[HN Gopher] I logged my activities at 15-minute intervals for th...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       I logged my activities at 15-minute intervals for the whole year
        
       Author : HuangYuSan
       Score  : 332 points
       Date   : 2021-01-03 17:04 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (samplesize.one)
 (TXT) w3m dump (samplesize.one)
        
       | WClayFerguson wrote:
       | Google/Facebook and companies like the old "Cambridge Analytica"
       | who buy their data, or similar data collection agencies, probably
       | have this exact level of detail on pretty much everyone who owns
       | a phone or computer.
        
       | hawktheslayer wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing--I'm reading Atomic Habits and have been
       | thinking about tracking like this. It's impressive that you stuck
       | with it and inspiring.
        
       | poulsbohemian wrote:
       | Y'know, do whatever works for you, but this kind of relentless
       | focus on time management feels like it runs exactly the opposite
       | of what I want in my life. Meaning, when I was younger I could
       | focus on problems for long chunks of time. As I've gotten older
       | and had to deal with work stress, kid stress, life stress, dozens
       | of devices all pinging me with notifications, people demanding my
       | attention constantly... the truth is I can barely make it 15
       | minutes without someone or something interrupting me. I had this
       | jerk client for a brief while - he was on monthly retainer, but
       | wanted this kind of minute-by-minute granularity of tracking my
       | time. It was the kind of thing that finally put me over the edge
       | against this kind of relentless optimization because all it was
       | doing was _wasting my time_ tracking time rather than actually
       | _doing the bloody work_. So hey, if tracking your life in 15
       | minute increments gives you what you need, great, but I
       | personally am working on how to build long increments of time
       | with greater focus.
        
         | baby wrote:
         | So the lesson is to offer days/weeks, not hours or minutes, of
         | work?
        
       | nyxtom wrote:
       | This sounds like a obvious question, but when do you log the
       | data? Do you set a timer every 15 minutes? What about the time
       | spent logging data every 15 minutes? Any complementary apps?
        
         | nequals1 wrote:
         | I try to note start and end times of activities. At work, or
         | whenever I'm doing something on my laptop I would fill the
         | spreadsheet as soon as I finish or take a break from an
         | activity (eg finished reading a paper, going on a coffee break
         | now). When I'm doing something more varied I would note
         | start/end times via google sheets app on my phone or just
         | remember them and fill them once I have access to my laptop.
         | Sometimes, I would use data from my fitbit (to see when I
         | started/stopped walking) or my search history (to see changes
         | between working vs looking at silly things on the internet).
         | The categories were broad enough that logging the data is not
         | too time-consuming and often they could be added as big time-
         | blocks of a single activity.
        
       | rdiddly wrote:
       | I just started doing this, but using 30-minute blocks, and fewer
       | categories. "Keep it simple." The goal is to make sure certain
       | activities receive at least a minimum of attention, and others
       | don't exceed a maximum. The rest, you don't need to schedule or
       | track. A flexible system. Freedom alongside order. Open prairie
       | just outside the city grid. Dreams amid plans.
        
       | veddox wrote:
       | > I guess the lesson here is that when it comes to focused work,
       | the 8-hour working day is an unattainable target and should not
       | be used as a benchmark.
       | 
       | Any thoughts on this?
        
         | fsflover wrote:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21465056
        
       | Donckele wrote:
       | All activities? anyone know what the limits were?
        
       | kingaillas wrote:
       | Fun and interesting read!
       | 
       | I'm doing a vastly scaled down time logging for 2021 - I want to
       | understand how I use my time at home after work. I'm using a time
       | tracker app, sometimes in conjunction with a pomodoro timer
       | (TimeCube Plus, red model with 5/10/20/25 min sides).
       | 
       | Since I'm only tracking my time at home, the categories are:
       | gaming, tv/movies, music instrument, foreign language, exercise
       | (that I can do indoors, such as weight training or flexibility:
       | yoga, stretching), computer (email, my time right now on HN,
       | general web surfing... anything not work related), and reading.
       | 
       | I'm not trying to account for house cleaning, sleeping, any
       | outdoor activity, cooking, working, etc. I just want to get a
       | better idea of how I spend my "free" time at home, and maybe make
       | some changes after gathering at least 3 months of data.
        
       | miguelrochefort wrote:
       | Awesome read!
       | 
       | I've been tracking all my time, also at a 15-minute resolution,
       | for the past 24 months.
       | 
       | It seems to make new habits so much easier to adopt. The biggest
       | surprise was how effective pre-tracking my time (aka time-
       | blocking) was at programming myself to do things. Making things
       | concrete and easy to visualize definitely helps in preventing
       | procrastination.
       | 
       | I see that you used Google Sheets for time tracking. Did you
       | consider using any other tools in conjunction, such as Google
       | Calendar or automatic time-trackers such as ActivityWatch,
       | RescueTime, Timing, ManicTime, or Memory? I have managed to
       | automate 80% of my time tracking.
        
         | sxg wrote:
         | Huge fan of time blocking! It's been a game changer for me.
         | Time blocking (pre-planning my daily schedule) eliminates the
         | need to figure out what to do next, which I realized was a big
         | source of procrastination. If my next steps/actions are
         | unclear, it's easier to just take a break or default to doing
         | something pseudoproductive (e.g. organizing my calendar, todo
         | list) rather than take on a meaningful new project.
        
         | rorykoehler wrote:
         | How do you deal with project deadlines?
        
         | karmelapple wrote:
         | Thanks for the recommendations! I have been using RescueTime
         | for years, and it's been great to see trends in my use of
         | various apps. At the new year, I analyzed how my Facebook use
         | changed over the years, and it's been great to see it come down
         | so much.
        
         | ad404b8a372f2b9 wrote:
         | Does one of those allow easy input of activity with a single
         | button click without required login and cloud use? Also are
         | they free?
         | 
         | I tried to find an easy tracking workflow a few years back but
         | all the apps had hidden dark patterns so I gave up.
        
           | gingerlime wrote:
           | I'd be happy skipping the free part for something that
           | preserves my privacy. Off the list GP posted, the first name
           | -- ActivityWatch -- seems to hit the mark? open source,
           | privacy-first, cross-platform according to the homepage[0].
           | Never even heard of it until now, but I might give it a try
           | :)
           | 
           | [0] https://activitywatch.net/
        
             | axetheone wrote:
             | I've picked up ActivityWatch an year ago precisely due to
             | those factors and I'm quite happy with it.
        
             | miguelrochefort wrote:
             | ActivityWatch is the one I'm using. It even runs on my
             | Android phone.
        
       | alextheparrot wrote:
       | My experience with this type of tracking is that it makes me more
       | thoughtful about my time. I used Numbers and it cloud-syncs to
       | most of my devices, I prefer this over passive trackers.
       | 
       | I did this for a month a while back, one realization I instantly
       | had was that a lot of the my attention issues were caused by
       | 'micro-interuptions'. For example, spending 8 minutes answering a
       | support question on Slack and then going to write code - how do I
       | record that? The same is largely true with Twitter or even HN,
       | spend 5 minutes browsing instead of doing something with
       | intention. Recording [Activity,Start,Stop] was preferable for me,
       | the continuous scale made it really easy to track not just what I
       | was doing, but the interstitial time when I didn't actively have
       | a plan to do something.
       | 
       | Just setting out to record what I am doing helped to limit the
       | number of things I was doing and made me be intentional about
       | what they were. This post was relatively timely, as I actually
       | started doing it again this morning.
        
