[HN Gopher] An Atonement of Nano
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       An Atonement of Nano
        
       Author : todsacerdoti
       Score  : 104 points
       Date   : 2021-02-08 11:46 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.noa-s.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.noa-s.org)
        
       | nezirus wrote:
       | In my opinion, mockery was never about Nano itself, but about
       | standards. Vi(m) is everywhere, it is a standard (you may like it
       | or not), so please learn a few basic commands, and you'll be able
       | to use it when necessary.
       | 
       | What's next? "I don't like cp command, so I will always install
       | thismagicommand on my servers..."
       | 
       | /rant on
       | 
       | Having nano as a default crontab editor (on some distros) does
       | not win popularity contest with more experienced admins, quite
       | the opposite.
        
       | tpoacher wrote:
       | I love nano (especially the latest version, not that 2.9 stuff
       | that's default on most linux distros). I don't mind vim and I'm
       | happy to work in it if I have to, but every now and then I redo
       | the 'vim tutorial' to help me not forget, and for the most part,
       | with a handful of (non-deal-breaker) exceptions, my thought is
       | always "I can already do all this stuff in nano".
       | 
       | Whenever I speak to people casually about why they like vim over
       | "e.g. nano", I find that people who think vim is far superior
       | often fall into one of these categories: - They like vim because
       | it allows them to do things I think are bad software engineering
       | practices which I would avoid anyway - They like vim because it
       | allows them to do things they are not aware nano can also do as
       | easily (especially given you e.g. can run arbitrary shell
       | commands on a selection). - They've gone overboard and have added
       | every single vim plugin in the book to convert it basically to an
       | IDE or something that is no longer an editor. - Nerd cred.
       | 
       | I only miss a couple of things when in nano, none of which are
       | dealbreakers: - "highlight all search results" (but search and
       | replacement otherwise works extremely well, and I can always do
       | the highlighted search in parallel in a less window) - "shift all
       | text to the right rather than only that line" (but again, one can
       | simulate this in a less window trivially - it's just a bother to
       | have to do so) - Inability to create pre-recorded custom macros;
       | you can only have one recorded macro live at any time.
       | 
       | But that's about it.
       | 
       | But having said that, I would not call myself a seasoned vim
       | user. So I ask with full honesty. Persuade me to jump to vim. Can
       | anyone argue specific points of things vim does better that nano
       | can't do?
        
         | forty wrote:
         | I don't know nano, I don't really use vim (kind of, I'm an Evil
         | person ^^).
         | 
         | Does nano has a very rich movement system such as Vim has? I
         | think that's one of the main selling point
        
           | tpoacher wrote:
           | Probably not! What kind of movements do you have in mind?
           | 
           | If you mean stuff like "delete 5 characters", probably not.
           | But I never really got the appeal of that over pressing
           | delete five times. The time it takes me to count the
           | characters to decide it's five of them is probably longer
           | than the time it takes to press delete the appropriate number
           | of times without thinking ...
        
             | forty wrote:
             | No, more something like "delete up to next dash" or "delete
             | everything between the quotes"
        
       | gelo wrote:
       | I use nano all the time for production linux services. Its
       | simple, effective and works really well in a shell session over a
       | satlink connection. The key combinations make it a lot easier to
       | not f*k up in those kinds of sessions.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | O_H_E wrote:
       | Nano could be wildly more accessible for beginners with an easy
       | config like this that sets saner keyboard defaults. It also
       | enables the little-known mouse support, which makes the shortcuts
       | hints at the bottom act like buttons.
       | 
       | https://github.com/RangerMauve/nanorc/blob/master/.nanorc
       | 
       | https://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v2.1/nano.html#Using-the-Mo...
       | 
       | I seriously find that the shortcuts hints being always present to
       | be very helpful, great UX for occasional fiddling with dotfiles
       | and files in /etc.
        
       | junon wrote:
       | The author assumes that disregard of nano as inferior and not up
       | to the daily task is somehow "elitist". It reads as though the
       | author has been personally afflicted by its lack of use, which
       | seems like a strange stance to hold.
       | 
       | I'm not required to like, laud, or advocate for every piece of
       | software. Conversely, I'm allowed to _not_ like things as well.
       | 
       | I didn't know it had these features, sure. But... so what? I
       | don't use nano, I don't like when things default to it as an
       | editor, and I'd rather not have it on my system because it's just
       | extra bytes used up on my disk.
       | 
       | If that makes me elitist, then so be it.
        
