[HN Gopher] Researchers propose that humidity from masks may les...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Researchers propose that humidity from masks may lessen severity of
       Covid-19
        
       Author : elsewhen
       Score  : 93 points
       Date   : 2021-02-14 16:13 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nih.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nih.gov)
        
       | ndnfjttkrk wrote:
       | One unexpected discovery for me was that wearing a tight FFP3
       | mask is quite pleasant during cold winter weather.
       | 
       | It's very effective at warming up the air, probably because it
       | mixes it with the one in the dead space.
        
         | deftnerd wrote:
         | I've had the same experience in general. my lips often get
         | chapped in sub freezing weather, but that hasn't happened this
         | year.
        
           | trhway wrote:
           | now once some designer/fashion gets a wind of it, the masks
           | will become a new niche clothing item - a nose/lips warmer
           | like say ear mufflers.
        
         | CarVac wrote:
         | It's pleasant in short bursts but I find that after walking to
         | work for 25 minutes in sub-freezing weather, my mask gets
         | clogged with condensation and becomes stifling to breathe
         | through.
         | 
         | During the spring though, I found that wearing a mask
         | completely prevented all of my seasonal allergy symptoms.
        
         | MisterBastahrd wrote:
         | I found that too, especially when I had some bronchial / throat
         | irritation that would normally encourage me to cough.
        
         | Jabbles wrote:
         | This is probably because it eliminates the wind chill factor.
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | Yeah it basically acts like a ski mask for a good portion of
           | your face.
        
         | switch007 wrote:
         | And even that benefit isn't enough for many people to wear
         | masks unless absolutely required (e.g. inside shops). It's been
         | unusually cold the past few weeks in the UK and I've seen less
         | and less mask usage on busy streets and even shop queues.
        
           | Wowfunhappy wrote:
           | I can't speak for anyone else, but in NYC I've been finding I
           | _have_ to take my mask off outside or I _literally_ can 't
           | see, because that's how much my glasses fog up. Like, I
           | walked straight into a pole one night.
           | 
           | After that, I decided that the increased risk of getting
           | COVID was lower than the risk of getting hit by a car.
           | 
           | I do know it's not this bad for everyone, and I have tried
           | different methods to mitigate it--anti-fog spray, different
           | masks, etc. From what I've read it's largely dependent on the
           | shape of your face, so I assume I just lost the lottery
           | there.
        
             | afterburner wrote:
             | Try tucking the mask slightly _under_ your glasses. And
             | make sure the nose strip has metal and can bend to the
             | shape of your face.
        
             | cjlars wrote:
             | You can almost 100% solve the issue by taping the top edge
             | of the mask to your face with surgical tape. Just a 6 inch
             | strip of tape along your nose and under each eye and
             | glasses fogging was 98% gone for me. It's probably not the
             | most comfortable for some people, but not so different from
             | wearing a band-aid. Very cheap and works with almost any
             | mask.
        
               | JohnCohorn wrote:
               | Also makes it hard to take off and on. Something I do
               | frequently when I'm out and about as there's no point in
               | wearing the annoying thing in my car or outdoors away
               | from crowds.
        
             | switch007 wrote:
             | Oh, I sympathise even though I don't wear prescriptions. I
             | do like to wear sunglasses quite often, and even thought
             | it'd help reduce a vector of infection. But I can't get a
             | mask and sunglasses combo that works for more than 10
             | seconds!
        
             | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
             | I mitigate it by simply not covering my nose. Before I
             | started doing that, condensation on my glasses was so bad
             | on certain days, that I had to have my partner lead me by
             | the hand across pedestrian crossings, because I could see
             | neither the lights nor cars.
             | 
             | Mask laws were instituted to get people to cover both nose
             | and mouth, but it is interesting to see different levels of
             | observance across Europe. In small-town Poland, for
             | example, I see a lot of people not covering their nose,
             | while in Romania I saw that people were very diligent about
             | covering their whole face, and I have laughed to watch
             | Albanian news and see that a lot of people in the street
             | just have the mask over their chin with neither mouth nor
             | nose covered.
        
