[HN Gopher] Why a variant that's 50% more transmissible would be...
___________________________________________________________________
Why a variant that's 50% more transmissible would be a much bigger
problem
Author : doener
Score : 5 points
Date : 2021-01-02 21:49 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (twitter.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
| LatteLazy wrote:
| Another bad twitter thread. Points for trying but he's got the
| maths wrong.
|
| The issue he has missed is that transmission rates directly
| affect lethality. 3.2% of covid patients require intubation [1]
|
| So the lethality rate is 0.8% ONLY for as long as you have enough
| ventilators and nurses and beds. The minute too many people have
| the disease at the same time, those beds get full, and the
| disease becomes 3.2% lethal.
|
| This has been the key issue since day 1: avoiding a quadrupled
| death rate from system collapse. So far, we couldn't keep R
| values below 1 in the UK or US. Some places are at risk of being
| overrun already. Now the R value is going up, as the new varient
| is more transmissible. So it is possible that the new varient is
| both impossible for our societies to handle AND torpedoes our
| main plan.
|
| This is why the EU suspended all flights with the UK when the
| numbers came out. Its effectively BOTH more transmissable AND
| more deadly.
|
| I'm starting to think we need a 24h covid channel like we have
| 24h news. People seem to be trying to work this stuff out. But
| they're all failing. I'm probably wrong too in at least part of
| the above?
|
| This is also why I don't source anything from fucking twitter
| threads. They're always people
|
| /Rant
|
| [1]
| https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/132/6/1317/109...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-01-02 23:02 UTC)