[HN Gopher] It's not Jung's, it's mine
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       It's not Jung's, it's mine
        
       Author : drdee
       Score  : 17 points
       Date   : 2021-01-14 16:52 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (lrb.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (lrb.co.uk)
        
       | mistrial9 wrote:
       | This is a mid-length essay revolving around the works, mind and
       | books of Ursula K. LeGuin. If you are interested in Fantasy as a
       | genre, that writer in particular, and "sexual politics and
       | identity" this essay is for you. I wonder why it is on HNews, but
       | heck, here it is. I clicked because I am an amateur Jung scholar,
       | too.
       | 
       | I read Left Hand in Darkness and most of those Earthsea books as
       | a schoolkid when they were new. I like Dungeons and Dragons. I am
       | wide-eyed and run away from the seemingly endless amount of
       | personal effort people put into 'alternate sexual identities' ..
       | similar to a cancer, to me.. an endless and unsolveable and
       | ultimately unresolvable morass, foisted into almost every
       | Wikipedia article and FOSS post these days. Why cant we keep
       | Pandora's Box closed? an intelligent reader might ask.
       | 
       | If this is an interesting essay, then there is one more
       | interesting essay in this world. Super. Why does this website
       | track my mouse movements while I read then? To present an ad at
       | just the right moment, apparently.
       | 
       | As many commentors here have pointed out, 'rage inducing
       | headlines' get more quick views. Similarly to my mind, 'alternate
       | sexual identity' as fundementally unsolveable also would get
       | endless views on the web. I dont care to participate. Choose for
       | yourself.
        
         | caconym_ wrote:
         | It's entirely your choice whether to recognize people's right
         | to define themselves how they want, or to wring your hands in
         | "intelligent" consternation at something you don't seem to have
         | put much effort into understanding and likely doesn't affect
         | you in any significant way.
         | 
         | No doubt it's become an ideological battleground that regularly
         | sees real ugliness from all sides, but, again, it's your choice
         | whether to let those people define the issues for you.
         | 
         | All that aside, I think it's a big mistake to equate Le Guin's
         | work (even _Left Hand_ itself) with either a) brainless SFF lit
         | with nothing more to say about being human than the average D
         | &D campaign, or b) an expression of the modern left's identity
         | politics doctrine, or something like it. Maybe you should give
         | her bibliography another look.
        
         | klyrs wrote:
         | Ah, yes. LGBT folks as a cancer. Why do we keep talking about
         | them? Wasn't it more convenient when men were men, women
         | weren't people, and any proof to the contrary was dead or in
         | prison? Keep Pandora's box closed, by all means! New rule,
         | _you_ get to pick my gender and sexuality, provided you 'll
         | accept my choices for you. If by "intelligent" you mean people
         | who are closed-minded and can't accept that their understanding
         | of the world is incomplete, then yes, an intelligent reader
         | _might_ ask that.
        
           | icefrakker wrote:
           | I wish people like you wouldn't try and shame shut up people
           | you disagree with particularly when you don't seem to
           | understand what the person you're disagreeing with is
           | actually saying.
        
         | jessaustin wrote:
         | _Why does this website track my mouse movements while I read
         | then? To present an ad at just the right moment, apparently._
         | 
         | Please improve your life: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/
        
         | wizzwizz4 wrote:
         | > _foisted into almost every Wikipedia article and FOSS post
         | these days._
         | 
         | I am sincerely sorry that I exist, and am involved in FOSS. I
         | shall try my best never to do anything worthy of mention in a
         | Wikipedia article - though no promises there; it's possible I
         | might get involved in a scandal, or contribute to a project
         | that gets popular faster than I can rebase my name out of the
         | commit history.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-01-15 23:02 UTC)