https://www.fourplex.net/2026/01/29/is-the-ram-shortage-killing-small-vps-hosts/ Fourplex Telecom LLC Fourplex Telecom LLC * Services * Blog * Contact * About USER PORTAL [RAM-Shortage-Header] 29 January Corporate, VPS 3-5 minutes to read Is the RAM shortage killing small VPS hosts? It is no longer news that RAM prices are high. The AI surge has DRAM producers like Micron focus on HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) to serve AI hyperscalers over the DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) used by ordinary consumers and small businesses. Consequently, for instance, servers which used to cost $2500 on Newegg now cost $5000. RAM alone is $2500 now. While most headlines focus on the DIY PC building community, less is said about small VPS (Virtual Private Server) hosts like mine. If we continue to focus on AI at all costs, small VPS Hosting businesses like mine might die out the way small ISPs died in the 2000s because of Big Telecom lobbying. So why should we care? What the 2000s taught us During the 90s internet boom, many dial-up ISPs (Internet Service Provider) popped up. These ISPs used voice lines from the local phone company, which, in the US, were mostly "Baby Bell" firms such as SBC (now AT&T) or Bell Atlantic (now Verizon). When the shift from dial-up to broadband started to be incorporated by the Baby Bells, Bill Clinton's FCC mandated in 2000 that the Bell firms had to lease out their copper DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) wires to other ISPs for a nominal fee, also known as "unbundling." This made sense in the US since taxpayer dollars were used to build those very Bell networks. Regulators in other countries also did the same. This prevented a phone or cable company from being a monopoly. While unbundling survived in Europe, the subsequent FCC took a different path: one which ultimately killed 7000 rival ISPs, raised prices, and hurt Net Neutrality a decade later. Line sharing between Bells and ISPs was never fair to the latter. Small ISPs were forced to charge higher prices than cable and phone companies due to high line fees. But instead of leveling the playing field, thanks to heavy lobbying from Bell firms, the Bush FCC reversed Clinton's decision and allowed Bell companies to not share their DSL or fiber networks. However, cable companies like Comcast never had to share their networks, despite having become near-monopolies a decade later. But, unlike Bell networks, cable networks were privately funded. Bell firms, however, refused to upgrade their lines during this period despite promising better fiber networks if sharing was killed, due to the wireless boom. It's only the recent fiber and 5G spurt which broke cable's monopoly. While rival DSL ISPs could build their own networks, as Sonic in California has done, many more exited broadband and became Microsoft partners. They lacked the know-how, or funding, for building fiber. And, even if they had the know-how and funding, they wouldn't stand a chance against Big Telecom lobbyists. Worse yet, despite flip flopping on Net Neutrality, subsequent FCCs from both parties institutionalized Bush's abandonment of line sharing since the firms needing line sharing went out of business or pivoted. How this compares to VPS hosts today Yes, the 2000s are back for fashion and music, but I really hope the death of mom-and-pop tech providers stays in the noughties. However, today's scenario is different from the dot-com era: * Bell companies legally had to share their lines, but now DRAM producers don't legally have to produce DRAM. * Line sharing wasn't essential for modern tech. DRAM is. * Bell companies intentionally killed small DSL ISPs. DRAM companies might unintentionally hurt small VPS hosts because of their focus on Big Tech. * DSL ISPs used "unbundled network elements" which Bell companies would not provide on their own. VPS hosts use standard servers and services like colocation, also used by other industries such as banks, airlines, et al. * Network unbundling is controversial. While I favor this approach, many don't for legitimate reasons. Despite this, telecom companies made a bet on only retail ISP customers and got what they wanted. And it forced broadband customers onto one-size-fits-all solutions instead of also having specialty providers. This could also happen to VPS hosting. AWS isn't suited for everyone. For instance, media streaming, VPN, and Tor relays aren't suited for big clouds due to high bandwidth costs. I personally run Tor relays, and there's a reason why I never ran them on Azure when I worked for Microsoft. On my VPS host, I have 16. Other customers have even more. Unlike DSL ISPs, many small VPS hosts will survive. Maybe at higher costs or a different focus. But if our industry dies out, it will hurt ordinary developers and sysadmins if the only options become pricey Big Tech clouds. A cash-strapped small business or college student will either have to avoid VPS hosting or use the subset they can afford. < Previous Storage VPS Terms and Conditions Update Next > BUSINESS hours Monday To Friday 09:30 AM To 6:30 PM CONTACT US Categories * Corporate * Storage * VPS Latest posts * Is the RAM shortage killing small VPS hosts? Jan 29, 2026 * Storage VPS Terms and Conditions Update Dec 12, 2025 * Introducing Fourplex's New Logo Aug 11, 2025 What can Fourplex do for you or your business? When you need VPS or IP tunneling solutions, you need a trustworthy company to do the job right. AMD Ryzen-powered VPS EXPLORE L2TP Static IP Tunnels EXPLORE SATA High Storage VPS EXPLORE Services with NYC location EXPLORE Reliable, Trusted Hosting and Connectivity Services in NYC and beyond! Mailing Address 167 Madison Avenue, Suite 205 #5098 New York, NY 10016 United States EMAIL us support@fourplex.net BUSINESS hours Monday To Friday 09:30 To 6:30 PM EST Follow us! * Facebook * X * LinkedIn * Services * Blog * Contact * About (c) Fourplex Telecom LLC Manage Consent To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions. Functional [ ] Functional Always active The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network. Preferences [ ] Preferences The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user. Statistics [ ] Statistics The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you. Marketing [ ] Marketing The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes. * Manage options * Manage services * Manage {vendor_count} vendors * Read more about these purposes Accept Deny View preferences Save preferences View preferences * {title} * {title} * {title} Manage consent