       | ThinkBeat wrote:
       | > human function - the boring stuff: eating
       | 
       | I disagree on this one.
       | 
       | Eating can and on good days should be a pleasure. It can also be
       | very social. Eating together is an ancient tradition. Breaking
       | bread.
       | 
       | It is a common misconception that it takes a lot of time. If you
       | are not used to cooking yourself then it will take time to learn
       | how (not just how to microwave),and then learn how to adapt it
       | for your own taste buds. Then you get used to it and a lot of
       | dishes can be made fresh in less than 10 mins.
       | 
       | It also involves going to the store. If going into a sad US
       | supermarket with plastic wrapped everything, It is easy to
       | understand the reluctance to spend time on it.
       | 
       | Yet a proper market with the flavors, the colors and variety it
       | is a different experience.
       | 
       | I often feel happy once I have found a right cut of fish, I cant
       | wait to get home, prepare it and eat it.
       | 
       | I am sad that in some countries and in some circles it is seen as
       | a "must do/boring", instead of "This is going to be delicious".
       | 
       | For some scarfing down a Granola bar and a protein milkshake is
       | what eating has been reduced to.
       | 
       | Granted that would save a lot of time and people are different.
       | 
       | Everyone should spend time satisfying the foundation of Maslow
       | pyramid. that a lot of users of this site can take somewhat for
       | granted (Not everyone :( )
       | 
       | Having been in the army for a while and at war ( As a means of
       | getting out of a bad background) I was made aware of how
       | important all the parts of the foundation is.
       | 
       | I swore to myself that I would always remember to be grateful
       | when I enter a place that is dry and comfortable, when I have an
       | actual bed to rest on, when I have dry clothing and boots in the
       | morning, and how miraculous it is to have a say in, and the
       | ability to not eat what minimally sustains you. A toilet that
       | flushes and is private and a the ability for a shower.
       | 
       | We should all be conscious of the privileged it is to have these
       | things available to us and take joy in it. It might not last.
       | 
       | Still even with old rations for 90 days straight the communal
       | experience of sharing a meal was present.
       | 
       | Also sex. It is not mentioned in the schedule. That may be for
       | puritanical reasons. That is no business of yours buddy, and that
       | is fine, but spend a bit evaluating what is included and what is
       | not. Most of this logged time in self actualization. Is it also a
       | reflection of what the author is proud of / wants to share.
       | 
       | Eating and sex both can be wondrous or a ration pack that should
       | have been thrown away 12 years ago. Both low on the pyramid.
        
       | lma21 wrote:
       | That's a lot of 'focused work'! I doubt I can log the time I
       | spend at work as focused-work... I have a feeling that low-focus
       | work would dominate. Does anyone else feel the same?
        
       | lawn wrote:
       | I'm always in ave of these posts, of how people are able to log
       | activities in these resolutions. I have really large problems
       | tracking what I spend my hours at work on, and often resort to
       | winging it.
        
         | radley wrote:
         | Stay in touch. I'm building an Apple app for that.
        
       | xkeysc0re wrote:
       | I am really really grateful I am not this kind of person. Not
       | everything needs to be quantified and analyzed. I'm glad OP had
       | fun with the exercise but this drive to amass data will only lead
       | to human suffering and oppression down the line
        
         | saberience wrote:
         | Yeah, I saw the title of this blog post and it immediately
         | depressed me. The idea of tracking my time minutely in some
         | effort to be more efficient or "productive" seems to be the
         | antithesis of being human.
        
         | ChrisLomont wrote:
         | > this drive to amass data will only lead to human suffering
         | and oppression down the line
         | 
         | On a large scale, science (and economics) is a drive to amass
         | data, which has led to vast reductions in human suffering.
         | 
         | Amassing data lets one (and mankind) make decisions not on
         | random conjecture or feeling, but on a solid footing, which
         | results in better decisions on how to allocate resources. Not
         | gathering data where it's possible to do so results in more
         | human suffering from making sub-optimal decisions from bad
         | inputs.
        
           | hezag wrote:
           | > Amassing data lets one (and mankind) make decisions not on
           | random conjecture or feeling, but on a solid footing, which
           | results in better decisions on how to allocate resources
           | 
           | "Better" is extremely relative. Better for whom?
        
             | ChrisLomont wrote:
             | Well, to start, the tens of billions of people in total
             | that have been fed over the past century by modern farming.
             | The tens of billions total that have been pulled from
             | poverty over the last 50 years. The billions right now
             | getting vastly better medical care than their ancestors.
             | 
             | What percentage of people would you claim worldwide or over
             | the past 100 years are worse off as a result of science and
             | economic advances? Care to list why they're worse off in
             | total?
        
           | mlady wrote:
           | I think there's a sweet spot somewhere. We're tending towards
           | too much data now with hourly employees working from home but
           | have their screens monitored for constant activity, even if
           | it isn't value-producing.
        
             | xkeysc0re wrote:
             | Exactly. The positivist drive to quantify and accumulate
             | "data points" about everything as though life is just an
             | optimization problem is dangerous and only serves
             | entrenched forces.
             | 
             | Quantification is a means to control. Some things - in my
             | opinion - ought not to be controlled.
        
           | snds wrote:
           | I suspect the parent comment is referring to amassing
           | personally identifiable information
        
         | const_HNBurner wrote:
         | I get this impulse, but I think OPs experiment really does have
         | some redeeming qualities. While I certainly wouldn't want to
         | bean-count my time _forever_ , I imagine that performing this
         | exercise for some period of time would make one more thoughtful
         | & intentional about how one spends their time. Sometimes you
         | need the data to see that you're spending way more time than
         | you'd desire on social media, or not enough time with your
         | friends, etc. I equate it to counting calories while dieting;
         | doing it forever leads to horrible quality of life (imo), doing
         | it for a month or two teaches you how much food you actually
         | need and makes you more mindful about your consumption.
         | 
         | EDIT: Also, the point of this sort of exercise isn't merely to
         | 'become more productive' - it's to gather data to help achieve
         | whatever outcome you find valuable in your life. Maybe it's
         | studying more for his exams (certainly different than working
         | more at your 9 to 5 bigco job fwiw), maybe it's spending more
         | quality time with family, etc. The point is collecting this
         | sort of data doesn't necessarily lead solely to optimizing your
         | output under capitalism, it can be a tool for better living. I
         | think.
        
         | nekopa wrote:
         | I don't understand this viewpoint. This type of data is being
         | misused already. I think it would be a net positive for
         | individuals to get their own data and use it for positive
         | outcomes. It shouldn't be shared with the world at large, but
         | when I've tracked certain info about myself, it has helped me
         | immensely.
        
           | lmarcos wrote:
           | I also think that the data itself can be used for positive
           | outcomes... The manual tracking though (every 15 min.) is the
           | downside.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | germanka wrote:
       | Lots of work btw...
        
       | natdempk wrote:
       | This was very cool, I'd be curious to hear more about the
       | logistics of logging this. I'm curious how they practically
       | logged all of this and made sure not to drop time across
       | different activities, busy days, etc. I feel like if I tried to
       | do this I would end up losing track of a lot of time.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | bobbydreamer wrote:
       | This person does it differently. He takes pic of everything timed
       | 
       | https://kaielvin.org/tl/t=1585396555000000
        
       | luxurytent wrote:
       | Everytime these come up, I am reminded how little time we have
       | for extracurricular activities as parents (outside of things
       | you'd do with the kids, e.g. hiking, swimming, etc)
       | 
       | But raising children is an investment in itself and the years
       | where the demand for attention is higher (0-5 especially) are
       | short in comparison to the future time you have for yourself.
       | 
       | I suppose you gain perspective and over those years an ability to
       | optimize for time :)
        
         | xwdv wrote:
         | The problem is when you have multiple children spaced over a
         | few years, you get a decade or more of time eaten up.
        
           | lb1lf wrote:
           | -My brother-in-law coined the phrase micro-holiday to keep
           | himself sane when having kids - a micro-holiday is the time
           | you have to yourself during a day. Most often, it occurs in
           | the time span between closing the rear door after packing the
           | young 'uns in and opening the driver's door after walking
           | around your car.
        
         | jedberg wrote:
         | > Everytime these come up, I am reminded how little time we
         | have for extracurricular activities as parents
         | 
         | This is interesting, because it's only a problem for non-rich
         | people. Rich people solve this with nannies and babysitters and
         | other home staff to take care of chores and child-rearing so
         | they have more time for work or leisure activities.
         | 
         | It really puts a point on the whole "everyone has 24 hours in a
         | day, but not everyone's 24 hours are equal".
        