         | MaxBarraclough wrote:
         | > I don't like when things default to it as an editor
         | 
         | I strongly favour Vim myself, but I don't blame anyone for
         | using Nano as a default editor. If the goal is to make a
         | program (or distro) as approachable as possible then Nano is a
         | sensible choice, much more so than Vim or Emacs.
        
           | junon wrote:
           | Sure, I never argued against that.
        
         | Jiocus wrote:
         | > I don't like when things default to it as an editor
         | 
         | Then, let things know what editor you prefer; $ export
         | EDITOR='vi'
        
           | junon wrote:
           | What makes you think I don't do this?
        
         | iruoy wrote:
         | > I'd rather not have it on my system because it's just extra
         | bytes used up on my disk
         | 
         | I'm assuming you're talking about your development
         | system/workstation.
         | 
         | Why would 2MB matter? It has no dependencies that aren't
         | installed by default in every distro.
        
           | junon wrote:
           | Because I don't like having cruft. It's simple.
        
       | jusssi wrote:
       | I think many of those who advise against nano have bad
       | experiences from earlier times when it didn't properly support
       | UTF-8 and EOL-diversity, resulting in broken files.
       | 
       | I personally use vim (as my console editor), but the feature set
       | I can actively use without referring to documentation probably
       | doesn't exceed by much what nano could do.
        
         | tpoacher wrote:
         | It also doesn't help that most distros tend to package nano 2.9
         | or older, whereas the latest version is now at 5.5 with
         | considerable improvements.
        
         | GrayShade wrote:
         | Inserting hard line breaks when word wrapping is quite annoying
         | too, and that's the default. I've seen a lot of people break
         | config files because they didn't start it with -w.
        
           | Denvercoder9 wrote:
           | The default has been changed in nano 4, and hard wrapping is
           | now off by default.
        
             | jsight wrote:
             | Oh, nice... maybe now I can finally break my habit of
             | randomly inserting "-w" after editor commands.
        
               | tpoacher wrote:
               | or you could change your .nanorc, or use the shortcut
               | inside the editor (Alt+L)
        
             | zepearl wrote:
             | Question:
             | 
             | When "hard wrapping" is off and I move the cursor to the
             | right beyond the screen, then the line on which the cursor
             | is gets moved to the left - ONLY that line.
             | 
             | Is there a way to have the other lines move as well to the
             | right?
             | 
             | Reason: sometimes I want to compare what I'm editing with
             | what is present at the same position in the rows
             | above/below - moving the cusor up/down to have those
             | contents displayed is a bit annoying... .
             | 
             | Thx
        
               | tpoacher wrote:
               | I find that a bit annoying too. My solution is to fire
               | the same file and line using `less` on a parallel window
               | (e.g. in byobu) with the -S enabled (which I have enabled
               | by default) which allows you to scroll to the right
               | instead of wrapping the text. You can then edit the line
               | in nano, and refresh (with Shift+R) as appropriate in
               | less to compare with the lines above.
        
               | zepearl wrote:
               | aha - Shift+R in "less", didn't know that - thanks!
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | arminiusreturns wrote:
         | Yeah, it took me a while to get past this, and still sometimes
         | hesistate to use nano (emacs here) just because I got bit by
         | this in those days, but now I generally don't have a problem
         | with nano and will often use it over vi on a remote box without
         | emacs or issues with using tramp.
        
       | nicolas_t wrote:
       | I wish most distros didn't default to nano. I like vim, I liked
       | when that was the default, now it's such a pain running something
       | like visudo and getting nano.
        
         | wffurr wrote:
         | It's easy to change the default. It's a lot harder to teach
         | every user how to exit vim.
        
           | Timpy wrote:
           | Yeah if you've gone through the trouble to learn vim you're
           | probably okay with tweaking some shell defaults as well. If
           | you're not comfortable in the shell at all it's much better
           | to get tossed into nano than it is vim.
        
           | tag2103 wrote:
           | I'm framing this comment.
        