               | Wowfunhappy wrote:
               | > I mitigate it by simply not covering my nose. Before I
               | started doing that, condensation on my glasses was so bad
               | on certain days, that I had to have my partner lead me by
               | the hand across pedestrian crossings, because I could see
               | neither the lights nor cars.
               | 
               | So it's not just me! But, if you're not actively talking
               | (ie, your mouth is closed), is wearing a mask below your
               | nose any better than just taking it off? I figure at that
               | point, I might as well put it in my back pocket.
        
               | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
               | I couldn't take it off entirely, because in the countries
               | I have been this winter masks are required outdoors by
               | law, and taking it off could lead to fines if police saw
               | me.
        
             | ficklepickle wrote:
             | My brothers work supplies masks with an internal nose flap
             | to prevent steaming up their safety glasses.
             | 
             | It seems to be very effective. I can't find a picture,
             | unfortunately my description leaves a lot to be desired.
             | 
             | But it's a common problem and there are a variety of
             | products that try to address it.
        
       | johnohara wrote:
       | This story from back in April 2020 made the rounds but didn't
       | receive the attention it may have deserved [0].
       | 
       | I cited this story because it pointed out that the air was heated
       | along with being humidified.
       | 
       | This is the original press release from U of C Medicine [1].
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://chicago.suntimes.com/coronavirus/2020/4/25/21236187/...
       | 
       | [1]https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/coronavirus-
       | disea...
        
       | Jabbles wrote:
       | What about humidity of the environment? Is that a reason behind
       | the success of countries like Thailand, Vietnam in tackling
       | Covid?
       | 
       | Possibly relevant study:
       | https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-virology-0...
        
         | xxpor wrote:
         | Places like the US have wildly varying levels of humidity,
         | seems like a good place to study that
        
           | bpodgursky wrote:
           | You'd have to separate out the effect of AC though. In the
           | hottest and wettest parts of the country, people may actually
           | live more of their lives in cold and dry air-conditioned
           | environments than in the north...
        
             | xxpor wrote:
             | Oof, that's a good point. And lots of people in the inland
             | west (we're it's _extremely_ dry) have whole home
             | humidifiers...
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | Related, when it comes to youth sports as vectors for
         | coronavirus transmission, ice hockey is a clear outlier, and
         | the low humidity levels in ice rinks is a primary theorized
         | reason:
         | https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/12/04/hockey-covi...
        
         | doliveira wrote:
         | Yeah Brazil and specifically Manaus in the middle of the Amazon
         | rainforest is doing a great job.
        
           | scythe wrote:
           | Considering that Brazilian scientists described the
           | government's strategy as an "institutional strategy to spread
           | the coronavirus"[1] _and_ they 're reporting a lower death
           | rate than France[2], you have to figure something in Brazil
           | is working in humanity's favor. It can't make up for
           | (probably) the worst policies in the world, of course.
           | 
           | [1]: https://english.elpais.com/americas/2021-01-29/study-
           | finds-t...
           | 
           | [2]: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
        
             | sjg007 wrote:
             | Your hypothesis does not square with the unfolding tragedy.
             | 
             | https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/what-we-do/news-
             | storie...
        
             | CorrectHorseBat wrote:
             | I don't think you can conclude anything from those numbers.
             | On the one hand Brazil is very likely underreporting and
             | has a much younger population, but on the other hand their
             | medical care is not as good.
        
             | maxerickson wrote:
             | A bit more than 20% of the people in France are over 65.
             | 
             | For Brazil, it's a bit more than 9%.
             | 
             | We know very well that age is a significant factor.
        
               | doliveira wrote:
               | I've seen some estimates that with the same age
               | distribution as Brazil France would have had half the
               | number of deaths:
               | https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-55847831
               | (Portuguese link)
        
             | doliveira wrote:
             | It may be a factor, but it's a pretty big leap to say
             | that's what is behind countries' successes and failures. I
             | mean, I've even seen people claiming it's due to "Asians
             | eating a lot of fish".
             | 
             | The most obvious explanation is (even literally) right in
             | front of our noses: politics, culture and age distribution.
        
           | muststopmyths wrote:
           | Sarcasm?
           | 
           | https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6.
           | ..
           | 
           | ( _Resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite high
           | seroprevalence_ )
        
             | doliveira wrote:
             | Yes, pure sarcasm. Quite a catastrophe there. And a
             | cautionary tale for what happens when denialists get their
             | way.
        
