[HN Gopher] The Great Gatsby: Misunderstood Novel
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Great Gatsby: Misunderstood Novel
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 49 points
       Date   : 2021-02-10 02:42 UTC (20 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | wyldfire wrote:
       | I just started watching HBO's "The Wire."
       | 
       | It was interesting to hear D'Angelo Barksdale's take on it [1]. I
       | think it's related to his character's arc - inner turmoil about
       | whether to leave the criminal world behind.
       | 
       | [1] https://youtu.be/8DOy4hCih7w
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | First time through The Wire? Oh man, I envy you.
        
       | Mistri wrote:
       | High school ruined this book for me. It would've been easier to
       | read if I hadn't been forced to tear apart every single sentence
       | for analysis. Hearing "Great Gatsby" triggers my gag reflex now,
       | along with most other books I analyzed in high school.
        
         | RBerenguel wrote:
         | I had this with The Picture of Dorian Gray, but on a re-read
         | later (several years on a bored weekend, that was before I
         | wrote code or read about code most of the time) I came to
         | really appreciate it.
        
         | jwdunne wrote:
         | Similar thing happened to me but with Of Mice and Men and
         | Macbeth. Come to enjoy those stories but it always felt like I
         | was meant to glean a deeper meaning than even the author
         | intended!
        
         | tjalfi wrote:
         | Literary augury[0] is my term for that kind of literature
         | discussion.
         | 
         | [0] https://www.britannica.com/topic/augury
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | I finally got around to reading Romeo+Juliet in my 40's. It was
         | much better than I expected, aside from all the tired cliches
         | in the prose.
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | In Italy that happens with Dante's _Divina Commedia_ and
         | Manzoni's _I Promessi Sposi_. Very good reads on their own,
         | they get absolutely destroyed by being forced on kids.
        
       | acdanger wrote:
       | Heh. It looks like GatsbyJS - the React static site generator -
       | cribbed their logo from the GQ magazine pictured in the article:
       | 
       | GatsbyJS: https://www.gatsbyjs.com/guidelines/logo#footnotes GQ:
       | https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1024x1280/p096h71g.webp
        
         | drewzero1 wrote:
         | Maybe! The font on the magazine appears to be Broadway
         | Engraved[1], but similar fonts were extremely common in the
         | book's time period, making any of them an obvious choice. The
         | logo looks a lot more like the C and O in Secret Agent NF[2].
         | Could be inspiration, or could easily be coincidence.
         | 
         | [1] http://www.identifont.com/similar?2AG [2]
         | http://www.identifont.com/similar?9TR
        
         | kylegill wrote:
         | Yeah there is certainly some truth to that, the original logo
         | design came from an open source contributor who mentioned some
         | ideas coming from the movie posters:
         | https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/408#issuecomment-2...
        
         | ksdale wrote:
         | They may well have done that, but as a very nit-picky aside,
         | that font has a pretty general art deco vibe, so it's not
         | necessarily unique to that GQ cover.
        
       | steve76 wrote:
       | Mixes real world celebrity into "literature as a product."
       | Interesting to think who would be like Fitzgerald today, and fun
       | to think authors can do that to people, draw crowds and
       | headlines.
       | 
       | Creates a world that likely wouldn't exist without the book.
       | 
       | Memento for a group of people who feel sympathy for a lost
       | friend, and remember an era where free expression was something
       | brand new. Paris in the 1920s was probably really nice, not
       | decadent, more like a wonderland, seeing things for the first
       | time.
       | 
       | Ten years after Fitzgerald died, when America had to compete
       | against fascism, communism and imperialism, we took everything
       | cultural, loaded it into a cannon, and shot it at the world to
       | see what would stick. How could it be disillusionment when we
       | took over the world?
        
       | kylegill wrote:
       | I agree with what the article mentions, and think the concept of
       | the Great American Novel [0] gives the Great Gatsby wings and
       | leads to it being more _popular_ than it perhaps is _understood_.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_Novel
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jrumbut wrote:
       | I'm not how naming a couch Gatsby really reflects a
       | misunderstanding.
       | 
       | His character really does have an opulent house and reading about
       | it is one of things you can enjoy in the novel.
        
       | winrid wrote:
       | The Green light! It must mean Envy!
        
       | GizmoSwan wrote:
       | I have seen several versions of it in the movies which were
       | easier to interpret than the novel.
       | 
       | Few months ago, I even saw a Korean version called The Burning on
       | netflix!
        
         | dondawest wrote:
         | That movie was based on the Haruki Murakami short story "Barn
         | Burning," though it did reference Gatsby directly in the
         | dialogue
        
           | GizmoSwan wrote:
           | Yes it did mention the Gatsby. The author was obviously
           | interpreting the psycho-thriller angle by design.
           | 
           | The privileged versus unprivileged; being trapped and unable
           | to achieve the dream and living with unfulfilled desires...
        
             | cercatrova wrote:
             | I watched Burning and Parasite as a duology, both have very
             | similar themes about modern day Korea. I'd suggest you
             | watch them back to back as well.
        
       | ARandomerDude wrote:
       | Also the world's most boring novel.
        
         | northwest65 wrote:
         | Give The Lord of the Rings a whirl...
        
           | baldfat wrote:
           | HEY, Two Towers and the double time line was UGH but LotR and
           | Foundations Trilogy are the only books I read every decade of
           | my life since my teens.
        
