https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/06/director-national-intelligences-word-games-explained-how-government-deceived Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF's 35th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Street Level Surveillance + apkeep * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Sponsorships + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate [privacy_s-]Privacy's Defender: My Thirty-Year Fight Against Digital Surveillance [privacy_s-] Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF's 35th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Street Level Surveillance + apkeep * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Sponsorships + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give The NSA's Word Games Explained: How the Government Deceived Congress in the Debate over Surveillance Powers DEEPLINKS BLOG By Kurt Opsahl and Trevor Timm June 11, 2013 The NSA's Word Games Explained: How the Government Deceived Congress in the Debate over Surveillance Powers Share It Share on Mastodon Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link ANDREA MITCHELL: "Why do you need every telephone number? Why is it such a broad vacuum cleaner approach?" JAMES CLAPPER: "Well, you have to start someplace."--NBC Meet the Press, this past Sunday Concerned about the surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans, last year Senator Ron Wyden asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Jr. a simple question: "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Wyden had good reason to worry. As a member of the intelligence committee he had access to classified information and had been warning from the Senate floor that the American people would be "shocked" to find out how the government was interpreting the FISA Amendments Act and the PATRIOT Act in secret. DNI Clapper's answer was simple: "No, sir ... not wittingly." [action-1c-]This just is not true. We've known for years that the government has been conducting surveillance on millions of ordinary Americans, and now we know that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued an order in April requiring Verizon to hand over *all* call records, foreign or domestic, of every call of every customer to the NSA. Simply put, DNI Clapper's statement was not the truth. On Sunday's Meet the Press, Clapper was grilled about his statement to Congress. He claimed it was the "least untruthful manner by saying no." How does he defend that? This may sound strange, but the Administration actually uses very particular definitions of words that are vastly different from how ordinary people interpret them and how they're normally defined. As we explained in this dedicated page to the NSA's word games, "collect" has a very different meaning to them than it does the rest of us. Under Department of Defense regulations, information is considered to be "collected" only after it has been "received for use by an employee of a DoD intelligence component," and "data acquired by electronic means is 'collected' only when it has been processed into intelligible form." In other words, the NSA can intercept and store communications in its database, then have an algorithm search them for key words and analyze the metadata without ever considering the communications "collected." Here's how Clapper explained it: JAMES CLAPPER: And this has to do with of course somewhat of a semantic, perhaps some would say too-- too cute by half. But it is-- there are honest differences on the semantics of what-- when someone says "collection" to me, that has a specific meaning, which may have a different meaning to him. "Too cute by half"? Clapper's answers certainly was not a slip of the tongue. Today, Wyden said in a statement that he gave Clapper a day's notice that he was going to ask the question, so as not to catch Clapper off guard. Wyden also gave Clapper a chance to amend his answer after his testimony, but Clapper declined. In bizarre analogy, Clapper compared the NSA's vast database with a library: A metaphor I think might be helpful for people to understand this is to think of a huge library with literally millions of volumes of books in it, an electronic library. Seventy percent of those books are on bookcases in the United States, meaning that the bulk of the of the world's infrastructure, communications infrastructure is in the United States. So in the DNI's world, "collection of U.S. persons' data would mean taking the book off the shelf and opening it up and reading." Of course, in the real world, when you add books to a library, that's when they become part of the collection. Even if the librarian hasn't read all, or even most of them. Imagine Clapper has a built a home library, and friend comes over. "That's quite a collection of books," the friend says. "No, no, that's not a collection of books - I haven't read them all." Ironically, the one check on Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act that was added by Congress is restrictions on how the FBI can target libraries. All of this would be amusing if the Administration's main argument to defend the NSA's massive spying program is that Congress has been informed of all their activities. Democracy can't function when Congress is "informed" by the "least untruthful" statements of the Administration, using unusual definitions that are designed to given an impression that is the polar opposite of the truth. Lots of words can have multiple definitions - "to fire" can mean to discharge a firearm or to glaze pottery in a kiln. But if you're asked if you fired a gun, they're not asking if you put it in a kiln. Senator Wyden was clearly asking if the NSA obtained the records, not whether they looked at each and every one, and DNI Clapper is too smart to have misunderstood him. It's clear Congress has been deceived and