[HN Gopher] US to auction off parts of Arctic wildlife refuge to...
___________________________________________________________________
US to auction off parts of Arctic wildlife refuge to oil drillers
Author : samizdis
Score : 29 points
Date : 2021-01-05 19:09 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
| soupson wrote:
| This will still get caught up in litigation, won't be backed by
| the Biden administration, and won't be funded by any of the big
| banks, which have refused to participate [0]
|
| [0]https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bank-of-america-joins-
| big-...
| gotem wrote:
| Interesting how it's good for energy production but not for the
| environment despite the environment producing energy.
| dgllghr wrote:
| Interesting how lobotomies are good for treating mania but not
| brains despite the brain producing mania
| notional wrote:
| > They said development would generate $900m, although an
| analysis by the non-partisan watchdog group Taxpayers for Common
| Sense, based on historical bid data, found that it would bring in
| just a fraction of that amount - no more than $27.6m. That would
| be split between the federal government and the state of Alaska.
|
| $900 million is a big number but when I opened this article I was
| wondering why any of the big name billionaires who are making
| climate change 'pledges', or basically thinking about Bezos here,
| wouldn't just buy it up instead.
|
| Then I got to this part in the next paragraph
|
| > The former governors Frank Murkowski and Bill Walker have
| encouraged the state to bid on any unwanted tracts itself, and
| last week a state-owned economic development corporation voted to
| authorize bidding up to $20m.
|
| It looks like there is at least in Alaska some efforts to keep
| the lands away from oil companies.
|
| Given that billionaires love to collect land even more than they
| like starting space companies, it'd be a huge philanthropic
| initiative to purchase it and have it turned into protected
| wildlife refuge.
| ENOTTY wrote:
| The economic development fund for the state of Alaska would not
| be purchasing tracts of lands for the purposes of preservation.
| They would be purchasing the tracts of land in order to
| preserve the ability to lease them to oil companies in the
| future, after the Trump administration leaves office.
| njarboe wrote:
| These lands are not being sold to anyone as implied in the
| standard click-bait style headline.
|
| It is probably best if this oil is left in the ground for future
| generations until we get our CO2 levels under control, but these
| are leases of the land for oil exploration and extraction. They
| expire and in many cases no wells will be drilled, especially if
| the price of oil keeps dropping.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-05 23:03 UTC)