           | luxurytent wrote:
           | > It really puts a point on the whole "everyone has 24 hours
           | in a day, but not everyone's 24 hours are equal".
           | 
           | Great point. Further driven by the pandemic
        
             | jedberg wrote:
             | Funny you mention that. Because of the pandemic, a lot of
             | people had to drop their in home help. Only the richest of
             | the rich, who had in-home help that lives with them, were
             | able to keep using in-home help.
        
               | maxerickson wrote:
               | Also people who decided not to worry about the
               | consequences of having someone coming in and out of their
               | home.
               | 
               | Seems to be lots of them really.
        
               | laumars wrote:
               | In the U.K. the government guidelines have been that
               | they're still allowed to work. And given the kind of
               | contracts many of them are on, if they don't come in they
               | don't get paid. So it really puts added pressure on
               | everyone to work.
        
           | whatshisface wrote:
           | Isn't paying someone else to raise your children... not
           | raising children? It's like comparing a bank with actual gold
           | in a vault and many expensive physical security measures with
           | someone who owns a futures contract with no delivery.
        
             | skipnup wrote:
             | Having a full time nanny would be as you described, in my
             | eyes.
             | 
             | But you can have someone clean your flat/house, someone do
             | the gardening, someone doing your taxes. Have someone cook
             | for you. And thus have more time for your kids and still
             | have more free time.
        
               | Balgair wrote:
               | Think someone like Alice the live-in-maid from _The Brady
               | Bunch_. Yes, she was part of child rearing, but Mike and
               | Carol were there too. Granted, it 's a saccharine sitcom
               | of total unbelievableness from the 60's.
        
             | jedberg wrote:
             | I mean, yes and no I suppose. Is sending your own kids to
             | school not educating your children? They still end up
             | educated. And with a nanny, they still end up "raised".
        
               | oblio wrote:
               | School isn't like a nanny, though.
               | 
               | I'm quite sure that psychology studies show that children
               | need to bond with their parents (biological or adoptive).
               | I imagine there's a fine line with that outsourcing and
               | it's hard to draw, as a thought experiment I'd guess if
               | they spend 80% of the time with their nanny, they're not
               | going to bond as well with their parents.
        
             | VLM wrote:
             | I raised some kids and a unquantified "lot of" time is
             | spent teaching them to gradually be independent adults by
             | occasionally making sure they're safe while they do their
             | own thing.
             | 
             | An excellent analogy is I spent some time in a minor
             | leadership position in a boy scout troop and beyond a
             | certain age the kids do all the work, the adults are there
             | to explain "and that's why the wood lot area is fenced
             | off", "and that is the correct archery range safety
             | procedure", "and no that is not a safe way to maintain a
             | campfire" and so on and so forth. As the actual troop
             | leader often said, if the adults are sweating something is
             | not being done correctly; the kids should be doing all the
             | work and the adults are mere safety advisor guests of the
             | kids.
             | 
             | Some kids in some subcultures are able to safely with
             | minimal adult supervision, for example, whittle wood sticks
             | into smaller theoretically artistic sticks at age 8 whereas
             | others STILL cannot responsibly whittle at age 24.
             | 
             | I spent a lot of time as a dad parenting at a laptop on the
             | deck occasionally saying "no, there's a buried gas line
             | there, dig for fossils over there" and the kids would make
             | their own "discoveries" underground.
             | 
             | Its kinda like being in management where some folks (or
             | kids) need near hand-over-hand supervision sometimes, yet
             | others you just kinda check on every day or so. Ideally by
             | the time the kids are adults (16, 18, 21, ..., ?) the
             | parents shouldn't be doing much other than occasional
             | management checkins and providing of advice.
             | 
             | There's a big difference between leading and enabling the
             | kids while knowing exactly what they're doing in a safety
             | sense, vs not being involved at all.
             | 
             | For example I know next to nothing about welding (well, I
             | know a little but I'm no certified nuclear boiler
             | welder...) so I was quite happy to have one of the boy
             | scout dads who's all certified up in welding teach that
             | badge "in my place". He teaches older apprentices how to
             | weld gas pipelines so he's certainly qualified to teach...
             | All I really did as his partner was make sure everyone
             | stayed hydrated LOL.
             | 
             | For little kids a lot of parenting is you just need a
             | parent figure at the park to occasionally say "no" and
             | redirect. "Yeah I see the league has a ball game at the
             | diamond so you can't play there, but no you're not playing
             | baseball in the busiest street in the city get back on the
             | grass now"
             | 
             | A better analogy is something like you're claiming if a
             | bank hires a security manager who enforces security
             | policies then the bank is not providing actual "uniformed
             | dude standing at attention" security. Yet some kind of
             | manager role may be the most important time/money the bank
             | can spend WRT security...
             | 
             | When they're younger toddlers they need a lot of parenting
             | until they discover lego or whatever, but that's a rather
             | short phase in their lives.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | alextheparrot wrote:
             | Seems to be that the distinction may not be important for
             | managerially oriented people. Some parents, of a mindset
             | which I was not raised by, seem to see the role of a parent
             | to be more in charge of "Coordinating an upbringing". I
             | don't think this mindset is wholly bad, though I would
             | expect it does have recognizable trade-offs.
        
             | serial_dev wrote:
             | There is a line between completely "outsourcing" raising
             | your children (how I "stereotypically" imagine royal
             | families might do) and getting help with the things that
             | take all your energy but doesn't really contribute to your
             | relationships with your children.
             | 
             | Washing clothes, buying groceries, cooking every day are
             | all things that must be done, but it can be done by another
             | person (nanny, au pair, or even grand parents) without
             | taking away (much) from your relationship with your
             | children.
             | 
             | Just imagine the difference between the mood of a parent
             | who cooked, cleaned, washed that day vs the parent who is
             | relaxed as all those things were done by outside (paid)
             | help. Same person in two totally different mood and energy
             | level by the dinner comes. Also keep in mind that these
             | things have to be done every single day, so while it might
             | be okay to work through this backlog every day for a week,
             | I'm sure your mood would change after you've done it for 10
             | years (assuming multiple children).
             | 
             | I heard once and I think it's true, that kids don't need 24
             | with their parents, they need the 2-3 hours (changing as
             | the kids age) with them every day, but after that they get
             | bored of daddy or mommy and want to do something with their
             | friends or alone.
             | 
             | If you can afford outside help, it _can_ actually make the
             | time you spend with your children more delightful, you may
             | bond more, and in the end have a better relationship with
             | them also in the long term.
             | 
             | It can obviously go wrong, if you look at your children
             | when they are 14 and you have no idea who they are because
             | they went to the nannies directly, but it doesn't mean it
             | can be done right.
        
               | Max_aaa wrote:
               | The food is kinda resolved for no-so rich families with
               | services like Hello Fresh, and so on. As you are just
               | left with the Cooking bit, which is actually a bonding
               | experience, as the little ones help with the meal.
               | 
               | And with cleaning, yes, that one is a chore.
        
         | nyxtom wrote:
         | Investment indeed! I think it all depends on how you define
         | what amounts to a "good day"
         | 
         | Maybe it means you have put in some meaningful work into having
         | quality time with your kids, or teaching them something new,
         | reading a book to them, or cooking with them and/or your
         | spouse.
         | 
         | Side note I can definitely empathize with the lack of time for
         | extracurricular. For our family it is generally something we do
         | together - which tends to fill multiple "cups". Outside of that
         | my spouse and I trade off for time to do these type of things
         | for ourselves.
        
       | renewiltord wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing this! I love the technique. I'm going to try
       | it out and see for myself.
        
       | ketanmaheshwari wrote:
       | Thank you for the post.
       | 
       | I did something similar -- I logged the activities on the world's
       | largest supercomputer (that I have access to) every hour
       | throughout the year 2020.
       | 
       | I logged information such as:
       | 
       | -- Who is logged in (the output of w command)
       | 
       | -- What processes are running and the overall system load (top
       | and ps aux)
       | 
       | -- What is the state of memory and disk
       | 
       | -- What is the state of job scheduler
       | 
       | I have the data now and very excited about processing it in the
       | coming weeks. I plan to anonymize and publish the data and the
       | process I employed to collect it.
        
