[HN Gopher] Research team demonstrates world's fastest optical n...
___________________________________________________________________
Research team demonstrates world's fastest optical neuromorphic
processor
Author : sizzle
Score : 31 points
Date : 2021-01-08 21:05 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.swinburne.edu.au)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.swinburne.edu.au)
| sroussey wrote:
| There are several universities, big corporations, and startups
| taking another look at analog computing, and ML seems to be
| application that will make it viable.
| hikerclimber wrote:
| hopefully this isn't true.
| cosmodisk wrote:
| Just simply pause for a second and admire this part: 10 trillion
| per second. No matter how you look at it, that's a lot.
| p1esk wrote:
| That's a lot, but the way to look at it is: "how many TOPS per
| second _per watt_ when we run Resnet-50 on it "
| ben_w wrote:
| Always nice to see optical processors in the news.
|
| How do the 10 TeraOPs/s on this compare to the 11 on the Apple
| M1?
| p1esk wrote:
| It's far too early to compare this with any commercial NN
| accelerators. From the article:
|
| _Although the performance of ONNs is not yet competitive with
| leading-edge electronic processors at >200 TOPS (for example,
| Google TPU and other chips), there are straightforward
| approaches towards increasing our performance both in scale and
| speed. Further, with a single processor speed of 11.3 TOPS, our
| VCA is approaching this range. The CA is fundamentally limited
| in data size only by the electrical digital-to-analogue
| converter memory, and processing 4K-resolution (4,096x2,160
| pixels) images at >7,000 frames per second is possible. The 720
| synapses of the CNN (72 wavelengths per synapses per neuron, 10
| neurons), a substantial increase for optical networks, enabled
| us to classify the MNIST dataset. Nonetheless, further scaling
| is needed to increase the theoretical prediction accuracy from
| 90% to that of state-of-the-art electronics, typically
| substantially greater than 95%._
| hetspookjee wrote:
| 7k fps on 4k resolution is an absurd amount of bandwidth. For
| 8 bit pixels that is 619 Gbps. Very interesting. Thanks.
| [deleted]
| bhassel wrote:
| ArsTechnica article discussing this paper (and one other), with a
| bit of background information:
| https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/01/two-ways-of-performi...
| bra-ket wrote:
| arxiv paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.07393.pdf
| RocketSyntax wrote:
| "10x the performance of TPU"
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-08 23:00 UTC)