https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/war-pretext-gulf-states-are-tightening-screws-speech-again Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF's 35th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Street Level Surveillance + apkeep * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Sponsorships + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate [logo-monog]If you use technology, this fight is yours.Donate today [effectingc]EFFecting Change: Can't Stop the Signal on April 16 [effectingc] Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF's 35th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Street Level Surveillance + apkeep * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Sponsorships + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give War as a Pretext: Gulf States Are Tightening the Screws on Speech--Again DEEPLINKS BLOG By Jillian C. York April 13, 2026 an image of a multi-colored globe inside of a hexagon War as a Pretext: Gulf States Are Tightening the Screws on Speech--Again Share It Share on Mastodon Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook Copy link an image of a multi-colored globe inside of a hexagon War does not only reshape borders. It also reshapes what can be seen, said, and remembered. When governments invoke "misinformation" during wartime, they often mean something simpler: speech they do not control. Since the escalation of conflict between the United States, Israel, Iran, and related spillover attacks in the Gulf, several governments have intensified efforts to silence dissent and restrict the flow of information. Journalism under pressure For journalists, the space to operate--already constrained in much of the Gulf--is narrowing further. Across the region, several countries (including the UAE, Qatar, and Jordan) have restricted access to conflict areas, warned of legal consequences for publishing footage, and drawn red lines around wartime reporting. These measures weaken independent coverage, elevate official narratives, and make it harder for the public to get an accurate account of events on the ground. Reporters Without Borders has documented an intensifying crackdown on journalists across Gulf countries and Jordan, including restrictions on reporting, legal threats, and heightened risks for those who deviate from official narratives. This aligns with the broader warning from the UN that repression of civic space and freedom of expression has significantly deepened across the region during the war. Criminalizing speech, one post at a time For ordinary internet users, the restrictions are just as severe. Since February, hundreds of people have reportedly been arrested across the region for social media activity linked to the war. In many Gulf states, the legal infrastructure enabling this is already well-established: expansive cybercrime and media laws criminalize vaguely defined offenses such as "spreading rumors," "undermining public order," or "insulting the state". In wartime, these provisions become catch-all tools: flexible enough to apply to nearly any form of dissent. In Bahrain, authorities have reportedly cracked down on people who protested or shared footage of the conflict online. The Gulf Centre for Human Rights has reported 168 arrests in the country tied to protests and online expression, with defendants potentially facing serious prison terms if convicted. In the UAE, authorities have arrested nearly 400 people for recording events related to the conflict and for circulating information they described as misleading or fabricated. Police have claimed this material could stir public anxiety and spread rumors, and state-linked reporting has described the crackdown as part of a broader effort to defend the country from digital misinformation. Saudi Arabia has also intensified restrictions, issuing a statement on March 2 banning the sharing of rumors or videos of unknown origin, and issuing a campaign discouraging residents from taking or posting photos. The campaign included a hashtag that reads "photography serves the enemy." Journalists have been prevented from documenting the aftermath of airstrikes on the country. Kuwait, Qatar, and Jordan have adopted similar restrictions on wartime imagery and reporting. Qatar's Interior Ministry has arrested more than 300 people for filming, circulating, or publishing what the ministry deemed to be misleading information. Taken together, these measures show how quickly wartime speech is being folded into existing legal systems designed to punish dissent. The regional playbook What's striking is how consistent these measures are across different countries. As we recently wrote, governments across the broader region have enacted sweeping cybercrime and media laws over the past fifteen years, which they are now putting to use. Across different countries, the same tools are being used: existing laws, fresh bans on sharing wartime imagery, and tighter restrictions on journalists and reporting. The vocabulary changes slightly from place to place, but the logic is the same: national security, public order, rumors, and social stability are justifications for control. This is not just a series of isolated incidents. It is a regional playbook for silencing critics and narrowing the public record. Gulf states have long relied on censorship and surveillance; the war has simply made those methods easier to justify and harder to challenge. From "digital hopes" to digital control As we've documented in our ongoing blog series, digital platforms were once seen--at least in part--as spaces that could expand public discourse in the region. But as we've also argued, those early "digital hopes" have given way to systems of regulation and control. The current crackdown is a continuation of that trajectory, not a temporary departure from it. States are not just reacting to the war; they are leveraging it to consolidate long-standing ambitions to dominate the digital public sphere. It may be tempting to see these measures as temporary, but emergency powers--like the one enacted in Egypt following the 1981 assassination of Anwar Sadat that lasted for more than three decades--have a way of sticking around. Legal precedents that are set during wartime often become normalized--or reinvoked during times of crisis, as occurred in 2015, when France brought back a 1955 law related to the Algerian War of Independence amidst the Paris attacks. And the stakes are high. As we've seen in Syria and Ukraine, regulations and platform policies can cause wartime human rights documentation to disappear. When journalists are constrained and eyewitness footage is criminalized, accountability is weakened. And when arrests become widespread, people learn to self-censor. Protecting freedom of expression in times of conflict is a requirement for accountability, not a concession to disorder. When people can document, report, and share information freely, it becomes harder for abuses to be hidden behind official narratives. Even in wartime, the public interest is best served by defending the space to tell the truth, not by silencing speech. Related Issues International Free Speech Content Blocking Tags bahrain jordan uae qatar saudi arabia Share It Share on Mastodon Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook Copy link Related Updates Hands holding up flowers under the word Hry@, Arabic for "freedom" Deeplinks Blog by Sarah Hamid | April 8, 2026 Digital Hopes, Real Power: How the Arab Spring Fueled a Global Surveillance Boom When people remember the 2011 uprisings across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), they picture crowded squares, raised phones, and the feeling that the internet had finally shifted the balance of power toward ordinary people. But the past decade and a half is also a story about how governments... Necessary & Proportionate logo Deeplinks Blog by Betty Gedlu | April 2, 2026 Google and Amazon: Acknowledged Risks, and Ignored Responsibilities In late 2024, we urged Google and Amazon to honor their human rights commitments. Since then, a stream of additional reporting has reinforced that our concerns were well-founded. Yet despite mounting evidence of serious risk, both companies have refused to take action. an eye covers a globe in multi-hued background Deeplinks Blog by Jillian C. York, Veridiana Alimonti | April 2, 2026 EFF's Submission to the UN OHCHR on Protection of Human Rights Defenders in the Digital Age Governments around the world are adopting new laws and policies aimed at addressing online harms, including laws intended to curb cybercrime and disinformation, and ostensibly protect user safety. Framed as necessary responses to legitimate concerns, they are increasingly being used in ways that restrict fundamental rights. Jacob Mchangama Deeplinks Blog by Jillian C. York | April 2, 2026 Speaking Freely: Jacob Mchangama Jacob Mchangama is a Danish lawyer, human-rights advocate, and public commentator. He is the founder and director of Justitia, a Copenhagen-based think tank focusing on human rights, freedom of speech, and the rule of law. Hands holding up flowers under the word Hry@, Arabic for "freedom" Deeplinks Blog by Jillian C. York | April 1, 2026 Digital Hopes, Real Power: From Revolution to Regulation Sixty-six percent of internet users live where political or social sites are blocked, and 78% live in countries where people have been arrested for online posts. This is the second installment of a blog series reflecting on the global digital legacy of the 2011 Arab uprisings. A hand holding a cellphone showing a verification screen and ACCESS DENIED in the background. Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings | March 30, 2026 UK Politicians Continue to Miss the Point in Latest Social Media Ban Proposal The UK is moving forward with its efforts to ban social media for young people. Ahead of this week's House of Lords debate on the topic, we're getting you situated with a primer on what's been happening and what it all means. Hands holding up flowers under the word Hry@, Arabic for "freedom" Deeplinks Blog by Jillian C. York | March 25, 2026 Digital Hopes, Real Power: Reflecting on the Legacy of the Arab Spring A new generation of protesters, raised on social media and often fluent in the tools of digital dissent, has taken to the streets in recent months and years. This is the first installment of a blog series reflecting on the global digital legacy of the 2011 Arab uprisings. woman speaking into bullhorn, vintage photo style Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | March 6, 2026 Admiring Our Heroes for International Women's Day: Celebrating Women Who Have Received EFF Awards Women in tech deserve more and brighter spotlights. At EFF, we've had the honor of celebrating some of our heroes at our annual EFF Awards, including many women who are leading the digital rights community. In this blog, we recognize Carolina Botero (EFF Award Winner, 2024), Chelsea Manning (EFF Award... Portrait of Ada Lovelace ca1840 public domain Deeplinks Blog by Allison Morris, Babette Ngene, Corynne McSherry, Jillian C. York, Sarah Hamid | March 6, 2026 Admiring Our Heroes for International Women's Day: Five Women In Tech That EFF Admires In honor of International Women's Day, we asked five women at EFF about women in digital rights, freedom of expression, technology, and tech activism who have inspired us. They include Anna Politkovskaya, Cindy Cohn, Jane (the organization), Ebele Okobi, and Ada Lovelace. [banner-dsaprinciples-1200x600] Deeplinks Blog by Karen Gullo, Christoph Schmon | January 27, 2026 DSA Human Rights Alliance Publishes Principles Calling for DSA Enforcement to Incorporate Global Perspectives The Digital Services Act (DSA) Human Rights Alliance has, since its founding by EFF and Access Now in 2021, worked to ensure that the European Union follows a human rights-based approach to platform governance by integrating a wide range of voices and perspectives to contextualise DSA enforcement and examining the... Share on MastodonShare on BlueskyShare on Facebook Related Issues International Free Speech Content Blocking Related Tags bahrain jordan uae qatar saudi arabia Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * mastodon * facebook * instagram * Blue Sky * youtube * flicker * linkedin * tiktok * threads Check out our 4-star rating on Charity Navigator. Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Giving Societies * Corporate Giving and Sponsorship * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *