[HN Gopher] Dire wolves were not wolves, new genetic clues reveal
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Dire wolves were not wolves, new genetic clues reveal
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 68 points
       Date   : 2021-01-14 11:57 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.scientificamerican.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.scientificamerican.com)
        
       | throwaway894345 wrote:
       | It says that Dire Wolves are an offshoot of "dogs"... I thought
       | dogs evolved from wolves in close contact with humans for long
       | periods of time, circa 15-30k years ago. If that's true, how
       | would these early dogs made it to North America? What am I
       | missing?
        
         | Udik wrote:
         | > It says that Dire Wolves are an offshoot of "dogs"
         | 
         | And then it says that their genetic analysis might indicate
         | that they're not even part of the _canis_ genus. Which means
         | they would not be considered dogs at all- so how could they
         | have descended from  "dogs"?
         | 
         | Seems just sloppy terminology to me.
        
         | wolfretcrap wrote:
         | North America bad bridge to Asia long ago
        
           | throwaway894345 wrote:
           | But probably not in the 15-30kya range, right?
        
             | svachalek wrote:
             | Apparently yes, for most of that time period.
             | 
             | "A reconstruction of the sea-level history of the region
             | indicated that a seaway existed from c. 135,000 - c. 70,000
             | BP, a land bridge from c. 70,000 - c. 60,000 BP,
             | intermittent connection from c. 60,000 - c. 30,000 BP, a
             | land bridge from c. 30,000 - c. 11,000 BP, followed by a
             | Holocene sea-level rise that reopened the strait.[22][23]
             | Post-glacial rebound has continued to raise some sections
             | of coast."
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beringia#Geography
        
         | ovis wrote:
         | They may be using the term "dog" to refer to Caninae (or
         | Canidae?) rather than wolf-derived pets, judging by the
         | description of the phylogeny.
        
           | selfsimilar wrote:
           | Exactly. Later in the article it's mentioned that the
           | researchers believe the DNA evidence will move the dire wolf
           | out of the 'canis' genus, which by implication will leave
           | them in the 'canidae' family. However I think the author
           | could have been more clear.
        
             | throwaway894345 wrote:
             | Yeah, I didn't realize that "dog" was equivalent to
             | "canidae".
        
         | dbingham wrote:
         | That's the popular understanding, but genetic studies caused
         | science to move away from that explanation some time ago. Dogs
         | seem to have evolved from a common ancestor with wolves quite a
         | ways back and show a good deal of genetic divergence. Though
         | they are still included in the "Canus" genus.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog#Origin
         | 
         | More detail:
         | 
         | > Genetic studies show that dogs and modern wolves display
         | reciprocal monophyly (separate groups), which implies that dogs
         | are not genetically close to any living wolf population and
         | that the wild ancestor of the dog is extinct.[4][2] An extinct
         | Late Pleistocene wolf may have been the ancestor of the
         | dog,[3][1] with the dog's similarity to the extant grey wolf
         | being the result of genetic admixture between the two.[1] In
         | 2020, a literature review of canid domestication stated that
         | modern dogs were not descended from the same Canis lineage as
         | modern wolves, and proposes that dogs may be descended from a
         | Pleistocene wolf closer in size to a village dog.[5]
         | 
         | > The genetic divergence between dogs and wolves occurred
         | between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago, just before or during the
         | Last Glacial Maximum[6][1] (20,000-27,000 years ago). This
         | timespan represents the upper time-limit for the commencement
         | of domestication because it is the time of divergence but not
         | the time of domestication, which occurred later.[6][7] One of
         | the most important transitions in human history was the
         | domestication of animals, which began with the long-term
         | association between wolves and hunter-gatherers more than
         | 15,000 years ago.[4]
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog
        
           | hobby-coder-guy wrote:
           | What is a village dog?
        
         | eloff wrote:
         | They're not referring to domestic dogs. Dogs must mean
         | something else in that field. They state that dire wolves split
         | from the common ancestor with wolves about 6M years ago and
         | didn't interbreed. That makes them about as related to wolves
         | as we are with chimps.
        
           | vinceguidry wrote:
           | Dogs in this sense refers to any member of the Canis genus.
           | Historically speaking, before taxonomic and genomic advances,
           | coyotes, wolves, jackals, and, well, dogs, were all called
           | dogs.
           | 
           | Similar usage inconsistencies persist throughout the world.
        
       | imbnwa wrote:
       | >It had long been assumed that dire wolves made themselves at
       | home in North America before gray wolves followed them across the
       | Bering Land Bridge from Eurasia
       | 
       | This sentence caught my mind because it really represented how
       | much randomness and accident you can abstract away with your
       | choice of words
        
         | Cerium wrote:
         | That sentence reads like a standardized English test question.
         | Follow up questions from the passage: "Why did dire wolves
         | choose North America as their home?", "True or False: Gray
         | wolves choose to follow the dire wolves in search of open
         | lands."
        
           | svachalek wrote:
           | Reminds me of SAT prep so many years ago.
           | 
           | Answer key: "To get away from the crowd of gray wolves",
           | "True"
           | 
           | Young me: Are you _kidding_ me?
        
       | some_furry wrote:
       | The art at the top of the article looks suspiciously like it
       | depicts dholes.
       | 
       | https://animals.sandiegozoo.org/animals/dhole
        
       | cafard wrote:
       | Shows what I know. I only ever heard the expression "dire wolf"
       | in a Grateful Dead song.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | Igelau wrote:
         | Don't murder me, I beg of you don't murder me.
        
         | quesera wrote:
         | You should read more G.R.R. Martin! :)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | peterbraden wrote:
       | Doesn't load at all in firefox. I guess they only tested in
       | chrome.
        
         | saiya-jin wrote:
         | not sure what setup you use, but for me (win 10 64b, latest
         | firefox, running ublock origin and ghostery) works fine
        
           | TheCapeGreek wrote:
           | Side note: You probably want to switch to Privacy Badger.
           | Less shakey than Ghostery with privacy and doesn't replace
           | ads with its own.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostery#Criticism
        
           | ViViDboarder wrote:
           | I use Firefox's content filter and it always to filter out
           | the actual content of the page. Oddly enough, refreshing made
           | it load just fine.
        
         | arbitrage wrote:
         | I'm sorry, I can't replicate. Firefox works fine, here.
        
           | jhauris wrote:
           | I think they fixed something. less than 5 minutes ago it
           | didn't load for me, and suddenly it did.
        
           | croisillon wrote:
           | here too
        
         | eloff wrote:
         | Didn't load for me first time in Firefox. I refreshed and it
         | worked.
        
       | throwanem wrote:
       | Link to the paper in _Nature_ :
       | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03082-x
        
       | budhajeewa wrote:
       | Wolf or not wolf, winter is coming.
        
         | eloff wrote:
         | It's January 14. Winter can't get any more here (I got the game
         | of thrones reference.)
        
         | 35fbe7d3d5b9 wrote:
         | I was about to make a reference to "six hundred pounds of sin"
         | until I realized we'd be making two different popular cultural
         | references.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-01-14 23:02 UTC)