         | JohnCohorn wrote:
         | A recent paper showed that obesity was related to spreading
         | sars-cov-2 more readily, not just the severity of disease of
         | the obese individual. The US and UK are world leaders in both
         | obesity and virus spread. And the countries doing well with the
         | virus are healthy and well within the normal weight range. I
         | don't honestly believe it will be as simple as this, but it's
         | amusing to think this _could_ be the big surprise connection.
         | 
         | https://www.pnas.org/content/118/8/e2021830118?fbclid=IwAR3q...
        
         | weberer wrote:
         | It seems that way. Here's another analysis of studies that
         | focused on indoor humidity.
         | 
         | >"If the relative humidity of indoor air is below 40 percent,
         | the particles emitted by infected people absorb less water,
         | remain lighter, fly further through the room and are more
         | likely to be inhaled by healthy people. In addition, dry air
         | also makes the mucous membranes in our noses dry and more
         | permeable to viruses," summarizes Dr. Ajit Ahlawat.
         | 
         | https://www.tropos.de/en/current-issues/press-releases/detai...
         | 
         | Actual paper:
         | 
         | https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-20-06-covid-0302
        
         | DennisP wrote:
         | Thailand and Vietnam also had 95% compliance with mask wearing.
         | 
         | https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/28979/what-s-be...
        
           | timr wrote:
           | And so does the US:
           | 
           | https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20201022/mask-use-by-
           | america...
           | 
           | https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/27/more-
           | americ...
           | 
           | Break it down by county or state, and you'll find that many
           | of the the areas with the highest reported compliance have
           | the worst overall metrics:
           | 
           | https://delphi.cmu.edu/covidcast/?date=20210209&region=42003.
           | ..
           | 
           | (and before anyone says it: sure, you can argue that mask-
           | wearing correlates with population density or _some other
           | factor_ that leads to greater disease prevalence, but doesn
           | 't that just beg the original question? People are wearing
           | masks the most in the places with the highest disease
           | prevalence. If "the reason" that Vietnam did well is mask
           | compliance...well, why didn't it work just as well here?)
        
             | scythe wrote:
             | >And so does the US:
             | 
             | This is _not_ my actual experience in the United States. It
             | 's practically impossible to find a laundromat in Rhode
             | Island that isn't constantly full of maskless noses, and
             | we're a blue state.
        
             | deepnet wrote:
             | SNIP
             | 
             | " Our review of the literature offers evidence in favor of
             | widespread mask use as source control to reduce community
             | transmission: Nonmedical masks use materials that obstruct
             | particles of the necessary size; people are most infectious
             | in the initial period postinfection, where it is common to
             | have few or no symptoms (45, 46, 141); nonmedical masks
             | have been effective in reducing transmission of respiratory
             | viruses; and places and time periods where mask usage is
             | required or widespread have shown substantially lower
             | community transmission.
             | 
             | The available evidence suggests that near-universal
             | adoption of nonmedical masks when out in public, in
             | combination with complementary public health measures,
             | could successfully reduce Re
             | 
             | to below 1, thereby reducing community spread if such
             | measures are sustained. Economic analysis suggests that
             | mask wearing mandates could add 1 trillion dollars to the
             | US GDP (32, 34).
             | 
             | Models suggest that public mask wearing is most effective
             | at reducing spread of the virus when compliance is high
             | (39). "
             | 
             | FROM
             | 
             | An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19 by Jeremy
             | Howard, Austin Huang, et al.
             | 
             | https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118
        
             | hvac wrote:
             | How would those same places be doing without masks?
        
             | ZeroGravitas wrote:
             | Both your links claim less than 95% compliance, and both
             | suggest a recent, marked improvement in mask wearing from
             | earlier dates (but still well after the start of the
             | pandemic).
        
