[HN Gopher] Jwz: I told you so, 2021 edition
___________________________________________________________________
Jwz: I told you so, 2021 edition
Author : rcarmo
Score : 55 points
Date : 2021-01-16 11:56 UTC (11 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (web.archive.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (web.archive.org)
| mindslight wrote:
| Another approach to splitting out the lock dialog would be to
| fire up another whole X server. That would be so bloated, the
| desktop environment developers might just go for it.
| eqvinox wrote:
| The bloat isn't in the X server, it's in the DE itself. You can
| start an X server and an xterm (without even a window manager)
| on pretty much an empty tank.
| rcarmo wrote:
| Archive org link because Jamie has strong feelings about being
| linked from HN (even down to blocking the folk on Twitter who do
| so).
| bzb6 wrote:
| Linux still not ready as a desktop operating system, news at
| eleven.
| rvz wrote:
| There you go. The same old reasons are still applied and
| unsolved.
| shrimp_emoji wrote:
| Well, more like the Cinnamon DE isn't. And, yeah, if you stray
| from the two superpower DEs with the most dev polish (KDE and
| GNOME), you're asking for jank and bugs.
| eqvinox wrote:
| Did you even read the article? "Hold enter, unlock Gnome-
| screensaver."
|
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1308572
|
| If you go back to an older GNOME version you can probably
| also find the current Cinnamon bug in there, it is in
| libcaribou after all.
| noir_lord wrote:
| I switched from XFCE to Cinnamon after I couldn't get on with
| Gnome, Cinnamon is (for my use case) way less "janky" than
| Gnome since the only way to get close to what I consider a
| pleasant productive desktop on Gnome is to install a bunch of
| very buggy plugins.
|
| Cinnamon at least makes operating like a classic DE a first
| order priority and it works nice across multiple screens.
|
| KDE does the same but aesthetically KDE drives me crazy for
| some reason starting with the complete lack of
| standardisation on padding and going down hill from there.
| mixedCase wrote:
| Yup, you're right. One hopes that Windows and macOS become
| ready at one point given their enormous corporate backing, so
| at least we can have one desktop OS that is actually usable and
| semi-secure.
|
| Alas, one just had a filesystem corruption bug caused by a
| slightly weird input and the other shits all over a different
| subsection of their userbase with every new major release
| between breaking their workflow and bugs like this one, where
| you can "hold enter to root".
| tinus_hn wrote:
| MacOS doesn't have a secure desktop either.
| muth02446 wrote:
| Alternative for screen locking on Linux
|
| https://github.com/google/xsecurelock
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-16 23:01 UTC)