https://goughlui.com/2026/03/07/tested-how-many-times-can-a-dvd%C2%B1rw-be-rewritten-part-2-methodology-results/ [INS::INS] Gough's Tech Zone Reversing the mindless enslavement of humans by technology. [svg][ritekw01-dashes-940x198] Skip to content * Home * The VHS Corner + Intro - Inside the VHS Cassette & VCR + VHS Repair - Fix me baby, one more time! + Mini-Me: VHS-C Teardown & Adapter + I'm Dirty, Wash Me! - Head Cleaning Cassettes + VHS Cassette Library > o ACME Extra High Grade o ACME Professional Grade o ACME Super Grade o Akai o BASF Extra Quality o Casio AG o Foto Processing o Fuji AG o G-Tape Premium Performance o Hi-Tech o Hitachi High Resolution o JVC Excellent Resolution o Kodak o Maxell EX o Maxell G o Maxell GU o Maxell GX o Memorex HS o National NV o NEC o NEC High Definition o Nichei o Onix o Opus o Palsonic HI o Panasonic o Philips HG o Polaroid High Quality o Polaroid High Standard o QTape o Raks SQ o Sanyo High Grade o Scotch EG o Sheen o SKC HQ Maxplay Grade o Sony Clarity and Durability o Sony Dynamicron o Sony Dynamicron Durable & Excellent Quality o Sony Super Durable & Excellent Quality o TDK Sharp & Clear o TDK Super Avilyn o TDK TV o Teac ASX o Teac HX o Teac X-1 o Teac X-2 + VHS Clip Library > o Week 1: DSE, Tandy, Acer, IBM, Apple, Microsoft and Sony o Week 2: Apple, SEDA, Foxtel, Global Comp. Sega World, Sony, Motor Show, Vodafone * The CPU Corner + CPGA132 (Intel) + CPGA168 or Socket 0/1/486 (Intel/AMD/Cyrix) + Slot 1 (Intel) + Slot 2 (Intel) + Socket 370 (Intel) + Socket 423 (Intel) + Socket 462 or Socket A (AMD) + Socket 478 (Intel) + Socket 479 (Intel) + Socket 5 (Intel) + Socket 754 (AMD) + Socket 939 (AMD) + Socket AM1/FS1b (AMD) + Socket AM2 (AMD) + Socket AM3 (AMD) + Socket H2 or LGA 1155 (Intel) + Socket H3 or LGA 1150 (Intel) + Socket J or LGA 771 (Intel) + Socket M (Intel) + Socket P (Intel) + Socket T or LGA 775 (Intel) + Super Socket 7 (AMD) + IBM PowerPC (Apple) + Sun UltraSPARC IIi (Sun) + Non-Socketed CPUs * The Optical Disc Corner + Apple + Arita + BASF and EMTEC + BenQ + Fujifilm + HiCO + Imation (CD-R & CD-RW) + Imation (DVD+-R/RW & BD-R/RE) + Kodak + LaCie + Laser + LG + Magmedia + Maxell + Mediacache + Mitsubishi + Mr. Data + Panasonic + Philips + Ricoh + RiDATA + RiTEK + Samsung + Sony (CD-R & CD-RW) + Sony (DVD+-R & DVD+-RW) + TDK (8cm DVD-R & DVD-RW) + TDK (BD-R & BD-RE) + TDK (CD-R & CD-RW) + TDK (DVD+-R) + TDK (DVD+-RW) + Verbatim (BD-R & BD-RE) + Verbatim (CD-R & CD-RW) + Verbatim (DVD+-R) + Verbatim (DVD+-RW) + Other Lesser Known Brands + Other Optical Disc Articles * The Hard Disk Corner + Hard Drive Performance Over the Years + Hard Drive Audio by Magnetic Pickup + Other Hard Drive Related Articles + Conner CFS210A (3.5'' 210MB 1994) + Fujitsu MHR2020AT (2.5'' 20GB 2002) + Fujitsu MHV2100BH PL (2.5'' 100GB 2006) + Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL (2.5'' 120GB 2006) + Fujitsu MHZ2120BH FFS G1 (2.5'' 120GB 2009) + Fujitsu MJA2160BH FFS G1 (2.5'' 160GB 2009) + Fujitsu MPA3026AT (3.5'' 2.62GB 1997) + Fujitsu MPC3064AT (3.5'' 6.48GB 1999) + Fujitsu MPD3084AT (3.5'' 8.45GB 1999) + Fujitsu MPE3064AT (3.5'' 6.48GB 2000) + Hitachi DK23CA-20 (2.5'' 20GB 2003) + Hitachi HDP725025GLA380 Deskstar (3.5'' 250GB 2009) + Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 / Toshiba DT01ABA300 (3.5'' 3TB 2012) + Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 / Toshiba DT01ACA300 (3.5'' 3TB 2012) + Hitachi HTS541040G9SA00 Travelstar (2.5'' 40GB 2006) + Hitachi HTS541060G9SA00 Travelstar (2.5'' 60GB 2006) + Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 (2.5'' 320GB 2011) + Hitachi IC25N060ATMR04-0 Travelstar (2.5'' 60GB 2005) + IBM 19K1552 Fireball lct (3.5'' 10.1GB 2000) + IBM DPTA-372050 Deskstar (3.5'' 20.5GB 2000) + IBM DTLA-307030 Deskstar (3.5'' 30.7GB 2000) + Maxtor 4D040H2 (3.5'' 40GB 2002) + Maxtor 6L250R0 DiamondMax 10 (3.5'' 250GB 2008) + Maxtor 6Y120L0 DiamondMax Plus 9 (3.5'' 120GB 2005) + Maxtor 82161E2 (2.5'' 2014MB 1998) + Maxtor 92049U3 (3.5'' 20.4GB 2000) + Quantum 1080AT Fireball (3.5'' 1080MB 1995) + Quantum 6.4AT EX64A024 Fireball EX (3.5'' 6.4GB 1999) + Quantum Fireball Plus AS (3.5'' 20.5GB 2001) + Samsung HD204UI SpinPoint F4EG (3.5'' 2TB 2010) + Samsung HD502IJ SpinPoint F1 (3.5'' 500GB 2009) + Samsung MP0804H Spinpoint M40 (2.5'' 80GB 2005) + Samsung SP2514N SpinPoint (3.5'' 250GB 2007) + Seagate ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB Momentus (2.5'' 1TB 2014) + Seagate ST2000DL003-9VT166 Barracuda Green (3.5'' 2TB 2011) + Seagate ST3120022A Barracuda 7200.7 (3.5'' 120GB 2004) + Seagate ST3120026A Barracuda 7200.7 (3.5'' 120GB 2004) + Seagate ST32000542AS Barracuda LP (3.5'' 2TB 2011) + Seagate ST320410A U6 (3.5'' 20GB 2002) + Seagate ST320413A U Series 5 (3.5'' 20GB 2002) + Seagate ST320LM010 Laptop Thin HDD (2.5'' 500GB 2015) + Seagate ST3250318AS Barracuda 7200.12 (3.5'' 250GB 2010) + Seagate ST32531A Medalist (3.5'' 2557MB 1998) + Seagate ST3320613AS Barracuda 7200.11 (3.5'' 320GB 2008) + Seagate ST3320620A Barracuda 7200.10 (3.5'' 320GB 2007) + Seagate ST340014A Barracuda 7200.7 (3.5'' 40GB 2004) + Seagate ST340810A U6 (3.5'' 40GB 2002) + Seagate ST34342A Medalist (3.5'' 4303MB 1998) + Seagate ST360021A Barracuda ATA IV (3.5'' 60GB 2002) + Seagate ST380011A Barracuda 7200.7 (3.5'' 80GB 2004) + Seagate ST380021A Barracuda ATA IV (3.5'' 80GB 2003) + Seagate ST380023A Barracuda ATA V (3.5'' 80GB 2003) + Seagate ST4000DM000-1F2168 Barracuda LP (3.5'' 4TB 2014) + Seagate ST5000DM000-1FK178 Desktop HDD (3.5'' 5TB 2015) + Seagate ST500DM002-1BD142 Barracuda (3.5'' 500GB 2015) + Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 Laptop Thin HDD (2.5'' 500GB 2017) + Seagate ST9160821AS Momentus 5400.3 (2.5'' 160GB 2007) + Seagate ST9200420AS Momentus 7200.2 (2.5'' 200GB 2009) + Seagate ST9500423AS Momentus (2.5'' 500GB 2011) + Seagate ST96812A Momentus 5400.2 (2.5'' 60GB 2006) + Toshiba MK1252GSX (2.5'' 120GB 2008) + Toshiba MK1652GSX (2.5'' 160GB 2008) + Toshiba MK2555GSXF (2.5'' 250GB 2010) + Toshiba MQ01ACF050 (2.5'' 500GB 2015) + WD WD100BA-60AK Expert (3.5'' 10GB 1999) + WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 Caviar SE16 GreenPower (3.5'' 1TB 2007) + WD WD10EURX-63UY4Y0 GreenPower AV (3.5'' 1TB 2015) + WD WD1600AAJS-00PSA0 Caviar SE (3.5'' 160GB 2007) + WD WD1600BEVS-08VAT2 Scorpio Blue (2.5'' 160GB 2009) + WD WD1600BEVS-22RST0 Scorpio (2.5'' 160GB 2007) + WD WD2000JB-00GVC0 Caviar SE (3.5'' 200GB 2005) + WD WD2002FAEX-007BA0 Caviar Black (3.5'' 2TB 2013) + WD WD20EARX-00PASB0 Caviar Green (3.5'' 2TB 2012) + WD WD2500AAJS-60Z0A0 Caviar Blue (3.5'' 250GB 2010) + WD WD2500JB-00GVA0 Caviar SE (3.5'' 250GB 2005) + WD WD2500YD-01NVB1 Caviar RE16 (3.5'' 250GB 2005) + WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 RE (3.5'' 250GB 2007) + WD WD3000JB-00KFA0 Caviar SE (3.5'' 300GB 