       | MengerSponge wrote:
       | I don't work in the biological sciences, but my money's on the
       | variolation argument more than the humidity behind your mask.
       | https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2026913
       | 
       | Here's why:
       | 
       | Humidity affects the dessication of droplets, which in turn
       | shifts what fraction become airborne (as aerosols) or settle out
       | (as droplets). In the tiny enclosed volume between your face and
       | your mask, that difference doesn't matter, because the whole
       | volume is exchanged multiple times with each breath.
       | 
       | Masks reduce the number of viruses that you're exposed to, so
       | even if you are exposed to enough to make you sick, you get less
       | sick than you would have otherwise.
        
         | andylei wrote:
         | > Humidity affects the dessication of droplets, which in turn
         | shifts what fraction become airborne (as aerosols) or settle
         | out (as droplets). In the tiny enclosed volume between your
         | face and your mask, that difference doesn't matter, because the
         | whole volume is exchanged multiple times with each breath.
         | 
         | The article doesn't say anything about droplets or the number
         | of viral particles you get exposed to. From the article:
         | 
         | > hydration of the respiratory tract is known to benefit the
         | immune system.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ppf wrote:
       | It does seem to me that this has been done ass-backwards. That is
       | - first mask mandates (and in many countries, too), then the
       | research that supports the idea that they do anything. Or, in
       | this case, "researchers propose".
        
         | lucb1e wrote:
         | What would you propose we do instead? Give a group masks and
         | tell a control group explicitly to not wear masks, then see who
         | contracts COVID more often?
         | 
         | There is such a thing called ethics. You can't experiment on
         | people when you have good reason to expect something will be
         | harmful for them, like feed them cancerous stuff to see what
         | happens. But you can check what happened to the people that
         | didn't comply, for example those that accidentally ate that
         | food, and still learn something.
         | 
         | Telling people to wear masks, even if there is a chance it
         | doesn't help, is not a weird idea during a pandemic. The chance
         | of it being counterproductive was fairly negligible compared to
         | the chance of it helping, and so you should do it.
         | 
         | Or did I misunderstand what you meant there?
        
         | sofixa wrote:
         | No, mask mandates were because masks stop you from inflecting
         | other people if you're sick and don't know it yet by stopping
         | the air you exhale and limiting its range.
         | 
         | This is research that wearing a mask actually help you have a
         | lesser form of Covid, entirely independently of propagation.
        
       | luxuryballs wrote:
       | I propose that when handled by the average citizen they also
       | increase the risk of bacterial pneumonia as you filter your warm
       | moist breath through a bacteria catcher/cultivator.
        
         | mrfusion wrote:
         | Wrong narrative, bro.
        
         | doliveira wrote:
         | Is that the new "theory"? Have you guys dropped the whole "O2
         | and CO2 levels" thing already?
        
           | luxuryballs wrote:
           | Who is "you guys"? You don't get to be the gatekeeper on
           | biology and medicine. This is a very reasonable concern. The
           | mouth is one of the dirtiest places on the body, which is why
           | human bites are so dangerous. Bacteria transfers from hands
           | which is why we promote washing hands. The logic follows this
           | hypothesis.
        
             | ceejayoz wrote:
             | > The mouth is one of the dirtiest places on the body,
             | which is why human bites are so dangerous.
             | 
             | To _others_ , with _broken skin_.
             | 
             | We're inhaling air that passes through our own dirty mouths
             | pretty regularly without getting infected by it already.
        
         | tasty_freeze wrote:
         | If one were to wear the same pair of underwear every day
         | without washing them, you'd probably smell bad and end up with
         | nasty rashes. But unless you are homeless where it is
         | difficult, everybody changes their underwear daily and washes
         | it after every use.
         | 
         | If you don't wash your plates, bowls, and utensils, you can get
         | sick due to crud which has grown on the residual cruft. That is
         | why people wash them between uses.
         | 
         | If you are using your mask long enough that it is developing
         | bacterial growths, that is your fault and isn't flaw of the
         | mask. Wash your mask after every use, giving it ample dwell
         | time in the soap before rinsing it. Wring it out, hang it to
         | dry, no problems.
        
         | ceejayoz wrote:
         | We'd have an absolutely massive uptick in non-COVID pneumonia
         | if that were the case.
         | 
         | (It'd also be a known phenomenon for surgeons, dentists,
         | nurses, painters, drywall installers, nail technicians, etc.
         | who've been using masks for decades.)
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | luxuryballs wrote:
           | How do you know we don't? They are instructed by CDC to mark
           | them as covid even if unsure.
        
