[HN Gopher] Google has turned off access to sync features for Ch...
___________________________________________________________________
Google has turned off access to sync features for Chromium
Author : stsewd
Score : 54 points
Date : 2021-01-23 21:21 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (bodhi.fedoraproject.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (bodhi.fedoraproject.org)
| rdiddly wrote:
| I wonder if this is a reaction to Chromium-based Edge overtaking
| Internet Exploder as the most popular Microsoft browser.
| butz wrote:
| Didn't Microsoft replace all Google APIs with its own
| alternatives? This change probably will have bigger impact for
| other browsers built on Chromium, like Brave, Opera, Vivaldi
| etc.
| cheph wrote:
| Pretty sure Opera, Vivaldi and Brave does not sync to google
| servers. The syncing to their servers will still work fine
| AFAIU.
| cheph wrote:
| Pretty sure Chromium based edge does not sync to google
|
| > The reasoning given for this change? Google does not want
| users to be able to "access their personal Chrome Sync data
| (such as bookmarks) ... with a non-Google, Chromium-based
| browser.
|
| I actually use this for having one google profile running in
| two browsers on one computer (one with a proxy, one without).
|
| Sucks quite a bit as this is the primary sync system for
| Chromium. You can run your own but that is not quite that nice.
| kowlo wrote:
| > There is no good reason for Google to do this, other than to
| force people to use Chrome.
|
| Sounds like a good reason (for them) to me!
|
| I've not used Chrome or Chromium for a while... nowadays it's
| between Safari and Firefox for me.
| coding123 wrote:
| This is actually a good thing. People shouldn't be syncing
| ANYTHING with google :)
| andrewinardeer wrote:
| Let people choose what to do.
| bluewalt wrote:
| Does it mean the end of browsers like Brave?
| teraflop wrote:
| Here is the discussion on the chromium-embedders mailing list:
| https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/embedder-dev/c/NX...
|
| Most interesting to me is that even though the Chrome team
| specifically provided API keys for open-source Chromium builds to
| use back in 2013, they are now claiming that "the Terms of
| Service don't allow this usage, and [the previous developer]
| didn't have authority to change the terms."
| juancn wrote:
| This makes sense from a support point of view.
|
| Supporting non-standard configurations costs money (both in
| direct and indirect ways, such as developer attention and time
| lost triaging bugs, etc.), they don't want to spend the money on
| it.
| jsnell wrote:
| Previously on HN:
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25801113
| santoshalper wrote:
| Man, the "don't be evil" days seem like so long ago.
| etaioinshrdlu wrote:
| Is the sync protocol documented? Can you just use an alternative
| server of some kind?
|
| Does vanilla Chromium try to sync at all now? Does it silently
| fail, loudly fail, or just never try?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-23 23:00 UTC)