         | swiley wrote:
         | Defaults in most distros _need_ to be sane and just work. You
         | can change this by just copying your $shellrc with EDITOR=vim.
        
         | jtvjan wrote:
         | Try using the `select-editor' command. If you don't have that,
         | you can also try setting $EDITOR and $VISUAL in your bashrc.
        
       | physicsguy wrote:
       | Nano is a great tool for people who aren't used to using command
       | line tools. I unashamedly used it for ages before switching to
       | Vim. I always recommend it to people who are new to doing work on
       | Linux remotely.
        
         | tpoacher wrote:
         | Ironically, it's an even better tool for people used to using
         | command line tools!
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | Disclaimer: I'm a gnu nano contributor.
       | 
       | It makes me happy seeing nano being considered this way. Some of
       | the features cited in the article were developed, improved,
       | influenced or implemented by me; mainly macros and external
       | commands.
       | 
       | It is possible to use the linter combined with macros as a "go to
       | implementation" or "go to declaration"[1]. I think it is also
       | possible to do the same so it can get completions from external
       | commands.
       | 
       | I'd like to improve nano enough to make it a good IDE, but its
       | main developer is against it.
       | 
       | [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nano-
       | devel/2018-05/msg000...
        
         | bayindirh wrote:
         | Oh hey,
         | 
         | I'm primarily a Vi user, but I respect and love nano. It's the
         | first editor I try on any system I'm not familiar with.
         | 
         | I'd also argue against growing nano to a good IDE, because I
         | think nano is in perfect form for its name and role.
         | 
         | Maybe there can be a fork (maybe called _micro_ ) which
         | contains the features you want to see in nano.
        
           | vanderZwan wrote:
           | FYI, Micro already exists, it's implemented in Go
           | 
           | https://micro-editor.github.io/
        
             | logo4poop wrote:
             | What about Mega?
        
               | bayindirh wrote:
               | I think _femto_ or _mili_ are more appropriate. Mili fits
               | since IDE 's a rather complex software and femto is a
               | playful irony like less:
               | 
               | "less is more, more or less."
        
             | tpoacher wrote:
             | Micro looks pretty cool! Thanks!
        
         | tpoacher wrote:
         | I love the ability to record a macro, I use it all the time.
         | But unfortunately only one macro can live in memory at any one
         | time.
         | 
         | I was hoping for the ability to record a macro, and then 'save'
         | it somewhere for future reuse (possibly by binding a shortcut
         | to it).
         | 
         | The link you point to seems very interesting to me for this
         | reason. If that means what I think it means, then that is a
         | good workaround for me, so I wanted to make sure: can you bind
         | a shortcut to a string which uses ansi sequences to simulate
         | keystrokes, and something like, e.g. "^R" to simulate pressing
         | control+R?
         | 
         | If that's the case, while I cannot "record and save" per se, I
         | could still use this technique to bind a key to a series of
         | keystrokes, like I would with a macro inside the editor.
        
           | marcodiego wrote:
           | Yes you can use ansi use pre-defined macros to fire key
           | combos. Edit your .nanorc and bid a sequence to a key (like
           | in the given example). To specify combos, press alt+v then
           | hit the key combo you desire.
        
       | ClumsyPilot wrote:
       | Sometimes I wonder why linux isn't more popular.
       | 
       | Then one of our interns calls me cause they are stuck in Vim and
       | I remember.
        
         | phowat wrote:
         | For all the issues that (rightly so) affect the popularity of
         | linux, I don't think this one is high on the list. This is
         | something that can be figured out in a single google query.
        
           | tpoacher wrote:
           | that's assuming you can exit vim to launch your browser in
           | the first place :p
        
           | wizzwizz4 wrote:
           | If you know what Vim is called, yes.
        
             | phowat wrote:
             | I just tried this very naive query: https://www.google.com/
             | search?hl=en&q=linux%20editor%20opene...
             | 
             | And the first hit teaches how to close vim. No need to know
             | what is called.
        
               | wizzwizz4 wrote:
               | You're assuming they know it's an editor.
        
       | SeeDave wrote:
       | I like nano and prefer how it navigates text to vim. If vim works
       | for you then great but... nano is just fine for me!
        
       | trabant00 wrote:
       | If you like nano use nano. There's nothing there though that can
       | replace the modal editing of vim or the hackability of emacs.
        