         | appletrotter wrote:
         | Not quite the world's largest supercomputer, huh?
        
           | remirk wrote:
           | 'The world' is relative. My world is different than yours.
        
             | ketanmaheshwari wrote:
             | I was talking about Summit[1]. Now the second largest.
             | 
             | [1] https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/olcf-resources/compute-
             | systems/sum...
        
       | makach wrote:
       | this reminds me of the struggle with logging my billable hours as
       | a consultant.. Ugh.. But HATS OFF. This data is interesting and
       | beautifully presented!
        
       | msapaydin wrote:
       | I am using a pomodoro app (productivity challenge timer) and as a
       | result track my time. The smartphone also tracks walking and
       | running and I have recently started tracking sleep as well. It
       | does 80% of the tracking automatically I guess. I also use
       | habitica as a complementary tracking tool.
        
       | polote wrote:
       | Whoaa, amazing, I've been doing the same during the last 5 years,
       | but I use an easier setup, I use an app, so I just have to click
       | on buttons at the end of each activity.
       | 
       | > Stay tuned to learn how do different activities influence my
       | mood
       | 
       | I only started doing that this year, and I'm pissed off I didn't
       | start doing it earlier, as that's where you can start doing
       | correlation on your life and your activities.
       | 
       | If some people are interested I have described how I track my
       | life here : https://blog.luap.info/how-i-track-my-life.html
        
         | barrucadu wrote:
         | How consistent do you manage to be with your mood tracking?
         | During the summer of 2019 I was thinking about doing that, but
         | never got started. Then autumn of 2019 rolled around and my
         | mood shot up dramatically, I didn't realise just how
         | dramatically the heat was affecting my mood.
         | 
         | So if I _had_ started when I had the idea, that would have been
         | the neutral point, and I 'd have had ~6 months of good days
         | after that.
        
           | polote wrote:
           | I have two mood tracking points per day, one when waking up
           | when when going to sleep. So if it is part of your routine it
           | is very easy to do. Then you must well define your scale if
           | your want to be consistent over time
        
       | tpoacher wrote:
       | Ah, the lengths PhD people will go to to avoid doing their
       | thesis... ah, the memories :)
        
       | barrucadu wrote:
       | I started tracking my time in 15-minute intervals a little under
       | a month ago, and I've also been surprised by how little effort it
       | is.
       | 
       | I've not gone for breaking by day up into 15 minute chunks,
       | instead I've been timing myself as I do things, and noting down
       | the duration rounded it to the nearest 15 minutes when I change
       | tasks. I'm also not tracking _everything_ , for example,
       | showering. So I have a fair bit of missing time every day, which
       | I'm aiming to get down to 2 hours or less a day.
       | 
       | I've already found myself using time more "productively" -
       | preferring to do things which are tracked (like reading) over
       | things which are not (like mindlessly browsing the internet).
       | 
       | There are a few key metrics I'm keeping an eye on:
       | 
       | - Average daily sleep deficit: `avg(8 - sleep hours)`
       | 
       | - Average daily work deficit: `avg(8 - work hours)` for work days
       | 
       | - Average daily missing time: `avg(24 - all hours)`
       | 
       | - Days since last day off work, not counting weekends
       | 
       | - Percentage of leisure hours: `avg(leisure hours / (all hours -
       | sleep hours))`
       | 
       | I'm also watching how I spend my work days, for example, what
       | proportion of my time is spent doing active work, or in meetings,
       | or doing admin work.
       | 
       | I'll likely expand the things I'm specifically monitoring as I
       | get more data.
        
         | nyxtom wrote:
         | Do you use an app for this, or do you just use the timer?
        
           | barrucadu wrote:
           | I'm manually noting down durations in timedot format
           | (https://hledger.org/hledger.html#timedot-format) in a text
           | file.
           | 
           | For example, today's entry as of 18:32 is:
           | 2021-01-03         leisure:anime
           | .......................         leisure:social      ..
           | sleep               6.5h         chores:foodprep     .
           | chores:regular      .         leisure:social      ......
           | leisure:ttrpg:play  ..........
           | 
           | Each dot is 15 minutes, so I'm missing a bit of time today.
           | Oh well.
           | 
           | I think that having a timer app which lets me start / stop
           | timers individually and give them names would be helpful. The
           | one I'm currently using, on my phone, just has a single
           | stopwatch.
        
             | tracyhenry wrote:
             | The font of the entry looks different than normal texts.
             | How is that done?
        
               | kzrdude wrote:
               | See https://news.ycombinator.com/formatdoc (from FAQ)
        
             | 6equj5 wrote:
             | Shameless plug: I wrote a little Python timer for Linux
             | that works great with a dropdown terminal like Yakuake:
             | https://github.com/krotera/timerBeetle
             | 
             | I often use it for timed tasks, and it's faster than
             | reaching for my phone or even opening a browser tab (and,
             | unlike a Google or DDG timer, it doesn't keep ringing until
             | you re-raise the browser window, find the tab, and silence
             | it, which always annoyed me). : p
        
       | lmarcos wrote:
       | I wouldn't mind having this kind of data... But manual logging is
       | something very painful to do at such intervals. In a parallel
       | universe, one where we don't have social media but mini drones
       | the size of an orange, I imagine these drones would be floating
       | around their owners and logging (locally!) all their activities
       | (algorithms determine the best kind of action for every human
       | activity (e.g., human sitting down with a book -> reading... The
       | drone could even attempt to read the book's title and log it as
       | well as metadata)).
        
       | sabellito wrote:
       | Super interesting. Definitely a little crazy, but I'm glad you
       | found the willpower to finish and share it.
       | 
       | And holy cow, 3:25h per day socialising? How?
        
         | nequals1 wrote:
         | The holiday period contributed a lot to that average. I also
         | lived with other people for the whole year (uni housing, with
         | family and now with flatmates), so meal times would count
         | towards socialising. And those coffee breaks and quick chats
         | here and there add up to a lot!
        
       | newbie578 wrote:
       | Interesting! I personally have used for the last 30 months the
       | app called Time Tracker.
       | 
       | Each second of every day is tracked, the timer goes on
       | continuously and I just change the current activity.
       | 
       | Looking back at it at the end of the year is surprisingly a
       | double-edged sword...
       | 
       | You are hit with a high knowing how much time you spent on work,
       | working out, reading, socializing, etc..
       | 
       | But then you get hit with the downside, which is that you see how
       | much time you wasted...
       | 
       | When you realize how much time gets spent on gaming, going to the
       | store or even changing your clothed (!!!) you start looking at
       | your time very differently.
       | 
       | If anyone has any questions or wants to know something I would be
       | glad to be of use..
        
         | SwiftyBug wrote:
         | How does that work? You open the app before you start every
         | activity and labels it? Even mundane ones like changing
         | clothes? Do you account for the time you spend logging things
         | in this app? How can you keep sanity having to open an app
         | every time you start a different activity?
        
       | haberman wrote:
       | For a long time I've wanted to create an Android/iOS app called
       | "Sample Me" or something similar, for collecting exactly this
       | kind of data about yourself. You design a survey with whatever
       | data you want to collect, then the app gives you a notification
       | at whatever interval you configure. A couple taps and you have a
       | sample point about your life, which gets appended to a Google
       | Sheet or similar, and maybe some in-app visualization of trends.
       | 
       | I'll probably never actually get to it, but it would be perfect
       | for a thing like this.
        
         | cocoa19 wrote:
         | Might be more convenient to use on a smart watch.
        
         | untech wrote:
         | I used a combination of Google Forms and IFTTT-scheduled emails
         | for that.
        