             | ceejayoz wrote:
             | We know because, again, various professions have been using
             | masks extensively for decades without all dropping dead of
             | pneumonia.
             | 
             | Your theory also falls down with the spikey nature of
             | hospitalizations/deaths. If it were the masks, you'd see a
             | steadily high count of these, not outbreaks that come and
             | go. The big early spikes in Italy and NYC were before
             | masking at all became a thing, even.
        
               | sofixa wrote:
               | > The big early spikes in Italy and NYC were before
               | masking at all became a thing, even.
               | 
               | And the first wave, which triggered the first wave of
               | lockdowns, was all during the time where there were
               | barely enough masks for medical personnel, let alone the
               | general public.
        
         | yborg wrote:
         | Totally disagree with this thesis but disagree with the
         | downvotes as well. I think it's important to understand the
         | mentality of the anti- crowd.
        
       | protoman3000 wrote:
       | Why do so many people exist, who outright disregard any public
       | hygiene?
       | 
       | Why do you enter a public bathroom, touch your privates with
       | unwashed hands and then leave without washing your hands? Why do
       | you spit on the floor? Why do you sneeze and cough in public
       | transport without covering your mouth and nose?
       | 
       | Can stupidity or ignorance alone explain this germ spreading
       | behavior? What are the psychological mechanisms behind these
       | highly infectious people? What's wrong with them? At least we
       | need an explanation for why we are suffering this huge amount of
       | pain!
        
         | vbezhenar wrote:
         | They exist to train your immune system.
        
       | nmstoker wrote:
       | I wonder if they're any similar effect at play worth those who
       | sleep/breathe with their mouth open vs closed.
       | 
       | Would need proper testing but the "arm chair" thinking here is
       | two fold:
       | 
       | 1. the nasal passage is specifically intended to help inhaled air
       | warm and be mildly humidified
       | 
       | 2. A tendency to sleep with your mouth open is more common in
       | those who are overweight and they've often been observed to be
       | hit worse by Covid
       | 
       | I'm mainly thinking point 1 here, as point 2 is probably just a
       | convenient coincidence, but you never know (until it's tested or
       | at least considered by more of an expert in this field than me
       | the amateur!)
        
         | SubiculumCode wrote:
         | To add to your thinking: COVID infection is usually most
         | dominant in the nasal passages. The lungs are less vulnerable
         | to infection, but may get infected via the upper respiratory
         | system via aspiration. This is a really interesting read:
         | 
         | https://sph.unc.edu/sph-news/researchers-map-how-coronavirus...
        
         | loveistheanswer wrote:
         | There is indeed compelling evidence that nose breathing has
         | many health benefits compared to mouth breathing. Including but
         | not limited to better sleep, and immume function.
         | 
         | https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/health-benefits-of-br...
        
         | DoofusOfDeath wrote:
         | When sleeping, do obese people generally do more mouth-
         | breathing? (IIRC, obesity is a major risk factor for sleep
         | apnea.)
         | 
         | If so, it might take some legwork to untangle those two factors
         | (mouth breathing vs other obesity issues) to explain covid's
         | disproportionate impact on obese people.
        
       | dstola wrote:
       | Humidity also encourages bacterial growth and I doubt inhaling
       | that constantly is healthy
        
         | pbourke wrote:
         | That is easily remediated by washing cloth masks after use.
        
           | faitswulff wrote:
           | Not to mention staying out of public spaces, obviating the
           | need for masks.
        
       | pbourke wrote:
       | It seems like wearing a mask in some environments (public
       | transit, crowded shops, etc) might be a good practice going
       | forward. I wonder if it will be normalized? Will you stand out if
       | you choose to wear a mask to the mall 5 years from now?
        
         | TheBlight wrote:
         | Don't take this as a personal attack, but when I see people
         | regularly wearing masks 5 years from now I'll certainly bias
         | against engaging with them. I'll assume they don't understand
         | risk and prioritize fear and emotion over reason. I won't be
         | mean to them (nor disrespectful at all) but I will keep my
         | distance socially (yes, somewhat ironically.)
        