       | posix_me_less wrote:
       | In 5-10 years nano or other simple discoverable text editor will
       | become the mainstream choice in terminals, and vi/vim will become
       | an obscure tool preferred by a small minority, mostly consisting
       | of the veteran "greybeards". See changes in Fedora. New kids are
       | breastfed on nano and/or MS/Apple IDEs.
        
         | dTal wrote:
         | I'd say that's the case already.
        
       | bifftastic wrote:
       | This article is genuinely difficult to read due to the lack of
       | capital letters. It shows a lack of consideration for the reader.
        
         | swiley wrote:
         | Wow I didn't even notice until I read this comment.
        
         | wizzwizz4 wrote:
         | It's a lack of consideration for tradition. nano is spelt all
         | lowercase, and starts sentences a lot; I think it'd be harder
         | to read if sentences alternated between initial capital and
         | initial miniscule.
        
           | toyg wrote:
           | That's just silly. Most tools are spelled lowercase and just
           | get capitalized in proper English when required. Facebook is
           | not capitalized in the logo, for example.
           | 
           | It's just being awkward for the sake of it.
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | I honestly hope this comes from using some accessibility tool
         | like dictation software. Otherwise it's honestly a childish
         | thing to do - and in that case I fully expect the retort will
         | be something like "I know people complaining about this are
         | just pedantics, I use it as a filter to decide who I should pay
         | attention to". I've seen similar attitudes before. Occasionally
         | someone will hide behind dyslexia, which begs some questions,
         | but I just don't have the medical training required to assess
         | the veracity of such claims.
         | 
         | Also, trying to evangelize a tool while being a weirdo is not
         | going to help your case.
        
           | bifftastic wrote:
           | That is a good point in general about dictation software or
           | other accessibility issues. Not likely to be the case for an
           | article about a text editor however.
           | 
           | The filter to decide who to pay attention to works both
           | ways...
        
         | rainingmonkey wrote:
         | Elsewhere on their blog (and especially on their gemlog) the
         | author discusses and uses teh constructed language Toki
         | Pona[1].
         | 
         | From wikipedia: > Capital initials are used to mark proper
         | adjectives, while Toki Pona roots are always written with
         | lowercase letters, even when they start a sentence.
         | 
         | I imagine they've deliberately carried this across to their
         | English language writing too.
         | 
         | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toki_Pona
        
       | domano wrote:
       | I just use VSCode over ssh for everything outside my local host.
       | The support in Code for ssh is awesome and maintained by
       | Microsoft AFAIK.
        
         | swiley wrote:
         | That requires a closed binary which (iirc) you copy
         | automatically to all your remote machines. Encouraging the use
         | of closed dev tools felt weird in 2019 but after 2020 it's IMO
         | irresponsible.
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | I use vi for quick edits and Emacs for serious development. I
       | find nano somewhat frustrating to use. But I'm glad it's there
       | because it's perfect for people who are new to terminal-based
       | Unix environments. (Back in my day, that often meant college kids
       | logging in to their school shell account.)
        
       | Philip-J-Fry wrote:
       | If I'm programming I'll use a graphical IDE, preferably something
       | by Jetbrains or at a push VS Code.
       | 
       | If I'm logging onto a server to change something small I'll use
       | nano. I don't have any reason to learn vi or emacs.
       | 
       | I never have to do anything that requires me to need anything
       | more than nano. If there ever is that requirement then it's gonna
       | be hosted somewhere else and deployed to the server anyway, so
       | I'll edit it on my machine in my ideal IDE.
        
       | wcarey wrote:
       | A wonderful use case for nano is introducing students who have
       | never used a command line before to unix. You can teach a
       | classroom of students to edit files in nano productively in a
       | single 45 minute class period, which means that an introduction
       | to programming class can move very quickly into actual
       | programming. If your goal is to have student produce a working
       | program on day one of class, nano is a godsend.
       | 
       | By then end of a semester, the students will be running into the
       | ceiling of nano as an editor and you can tell them about other
       | more featureful editors.
        
         | enriquto wrote:
         | I don't understand your argument here. You do not need to use a
         | terminal-based editor when you work on the command line. You
         | can run "gedit file.txt" just like you do "nano file.txt" and
         | it will work as well. I guess this may be even easier for
         | newcomers, wouldn't it?
         | 
         | Until you start editing files remotely through ssh, and then
         | they will understand why the obvious thing (calling a graphical
         | program from the command line) may not work as expected.
        