             | Rhinobird wrote:
             | Lord of the Rings is boring until they get out of
             | Rivendell. Once they actually start their journey it's a
             | fun read.
        
       | ttz wrote:
       | Nothing misunderstood. IMO it's just a mediocre book with
       | overemphasis on hiding middling meaning in prose. A story that
       | speaks many words but says little.
        
         | kinghtown wrote:
         | No, it's an excellent novel. I do think it's a little
         | overrated, but mediocre would be a silly take on it. It's
         | highly regarded for a reason. For sure there are greater
         | American novels..
        
           | leephillips wrote:
           | An opinion that differs from yours is not, thereby, silly. I
           | also find it mediocre. A bit of a bore overall, the prose
           | unremarkable.
        
             | kinghtown wrote:
             | We all harbour silly opinions.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | " _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other
         | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something._"
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
         | omosubi wrote:
         | which novels are better?
        
           | ReptileMan wrote:
           | I would say that from what is considered Great American
           | Classics only catch 22 is actually good.
        
           | alwaysanon wrote:
           | I really rate Jack London as the great American novelist. I
           | like the lessor known Sea Wolf the best of his but White Fang
           | and The Call of the Wild really capture a sense of adventure
           | and the history and vibe of that period of American expansion
           | into the West.
        
             | deepsun wrote:
             | Interestingly, Jack London saw writing as purely commercial
             | activity. He preferred to buy plots, or "take the idea"
             | (hence lots of plagiarism accusations) to inventing.
        
           | leephillips wrote:
           | So, so, many. Moby Dick; The Scarlet Letter; Lolita; Ulysses;
           | Et Tu, Babe; Lexicon; Malone Dies;....
        
             | dan_hawkins wrote:
             | Ulysses is Irish though.
        
               | leephillips wrote:
               | So is _Malone Dies_ ; maybe I misinterpreted the
               | question, if it was asking only about American novels.
        
             | gverrilla wrote:
             | ulysses - you gotta be kiding. did you read that?
        
               | QuesnayJr wrote:
               | I think the conceit (the different styles for different
               | chapters) sometimes overwhelms the book, but it has a lot
               | of highlights, like the opening and closing chapters. I
               | think of this quote often:                 History,
               | Stephen said, is a nightmare from which I am trying to
               | awake.
        
               | leephillips wrote:
               | Twice, and I dip into it now and then and read a chapter.
               | It's one of my favorites.
        
           | happyconcepts wrote:
           | Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky struck me as a better
           | novel. But it's almost 1000 pages.
        
           | tjalfi wrote:
           | There's always The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov.
        
       | mikhailfranco wrote:
       | Another discussion of the book on the BBC:
       | 
       | https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000r4tq
       | 
       | I used to think of _" In Our Time"_ as the set of topics for
       | which every educated person should have a basic understanding of
       | the facts, hence hold an informed opinion, and be able to enter a
       | meaningful discussion.
       | 
       | But now it is approaching ~900 episodes, so the subjects are
       | necessarily becoming more obscure, but that also means there is
       | occasionally a fascinating surprise.
       | 
       | https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qykl/episodes/player
        
       | pseudolus wrote:
       | What's particularly interesting, and was unknown to me, was that
       | 'The Great Gatsby' was not an immediate success. I was similarly
       | surprised when I read that 'Moby Dick' had an initial print run
       | of 500 copies and that only 3215 copies were sold during
       | Melville's lifetime [0]. I guess authors get second chances.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.biblio.com/moby-dick-by-melville-
       | herman/work/550...
        
         | the_snooze wrote:
         | Moby Dick probably would have sold more early on if it weren't
         | interleaved with chapters from a whaling ship operating
         | handbook.
        
           | josephorjoe wrote:
           | lol. but the third time you read Moby Dick those are the best
           | parts.
           | 
           | loose fish vs fast fish is top of the line 19th century
           | humor.
           | 
           | i admit i was bored to tears by those sections on the first
           | read.
           | 
           | honestly i think it just isn't a great read for people in
           | their teens/20s as the world weariness, fatalism, and
           | obsession with an imperfect understanding of an obscure
           | expertise is something better appreciated as one ages.
        
         | devindotcom wrote:
         | Melville was already an established author after Typee and Omoo
         | - Moby Dick was sort of like a Sgt Pepper situation. People
         | expected a sea story and they got something quite a bit
         | different. Or imagine if Tom Clancy wrote ten Jack Ryan books
         | and then Gravity's Rainbow or something.
         | 
         | Sadly many authors don't get the recognition they deserve for
         | generations afterwards... but the important thing is they
         | didn't let that possibility dissuade them from writing!
        
       | mrkeen wrote:
       | I misunderstood this article as well!
       | 
       | Anyone want to let me in on what the book's really about?
        
         | karaterobot wrote:
         | The article doesn't offer a position on that. It just points
         | out the obvious fact that it's NOT about how cool and fun it is
         | to be rich and throw fancy parties, and that understanding the
         | context of the narrator being a returning soldier and member of
         | the lost generation is important.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | acabal wrote:
       | The Great Gatsby entered the US public domain this year, and you
       | can read it for free at Standard Ebooks:
       | https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/f-scott-fitzgerald/the-gre...
        
         | omosubi wrote:
         | the audiobook is also free on spotify -
         | https://open.spotify.com/album/3pGXKRHWi69wIBdI39PfZc?si=rnT...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-10 23:01 UTC)