[HN Gopher] Mediocrity Is Now Mandatory
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mediocrity Is Now Mandatory
        
       Author : psim1
       Score  : 30 points
       Date   : 2021-02-07 19:27 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com)
        
       | actuallyalys wrote:
       | This seems less like an argument and more like a loosely
       | connected list of things that the author doesn't like, everything
       | from Diversity and Inclusion departments to Bernie Sanders'
       | appointment to the Senate budgetary committee--the main
       | commonality is that they're somehow left or left of center. If
       | you already dislike these things, maybe the idea that they're all
       | related is convincing. But if not, it just seems like recycled
       | complaints.
       | 
       | Maybe there is a deep connection to mediocrity in each of these
       | examples, but he doesn't really make that case, only that the
       | status quo, which he asserts used to be about excellence, is
       | changing.
        
       | tamaharbor wrote:
       | We are becoming the movie "Idiocracy". Sad.
        
       | mrkramer wrote:
       | "Why work when Uncle Sam provides table stakes for mob-trading
       | GameStop and dogecoin?"
       | 
       | This made my day.
        
       | Grakel wrote:
       | College will become high school. It will be free, mandatory, and
       | which one you went to won't matter at all. That's not important.
       | But what is important, is that like high school, it won't matter
       | what you studied, or if you stood out. In fact, it's already
       | happening.
        
         | benibela wrote:
         | That is how it is in Europe
        
       | systemvoltage wrote:
       | I find a similar worrying trend in Software Engineering.
       | Criticisms are often supressed [1], people are afraid of saying
       | anything negative to "offend" someone, right-to-be-offended is
       | rampant and often go unchecked and it's sending chilling effects
       | in social media, Github, work places, forums, and slack channels.
       | When we used to meet in person to discuss, there is a level of
       | courtesy and acceptance of dissent as a matter of intellectual
       | discourse, this is being eroded in front of our eyes. Online
       | discussions in the past weren't so gamified as things are today.
       | 
       | On Github, saying something across the grain or against it can
       | lead to public shaming - all beautifully souped up for public
       | consumption in the form of 31 downvotes, emojified, recorded and
       | attached to someone's name. Now, that person will perhaps think
       | twice before saying something negative ever again, silenced and
       | rejected by the public previously. Email mailing lists are far
       | superior in arguing about a point than Github. Makes me furious
       | just thinking about how shitty we have become. It's getting worse
       | everyday. If you think that these people are just "assholes and
       | always complain"; we have a mechanism for people who are truly
       | assholes - be tolerant and ignore them.
       | 
       | Folks, it's time to ditch the 'Emoji Casino' for any sort of
       | serious intellectual discourse. That includes Github and anything
       | that's "social". One should be judged by the merit of their words
       | and thoughts, not statistics and concensus.
       | 
       | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25991563
        
         | gwilikers wrote:
         | Reading this, all I can think is that you are just asking for
         | everyone to spare your feelings while insisting you shouldn't
         | put in the effort to spare anyone else's.
        
           | harpiaharpyja wrote:
           | He isn't asking that though, so was there something you
           | wanted to say about what the GP actually wrote?
        
             | gwilikers wrote:
             | > we have a mechanism for people who are truly assholes -
             | be tolerant and ignore them.
             | 
             | Why does the GP feel they can convey their criticisms to
             | other parties as callously as they please, but reject that
             | anyone should respond to them negatively?
        
       | jakelazaroff wrote:
       | I think the second paragraph of this article is unintentionally
       | revealing:
       | 
       |  _> One high school near me just dropped freshman advanced-
       | standing (honors) English "to combat the effects of academic
       | 'tracking" because it "ultimately separates students of different
       | socioeconomic and racial backgrounds." It turns out that middle
       | schools from lower-income areas aren't adequately preparing their
       | students for high school. So rather than fix that problem, they
       | dumbed down high school._
       | 
       | Rather than write about that problem, the author takes the far
       | less interesting path of complaining about lowering standards.
       | Much easier to advocate a return to a recent status quo than to
       | dig into the sticky, uncomfortable reasons that education is
       | stratified by race and class.
       | 
       | This article is basically a case study in what it purports to
       | call attention to. What could have been an interesting article is
       | merely a mediocre fallacy-filled defense of conservative economic
       | policies that, increasingly clearly, do not work.
        
       | boh wrote:
       | This article assumes grading and categorizations leads to non-
       | mediocre results. And yet, to use the article's own example,
       | Steve Jobs took classes at Reed college without actually being
       | enrolled, losing the opportunity to even get a "loosey-goosey
       | grade-point average" but was considered "exceptional". Being
       | graded doesn't "manifest merit".
       | 
       | These kind of articles tend to vacillate between two extremes.
       | Either academia is killing creativity and producing unthinking
       | drones who live for grades, or schools are too lax with their
       | grading to produce exceptional students.
       | 
       | Mediocre is synonymous with average, which logically speaking, a
       | school will be more likely to produce regardless of its grading
       | policy (aptitude being a moving target). Simply put, exceptional
       | people/circumstances that produce exceptional results are
       | exceptional because they are not the average, so expecting a non-
       | average result from an education system servicing large
       | populations is unlikely in any scenario. Improvements in
       | education require specific solutions to specific problems,
       | arguing more grades/categories are necessary in order to produce
       | some vague idea of merit isn't a relevant assertion.
        
       | greenyoda wrote:
       | Archive link to complete article: https://archive.is/IB9Oz
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-07 23:02 UTC)