2006) + WD WD30EZRX-00MMMB0 Caviar Green (3.5'' 3TB 2011) + WD WD3200JB-00KFA0 Caviar SE (3.5'' 320GB 2006) + WD WD400BB-22HEA1 Caviar (3.5'' 40GB 2004) + WD WD400BB-60DGA0 Caviar (3.5'' 40GB 2003) + WD WD40EZRX-00SPEB0 Green (3.5'' 4TB 2014) + WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 Caviar GP GreenPower (3.5'' 500GB 2008) + WD WD5000AAKS-00TMA0 Caviar SE16 (3.5'' 500GB 2007) + WD WD5000AAKX-603CA0 Caviar Blue (3.5'' 500GB 2011) + WD WD5000LPLX-75ZNTT0 Black (2.5'' 500GB 2019) + WD WD60EZRX-00MVLB1 Green (3.5'' 6TB 2015) + WD WD7500BPVT-80HXZT3 Scorpio Blue (2.5'' 750GB 2012) * Other Pages + Raspberry Pi: Element14 vs RS Components + SD/SDHC/SDXC CID CSD Register Data Database + SD/SDHC/SDXC Performance Test Database + Blu-ray Recordable Disc BCA Collection + BenQ DW1640 Media Code Support List for Firmware BSRB + BenQ DW1650 Media Code Support List for Firmware BCIC + LG GGW-H20L Supermultiblue Media Code Support List for Firmware YL07 + Lite-On iHAS624 A Media Code Support List for Firmware ZL2U + Lite-On iHAS624 B Media Code Support List for Firmware GL2A + Lite-On SHM-165P6S Media Code Support List for Firmware MS0R + LITEON LH20A1S Media Code Support List for Firmware 9L08 + LiteOn SOHW-832S Media Support List for Firmware CG5M + NEC ND3500AG Media Code Support List for Firmware 2.1B + Pioneer DVR-111L Media Code Support List for Firmware 8.29 + Pioneer DVR-218L/LBK Media Code Support List for Firmware 1.03 + Terms of Use & Privacy Policy * Project FAX + Fax Technicalities & Audio Samples + Library of Received Faxes * About Me + Publications and Appearances + Contact Me * Gough's Review Challenge * Interesting Links - Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 1: The Contenders & ECMA Standards Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 2: Methodology & Results Posted on March 7, 2026 by lui_gough Now that we've covered the contenders for this test, I will cover how this test will be performed and go through the results. It was a long time for me, but for you, it'll just be a few hours between posts ... Methodology & Limitations It might sound simple to experimentally determine how many times a DVD+-RW can be rewritten - simply write the disc and read the disc until it fails, but this ignores a few nuances, more specifically, how can it feasibly be done and what do the results even mean. For this test, rather than write my own software to try to write, read and quality scan a disc, I opted to stick to using Opti Drive Control. Using the software, a test disc can be written and verified, the transfer rate can be checked and quality scans can be performed. The write-verify cycle ensures the disc is at least readable, while transfer rate tests allow for "weaknesses" in the recording quality to be identified based on their impact on the transfer rate. Finally, the quality scan feature allows for the drive to report correctable errors and jitter levels to be able to identify degradation in recording quality before it impacts on the readability of the disc. But I wasn't going to have enough lifetime to sit there, click buttons, burn after burn. After all, a 2x burn takes about 30 minutes, and if the disc can survive 1000 cycles - that'd be almost 21 days of burning time alone. A 4x CLV quality scan (my favoured scan rate) takes 15 minutes too, while a TRT and verify added together may take around the same amount of time, assuming the disc is good. So this is a big time investment that demands automation. To do this, I decided to write my own script using pyautogui. This Python library allows for automating clicks and keystrokes, so I wrote a script that would detect elements on the screen to deduce what was happening and click the appropriate buttons, taking screenshots at the right time so as to capture the results. The script was really flaky at first, in part because I was running on a very old spare computer that was slow to draw the graphs resulting in "broken" screenshots. Furthermore, it seems the theming and styling of Windows is important too, as later versions of Windows may highlight boxes on hover-over, resulting in failed exact-matches for screen snippets. After debugging with a few delays, trying different variants of buttons and building in error-recovery (i.e. sometimes flaky discs just need a "refresh" nudge), I had something ready to unleash on test sample discs. This leaves the question of which drive I should use for the test. It didn't take me long, but that old computer I was donated had a practically unused, retail Lite-On iHAS120 6 in it which was a great candidate for testing. This drive supported error scanning with jitter, making it a key asset and quickly became one of my favourites even before I bought a duplicator filled with its cousins. Even better, I had two extra drives of the same model in the collection, so if it should fail, I could carry on the experiments with the spares. The script would use ODC to write a test disc, verify the test disc, run a TRT on the test disc and then a quality scan. It would loop around over and over until the script timed out on an unrecoverable error condition or I stopped it as it exceeded expectations or had previously had a verification error but was not bad enough to cause the script to fail issuing further rewrites. Specifically, the disc was not unloaded and reloaded between attempts to save wear and tear on the tray mechanism and reduce noise. Soon, an issue was discovered due to the slow nature of the media meant that it would take close to a whole year to complete testing, so I employed a second iHAS120 6 in parallel - this one in a USB 2.0 enclosure connected to a mini-PC. This ran Windows 11, and was both faster and more power efficient. The script needed to be modified for this, but it allowed for improved test throughput. [svg][1749747612] One downside of Windows 11 is its propensity to download and automatically install updates, which caused a few interruptions to testing. Eventually, I killed the requisite services and firewalled the machine from the internet entirely, to stem the automatic updates. With a pile of screenshot files, I used OpenCV to detect the contours around the window, crop out each screenshot and use template matching to determine the type of screenshot. It was also used for template matching to determine the first point of failure. Pillow and NumPy was used for image manipulation, including adding a run counter, resaving the image and exporting the sequences as video files which were then re-encoded using Handbrake. This was the only data-efficient way to represent all of the images without creating an inode exposion, or very very large animated GIF/PNG file. The key limitations of the experiment, as proposed, are as follows: * Quality scanning on rewritable discs works, however, it