           | ThaDood wrote:
           | I think the point may have been that nano is a safe
           | assumption to be on most any GNU/Linux machine where as gedit
           | might not be and that nano has all of the commands listed on
           | the screen for quick reference.
           | 
           | For example when I was taking my sysadmin class we used
           | CENTOS which did not have gedit since it did not have a GUI.
           | We used VI instead, but I learned nano was good for simple
           | fixes and I did not have to google the method of saving and
           | exiting.
        
             | jonfw wrote:
             | For an entry to programming class, I'm not sure why you
             | would forego a GUI though.
             | 
             | For context, I just got my cs degree a year ago and most of
             | my classmates only know a terminal as that bottom pane in
             | vscode
             | 
             | If you want people to get up and running quickly, either
             | require vscode or have people program in one of those
             | browser based IDEs
        
               | Jtsummers wrote:
               | Students should be taught what the terminal is, how to
               | use it, how to program it, and to not be afraid of it
               | during their program. But whether it belongs in a first
               | class or not is debatable. In a first class, students
               | have so many other things to learn that adding on the
               | terminal can be a bit overwhelming (typically the actual
               | material of data structures & algorithms, but also the
               | syntax of some language, the first time they've ever had
               | to be so precise in writing anything down in their
               | lives). I liked how, in the late 90s/early 00s, GT made a
               | point of teaching you to use the terminal in the 3rd CS
               | course (various numbers, 2130, 2230, some others). By
               | that point, you were comfortable with programming itself
               | so learning to use a computer properly wasn't a big
               | addition there.
               | 
               | I was disappointed when I got to grad school and many of
               | my peers didn't even know how to invoke a compiler or
               | interpreter from the command line. If you didn't give
               | them a common IDE, they were absolutely lost.
        
       | SaraPolson wrote:
       | I am a student and I have problems writing my essays and it takes
       | a very long time. I want to advise you on the service
       | https://www.a-writer.com/term-papers/ Professionals work there,
       | they are always in touch, they exactly fulfill the requirements
       | and, most importantly, they use real sources, and not stupidly
       | download from the Internet. Save your time - try it.
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | nano is the first thing I install on any machine I have access
       | to.
       | 
       | I don't use editors from the command line long enough to learn vi
       | or emacs and I know how to quit nano (and it reminds me if
       | needed).
       | 
       | And the colors are nice now, too.
        
       | jolmg wrote:
       | It seems this list of features is not exhaustive. It also seems
       | to have support for a file browser to select files, mouse,
       | autowrapping/autofilling, spellchecker, etc.
       | 
       | Quite a lot of things are listed in the info manual.
        
       | rgoulter wrote:
       | IMO, nano does seem like the terminal equivalent of notepad. The
       | key value proposition being that it's easy to use without having
       | to learn how to use it, especially compared to what you have to
       | learn for vi/emacs. - Most of the time you won't need to be
       | editing files in the terminal, so it's a good 'emergency' tool
       | just in case you need to.
       | 
       | TBH, I wasn't aware of sophisticated features like automatically
       | commenting/uncommenting. But I think putting effort into
       | memorising those is less useful than putting effort into learning
       | at least the basics of vi or emacs. -- There should be no shame
       | in using nano.. I just can't agree that it's worth putting time
       | in to memorise those keybindings.
       | 
       | Though now I wonder why there isn't a VSCode-equivalent (emphasis
       | on "works out of the box" and "easy to use") for the terminal.
        
         | pjmlp wrote:
         | Back in the day (mid-90's), many that I knew using nano were
         | former users of Q-Edit.
        
           | Jtsummers wrote:
           | It was pico then, nano came out a bit later. But I used it
           | because it was what pine used and I got used to it. Then I
           | decided to learn vi and emacs sometime later.
        