         | IkmoIkmo wrote:
         | I'd love this on an apple watch. Would be especially nice to
         | combine with an NFC tag. e.g. when you brush your teeth, just
         | hold your watch to the brush which has an NFC tag, then start
         | brushing. That activity is now recorded somewhere.
         | 
         | It's really not a big deal to open an app, browse to the
         | particular activity, and register it. But somehow in practice
         | it is. It's another chore that I never really get around to
         | doing consistently. And if you're not tracking data
         | consistently, it's very quickly quite useless.
        
         | l-p wrote:
         | Track & Graph [1] could work for you, it's FOSS and your full
         | DB is easily exportable. You can set reminders and track either
         | numbers, durations, or MCQs. I'm using it to track long-term
         | post-COVID symptoms, fun stuff.
         | 
         | [1]: https://github.com/SamAmco/track-and-graph
        
         | radley wrote:
         | I'm building an Apple app that does this and saves everything
         | as a journal.
        
           | radley wrote:
           | If anyone is curious:
           | 
           | https://radleymarx.com/work/time-journal
        
           | raunakdag wrote:
           | Do you have a waitlist? I want to sign up
        
             | radley wrote:
             | Wasn't planning on it. I'd be happy to email you when it
             | launches.
             | 
             | Please ping me here: radleymarx at gmail.
        
         | tra3 wrote:
         | There's Reporter App [0] on app store. It was designed for a
         | very similar purpose.
         | 
         | 0: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/reporter-app/id779697486
        
       | clockman wrote:
       | I do this as well. Mine is to track actuals against my schedule.
       | Helps knowing what I should be doing. It's just a habit now. It's
       | all on paper though, no digital aspect.
        
       | nyxtom wrote:
       | The GitHub-esc point system grid is a great brain hack. Really
       | like this system
        
       | l33tbro wrote:
       | "Today's society is no longer Foucault's disciplinary world of
       | hospitals, madhouses, prisons, barracks, and factories. It has
       | long been replaced by another regime, namely a society of fitness
       | studios, office towers, banks, airports, shopping malls, and
       | genetic laboratories. Twenty-first-century society is no longer a
       | disciplinary society, but rather an achievement society".
       | 
       | - Byung-Chul Han
        
       | 5tefan wrote:
       | 1.76 days idle? I'd call that impossible. How can you be busy the
       | whole waking time? Sounds like burn out is creeping in.
       | 
       | Idle is my most important state of mind. Daydreaming. Suddenly
       | some ideas pop into my mind. It is almost Zen like. Without being
       | idle no focussed work. It fuels my work.
        
         | GuB-42 wrote:
         | Idle in that context is meant for things like waiting in line.
         | There is another category for what you describe: chilling (3.49
         | days), plus there is certainly idle time folded into other
         | activities, like travelling.
        
           | nequals1 wrote:
           | exactly this!
        
       | axetheone wrote:
       | I also happened to time track my time this year, although in a
       | more automatic (and less detailed) way. For that I used
       | ActivityWatch on my personal laptop (which I use for all non-work
       | related matters) in order to have an automatic way to track my
       | time and, at least for me, figure out how much time I'm wasting
       | on time wasters like social media, Youtube, Hacker News and so
       | on. It was interesting to see the difference between the time I
       | think I'm spending and the time I'm actually spending.
        
       | Draiken wrote:
       | I am always baffled how sad this extreme focus into productivity
       | makes me.
       | 
       | If you discovered you were going to die in a year, would you
       | continue to spend all your time being "productive"? I figure
       | almost everyone would shift all their focus on doing things that
       | "really matter".
       | 
       | Sadly I believe the world managed to make us feel guilty when
       | we're not doing something that makes someone else rich (majority
       | of jobs).
       | 
       | I'm a pessimist so I'd probably get very sad at some real data
       | telling me how many hours I have wasted making someone else
       | money.
        
         | ArtWomb wrote:
         | >>> If you discovered you were going to die in a year, would
         | you continue to spend all your time being "productive"?
         | 
         | Called to mind an Old Zen Koan. Before Enlightenment: chop
         | wood, carry water. After Enlightenment: chop wood, carry water
         | ;)
         | 
         | If lifecasting were automated, it would form a tremendous data
         | set. The historical antecedents are legion: Vannevar Bush's
         | Memex. Buckminster Fuller's Dymaxion Chronograph. Gordon Bell's
         | MyLifeBits. Yes, even YC's own Justin.tv. Simple daily plain
         | text often works best for me. Re-visiting old entries is gold.
         | Like inviting your younger self over for a cup of tea ;)
        
         | TeMPOraL wrote:
         | > _If you discovered you were going to die in a year, would you
         | continue to spend all your time being "productive"? I figure
         | almost everyone would shift all their focus on doing things
         | that "really matter"._
         | 
         | Nah. I'd ensure that my family is going to be well-cared for,
         | that all affairs are in order... and then proceed to blow the
         | remaining time on videogames and whatever strikes my fancy.
         | With an actual dead line of one year, there's no point in
         | starting anything that "really matters" to me.
         | 
         | Now if I knew for certain I'll die in exactly 10 years, I'd
         | optimize the shit out of my life. I'd be a god of productivity.
         | Or at least I'd try. In reality, knowing that my life is likely
         | to actually end in somewhen between 30 to 50 years is already
         | giving me this motivation.
         | 
         | Because the problem here isn't the focus on productivity, but
         | what you're trying to be productive about. Most of us live
         | lives full of things we wouldn't want to do if we could afford
         | it. It makes sense to try and optimize them to minimum - to
         | make room for the stuff that "really matters".
        
         | sunir wrote:
         | I think you have a very narrow understanding of what
         | "productive" means. You can produce or make progress towards
         | anything that you value. Making other people money is just one
         | avenue.
         | 
         | If you had a year to live, you would definitely want to be
         | productive. There's a lot that needs to get done to wrap up
         | your one single life well, so that your time on earth wasn't
         | lost. Just getting your will and testament done, talking to all
         | your loved ones, getting your affairs in order for any
         | dependents, tying up any loose ends so they aren't inherited,
         | cleaning up your house for the estate.
         | 
         | If you know older people, you'll see them doing these kinds of
         | activities in their later years. That's still being productive.
         | You're still making progress.
        
           | CarelessExpert wrote:
           | > If you had a year to live, you would definitely want to be
           | productive.
           | 
           | No, I'd want to be happy. It's the uniquely American
           | Calvinist view that conflates these things.
        
             | MetalGuru wrote:
             | Guitar makes me happy. Feeling stimulated and feeling like
             | I'm progressing makes me happy. I can be productive in
             | guitar. Where's the conflation in this?
        
             | oblio wrote:
             | Yeah, agreed. I don't think I know any person that's
             | written their will, for example.
        
           | coldtea wrote:
           | > _If you had a year to live, you would definitely want to be
           | productive._
           | 
           | You'd be surprised.
           | 
           | That's more of rat-race-disease artifact, where a person is
           | measured by their "achievements" and "success" (as opposed to
           | being intristically worth).
           | 
           | Many people of many peoples would want to either relax, love
           | and be with family, or enjoy themselves (and more likely a
           | healthy combination of the two).
        
             | TeMPOraL wrote:
             | And unless you're completely free of obligations, you'd
             | want to maximize the time you spent "relaxing, loving and
             | being with family, or enjoying yourself". This requires
             | some thought and effort - and that's precisely being
             | productivity / optimizing your life.
        
         | nequals1 wrote:
         | I probably used productivity too carelessly in my article - I
         | meant it more as 'doing things that make me happy/help me
         | develop as a person' as opposed to 'doing things that feel nice
         | and easy now but I'd rather do them less'. I consider hobbies,
         | reading books, going on walks and things like that as
         | productive and tried to reduce time I spent mindlessly
         | scrolling social media.
         | 
         | I'm also doing my PhD so by trying to increase my at-work
         | productivity I'm trying to make sure that I don't waste too
         | much of taxpayer's money.
         | 
         | But I agree that optimising productivity too much could be
         | anxiety-inducing and I was trying to be mindful of that while
         | looking at my data and deciding what to change in my life based
         | on it.
        