was previously established that some discs return very poor error scan values but remain readable and vice-versa, so it is not definitive regarding the readability status of a disc as there may be impairments that affect a quality scan but which are compensated on a read-out. This is why we also use transfer-rate test and verification of the data to ensure it is readable. The criterion for disc failure is set as the first verification run that fails due to an error. * The resulting cycle life result is valid only for the combination of burner and disc tested - the iHAS120 6 used in the test may be better with some media than others. Furthermore, testing of a single sample does mean that we don't have visibility on whether the result is consistent for discs of that type or for just that sample. This is unfortunately, a limitation borne of having limited resources in terms of time, energy and recorders that can do everything. * When rewriting DVD+RW media, a direct overwrite takes place. But rewriting DVD-RW media, it seems ODC runs a full erase on the disc first, before writing. This means that, technically speaking, the DVD-RW discs have done twice the cycles than actually counted (as the full erase is a full write, but not one we made use of). In theory, a restricted overwrite operation on DVD-RW should avoid this, but as ODC does not seem to perform this (and I didn't bother trying to add additional code to invoke a quick erase first), this behaviour was tolerated even though it increased test length as well. * The cycle life number may be off by up to three counts in the worst case - this is due to the machines having restarted mid-test resulting in one write being discarded. But this is small compared to the number of cycles envisaged, so is considered "within error margins". In all, this was an absolute epic experiment that took over half-a-year to run ... and then sat around waiting for me to have the time to compile the data in a presentable way. Results Let's start by looking at each disc type in turn. Memorex 8x DVD+RW I had high hopes for this RITEK-008-000, but alas, perhaps it's just not a good fit for the drive or the media itself might have quietly gone bad in some way. [svg][cr-1738729098-300x244] [svg][cr-1738731420-300x244] While the drive did a Z-CLV 8x burn initially, every subsequent burn was stuck at 6x CLV. It's as if the drive knew something was not right so refused to go faster. When the system was rebooted because of inevitable Windows Update shenanigans or power outages, we would get a single 8x burn again ... but that's about it. [svg][trt-1738732263-300x244] [svg][trt-1738729936-300x244] The smooth readback curves are ... a little deceptive. [svg][qs-1738730836-300x244] [svg][qs-1738733164-300x244] The first two writes out of the bat are just not good looking. Below are videos running at 5fps that show the results run-after-run. The first failure to verify occurred at just 106 runs. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rit08-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rit08-trt-h264.mp4 The transfer rate test curve gets lumpy and then eventually errors start cropping up around the time verify failure first occurs. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rit08-vf-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rit08-qs-h264.mp4 Quality-wise, the values jump around unpredictably and a spike near 0.5GB might just be characteristic of this particular series of Lite-On drive's firmware. The lower speed does improve the burn, but PIE-wise it's a fail all-round and PIFs is mostly fail too with a few burns being perhaps marginal. Sony 6x DVD-RW As I was most interested in the faster discs, I tried these discs first, but surprisingly they fell short of my expectations. As a result, I tested two samples of this - here are some screenshots from the second sample. [svg][cr-1744709968] A Z-CLV write is achieved at 6x - not CLV even though the drive manages 6x CLV on DVD+RW media. A write in around 10 minutes is noticeably faster than the 15 minutes a 4x burn takes. But the drive does "flicker" and decide to go 4x CLV in later runs. [svg][trt-1744710818] Smooth reads ... [svg][qs-1744711723] ... but all is not well with this quality scan. It's hit the limit for PIEs and it's only the first burn. Jitter is a bit high but PIFs are good. Perhaps rewriting faster than 4x is really pushing the phase change medium? Videos of the full tests of each sample follow. Sample 1 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6a-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6a-trt-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6a-vf-h264.mp4 This sample managed 204 cycles until its first verify failure. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6a-qs-h264.mp4 For this sample, the disc did well initially but errors started to climb consistently to the point of really being in danger by 50 cycles or so. There are a few error dialogs, as this was an earlier test and I hadn't quite perfected my script, which is another reason why I opted to test a second ... but this drive seems to do so much better in terms of error rates and jitter at 4x than it does at 6x writing. Sample 2 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6b-cr-h264.mp4 I didn't change anything but get a new sample of the disc and this one seems marginally more willing to burn at 6x rather than 4x. There is still many occasions where it falls back. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6b-trt-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6b-vf-h264.mp4 This disc managed to make 223 cycles before its first failure, a similar result to the previous sample. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/sony6b-qs-h264.mp4 By about 40 runs, the error rates had crept up into danger territory, but it seems that we get bursts of better results whenever the drive falls back to 4x. Nevertheless, this is not a very "stable" rewriting characteristic and the jitter level is high, suggesting it's not writing with a good strategy. Victor JVC 6x DVD-RW [svg][cr-1749612215] Can you tell the difference with a Japanese-made disc? Well, yes, actually. This one consistently achieved 6x writes ... [svg][trt-1749613062] ... the first write looked quite good ... [svg][qs-1749613971] ... and even though it's clear the faster writing at 6x did result in lower quality and higher jitter, the PIEs are acceptable, the PIFs are very good and the jitter level is not too bad either. Will it last in the long-run? https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/jvcvd7-cr-h264.mp4 Write-after-write ... 