, it's up to the player to
             | support the codec.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | heyitsme wrote:
         | I have a computer on my network that runs an nfs server and
         | hosts media, then use kodi on nvidia shields (or other
         | computers) to access it. It works extremely well... as in not
         | even a single issue for years now. I should stress that this is
         | at the level of just serving files, as I don't show any
         | metadata associated with the media (as it's mainly personal
         | home movies, etc).
        
           | forty wrote:
           | How do you authenticate to the nfs server? Did you setup
           | kerberos ?
           | 
           | I have always been reluctant to go that path, it felt to
           | complex for my home use case. I generally use ftp instead for
           | this reason, but I guess it's not as efficient.
        
             | heyitsme wrote:
             | I don't password protect the media files on the nfs server
             | - they are visible password-free from any machine on my
             | local network. Of course if someone has sensitive material
             | and/or the local network is shared, say, then some extra
             | setup is needed.
             | 
             | EDIT: another common use-case for me is basically grabbing
             | lots of youtube videos/playlists via youtube-dl, which then
             | lets me watch them on anything and everything than can run
             | kodi commercial-free without jumping through hoops (i.e.
             | browser addons or sideloading third party youtube apps,
             | etc)
        
             | 29083011397778 wrote:
             | I share my media on an Ubuntu server via NFS - all I've
             | done is set the shared media library as read-only for the
             | devices it's shared with, and specify the (local, reserved)
             | IP it should be sent to. The only authentication is the
             | fact that it's LAN-only, and being sent to the right
             | (local) IP
             | 
             | Kerberos would be _far_ too complex to be warranted here -
             | all that 's needed is nfs-kernel-server and /etc/exports on
             | the server side.
             | 
             | Granted, my network is reasonably locked-down (MAC address
             | filtering, (reserved) IP addresses available matching the
             | number of devices on the network), but security beyond that
             | has never really crossed my mind.
        
       | madaerodog wrote:
       | Kodi V19 is going to give dyslexics readers like me shivers :P
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-21 23:02 UTC)