         | polote wrote:
         | Well, the answer is easy. We are all different.
         | 
         | We all have one only life, some people prefer to spend it
         | watching football, some being productive, some helping others,
         | and some ...
         | 
         | Of course you will also find people who are not happy at the
         | life they have, and trying to live the life of others. But you
         | will also find people being happy doing things that make other
         | people sad.
        
           | dvtrn wrote:
           | _Well, the answer is easy. We are all different_
           | 
           | It's so easy it gets skipped over in almost every thread like
           | this, it seems, where someone goes off on some expedition of
           | personal development and chooses to write about it to share
           | with others where inevitably someone comes along to
           | pontificate why anyone would even bother.
           | 
           | There's not always going to be some neat, logical nor
           | highfalutin reason for an individual making a choice about
           | documenting, recording and analyzing parts of their life.
           | 
           | And that's fine. Promise.
        
         | gibrown wrote:
         | > If you discovered you were going to die in a year, would you
         | continue to spend all your time being "productive"? I figure
         | almost everyone would shift all their focus on doing things
         | that "really matter".
         | 
         | But if you are going to try and do things that "really matter"
         | don't you want to be productive at them?
         | 
         | I've seen a number of folks with ALS who have done amazing
         | things with the time they had left, and I am sure they focused
         | on their productivity in doing them.
         | 
         | This also isn't a hypothetical for me. I have a damaged spinal
         | cord and have spent amazing amounts of time tracking data to
         | try and improve my body and my life. Not the same as facing
         | death since I am trying to optimize my time to get back to a
         | point where my body is stronger and in less pain so I can spend
         | more time with my kids and also do the other things I want. It
         | is a very tough balance.
        
           | Draiken wrote:
           | > But if you are going to try and do things that "really
           | matter" don't you want to be productive at them?
           | 
           | I'd definitely try to, hehe.
           | 
           | For me it's more about what we categorize as productive than
           | the experiment itself. The experiment is a great way to
           | gather data. But the categorization made me really think
           | about what people, in general, categorize as "productive".
           | 
           | Maybe sleeping should be way more important than many job
           | related things, but by default we assume sleeping is just a
           | necessity, many times sacrificing it in favor of the others.
        
         | dtran wrote:
         | I think "being productive" vs. "time well spent" and "doing
         | things that really matter" is a false dichotomy. It doesn't
         | have to be this way. I know that's a statement from a position
         | of privilege-- not every has a job where they can feel like
         | they are in a flow state while working, but do you have any
         | side projects or hobbies where you feel both productive _and_
         | feel like it 's time well spent?
         | 
         | Coming to this pretty late, but I've been fascinated with the
         | concept of _flow_ recently, which researcher Mihaly
         | Csikszentmihaly described as:                 "The best moments
         | in our lives are not the passive, receptive, relaxing times . .
         | . The best moments usually occur if a person's body or mind is
         | stretched to its limits in a voluntary effort to accomplish
         | something difficult and worthwhile"
         | 
         | Again, not everyone is in a position to do this, but I think we
         | should de-emphasize number of hours spent in "work mode" albeit
         | inefficiently or without great focus or working on things that
         | aren't super important and more time seeking deep focus and
         | then time completely off to relax, recharge and let ideas
         | background process/percolate.
        
           | oblio wrote:
           | Your viewpoint still dismisses one of the best categories of
           | "time wasting"/"things that really matter": time spent
           | socializing with friends and family.
           | 
           | There have been a few studies that were pointing out people
           | in Southern Italy live very long and happy lives (I think
           | happiness was self-reported), despite living in relative
           | poverty compared to developed countries. Sun + healthy diets
           | + lots and lots of intense social interactions with family
           | and close friends.
        
             | emteycz wrote:
             | Personally I consider time with friends and family
             | productive time and most definitely time well spent, but
             | surely you have noticed that even these moments can stretch
             | out into unproductivity - maybe some members of the family
             | or friend group want to go home and spend their time on
             | their own things, so a little planning is useful even for
             | family/friends/relaxation.
             | 
             | Productive usage of my time means I am not doing simple
             | things the hard way, that I manage my attention, and that I
             | spend time on things that I care about, not that I stop
             | caring about my family.
        
               | oblio wrote:
               | That's funny of you to say.
               | 
               | Extending my example from above, American dining habits
               | are: you stay in the restaurant for about as much time as
               | what you need to eat/drink, then you go away (maybe
               | gently nudged by staff to get out if you stop ordering
               | something after 1 hour or so). Italian dining habits are:
               | you go to dinner and you stay there until everyone has
               | discussed about everything they wanted to discuss, no
               | matter how long that takes.
               | 
               | I imagine for someone from the Italian culture your
               | perspective would seem completely alien.
               | 
               | And regarding family members or friend that want to
               | leave, surely everyone is mature enough to just get up
               | and go when they have to. Why do you need to manage that
               | for them?
        
               | emteycz wrote:
               | Regarding my family/friends, I was talking about managing
               | myself, my own time, not them - in this particular case I
               | meant that I could predict when I can be home to do my
               | own things, for example.
               | 
               | My perspective never disallowed me from staying at the
               | table for hours until everyone was saturated with
               | friendly banter. I spent many months in Italy, Croatia,
               | Spain, Georgia, Poland and elsewhere doing just that, and
               | I consider it time spent productively - relaxation and
               | socialization is important to me.
        
             | jader201 wrote:
             | > I think happiness was self-reported
             | 
             | Isn't that implied? How else can you measure happiness
             | aside from someone telling you they're happy?
             | 
             | Somewhat of a genuine question -- curious if
             | studies/surveys use some other way to measure happiness.
        
             | jader201 wrote:
             | > + lots and lots of intense social interactions with
             | family and close friends.
             | 
             | As an introvert, I find "lots and lots of intense social
             | interactions" draining (by definition).
             | 
             | Granted, I do enjoy hanging out with friends and family,
             | but often feel drained a bit afterwards.
             | 
             | Of course, I'm not advocating being a loner. I wouldn't
             | like that either.
             | 
             | My main point is, I wonder if extroverts -- or those that
             | are energized from intense social interactions -- are more
             | destined to be happy vs. introverts.
        
               | dukeyukey wrote:
               | > I wonder if extroverts -- or those that are energized
               | from intense social interactions -- are more destined to
               | be happy vs. introverts.
               | 
               | Sadly for introverts, that seems to be the case.
               | 
               | Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/quiet-
               | disadvantag...
        
             | renewiltord wrote:
             | The long life thing heavily correlates with the lack of
             | quality in record keeping.
        
         | duke_core wrote:
         | I can't remember his name, there was a youtuber named Ali Abdal
         | (I think?) whose videos are focused around productivity and
         | they give me the same feeling that you're talking about in your
         | comment. When you're talking about to 'productively' watch tv
         | shows while try to get some work done in the background thats
         | going a bit too far
        
           | Insanity wrote:
           | Yes it's that youtuber (Ali Abdal). He had this video about
           | productively watching TV by watching the netflix shows sped
           | up 2x or something like that.
           | 
           | Similar for listening to audio books etc. Personally quite
           | dislike those kind of ideas as well, takes the joy out of
           | recreation.
        
         | 6gvONxR4sf7o wrote:
         | I agree with you if productivity is work, but I also consider
         | my hobbies productive. Netflix and Reddit and HN and the inane
         | parts of the news I consider unproductive. And yet I spend
         | probably at least 12 hours per week on those. It's a scrolling
         | addiction and (god how hypocritical is it for me to take the
         | time to type this here) it's good to avoid.
        
           | Draiken wrote:
           | And that's exactly what I'm questioning. Why are Reddit and
           | HN labeled as non-productive? Is it because it doesn't do
           | anything to us or because we're trained to only label
           | "skills" as productive?
           | 
           | I learned more through HN than I did with many books. Reddit
           | improved my day through stupid memes that made me laugh more
           | times than I can remember.
           | 
           | Yet when I'm browsing those sites, I feel guilty. Even while
           | writing this very comment.
           | 
           | That's what saddens me.
        