6x ... no problem! https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/jvcvd7-trt-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/jvcvd7-vf-h264.mp4 Compared to the two Riteks above, this one certainly exceeded my expectation. The first verify failure occurred at run 639. It's not quite 1000 rewrites in the sense of rewrites of useful data, but if we consider the full-erase between writes, then this exceeds the claimed 1000 cycles. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/jvcvd7-qs-h264.mp4 This disc seems to exhibit a phenomenon where the error rates decrease after the first few writes, sometimes attributed to some annealing. Unfortunately, after the first 130 or so cycles, the error rates swing wildly from burn to burn - perhaps indicating a change in characteristic where the calibration chooses a power that is sometimes "hit" and sometimes "miss". As expected, the jitter value increases somewhat as the disc ages, as claimed by the Pioneer white-paper about DVD-RW. The spike around 0.5GB shows up late in the discs' life at the Z-CLV transition point. This suggests to me that this is a good quality exemplar of what is possible and to be expected as a disc is being worn-down by rewrites. TDK 4x DVD+RW (Version 1) Rather than go through screenshots for the slower varieties of discs, I'll present just the video time sequences and short commentary. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rjpnw11-cr-h264.mp4 Nothing special here - 4x burns are fairly event-free. The drive just chugs away ... it's not like it's going to fall-back to 2.4x ... I've never seen it happen. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rjpnw11-trt-h264.mp4 There are some wiggles towards the outer, suggesting this disc was never perfectly healthy to begin with. These get significantly worse as we exceed 330 cycles when the first big dips near the outer start to show. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rjpnw11-vf-h264.mp4 The disc managed 413 cycles until its first verify error. This is not quite 1000, but is more than I had initially imagined. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/rjpnw11-qs-h264.mp4 The quality scan graph confirms that the disc isn't doing well towards the outer, but this behaviour remains relatively stable. As the wear begins, the inner diameter sees random spikes and surges in error rate - I wonder if this is because the drive simply doesn't choose the right power as its running OPC against "worn" areas or whether the recording layer laser power margin is shrinking meaning the same calibration errors result in bigger influences in the burn. [svg][ricohw11-defects-1024x576] The failure of this disc was actually visible in some way - there were dark speckles on the recording layer itself. Perhaps these were impurities or pin-prick holes in the reflective layer. Usually they might cause more of a disturbance, but this disc still did well given the degraded state it was in at test conclusion. The fact that the jitter remained low throughout the discs' life suggests to me that the recording layer may have had more to offer, had it not been plagued by this "disc rot". TDK 4x DVD+RW (Version 2) https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/p041-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/p041-trt-h264.mp4 For a disc type that I've previously used and considered not so good, it starts off strong. It's not until about 190 writes that the outer edge starts to show signs of giving up. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/p041-vf-h264.mp4 The first verify error occurred at 218 cycles, far from 1000 cycles but it also means that the ailing RICOHJPN-W11 managed to go almost twice as far. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/p041-qs-h264.mp4 The quality scan suggests very average burn quality on the PIEs, turning to bad by about 80 cycles. PIFs are elevated all round and jitter is a bit variable. Outer diameter failure is clear by about 120 cycles in quality scans and becomes the dominant feature as the runs progress with jitter increasing. TDK 4x DVD+RW (Version 3) https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw02-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw02-trt-h264.mp4 A spot near the outer edge causes tiny dips that are visible already around 180 cycles in, but this becomes a severe issue as we get into the 800 cycle territory. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw02-vf-h264.mp4 This disc managed an impressive 850 cycles to the first verify error. Not bad at all. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw02-qs-h264.mp4 Burn quality takes a few burns to settle down to an acceptable PIE but marginal PIF. Outer edge issues are apparent from the start, suggesting this may be the result of ageing, storage or degradation by light or atmosphere. The recording of the bulk of the disc remains stable into the early 400 cycles, but towards the mid-late 400s, the drive and media work to cause a "wave" of error that grows and shrinks, perhaps a consequence of direct overwrite interactions with the previous recording. So this explains why a rewritable disc can have a bad burn, then be followed by a good few burns, then suddenly go bad again. Verbatim 4x DVD+RW https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02a-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02a-trt-h264.mp4 There are little dips in the TRT right from the outset indicating the burn is a difficult one. By about 60 cycles, the outer starts to waver ... then everything goes to crap. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02a-vf-h264.mp4 You'd expect a lot from Verbatim ... but we only got 96 cycles until the first verify error. As it is a major media brand, the expectation is that it'd be quite compatible, so blaming on the drive seems a bit unlikely. Could this have somehow degraded? https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02a-qs-h264.mp4 High jitter and a sea of reds ... the burn is practically never acceptable ... BONUS: DC Erase - Can It Revive a Rewritable? As an owner of the Nu Tech DDW-082, I can definitely say that it was not a particularly good burner in any regard. Flaky firmware, questionable burn quality and compatibility. I regretted the purchase. But one thing it could do, that no other drive I had could, was a function called DC Erase that was said to revive rewritable discs. This function was said to restore the "bright" surface that you would see from a brand-new virgin rewritable disc. To do this, you'd have to use DVDInfoPro to access the functionality. The Verbatim disc didn't do well out-of-the-box so I decided to give it a try to see if such a thing would even work ... [svg][nu-dcerase-300x151] [svg][nu-dcerase3-300x151] [svg] [nu-dcerase2] ... so the disc was DC erased and short of a few hairline sections, the disc did have a bright surface. While all other drives to my knowledge do not have a DC Erase function that is user-accessible, all drives are able to do DC Erase as this is required for the Power Calibration Area prior to calibration: [svg][Screenshot-2026-03-07-154830] [svg] [Screenshot-2026-03-07-155103] So the drives are doing it internally for some areas, but generally, this is a function not available otherwise. The reasoning, as far as I have heard, is that this sort of erase wears out the disc more than writing a valid sequence of digital "zeroes" to the surface, but in this case, it seems to have revived the disc for a little longer. But given the DDW-082's limited compatibility with slower (4x) media only, I didn't decide to test this feature out any further. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02b-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02b-trt-h264.mp4 It did return the disc to a passing state for a bit, but the curve still jitters indicating bad burns. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02b-vf-h264.mp4 The disc failed at 103 cycles, so it's within spitting distance of the first test, but not because of a verify error. Instead, it failed because it produced consistent write errors. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mkma02b-qs-h264.mp4 The curves are similarly covered in red, although the spikes in jitter seem to be getting worse and haven't been helped. This suggests there may have been some actual damage to the disc (e.g. scratching on the surface by the pick-up head, or internally to the structures needed for tracking). TDK 4x DVD-RW https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw03-cr-h264.mp4 https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw03-trt-h264.mp4 Around 190 cycles, the disc seems to show a case of outer-edge dips, which gets worse and worse. It seems that outer edge is "lethal" - it's where the recording layer gets closest to the atmosphere but also light impinging from the side of the disc (e.g. while it's in its case). Aside from the common cause of physical damage which is not relevant in this test, that's why you probably shouldn't expect to fill your discs to the brim and have the outer be just as readable as the inner. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw03-vf-h264.mp4 This disc managed 237 cycles before a verify failure, and being a "dash" format disc, if you consider the full erase a cycle, you can double this figure. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cmcw03-qs-h264.mp4 Write quality was quite good, PIE wise and marginal on PIF. Jitter is not bad. By about 133 cycles, the outer edge starts taking a dominant role, modulating the error graph while the majority of the burn still seems okay. The inner edge starts to follow and the jitter trend clearly reflects this. So I wonder what's so problematic about the inner and outer edges - could it be that spin-coating is used and those being the "boundary" points result in film thickness unevenness (a form of edge beading) that makes it more susceptible to recording quality drift? [svg][cmcw03-surface-pinch-1024x576] While nothing was too apparent visually, there was this odd spot where it almost looked like the layer was "pinched" ... an uneven spot. As it was in the bulk of the disc and not at the edges, the influence it had on error rates seems rather limited. TDK 2x DVD-RW https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/tdkm3-cr-h264.mp4 Writing at 2x feels so slooooooooowwwwww .... I could barely contain my excitement at having to leave this for a month or two .... https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/tdkm3-trt-h264.mp4 Already, from early on, there are a few "blips", some getting bigger by about 80 runs in. But the disc manages to hang in there despite the blips and dips getting bigger and more severe, by about 180 cycles. The shakiness extends to the whole disc by about 240 cycles, but it refuses to give up. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/tdkm3-vf-h264.mp4 In fact, I chose to terminate the test at 1008 cycles - no verification failure occurred in over 1000 cycles. Being a dash format, if you consider a full erase as a cycle, this means over 2000 cycles ... https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/tdkm3-qs-h264.mp4 Burn quality looked quite good initially but then started to bounce around unpredictably, starting to exceed limits by about 70ish cycles. The phenomenon of "good burn, bad burn" back-to-back seems to rear its head and the jitter seems to creep up as well. The case of this disc managing to survive so long is both a miracle, but also perhaps quite a bit pf luck that in spite of its quite horrific results even at about 370 cycles in, that the drive did not give up trying to read back the data. Maxell 2x DVD-RW https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mxl2x-cr-h264.mp4 Another slow disc ... but I'm patient ... so let's go. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mxl2x-trt-h264.mp4 The TRT tended to show only minor flickers, mainly on the outside edge before the disc failed to verify. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mxl2x-vf-h264.mp4 This one managed 327 cycles, which is a bit more than the "plus" format high-speed Ritek discs managed. https://goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/mxl2x-qs-h264.mp4 Butn quality was quite good overall even though jitter was a bit on the high side. Spikes started to develop but quality didn't get bad until about 130-160 cycles when the error humps started to grow higher and higher. Overall Summary In total, the results are summarised below: [svg][dvdrw-endurance-results] The only disc that achieved a full 1000+ cycles without an error was the TDK 2x DVD-RW (TDK502sakuM3). All other discs failed, mostly due to a read error in verification, with the DC-erased MKM-A02-000 failing with a write error. If we consider that "dash" format discs were erased fully before rewrite, that would be indeed impressive, suggesting the TDK 2x disc completed 2000+ cycles while the JVC Victor managed 1200+ cycles. On the "plus" side, the CMC MAG-W02-000 got close at 850 cycles, but there were also disappointments. The Verbatim MKM-A02-000 managed just shy of 100 fresh from the box, and achieved about the same after being "revived" with a DC Erase by the Nu Tech DDW-082. Perhaps there was some form of degradation that I could not see visibly. The 8x RITEK-008-000 also managed around 100 cycles and in both cases, it seems the write quality was horrible out-of-the-box. Perhaps the iHAS120 just doesn't like those discs. The PHILIPS-041-000 failed sooner than the RICOHJPN-W11-001 which matches up with my prior experience. At least, in this small sample, it would seem that a few of those "plus" format discs did very badly - be it compatibility or age-related