[HN Gopher] The Risk Makers: The nuclear, auto, and food industries
___________________________________________________________________
The Risk Makers: The nuclear, auto, and food industries
Author : ColinWright
Score : 13 points
Date : 2021-01-18 18:11 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (onezero.medium.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (onezero.medium.com)
| jacquesm wrote:
| Researching the abuse potential of what you put out online is an
| important step in making sure you remain in control of the
| narrative around your offering. If you don't do that one day you
| will wake up to find out that you are now co-founder of something
| that you abhor.
| karaterobot wrote:
| If Facebook has 35,000 people working on safety and security, and
| knows it is now under scrutiny, yet still shits the bed like
| clockwork, what solution is going to fix this to our
| satisfaction?
|
| I'm not really sure there is a viable prevention strategy here.
| The problem of social networks is the problem of human nature
| multiplied by technology, and the regulatory fixes we're likely
| to try seem either quaint or dystopian.
|
| The level of oversight and regulation the nuclear, auto, and food
| industries operate under would be considered crippling in a
| consumer-facing social network space. Batya Friedman (whose
| opinion I already respected) alludes to this in the article. If
| these companies need an impact study to be done and an appointed
| panel to sign off on new features, they'll just lose out to
| competing foreign products without that oversight. My government
| can prevent me from buying an unsafe foreign car, but at present
| they don't generally stop me from signing up for unsafe foreign
| social networks. I'm sure I don't want them to get into that
| practice, either.
|
| I ask myself whether I would want the Trump administration
| overseeing social networks, and by extension do I want an
| indeterminate future administration to have that role either?
| Probably not, nor do I believe any committee or panel would be
| truly above the reach of politics.
|
| In any case, risk management begins by assuming risks are not
| entirely preventable, so quick and effective mitigation should be
| part of any robust solution. Though it may prevent some
| disasters, I'm skeptical whether more bureaucratic oversight
| helps quickly address them when they arise. There's even reason
| for me to think that social media is complex and unique enough
| from nuclear, auto, and food that the existing oversight model
| may not even be useful if extended into this space.
|
| In short, I am not confident in the government's ability to come
| up with something new and brilliant enough to regulate this space
| effectively.
|
| I think this is the quote that sums up the problem for me:
|
| > "We may decide we're not wise enough for certain kinds of
| tools, or certain kinds of companies"
| dredmorbius wrote:
| This should be mandatory reading for all of the tech sector.
| Engineers, founders, investors, VC, marketing, QA, PMs, counsel,
| sales, janatorial and cafeteria staff.
|
| Long (~30pp printed) but rewarding.
| LatteLazy wrote:
| I gave up when the author blamed whitness and maleness for the
| Burmese genocide...
| cjbenedikt wrote:
| Author was quoting a piece of research. Why would that stop you
| from reading?
| LatteLazy wrote:
| It wasn't a quote, it was something they choose to include.
| And it was one too many unfounded assumption presented as if
| it was a fact. Just because someone claims something doesn't
| make it true. Tying a dozen or so claims together is all the
| more likely to be untrue overall. And that was the whole
| article as far as I made it...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-18 23:02 UTC)