         | renewiltord wrote:
         | Sometimes I get the impression 99% of HN comments are pretty
         | much: I like X. I don't know why anyone else likes Y.
         | 
         | All right, yeah, desire vectors are different for different
         | people, homie.
        
         | chrisfosterelli wrote:
         | From TFA:
         | 
         | > I knew I was spending quite a lot of it on social media, but
         | I wasn't sure how much exactly. I also knew I was working quite
         | a lot and wanted to quantify exactly how much (spoiler alert:
         | not that much). I hoped that keeping track of what I do would
         | help me to identify chunks of time that were being wasted and
         | to turn them into quality time.
         | 
         | Tracking time doesn't inherently have to be to optimize for
         | "making someone else rich"; she specifically did this with the
         | goal of spending more time on things that "really matter".
        
           | Draiken wrote:
           | But I never said tracking time inherently does that. I agree
           | with you. It's a great way to put things in perspective.
           | 
           | It's just my personal experience that the majority of time we
           | label as "productive" is in fact productivity for the sake of
           | someone else profiting on top of it. I have nothing against
           | the OP or the article.
        
           | DecayingOrganic wrote:
           | I'll raise my head above the parapet and admit that I don't
           | get it. How about just scheduling things? If you want to
           | spend more time on things that matter, just pick a date and
           | time, and get going.
           | 
           | That said, perhaps the alluring part was gathering data on
           | one's self.
        
             | renewiltord wrote:
             | Because Akrasia. I currently am supposed to be doing other
             | things but I am spending it on HN.
        
               | dundercoder wrote:
               | akrasia akrasia /@'kreIzI@ , @'krasI@ / (also acrasia) >
               | noun [mass noun] mainly Philosophy the state of mind in
               | which someone acts against their better judgement through
               | weakness of will. - ORIGIN early 19th century : from
               | Greek, from a- 'without' + kratos 'power, strength'. The
               | term is used especially with reference to Aristotle's
               | Nicomachean Ethics.
        
               | jader201 wrote:
               | So basically procrastination. Not exactly the same, but
               | the same sentiment.
        
             | TeMPOraL wrote:
             | 'renewiltord mentioned Akrasia. That's one big thing.
             | 
             | Another thing is that you may not have enough time to fit
             | the things you want with your schedule - and you first need
             | to optimize your things in your life. That may involve
             | optimizing your productivity at work, to free up time or
             | energy for your own things. That also will involve taking a
             | look at what you do around and after work. All of us live
             | at least partially on autopilot, so bad habits tend to
             | sneak up and stay unnoticed. You need to shine a light
             | every now and then to identify and eradicate them - and
             | then that's more time and/or energy freed up for doing the
             | things that matter to you.
             | 
             | Perhaps a less contentious way of saying "focus on
             | productivity" is to say "making the wisest use of the 24
             | hours one has in a day".
        
             | the_local_host wrote:
             | Productivity is a scam. Jeff Bezos doesn't double his own
             | productivity; he doubles Amazon's.
        
           | gcc_programmer wrote:
           | It's a she ;)
        
           | theli0nheart wrote:
           | > _he specifically did this_
           | 
           | You got the wrong pronoun. "One gal's quest to optimise her
           | life" is the blog's subtitle.
        
             | chrisfosterelli wrote:
             | Ah thanks! My bad. Corrected.
        
               | [deleted]
        
         | danesparza wrote:
         | Read the article.
         | 
         | The article has a completely different tone than what you are
         | assuming from the headline.
         | 
         | ~~~                   4 points per hour for the most productive
         | activities (focused work towards uni & self-improvement and
         | exercising)         3 points for reading books         2 points
         | for reading blogs, listening to podcasts, lower intensity work
         | etc         0 points for things that are important but I do
         | them anyway (socialising, sleep etc)         -4 points for
         | procrastination
         | 
         | ~~~~
         | 
         | No mention of making someone else money. But a mention of being
         | a procrastinator with life.
        
           | Draiken wrote:
           | I did read it :)
           | 
           | My point is that the majority of "productive" things we do
           | are geared towards our jobs. And the majority of jobs enrich
           | the people at the top at the expense of your expertise and
           | time invested. YMMV.
           | 
           | Not sure why so many people assumed I had a bad view on the
           | article or the OP. I think what was done was fascinating, but
           | it made me sad.
        
             | TeMPOraL wrote:
             | > _My point is that the majority of "productive" things we
             | do are geared towards our jobs._
             | 
             | There's a confounder here that's relatively specific to
             | some types of jobs / industries (like IT): the same skills
             | and knowledge that is "geared towards our jobs" is also
             | used outside work. In our industry, a lot of people -
             | including myself - are hobbyists. They enjoy the same stuff
             | they also do for a living. In this setting, your personal
             | pursuit for knowledge and fulfillment may look from outside
             | as indistinguishable from your job.
        
         | mbeex wrote:
         | Another issue here is an extremely narrowed definition of
         | productivity. It has cog-like traits, Fordian belt work comes
         | to mind. Yes, in this context you can become less productive
         | for one reason or another. But all these micro-optimizations
         | will also affect the mind in the long run in a much more
         | profound way. More than anything its higher forms - even of
         | productivity - especially these connected with creativity.
         | 
         | You cannot fight this with a clock watch the same way the vast
         | majority of people cannot lose weight by simply dieting. For
         | this, you need positive incentives. Not to be misunderstood,
         | sometimes you have simply to grit your teeth.
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | I'm with you. If it took one minute to log each of the previous
         | 14, I'd rather have 24 hours of my life back.
         | 
         | It's the same with social media.
         | 
         | Once I realized that spending two hours a day on social media
         | meant I was giving up 30 days of my life each year for... what?
         | So someone in SV can buy a second boat, or a third house?
         | 
         | I limit my social media to under 15 minutes a day now
         | (including HN.) If the social ad tech companies want more than
         | that, they can pay me.
        
           | hombre_fatal wrote:
           | The only thing you can think of doing once you were to ween
           | yourself from your vices (like OP and social media) is work?
           | Even worse, making someone else rich?
           | 
           | You obviously don't think that, so I don't get why you and
           | grandparent are projecting that onto OP.
           | 
           | I want to minimize my wasted time like mindless Redditing so
           | that I can maximize my time spent doing things that fulfill
           | me. It's just a great tragedy that it's so much easier to
           | waste time in unfulfilling ways like spending a day in a
           | heroin nod than it is to do the things that maximize my life.
        
         | nitrogen wrote:
         | I think if you were going to die in a year you would stop doing
         | everything with a payoff more than a few months in the future.
         | It's a mistake to think that what "really matters" is whatever
         | pays off now instead of later.
         | 
         | When you have longer to live, it makes sense to work now to get
         | more of what "really matters" five, ten, and twenty years down
         | the line.
        
         | onion2k wrote:
         | _If you discovered you were going to die in a year, would you
         | continue to spend all your time being "productive"?_
         | 
         | No.
         | 
         | But if I discovered I was going to die in 30 years time, and I
         | wanted to make sure my house was paid for, I'd done the things
         | I want to do, and there were savings in the bank to make sure
         | my partner was safe, then I absolutely would. Most of us are
         | closer to that position than being on the verge of imminent
         | death.
        