DNI Clapper and the Administration should come clean on how, when, and why they scoop up the phone and Internet records of millions of Americans. Join EFF in calling for a full investigation by emailing Congress today. Related Issues NSA Spying PATRIOT Act Share It Share on Mastodon Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Related Updates US flag with spying eyes for stars Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia | October 8, 2025 EFF and Other Organizations: Keep Key Intelligence Positions Senate Confirmed In a joint letter to the ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, EFF has joined with 20 other organizations, including the ACLU, Brennan Center, CDT, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, and Demand Progress, to express opposition to a rule change that would seriously weaken accountability in the intelligence community. An NSA employee sits at a screen monitoring international communications Deeplinks Blog by Andrew Crocker, Matthew Guariglia | January 22, 2025 VICTORY! Federal Court (Finally) Rules Backdoor Searches of 702 Data Unconstitutional In a landmark ruling, a federal district court held that backdoor searches of databases full of Americans' private communications collected under Section 702 ordinarily require a warrant. Congress should uphold its responsibility to protect civil rights and civil liberties by refusing to renew Section 702 absent a number of necessary reforms. 2024 Year In Review Banner Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia | December 28, 2024 NSA Surveillance and Section 702 of FISA: 2024 in Review Mass surveillance authority Section 702 of FISA, which allows the government to collect international communications, many of which happen to have one side in the United States, has been renewed several times since its creation with the passage of the 2008 FISA Amendments Act. This law has been an incessant... A shadowy figure reading texts over the shoulder of a penguin on their phone. Deeplinks Blog by Christian Romero | December 18, 2024 "Can the Government Read My Text Messages?" You should be able to message your family and friends without fear that law enforcement is reading everything you send. Privacy is a human right, and that's why we break down the ways you can protect your ability to have a private conversation. Learn how governments are able to... [paglen-nsa-credit_1] Deeplinks Blog by David Sobel | October 22, 2024 In Appreciation of David Burnham We at EFF have long recognized the threats posed by the unchecked technological prowess of law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Since our founding in 1990, we have been in the forefront of efforts to impose meaningful legal controls and accountability on the secretive activities of those entities, including the National... [NSA-eagle-2_0] Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia | October 22, 2024 How Many U.S. Persons Does Section 702 Spy On? The ODNI Needs to Come Clean. EFF has joined with 23 other organizations including the ACLU, Restore the Fourth, the Brennan Center for Justice, Access Now, and the Freedom of the Press Foundation to demand that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) furnish the public with an estimate of exactly how many... Globe icon in bright colors Deeplinks Blog by Corynne McSherry, Matthew Guariglia, Brendan Gilligan, Andrew Crocker | June 6, 2024 Security, Surveillance, and Government Overreach - the United States Set the Path but Canada Shouldn't Follow It The Canadian House of Commons is currently considering Bill C-26, which would make sweeping amendments to the country's Telecommunications Act that would expand its Minister of Industry's power over telecommunication service providers. It's designed to accomplish a laudable and challenging goal: ensure that government and industry partners efficiently and... An NSA employee sits at a screen monitoring international communications Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia, Brendan Gilligan, Cindy Cohn | May 10, 2024 The FBI is Playing Politics with Your Privacy A bombshell report from WIRED reveals that two days after the U.S. Congress renewed and expanded the mass-surveillance authority Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Paul Abbate, sent an email imploring agents to "use" Section... [NSA-eagle-2_0] Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia, Andrew Crocker, Cindy Cohn, Brendan Gilligan | April 22, 2024 U.S. Senate and Biden Administration Shamefully Renew and Expand FISA Section 702, Ushering in a Two Year Expansion of Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance One week after it was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, the Senate has passed what Senator Ron Wyden has called, "one of the most dramatic and terrifying expansions of government surveillance authority in history." President Biden then rushed to sign it into law. An NSA employee sits at a screen monitoring international communications Deeplinks Blog by Brendan Gilligan, Matthew Guariglia, Cindy Cohn | April 11, 2024 Bad Amendments to Section 702 Have Failed (For Now)--What Happens Next? Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted against considering a largely bad bill that would have unacceptably expanded the tentacles of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, along with reauthorizing it and introducing some minor fixes. Share on MastodonShare on XShare on Facebook Related Issues NSA Spying PATRIOT Act Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * mastodon * facebook * instagram * x * Blue Sky * youtube * flicker * linkedin * tiktok * threads Check out our 4-star rating on Charity Navigator. Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Giving Societies * Corporate Giving and Sponsorship * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *