https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/technology/social-media-trial-verdict.html Skip to contentSkip to site index Technology Today's Paper Social Media on Trial * Companies Found Negligent * Child Safety Trial Against Meta * Snap Settles Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load. Supported by SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case A jury found the companies harmed a young user with design features that were addictive and led to her mental health distress. Listen * 8:59 min * Share full article * * * 1.1k Mark Zuckerberg, wearing a suit and tie, walks down steps outside a marble building surrounded by other people. Meta's chairman and chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, at Los Angeles Superior Court last month.Credit...Mark Abramson for The New York Times Cecilia KangRyan MacEli Tan By Cecilia KangRyan Mac and Eli Tan Cecilia Kang reported from Washington, Ryan Mac from the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County and Eli Tan from San Francisco. March 25, 2026Updated 5:36 p.m. ET The social media company Meta and the video streaming service YouTube harmed a young user with design features that were addictive and led to her mental health distress, a jury found on Wednesday, a landmark decision that could open social media companies to more lawsuits over users' well-being. Meta must pay $4.2 million in combined compensatory and punitive damages, and YouTube must pay $1.8 million. The bellwether case, which was brought by a now 20-year-old woman identified as K.G.M., had accused social media companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes or digital casinos. Citing features like infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations, K.G.M. sued Meta, which owns Instagram and Facebook, and Google's YouTube, claiming they led to anxiety and depression. The verdict in K.G.M.'s case -- one of thousands of lawsuits filed by teenagers, school districts and state attorneys general against Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Snap, which owns Snapchat -- was a major win for the plaintiffs. The finding validates a novel legal theory that social media sites or apps can cause personal injury. It is likely to factor into similar cases expected to go to trial this year, which could expose the internet giants to further financial damages and force changes to their products. Image Luis Li, the attorney representing YouTube and Google, arrives at the court after the jury reached a verdict in the bellwether case. Credit...Mike Blake/Reuters The personal liability argument draws inspiration from a legal playbook used against Big Tobacco last century, in which lawyers argued that the companies created addictive products that harmed users. The companies have largely dodged legal threats by citing a federal shield, called Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which protects them from liability for what their users post. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in. Want all of The Times? Subscribe. Related Content * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Site Index Site Information Navigation * (c) 2026 The New York Times Company * NYTCo * Contact Us * Accessibility * Work with us * Advertise * T Brand Studio * Privacy Policy * Cookie Policy * Terms of Service * Terms of Sale * Site Map * Canada * International * Help * Subscriptions * Manage Privacy Preferences