[HN Gopher] Nanowire could provide a stable, easy-to-make superc...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Nanowire could provide a stable, easy-to-make superconducting
       transistor
        
       Author : el_duderino
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2021-02-11 13:20 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (news.mit.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (news.mit.edu)
        
       | TobySKT wrote:
       | By providing custom telemedicine software development services,
       | our aim is to transform the way patients and healthcare providers
       | communicate by using emerging technologies. Our developers ensure
       | your telemedicine solution complies with regulatory standards
       | such as HIPAA and HL7 and all telemedicine software development
       | standards. https://steelkiwi.com/expertise/telemedicine-software-
       | develo...
        
       | nickthemagicman wrote:
       | If laptops had superconductors would the battery life increase?
       | 
       | Also am I thinking too small for the potential of
       | superconductors?
        
         | ben_w wrote:
         | Yes to both, if you can do it at STP. Superconductors make
         | practical many things which are otherwise extremely expensive
         | or just plain impossible.
        
         | simiones wrote:
         | By my understanding, a superconducting computer does consume
         | less power than a traditional computer, even taking into
         | account the cooling systems.
         | 
         | However, superconductivity requires either extremely low
         | temperatures (a few kelvins at most) or even more extreme
         | pressures (think many kilometers underground), so it is
         | currently outside the realm of possibility for a mobile device.
        
           | nynx wrote:
           | actually, it's more like within a factor of two of the
           | pressure at the center of the earth.
        
           | SiempreViernes wrote:
           | Well, some types of superconductors work fine at the simply
           | low temperatures provided by liquid nitrogen (77 K).
           | 
           | Though there are other factors like ability to be made into
           | wires and how much current they can carry before switching
           | out of superconductivity you might be having in mind with
           | your single Kelvins number.
        
       | SiempreViernes wrote:
       | Not really clear to me why the choke wire needs to be
       | superconducting too, or indeed if it really is superconductive in
       | any important sense of the word. The point seems to be that the
       | choke wire quenches easily and provides heat from internal
       | resistance.
       | 
       | Also, this sounds like it is purely a switching transistor since
       | superconductors aren't really grey-area type of things, you get
       | them in the superconducting state or in the normal state and the
       | transition is about as smooth as that from water to steam.
        
       | sradman wrote:
       | > In 1956, MIT electrical engineer Dudley Buck published a
       | description of a superconducting computer switch called the
       | cryotron. The device was little more than two superconducting
       | wires: One was straight, and the other was coiled around it. The
       | cryotron acts as a switch, because when current flows through the
       | coiled wire, its magnetic field reduces the current flowing
       | through the straight wire.
       | 
       | > [Karl Berggren] dubbed his superconducting nanowire device the
       | nano-cryotron in tribute to Buck... The nano-cryotron uses heat
       | to trigger a switch, rather than a magnetic field.
       | 
       | Dudley Buck's cryotron:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryotron
        
       | peter_d_sherman wrote:
       | I like the idea a lot and am not criticizing this article, it's
       | author, or the concept, but a few quick "minor corrections" if I
       | might:
       | 
       | >"Superconductors -- materials that conduct electricity without
       | resistance"
       | 
       |  _" Superconductors -- materials that conduct high amperages at
       | low voltages without heat"_
       | 
       | >"Most metals lose resistance and become superconducting at
       | extremely low temperatures, usually just a few degrees above
       | absolute zero."
       | 
       |  _Most metals, even small cross-sections -- can already conduct
       | huge amounts of amperage -- but the electricity so passing must
       | be conditioned so as to be at a high enough voltage -- to prevent
       | heating effects.
       | 
       | A good example of this would be a high-voltage transmission line;
       | those tall steel towers carrying aluminum cables.
       | 
       | The amount of electricity that they carry is enough to melt a
       | small building -- but the cables themselves, despite being much
       | smaller in diameter, never melt -- why is that? -- this is
       | because the electricity is at high voltage...
       | 
       | So is metal with electricity running through it at high voltage a
       | superconductor? Technically not, because there are power losses
       | over long enough distances._
       | 
       | Also, it would not surprise me if _everything_ (every metal that
       | is, and possibly non-metals as well) -- _becomes superconducting
       | at a few degrees above zero..._
       | 
       | In other words, superconductivity -- might be more of a _property
       | of temperature_ -- than it is of the underlying material...
       | 
       | Now, combine that idea with the idea that electricity can be
       | conditioned in various ways to enable greater degrees of
       | conductivity (voltage is one, frequency is another) -- without
       | heat -- and then we might have a larger understanding of the
       | underlying Physics...
       | 
       | That being said (and I hope it was not taken as a criticism -- it
       | was not intended to be!),
       | 
       | I do like and appreciate very much the idea of superconducting
       | nanowire!
        
         | BenjiWiebe wrote:
         | Personally, I find the original more accurate and clear.
        
       | _8091149529 wrote:
       | This is quite a convoluted way of making an electrical switch. In
       | brief, the carriers of supercurrent (Cooper pairs) in the channel
       | are "depleted" (actually: broken up) by a local heater that
       | raises the channel temperature above the superconductor's
       | critical temperature.
       | 
       | The circuit topology, a heater coupled to a superconducting wire
       | to sense the local tempreature, is the same as in a transition-
       | edge sensor (TES), and functionally identical to a
       | supercondicting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD). [SNSPD
       | does not have a separate heater.] These cryogenic detectors are
       | typically used when a good electrical amplifier does not exist
       | for the input radiation. A textbook example would be optical or
       | x-ray photons.
       | 
       | I believe the device will be terribly inefficient as a
       | transistor. The root cause is that the electrical signal gets
       | converted into heat and back: Heater current -> Electron heating
       | -> Phonon (lattice) heating -> Breaking of Cooper pairs in the
       | channel -> Suppression of (super)current. Once the heat is in the
       | phonons (lattice vibrations), it can propagate anywhere in the
       | chip substrate.
       | 
       | Also, the active area needs to be continuously heated to maintain
       | the resistive ("off") state.
       | 
       | Since HN is mostly a computing-oriented forum: This transistor
       | will not be used for general-purpose logic cricuits.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-11 23:03 UTC)