           | throwaway189262 wrote:
           | In some (mostly Asian) countries you're expected to wear a
           | mask if you go out when you're sick. Contrast that to
           | freedomland where it's normal to have people hacking like
           | crazy just about everywhere.
           | 
           | It's required to wear a mask 100% of the time in some medical
           | professions. This is usually so you don't get vulnerable
           | people sick, not to protect yourself. Medicine is highly
           | evidence based. If masks didn't work these rules wouldn't
           | exist.
           | 
           | Most of those wearing masks aren't doing it out of "fear and
           | emotion", they're doing it to protect others. We all know
           | that cloth style masks everyone is wearing offer the wearer
           | almost no protection. The value is primarily in the
           | protection they provide to others by blocking aerosols when
           | you breathe and talk.
           | 
           | I get the feeling you follow some news sources that
           | erroneously claim people wear masks to calm their fear and
           | emotions
        
             | TheBlight wrote:
             | Using terms like "Freedomland" expose your biases fairly
             | clearly and make it easy for me to safely ignore you.
             | 
             | But you might be surprised to learn that even as recently
             | as 2016 the use of masks in surgical settings wasn't
             | understood to be backed by very strong science:
             | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
        
               | throwaway189262 wrote:
               | Lol "you aren't likely to share the same opinions as me
               | because of a word you used so I I'm going to ignore you".
               | Very intellectual, rational, and nuanced good brain type
               | thinking.
               | 
               | This article is about surgical masks which are basically
               | tissue paper not N95's. In some healthcare settings N95
               | is required especially when dealing with
               | immunocompromised or extremely infections diseases like
               | active TB or SARS. The evidence for these is much
               | stronger
        
           | netsharc wrote:
           | 2018, someone has a bad flu, still wants to get groceries or
           | go to the doctor.
           | 
           | In Japan: they'd be worried about infecting others so they
           | would wear a mask.
           | 
           | In USA: Even if they cared about other and could buy a mask,
           | they'd be worried about the weird looks, so they don't wear a
           | mask.
           | 
           | Hopefully in 2026, assuming Covid is solved by then, people
           | wearing masks in the US won't be looked weirdly, or even if
           | people like you do, the sick people would think "Why should I
           | give a shit what you think.".
        
           | che_shirecat wrote:
           | From a strictly rational perspective, wearing a mask in
           | public transit is always the correct decision, you are
           | statistically less likely to contract airbourne diseases with
           | a mask on. You're free to attach emotional significance to
           | the act of wearing a mask, but maybe it has the desired
           | effect - I personally would rather not interact socially with
           | anyone on public transit, so maybe we are both the better for
           | it.
        
             | TheBlight wrote:
             | >you are statistically less likely to contract airbourne
             | diseases with a mask on.
             | 
             | What are you basing this assessment on? Are all masks
             | equal? Does training in mask application matter? For what
             | duration are different types of masks effective?
        
               | throwaway189262 wrote:
               | Google is good for this. N95 and higher is effective.
               | Mask application matters but they're effective without
               | 100% seal. I don't think they get less effective with
               | time, just harder to breathe through.
        
               | ficklepickle wrote:
               | I find N95 easier to breathe through than surgical masks.
               | They use static, not mechanical filtration, which doesn't
               | seem to cause much restriction on air flow.
               | 
               | They do get less effective with time, exposure to
               | moisture. Using alcohol to clean an N95 will
               | significantly reduce its effectiveness.
               | 
               | Early on, Stanford did a study on various methods of
               | sterilizing N95s and the change of effectiveness. Heat
               | (70degC for 30 mins) was best.
               | 
               | https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/01/researchers-show-
               | how-to...
        
             | tinus_hn wrote:
             | From a strictly rational perspective, avoiding any and all
             | infection is not the correct decision because that way you
             | don't build up an immune system and remain massively
             | vulnerable to the mildest of diseases.
        
           | SteveNuts wrote:
           | You can probably safely assume anyone wearing a mask in 5
           | years is doing so because they are sick but still need to be
           | in public for essential everyday tasks.
        
           | ctur wrote:
           | Do you feel the same way about seatbelts? If people choose to
           | be safer by wearing masks, judging them is pretty extreme.
           | This kind of attitude is what made the early days of the
           | pandemic a mess.
        
             | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
             | Masks cover one's facial expressions. Showing one's own
             | facial expression and being able to see others' is an
             | important part of social interaction in many cultures.
             | Indeed, whether one person feels he or she can
             | instinctively trust another is often based on getting a
             | view of the other person's face.
             | 
             | This behavior can be suspended temporarily on a short-term
             | basis when a population perceives an urgent state of
             | pandemic or (as in Japan) when an individual says he has a
             | cold, but it may not be sustainable at a society-wide scale
             | beyond that. Seatbelts faced cultural resistance before
             | adoption, sure, but much less than masks would once the
             | acute COVID risk has passed.
        
             | TheBlight wrote:
             | This is a silly false equivalence but I'll engage with it
             | because it seems annoyingly popular. The evidence of
             | efficacy of seatbelt usage in crash scenarios is abundantly
             | clear. The same isn't true for wearing a cloth/surgical
             | mask in public during a pandemic featuring an airborne
             | virus. I'm aware there are hand-wavy meta-studies and
             | extrapolated surveys on the issue (but 1 RCT from Denmark
             | which showed no statistical significance between control
             | and experimental groups. See
             | https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6817) but
             | common sense and being able to evaluate statistics of mask
             | mandated regions vs. not indicates to me their findings are
             | dubious at best. Even n95s are not likely useful against an
             | airborne virus if not properly fitted and regularly
             | replaced.
             | 
             | What wearing the mask does show me is that a person is
             | extremely susceptible to propaganda and likely has
             | conformist tendencies. This isn't necessarily true in all
             | cases but I think it will be for the majority of them. This
             | sort of person is dangerous to bring in to your social
             | circle because they can easily be manipulated into being an
             | instrument of the state. I don't want to have to police my
             | own thoughts and opinions in front of my friends and in an
             | increasing totalitarian "cancel culture" environment this
             | risk becomes increasingly more substantial and existential.
        
               | sofixa wrote:
               | Is it not obvious, common sense and proven that masks
               | stop you from spreading the virus if you have it and
               | don't know yet? Are there still people unaware of that?
               | Out of curiosity, where do you live?
               | 
               | And you should tell frontline medical personnel that
               | masks don't protect them, they'll be glad your non-
               | conformist ultra intelligent mind managed to figure it
               | out.
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | It became normal practice in East Asia after bad flu pandemics.
         | 
         | To be quite honest, masks are very helpful, given that they are
         | infinitely more effective than covering the mouth with hands or
         | elbow (it doesn't block everything, and people often do not
         | sanitize their hands or elbows afterwards).
         | 
         | Masks are also used in Japan to protect the wearer from
         | allergens during their allergy season. After I read about it, I
         | also started doing this, and I noticed my symptoms were a lot
         | less terrible than previous years. They are also used in China
         | when smog is bad.
         | 
         | Given how cheap masks are, and how we will have a lot of
         | manufacturing left after all this that will drive prices down,
         | to me it is a no-brainer, and I'd definitely prefer it if
         | Americans resume their practice of coming into work sick once
         | we are at least partially back in office. (Now, they do this
         | because we have terrible sick leave, but masks are at least not
         | super-expensive at solving the problem absent some state or
         | federal push for mandated paid sick leave.)
        
         | heavyset_go wrote:
         | Doubt it. Not wearing masks has become a political hill many
         | have chosen to die on, and there are tons of people who virtue
         | signal by choosing to go without them or judging others for
         | choosing to wear them.
        
       | pitspotter wrote:
       | These days if I feel any sort of respiratory illness coming on I
       | head straight to bed and get my head under the covers. The secret
       | is to create a 'cave' or pocket of air by using a pole or prop to
       | hold the duvet or comforter up like a little tent. Experience
       | does seem to bear out that lungs prefer moist, warm air.
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | I'm curious though what that would do to CO2 levels.
        
       | afterburner wrote:
       | Measure the humidity in the air where you live, especially where
       | you sleep (and therefore probably spend most of your time). If
       | it's below 30% in the winter, get a humidifier good enough to
       | actually raise it. If you can't get a humidifier good enough to
       | humidify your entire living spaces, try just your bedroom.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-14 23:01 UTC)