[HN Gopher] 7.3 earthquake near Fukushima in Japan
___________________________________________________________________
7.3 earthquake near Fukushima in Japan
Author : asimjalis
Score : 67 points
Date : 2021-02-13 19:38 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nbcnews.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nbcnews.com)
| supernova87a wrote:
| Luckily though, it seems to have been so deep (50km) that the
| surface effects were not as bad as could be for a 7.3.
| evanb wrote:
| https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000dher...
| Shivetya wrote:
| The concern some have is that this earthquake could simply be the
| lead in for the larger one to follow similar to the Tohoku quake
| corey_moncure wrote:
| There have been 9 earthquakes in this region of magnitude >=
| 7.0 since 2011, including the 9.1 Tohoku quake. Of the
| remaining magnitude >= 7 quakes, 5 were in 2011, 1 was in 2012,
| and 1 in 2013, and finally the newest one yesterday.
|
| Source:
|
| https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=16.46769...
| DavidSJ wrote:
| That's helpful information. It doesn't invalidate the
| concern, however, since very large earthquakes are often
| preceded by moderately large foreshocks, so there is an now a
| temporarily elevated risk of a very large earthquake in that
| region.
| saberdancer wrote:
| In the list you can see a foreshock happening two days
| before 9.1 earthquake (Tohoku). Then after that you have a
| couple of years of aftershocks. Obviously this is not a
| guarantee "big one" is coming but it's probably good idea
| to check contingency plans.
| timr wrote:
| NHK is reporting power and gas outages, a landslide on a highway
| and minor infrastructure damage, but nothing severe. No nuclear
| plants are reporting anomalies, and there's no risk of tsunami.
|
| https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20210214_29/
|
| (Edit: this is the english-language NHK and doesn't go into
| everything I said...I'm watching the coverage on Japanese TV,
| which is more detailed.)
| johnohara wrote:
| Japan Meteorological Agency reported it as 7.1
|
| USGS reported it as 7.1
|
| Prime Minister Suga reported "no anomalies, ... everything is
| normal."
|
| Okay. The Japanese have a lot of experience with earthquakes.
| They should know. I trust the assessment.
|
| The article declares it 7.3, citing the JMA, who were quoted as
| reporting it as 7.1 in the very next paragraph.
|
| No explanation anywhere for how it became 7.3.
|
| Meh, what's two points on a logarithmic scale of seismic energy?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-02-13 23:01 UTC)