causes, resulting in there being an apparent skew towards "dash" format being more durable. In the past, I heard of rumours that rewriting would damage the ATIP grooves (plus) or pre-pits (dash), or that the embossed area on a DVD-RW would eventually become damaged, but I'm not sure any of that is actually the case. It's more likely that the material itself may be degrading or incompletely changing between amorphous and crystalline forms, resulting in a lower signal-to-noise ratio. To use an analogy - if you were to use pencil and paper, writing and erasing over and over again, the paper wouldn't be quite as clean as it was when you started, so the contrast between light and dark would reduce until everything was just sort of "grey". Perhaps DC Erasing might be able to condition the surface to a more uniform state to help revive the recording layer, but as it shouldn't be doing anything beyond what normal laser powers would do to the recording layer, I suspect it wouldn't have much of lasting impact. That being said, the jitter spikes on the Verbatim MKM-A02 usually indicate something bad is happening to the ability of the pick-up head to track the grooves. I wonder if that is actual damage to the tracking information or some kind of defect not visible to the eye that's causing the drive some difficulty. It should be noted that failures were often observed to be transitory - one pass would fail but the following pass would succeed. Eventually, the rates of failure would increase, leading to back-to-back failures. This is the nature of "luck" when you're on the edge of failure and success - something as simple as random noise or a slightly different write or reading condition could cause it to go one way or the other. But it may also indicate that wear is causing the recording layer to respond inconsistently - if it does so during optimum power calibration, the burner could end up picking a worse-than-ideal write laser power and end up suffering a poorer burn than necessary. This is especially relevant as the drive doesn't have an active W-OPC strategy, instead seemingly "blindly" writing away after an initial OPC is performed. Either way, it does indicate the erosion of all the available error correction margin - so it's basically a very fragile recording. As this test did all writes and reads back-to-back, it doesn't explore the endurance of the phase change layer after its been heavily exercised. I've read some comments (although I can't recall where) that suggested that phase-change layers that have been cycled a lot may become prone to having their crystalline states turn amorphous more easily or almost spontaneously resulting in a lower data retention lifetime. Whether this is the case is not known and determining this was not one of the aims of this experiment. Bonus: Drive Status After completion of this round of tests (and another I haven't posted about), my two drives have racked up .... [svg][statistics-usage-deskop-end] ... 3725 burns, for a total operation time of 2900 hours and ... [svg][Screenshot-2025-07-28-192246] ... a total of 1523 burns for a total of 1120 hours. So that's about 4020 hours across two drives, 5248 burns and both drives are still seemingly operating just fine. While everything mechanical will wear out over time due to use, these drives even though they are somewhat light-weight and tinny, still seem to be rather strong. As a result, those duplicator drives with 500-or-so writes on them are still perhaps considered rather young! But then again, I've had more than a few personal drives of mine do a lot less work and suffer a sudden laser diode failure too ... so it's sometimes luck-of-the-draw. Conclusion While it seems that rewritable discs claim a rewritable lifetime of 1000 writes or sometimes more, in practice even when handling damage to the disc is taken out of the equation, a majority of discs fail to achieve this level of rewrites. Granted, some of the discs are likely old and potentially degraded, but it would seem a couple-of-hundred rewrites is more realistic limit given this combination of Lite-On iHAS120 6 and media. One disc did achieve 1000 cycles - the TDK 2x DVD-RW, but it seemed to be clinging on all the way, aided by the fact the drive just didn't seem to give up even when the burn quality looked hopeless. It was nice to see that 8x and 6x recording was achievable, albeit in Z-CLV and not consistently, with the higher speed Ritek discs delivering horrific burn quality in general, but perhaps this is the fault of the iHAS120 to some extent. The JVC is the only "high speed" disc to perform well. As suggested by the Pioneer white paper, increased jitter is observed as the disc reaches exhaustion. After the exhaustion of one Verbatim disc, I decided to let my Nu-Tech DDW-082's "fabled" DC Erase function try to revive the disc. To its credit, it did revive the disc which allowed it to achieve a cycle life very similar to the "fresh" result, but albeit the quality was always poor and this didn't do anything to fix it. Aside from this, there is also the question of whether cycling would affect the endurance of the recorded data or whether structural damage was being done to the disc itself as a result of multiple overwrites. While I couldn't answer this definitively based on these tests, I suspect the structure of the disc is still very much intact in most cases and that the increased errors may have been the result of the degradation of the recording layers' response. The only exception may be the Verbatim MKM-A02 which failed due to write errors and had noticeable spikes in jitter which usually occur when the drive can't accurately track the spiral groove. As for the cause of the phase change material wear-out and its side-effects on data retention lifetime, I can make no conclusion. This was a big effort to complete in the end ... but it was also fascinating to me. The bad news is that this post is now over, but the good news is that this experiment might not be done yet. Thanks to generous donations from pepst and a few more acquisitions from Japan, I've managed to amass even more rewritable discs to test. Rather than just test them once or across a few drives ... perhaps they should just undergo torture on one drive to see how well they can handle it. After all, my iHAS120 6's are still fighting fit and I don't see anyone else doing this! Bonus My thanks to pepst who contacted me by e-mail to share some knowledge, which I much appreciated. As for the origin of the discs, TDK DVD+RW 4x (Version 2) was manufactured using a Philips stamper by CMC Magnetics. As for the serial numbers, the serial numbers of +RW discs always start with the letter P, while the numbers of "minus" discs always start with the letter M. That definitely makes sense ... although the "dash" format