         | maria_weber23 wrote:
         | Tracking your time spent has nothing to do with productivity.
         | It is simply data you may chose to act on or not.
         | 
         | If this person was out for optimizing income, tye6 would not
         | have studied a PhD in the first place, because that's 6 years
         | wasted, plus tuition on top of it.
         | 
         | You can your tracking to optimize for whatever variable you
         | want to optimize. You could realize that you work too much and
         | aim for working less. You could realize that you do social
         | media too much and aim to do less of it, etc. It's up to you.
         | 
         | As for not making money. The world is, sadly highly biased
         | towards rich people. If you are poor and happy (which is
         | totally possible) you are still highly at risk that this state
         | won't last. Without money, you are f __*ed in this world. It 's
         | just the way it is. If you are dependent on income you are
         | dependent on A LOT of things. The best you can generally do for
         | your happiness is become income independent as fast as
         | possible, which usually means to earn as much as possible as
         | early as possible and then live from investments while focusing
         | on everything that's not work.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | javajosh wrote:
         | I can be pessimistic, too, but I had a different reaction. The
         | OP's post is about measuring a life according to behaviors
         | (activities) and with that data the OP is thinking out loud
         | about how he wants to change things. This is an artifact that
         | describes an analytical mind observing and addressing the daily
         | animal/mind hybrid that actually lives in and experiences the
         | world.
         | 
         | I tend to agree that "productivity" is an unhealthy obsession
         | linked to vain status chasing, and (among many circles) a
         | vaguely sinister implication. It is too often used as a
         | euphamistic criticism by employers who inevitably want more out
         | of the workers. _Produce or die_ is the default law of the
         | capitalist jungle, so the  "productivity number" is the number
         | that a system would use to fire you.
         | 
         | But the OP's situation is quite different. There is no
         | misalignment between "the boss" (his current analytical mind)
         | and "the worker" (the daily mind/body cyborg beast). The boss
         | _really wants the best_ for the worker; the worker _really
         | wants to do his best_ for the boss. (And to me it seems like
         | the boss has his priorities straight, and is doing right by his
         | worker with this analysis and recommendations).
        
         | dnautics wrote:
         | Did you read the article? "I work less than I thought I did and
         | that's ok"
        
           | Draiken wrote:
           | I did. But it also mentions procrastination as a -4 point and
           | sleep as a 0.
           | 
           | And my sentiment is also from reading some of the comments
           | here. So many people obsessed with productivity.
           | 
           | Some have a clear reason to do so, but I fear many do it
           | because of outside pressures, or never even thought about it.
        
             | throwaway2245 wrote:
             | The scores are relative to each other.
             | 
             | I certainly prefer to sleep than to procrastinate, so this
             | matches up with your example.
             | 
             | And, I certainly prefer to do almost any task than
             | procrastinate. Procrastination (by which I understand:
             | wasted effort thinking about being productive without
             | actually doing anything) makes me feel grim. I would have
             | valued that time more doing almost anything else.
             | 
             | If sleeping helps me to avoid procrastination, then this
             | scoring system still encourages sufficient sleep to do
             | that.
        
             | hobofan wrote:
             | I don't think there is necessarily anything wrong with that
             | scoring.
             | 
             | Sleeping is basically neutral (maybe it should give 0.5
             | points instead or something small that doesn't dilute the
             | rest of the scoring system).
             | 
             | I'd also score procrastination negatively even if you are
             | not obsessed with productivity. Procrastination can easily
             | cause negative feelings (and for me is probably one of the
             | biggest sources for them) and can be viewed as a separate
             | thing as dedicated downtime.
        
               | Draiken wrote:
               | Oh, neither do I.
               | 
               | What made me sad is that I'd likely have a very similar
               | scoring if I did this myself.
               | 
               | For example, I wish I didn't score sleep as a waste of
               | time, when it's likely more important than many of the
               | things regularly deemed important by society.
        
           | m000 wrote:
           | This sentence is exactly the problem. Everything is focused
           | around work and productivity. So much, that you have to pat
           | yourself on the back when find out your work throughput was
           | less than what you thought it was.
           | 
           | Why do we read about "I work less than I thought I did and
           | that's ok" and not e.g. "I spent more time with my family
           | than I thought I did, and that's great"?
        
             | dnautics wrote:
             | same article says "I spent more time reading than I thought
             | I did, and it's great"
        
       | guessmyname wrote:
       | Great article.
       | 
       | I have been doing the same for the last two years or so. I use
       | Qbserve [1], a native (privacy-focused) time tracker for macOS
       | developed by a couple living in Chile. The application keeps all
       | the information on my computer in an SQLite database, making it
       | very easy to analyze. I regularly reference it during my
       | quarterly performance reviews to justify ups-and-downs in my
       | results.
       | 
       | I will use this article as inspiration for writing a blog post
       | sometime.
       | 
       | Coincidentally, I also saw a Reddit post last night [2] with the
       | original poster's data analysis of all their expenses recorded
       | through 2020. I bookmarked it because I collected similar
       | information during the previous three years to write another blog
       | post. Unfortunately, I am still unsure how to write such an
       | article without revealing too much personal information.
       | 
       | [1] https://qotoqot.com/qbserve/
       | 
       | [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/kp3fcn/a/
        
         | saberience wrote:
         | This comment depresses me so much. You track your own time
         | obsessively and use it as a reference in performance reviews?
         | 
         | This sounds like a dystopian hell out of Big Brother.
        
           | guessmyname wrote:
           | > _This comment depresses me so much. You track your own time
           | obsessively and use it as a reference in performance
           | reviews?_
           | 
           | To each their own.
           | 
           | I genuinely find the data I track useful to reflect on what I
           | spend my time on and whatnot, especially when I want to
           | answer questions like: Did I get enough time off from work _
           | --and programming, in general--_ last quarter? Did I use the
           | X program enough to justify a license renewal? How much time
           | did I spend on meetings versus actual programming? Did I get
           | enough sleep last week? Am I having lunch at regular times?
           | How much time am I spending on professional growth? Etc.
           | 
           | And for the sake of clarification, I started tracking my own
           | time long before I got my current job, so clearly, I do not
           | do it specifically for my performance reviews. I simply
           | happen to find the data analysis useful to support some
           | things I say, and also, as some people say _"the more data
           | you have, the more accurate the prediction"_.
        
         | gbrindisi wrote:
         | I am curious, can you share the reddit post?
        
       | pmyteh wrote:
       | My usual plug for TagTime[0], which handles this in a slightly
       | different (and in my view better) way: it stochastically tracks
       | your time by randomly sampling times to ask you what you're doing
       | _right now_. Fair in expectation, timeless (no slacking off
       | because you 've just filled in the timesheet), accurately
       | captures (on average) the cost of all the short phone calls and
       | context switches.
       | 
       | It's by the Beeminder people, but works on its own. A hacky pile
       | of perl scripts. I've run it continuously for 8 years now.
       | 
       | [0]: https://github.com/tagtime/TagTime
        
         | tra3 wrote:
         | I tried running it a couple of years ago, no luck. I can't
         | recall what the problem was. Is it actually functional?
        
           | pmyteh wrote:
           | It's fully functional, though not straightforward. Needs a
           | bit of setup, and doesn't handle multiple machines
           | particularly well.
           | 
           | That's the perl version I linked. There's a similarly
           | functional android version, I think.
        
         | zufallsheld wrote:
         | Does anyone know of a similar tool for windows?
        
           | smitop wrote:
           | Here's a list of implementations:
           | http://doc.beeminder.com/tagtime (I also wrote a web
           | implementation: https://ttw.smitop.com/)
        
         | gibrown wrote:
         | I used tagtime for a while a decade or so ago. I agree that the
         | stochastic tracking is a lot better since you can't game it. I
         | may try it again, so thanks for the reminder.
         | 
         | I've been a paid subscriber to http://rescuetime.com/ for
         | almost a decade now. Passive tracking and analysis. But it is
         | not much of a nudge to really focus on things. Thanks for the
         | reminder.
         | 
         | I need to write up my Elasticsearch setup for indexing my
         | health/rehab tracking data, but the code is here:
         | https://github.com/gibrown/es-health-tracker and some of the
         | older tracking I wrote about here:
         | https://greg.blog/2018/06/15/relearning-to-walk-at-forty/
        
       | matsemann wrote:
       | I think it would be nice to try for a month, to see where time is
       | spent. Maybe finding some surprises or things to tweak to move
       | time around to what I really want.
       | 
       | At least when I was a poor newly graduated boy suddenly having a
       | salary but not much left at the end of the month, tracking
       | everything for one month made it clear where the money went. So
       | instead of acting on feelings I could act on data.
        
       | tus88 wrote:
       | Where are all the lawyer jokes?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-01-03 23:00 UTC)