             | markandrewj wrote:
             | I have used both Pico and Nano. The selling point of Nano
             | to me is it being small and available. I don't do my day to
             | day work in nano, but even in the most minimal system it is
             | normally there, which makes it useful for configuration
             | changes in a pinch.
             | 
             | Another editor that works similarly to Nano, that most
             | people don't seem to know about, is Micro (GNU) Emacs.
             | Although it's not as small or common.
             | 
             | https://github.com/troglobit/mg
        
               | Jtsummers wrote:
               | nano is available because it was made to be, pico is
               | similarly small. nano was created, in large part, as a
               | response to the license of pico, while (at the time)
               | intending to be a drop-in replacement. Since it was under
               | the GPL and became included in most distros, it was
               | developed further than pico, because users of pico had to
               | seek it out. It wasn't present on most systems without
               | installing it yourself (or having an admin who did).
        
             | pjmlp wrote:
             | Might have been, it was so long ago.
        
         | tomtomtom777 wrote:
         | > Though now I wonder why there isn't a VSCode-equivalent
         | (emphasis on "works out of the box" and "easy to use") for the
         | terminal.
         | 
         | The terminal is effective because you can combine all kinds of
         | tools together. Or as some say, the shell is the IDE.
         | 
         | If you're searching for a single application that performs all
         | these tasks out of the box, there is no longer sufficient
         | benefit in using the terminal. A terminal variant of VSCode
         | would be inferior to the GUI variant.
        
         | mtrycz2 wrote:
         | There was a Sublime-Text-equivalent for the terminal, but I
         | cannot remember its name for the life of me.
        
           | ttt0 wrote:
           | Micro?
        
           | girvo wrote:
           | TextAdept was my go-to for that.
        
           | forgotpwd16 wrote:
           | https://github.com/slap-editor/slap ?
        
         | wffurr wrote:
         | Spacemacs or SPF13 are kind of like that.
        
         | kiririn wrote:
         | The key selling point of Nano for me is displaying the core
         | controls in the footer at all times
         | 
         | This used to be a fairly standard thing in the days of DOS,
         | shame it is not more widespread - my memory for keyboard
         | combinations is atrocious
        
           | tharne wrote:
           | 100%. When I need to remotely help less experienced users
           | solve some issue on a remote server, those controls in footer
           | are incredibly useful.
        
           | awiesenhofer wrote:
           | Seconded. I mostly use vim now, but especially for beginners
           | discoverability - or at least displaying how to exit the
           | current program - is an underrated feature.
        
           | paol wrote:
           | Absolutely. This is also why it's the right choice for the
           | default editor: it lets anyone use it even if they've never
           | seen it before.
        
         | tpoacher wrote:
         | No need to memorise anything. All the shortcuts appear on the
         | menu right at the bottom (and if you want more detail, there's
         | the help page, also linked to on the menu at the bottom)
        
       | GavinAnderegg wrote:
       | I'm now a Vim user in the terminal, but while growing up on
       | mid-90s Slackware I used `joe`. I really figured that little
       | editor out, and it was surprisingly feature rich. Still shares a
       | fond place in my heart.
       | 
       | In the late 90s/early 2000s I started encountering Unix machines
       | that weren't my family's 486. I found that `joe` really wasn't
       | installed anywhere, so I endeavoured to figure out `vi`. This
       | worked well as it was often the default editor on the systems I
       | was attaching to. Some systems used `pico`, and later `nano`...
       | and I found that annoying.
       | 
       | Fast forward a few years, and `nano` seemed to be the default
       | everywhere. At first I found this very irritating, but over time
       | I've come to realize that many have the same sort of feelings
       | about `nano` that I did about `joe`. No, they're not super-
       | extensible mega-editors, but they're fine for editing a few
       | config files or a crontab. More than fine once I bothered to wrap
       | my head around the feature set and stopped grumbling every time I
       | was in a `nano` session. (Though I still set `vim` as my default
       | when reasonable on servers.)
       | 
       | So, I'm sorry little `nano` for all the past grumbling. You may
       | not be my first choice, but I respect you for the workhorse you
       | are!
        
         | discreteevent wrote:
         | I'm the opposite. I used to use vim and then for years I was
         | working on windows stuff. When I came back to linux I wasn't
         | that fluent with vim anymore and I didn't use it for
         | development anyway, just live changes for config files etc. So
         | I decided to switch to nano for that. It's great and it feels
         | really small and light compared to vim (by "feels" I mean
         | subjectively) and I like that.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-10 23:02 UTC)