would very much get angry at being called "minus" ... that's a mistake I make all too often! Perhaps that might mean the stamper or the whole plant was moved over to Taiwan, thus carrying the original IFPI code but being a product of Taiwan. Then, pepst followed up with even more information ... the situation with Philips' optical disc laboratory was quite interesting. It was called Optical Research and Development (OM& T) and was responsible for inventing and developing the manufacturing process for advanced optical media--basically, they were behind the development of CD-RW, DVD+RW, DVD+R, and later BD-R and BD-RE formats, when it comes to recordable formats. The primary task was to develop these formats and later license them to other manufacturers and collect patent royalties. The secondary task was to assist mainly smaller manufacturers with the manufacturing process, which meant supplying stampers and manufacturing know-how. For example, Philips OM&T assisted with the entire production process (except for the production line, which came from other suppliers) for the Belgian manufacturer Sentinel and the Taiwanese producer Nanya Plastics, to which they supplied the stampers and provided extensive assistance with the design of the disc layers and complete process know-how. They also helped several other manufacturers to a greater or lesser extent, e.g. in the early days of Daxon and Infomedia (until they had a complete proprietary production process and their own mastering department for the production of their own stampers), and supplied +RW stampers with Philips MIDs (CMC, MBI) to several other manufacturers. If I am not mistaken, this department was bought by the Indian company MBI in 2007 or 2008, mainly because of its cutting-edge technological processes for fast BD-R and BD-RE, and it essentially ceased to exist quickly. This was at a time when Philips was selling off almost all of its research and manufacturing divisions. On the contrary, despite the drastic decline in prices and margins for optical discs at that time, MBI was happily buying up everything it could. In addition to OM&T, they bought all the production lines of the bankrupt manufacturer MAM-E & CSI, the American company Imation, and the Japanese company Maxell, which was relatively nonsensical in the given economic situation and at a time when they were unable to fully use even their existing production capacities. Like it? Share it! * Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook * Share on X (Opens in new window) X * Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit * Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn * More * * Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr * Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest * Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp * Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram * Related [svg][6b72892] About lui_gough I'm a bit of a nut for electronics, computing, photography, radio, satellite and other technical hobbies. Click for more about me! View all posts by lui_gough - This entry was posted in Computing, Tech Flashback and tagged computer storage, destruction, endurance, failure, number crunching, optical disc, optical discs, tested, vintage stuff. Bookmark the permalink. - Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 1: The Contenders & ECMA Standards 2 Responses to Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 2: Methodology & Results 1. [svg][1813] Ron D says: March 12, 2026 at 4:43 pm Interesting... I always assumed they would last indefintely as a kid. Never realized they would eventually degrade similar to NAND Reply 2. [svg][45a0] Mies says: March 12, 2026 at 10:42 pm When I was a kid I heard you could only write these so many times. I was super careful and think at most I wrote to a DVD-RW like 5 times to the same disk. Then I got antsy. Reply Error: Comment is Missing!Cancel reply * My Links + About Me + Publications and Appearances + Contact Me + Legacy Site + Facebook + Twitter + YouTube + LinkedIn + Google Scholar + ORCID ID + element14 Community Blog + Interesting Links + Terms of Use & Privacy Policy + Site Server Status + Site Server Status (2) * Categories + Audio + Computing + DIY + Electronics + Event + Flash Memory + Lighting + Obituary + Opinion + Photography + Power Bank + Power Station + Radio + Raspberry Pi + Salvage + Satellite + Tablet + Tech Flashback + Telecommunications + Travel + Uncategorized * Recent Posts + Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 2: Methodology & Results + Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 1: The Contenders & ECMA Standards + Tested, Modified: YX-Q01 Two-Way Automatic Mains Switch Module + Notes: Westinghouse EasyCare 500 8kg Front-Load Washing Machine (WWF8024M5WA) Energy Usage + Project: DVD-RAM Testing feat. New-Old-Stock Ver 2.x (2x/3x/ 5x) Discs + Tech Flashback: Acard ARS-2050B 1-to-11 CD/DVD/BD Duplicator Tower (ft. MSI DH-20AS 6 DVD+-RW Drives) + Review: Eskimo eSIM for Tourists & Travelers - Global/ Regional & Long Expiry + Review, Teardown: Novoo RG100 GaN 100W Wall Charger (2xUSB-C+1xUSB-A, NCAU100D-123K) + Review: Kolet "Next Gen" Travel eSIM + Tested: DVD-RAM2 - The Fastest, Most Reliable, Rare Rewritable DVD (ft. Asus DRW-1814BLT) + Tech Flashback: Recordable HD DVDs - Few Recorders, Slow, Flaky Performance & Even More Shortlived + Tech Flashback: HD DVD - A Format Abandoned Soon After Birth + Tech Flashback: Blu-ray, but Not As You Might Know It! (feat. BD-RE V1.0, Professional Disc) + Tech Flashback: Blu-ray Disc - The HD Format War Winner (incl. LDC/BIS Scanning) + Update: Telstra's Free Calls to Santa 2025 (#HOHOHO) - New Tricks & Out-of-Office + Tech Flashback: Archival Discs (Mitsui Gold, "Designed for Photo Applications", Verbatim PhotoSave, Memorex Pro Gold Archival) + Review: TP-Link Deco X80-5G - A Good 5G Modem or Not? + Tested: Mitsubishi 2x DVD-R (DHR472U1/5, Made in Japan) [MID:MCC00RG200] + Review: Imuto 1.5V Li-Ion AA (2400mAh/3600mWh) Battery + Charging Station Set (TF-CD-009LDC) + Notes: When Your Ecoflow App Not Working Leads to a Networking Workaround + Review: esim.io OneSIM Worldwide Travel eSIM + Review: Singapore Airlines Exclusive Global Roaming eSIM for 118 Countries (via Pelago, by Frewie) + Tested: JXND XJS4056-based Mini-USB Li-Ion/Li-Poly Battery Charger Module + Tested: Printable.2 "as seen on www.dvd-recordable.org" DVD-R + Quick Review: XTAR L4 Pro 1.2V Ni-MH & 1.5V Li-Ion AA/AAA Smart Battery Charger + Tested: USB-C Barrel Connector Adapters (5.5mm OD, 2.1/2.5mm ID) + Where Are They Now? More Discs Uncovered ft. Pressed DVD9s, CD-Rs, DVD+-Rs & BD-Rs (Part 3) + Review: Samsung 256GB Bar Plus (MUF-256BE4/AM) & USB Type-C Flash Drive (MUF-256DA/AM) + Quick Review: PNY Turbo Attache 3 256GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive (P-FD256TBOP-GE) + Tested: Ritek 16x DVD+-R ft. Traxdata Magic Silver, ValuePack, Maxell & Hi-Disc + Analysis: Telstra's Free Calls to Santa 2025 (#HOHOHO) - Actual Number & What's New? + Review: XTAR 1.5V AA LR 3000mAh USB-C Rechargeable Li-ion Battery + Review: QCY H3S LDAC Dual-Driver Bluetooth v6.0 ANC Headphones + Review: Klook Travel eSIM (RedteaGO) + Tech Flashback: Double-Sided (4.7GB x 2) Recordable DVDs (Data Home, SuperX) + Tech Flashback: Maxell DVD-R for Authoring (or Not?) + Review: Truely - Unlimited (5GB then 512kbit/s) Switchless Travel eSIM + Project: VBUS Fixer (When 5.5V is Just Too Much for Your USB Devices) + Tested: Printable.1 "as seen on www.dvd-recordable.org" DVD-R [MID:VANGUARD] + Tested: Pro-Feel DVD-R for Video 4x (PF DR120PW4X50PS) [MID:VANGUARD] + Review: Thermal Master P3 Android/iOS/Windows USB-C Thermal Camera (256x192/25Hz/35mK) + Quick Review: Knowledge Zenith (KZ) PRX 4th-Generation Planar Diaphragm IEMs + Quick Review: Qwertykeys Pearl Milk Tea Custom Keycaps + Tested: CE8301 Boost, XL2001 (HW-676) & XL1583 (HW-681 Clone) Buck 5V USB Power Modules + Review, Tested: XTAR 2600mAh 1.2V Ni-MH AA Rechargeable Battery + Tested: DSN-MINI-360 (MP1482-based) 2A Buck Converter Module (4.5-18V In) + Teardown: A&D Medical UA-651SL Blood Pressure Monitor + Quick Review: Samsung Bar Plus 512GB USB 3.2 Gen 1 Flash Drive (MUF-512BE4/APC) + Project: A Poor-Man's Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) ft. A&D UA-651BLE + Notes: Motorola moto g84 5G USB OTG Problems - Bad VBUS? * March 2026 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 << Feb * Archives + March 2026 (2) + February 2026 (7) + January 2026 (8) + December 2025 (9) + November 2025 (10) + October 2025 (9) + September 2025 (11) + August 2025 (11) + July 2025 (7) + June 2025 (5) + May 2025 (8) + April 2025 (8) + March 2025 (12) + February 2025 (12) + January 2025 (10) + December 2024 (16) + November 2024 (6) + October 2024 (10) + September 2024 (9) + August 2024 (8) + July 2024 (10) + June 2024 (13) + February 2024 (2) + January 2024 (7) + December 2023 (14) + November 2023 (3) + October 2023 (11) + September 2023 (3) + August 2023 (7) + June 2023 (8) + May 2023 (4) + April 2023 (4) + March 2023 (9) + February 2023 (4) + January 2023 (4) + December 2022 (16) + November 2022 (6) + October 2022 (8) + September 2022 (4) + August 2022 (7) + July 2022 (11) + June 2022 (6) + May 2022 (4) + April 2022 (9) + March 2022 (10) + February 2022 (8) + January 2022 (6) + December 2021 (16) + November 2021 (6) + October 2021 (8) + September 2021 (7) + August 2021 (9) + July 2021 (7) + June 2021 (6) + May 2021 (13) + April 2021 (13) + March 2021 (10) + February 2021 (9) + January 2021 (12) + December 2020 (15) + November 2020 (1) + October 2020 (9) + September 2020 (14) + August 2020 (13) + July 2020 (7) + June 2020 (13) + May 2020 (14) + April 2020 (18) + March 2020 (2) + February 2020 (9) + January 2020 (21) + December 2019 (10) + November 2019 (8) + October 2019 (14) + September 2019 (8) + August 2019 (12) + July 2019 (9) + June 2019 (6) + May 2019 (4) + April 2019 (12) + March 2019 (23) + February 2019 (20) + January 2019 (23) + December 2018 (11) + November 2018 (7) + October 2018 (4) + September 2018 (3) + August 2018 (19) + July 2018 (6) + June 2018 (5) + May 2018 (21) + April 2018 (7) + March 2018 (8) + December 2017 (12) + November 2017 (19) + October 2017 (1) + July 2017 (4) + June 2017 (16) + May 2017 (6) + January 2017 (11) + December 2016 (30) + November 2016 (13) + October 2016 (15) + September 2016 (19) + August 2016 (16) + July 2016 (8) + June 2016 (31) + May 2016 (14) + April 2016 (21) + March 2016 (13) + February 2016 (17) + January 2016 (19) + December 2015 (20) + November 2015 (12) + October 2015 (15) + September 2015 (4) + August 2015 (12) + July 2015 (22) + June 2015 (14) + May 2015 (21) + April 2015 (25) + March 2015 (14) + February 2015 (16) + January 2015 (6) + December 2014 (11) + November 2014 (12) + October 2014 (19) + September 2014 (11) + August 2014 (21) + July 2014 (18) + June 2014 (20) + May 2014 (12) + April 2014 (7) + March 2014 (23) + February 2014 (18) + January 2014 (16) + December 2013 (15) + November 2013 (14) + October 2013 (21) + September 2013 (13) + August 2013 (17) + July 2013 (26) + June 2013 (26) + May 2013 (11) + April 2013 (17) + March 2013 (31) + February 2013 (27) + January 2013 (36) + December 2012 (31) + November 2012 (39) + October 2012 (3) + February 2012 (18) + January 2012 (1) * Tags + analysis + audio + battery + cheap + computer hardware + computer storage + ebay + electronics + element14 + event + flash + flash memory + improvise + led + lighting + made-in-china + mobile + networking + new stuff + opinion + optical disc + photography + power + power bank + project + public transport + radio + random + repair + review + review-challenge + rf + salvage + storage + tablet + teardown + tested + test equipment + testing + travel + usb + video + vintage hardware + vintage stuff + visited * Recent Comments + Mies on Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 2: Methodology & Results + Ron D on Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 2: Methodology & Results + lui_gough on Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 1: The Contenders & ECMA Standards + Marcus W on Tested: How Many Times Can a DVD+-RW Be Rewritten? - Part 1: The Contenders & ECMA Standards + Moscito on Quick Review, Teardown: Veektomx VT103 10000mAh 38.5Wh Power Bank + Tm on Project: VBUS Fixer (When 5.5V is Just Too Much for Your USB Devices) + Kaz on Notes: Motorola moto g84 5G USB OTG Problems - Bad VBUS? + lui_gough on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + cheapie on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + cheapie on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + lui_gough on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + cheapie on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + pepst on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + lui_gough on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + cheapie on Tech Flashback: DVD-R for Authoring (ft. Pioneer DVS-R4700SP & TDK DVD-R47SV20) + lui_gough on Project: DVD-RAM Testing feat. New-Old-Stock Ver 2.x (2x/3x/5x) Discs + cheapie on Project: DVD-RAM Testing feat. New-Old-Stock Ver 2.x (2x/3x/5x) Discs + lui_gough on Project: DVD-RAM Testing feat. New-Old-Stock Ver 2.x (2x/3x/5x) Discs + cheapie on Project: DVD-RAM Testing feat. New-Old-Stock Ver 2.x (2x/3x/5x) Discs + lui_gough on Project: Data Recovery from a Blue Imation SuperDisk (LS-120) * Meta + Log in + Entries feed + Comments feed + WordPress.org [INS::INS] Gough's Tech Zone All content (c) 2012 - 2025 Gough Lui unless otherwise stated. Proudly powered by WordPress.