[HN Gopher] Science's Demons, from Descartes to Darwin and Beyond
___________________________________________________________________
Science's Demons, from Descartes to Darwin and Beyond
Author : fortran77
Score : 46 points
Date : 2021-01-08 15:29 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.newyorker.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.newyorker.com)
| threeden wrote:
| > Most of us would consider the discriminatory insurance demon to
| be truly demonic, but, in general, scientific demons simply
| represent gaps in our existing knowledge, anthropomorphic
| accounts of the unknown or the unexplained. Given their
| aspirational quality--a longing toward greater understanding--
| these roles might at first seem better filled by angels. But,
| because they often represent theories that violate laws of time
| or space, machines that exceed human capacities, and technologies
| that threaten human existence, the use of demons feels
| appropriate; their very identity suggests the workings of a
| mischievous or malevolent force
|
| This characterization of the supernatural being is irrelevant to
| their nature.
|
| > Canales quotes a computer scientist at Microsoft who argued
| that Internet and finance companies today "are trying to become
| Maxwell's demons in an information network." His example was a
| health-insurance company using Big Data to sort desirable
| customers from undesirable customers
|
| That's a cute thought experiment albeit not directly the of the
| same kind previously discussed. This person is clearly discussing
| aggregated human effects, nothing hard to prove there.
|
| > This strange being disappears entirely from the final version
| of "On the Origin of Species," where only the theory of natural
| selection appears, absent any miraculous causes or supernatural
| forces.
|
| Makes you wonder if the publication would have received the same
| attention had this part not being removed from the final
| revision.
|
| > Still, among those who studied it more closely, Maxwell's demon
| has inspired new technologies and theories in fields as diverse
| as chemistry, cosmology, nanotechnology, neuroscience, and
| cybernetics.
|
| The article, albeit being a great summary, does little effort to
| acknowledge the difference between demons being merely analogies
| for the unknown versus being the catalyst of new ways to tame
| nature.
| chrischapman wrote:
| 2,665,866,746,644 is my new favorite number.
| harscoat wrote:
| Socrate's demon not mentioned?
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(classical_mythology)#S...
| gshubert17 wrote:
| Perhaps the difference is that according to the article, the
| scientific demons are explanatory metaphors, presumed to be
| imaginary; and according to Plato, Socrates acted like his
| daemon is real?
|
| [edit, wording and punctuation]
| B1FF_PSUVM wrote:
| _" According to such taxonomies, demons were a busy bunch, tasked
| with everything from promoting quarrels, discord, and war (the
| work of a demon called Bufas) to inserting errors into the
| manuscripts of scribes and keeping tabs on the mispronunciations
| of preachers during worship (the work of Titivillus)."_
|
| I'll say the old theology (with deities, etc.) had more amusing
| bits than the modern scientific theology, which tends to be dour
| and self-righteous.
|
| (But, hey, miracles now are a lot cheaper ...)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-09 23:02 UTC)