https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world Skip to content Watch Live * Home * News * Sport * Business * Innovation * Health * Culture * Arts * Travel * Earth * Audio * Video * Live * Documentaries * Home * News + Israel-Gaza War + War in Ukraine + US & Canada + UK o UK Politics o England o N. Ireland # N. Ireland Politics o Scotland # Scotland Politics o Wales # Wales Politics + Africa + Asia o China o India + Australia + Europe + Latin America + Middle East + In Pictures + BBC InDepth + BBC Verify * Sport * Business + World of Business + Technology of Business + NYSE Opening Bell * Innovation + Watch Documentaries + Technology + Science + Artificial Intelligence + AI v the Mind * Health + Watch Documentaries * Culture + Watch Documentaries + Film & TV + Music + Art & Design + Style + Books + Entertainment News * Arts + Watch Documentaries + Arts in Motion * Travel + Watch Documentaries + Destinations o Africa o Antarctica o Asia o Australia and Pacific o Caribbean & Bermuda o Central America o Europe o Middle East o North America o South America + World's Table + Culture & Experiences + Adventures + The SpeciaList * Earth + Watch Documentaries + Natural Wonders + Weather & Science + Climate Solutions + Sustainable Business + Green Living * Audio + Podcast Categories + Radio + Audio FAQs * Video + Watch Documentaries + BBC Maestro + Discover the World * Live + Live News + Live Sport * Documentaries [ ] Home News Sport Business Innovation Health Culture Arts Travel Earth Audio Video Live Documentaries Weather Newsletters Watch Live The '3.5% rule': How a small minority can change the world 14 May 2019 ShareSave David RobsonFeatures correspondent ShareSave [grey-place]Getty Images Protestors in Sudan (Credit: Getty Images) Getty Images Nonviolent protests are twice as likely to succeed as armed conflicts - and those engaging a threshold of 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change. In 1986, millions of Filipinos took to the streets of Manila in peaceful protest and prayer in the People Power movement. The Marcos regime folded on the fourth day. In 2003, the people of Georgia ousted Eduard Shevardnadze through the bloodless Rose Revolution, in which protestors stormed the parliament building holding the flowers in their hands. While in 2019, the presidents of Sudan and Algeria both announced they would step aside after decades in office, thanks to peaceful campaigns of resistance. You might also enjoy: * Ten simple ways to act on climate change * The words to get what you want * How the views of a few can influence a country In each case, civil resistance by ordinary members of the public trumped the political elite to achieve radical change. There are, of course, many ethical reasons to use nonviolent strategies. But compelling research by Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist at Harvard University, confirms that civil disobedience is not only the moral choice; it is also the most powerful way of shaping world politics - by a long way. Looking at hundreds of campaigns over the last century, Chenoweth found that nonviolent campaigns are twice as likely to achieve their goals as violent campaigns. And although the exact dynamics will depend on many factors, she has shown it takes around 3.5% of the population actively participating in the protests to ensure serious political change. Chenoweth's influence can be seen in the recent Extinction Rebellion protests, whose founders say they have been directly inspired by her findings. So just how did she come to these conclusions? [grey-place]Getty Images The organisers of Extinction Rebellion have stated that Chenoweth's work inspired their campaign (Credit: Getty Images)Getty Images The organisers of Extinction Rebellion have stated that Chenoweth's work inspired their campaign (Credit: Getty Images) Needless to say, Chenoweth's research builds on the philosophies of many influential figures throughout history. The African-American abolitionist Sojourner Truth, the suffrage campaigner Susan B Anthony, the Indian independence activist Mahatma Gandhi and the US civil rights campaigner Martin Luther King have all convincingly argued for the power of peaceful protest. Yet Chenoweth admits that when she first began her research in the mid-2000s, she was initially rather cynical of the idea that nonviolent actions could be more powerful than armed conflict in most situations. As a PhD student at the University of Colorado, she had spent years studying the factors contributing to the rise of terrorism when she was asked to attend an academic workshop organised by the International Center of Nonviolent Conflict (ICNC), a non-profit organisation based in Washington DC. The workshop presented many compelling examples of peaceful protests bringing about lasting political change - including, for instance, the People Power protests in the Philippines. But Chenoweth was surprised to find that no-one had comprehensively compared the success rates of nonviolent versus violent protests; perhaps the case studies were simply chosen through some kind of confirmation bias. "I was really motivated by some scepticism that nonviolent resistance could be an effective method for achieving major transformations in society," she says Working with Maria Stephan, a researcher at the ICNC, Chenoweth performed an extensive review of the literature on civil resistance and social movements from 1900 to 2006 - a data set then corroborated with other experts in the field. They primarily considered attempts to bring about regime change. A movement was considered a success if it fully achieved its goals both within a year of its peak engagement and as a direct result of its activities. A regime change resulting from foreign military intervention would not be considered a success, for instance. A campaign was considered violent, meanwhile, if it involved bombings, kidnappings, the destruction of infrastructure - or any other physical harm to people or property. "We were trying to apply a pretty hard test to nonviolent resistance as a strategy," Chenoweth says. (The criteria were so strict that India's independence movement was not considered as evidence in favour of nonviolent protest in Chenoweth and Stephan's analysis - since Britain's dwindling military resources were considered to have been a deciding factor, even if the protests themselves were also a huge influence.) By the end of this process, they had collected data from 323 violent and nonviolent campaigns. And their results - which were published in their book Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict - were striking. Strength in numbers Overall, nonviolent campaigns were twice as likely to succeed as violent campaigns: they led to political change 53% of the time compared to 26% for the violent protests. This was partly the result of strength in numbers. Chenoweth argues that nonviolent campaigns are more likely to succeed because they can recruit many more participants from a much broader demographic, which can cause severe disruption that paralyses normal urban life and the functioning of society. In fact, of the 25 largest campaigns that they studied, 20 were nonviolent, and 14 of these were outright successes. Overall, the nonviolent campaigns attracted around four times as many participants (200,000) as the average violent campaign (50,000). The People Power campaign against the Marcos regime in the Philippines, for instance, attracted two million participants at its height, while the Brazilian uprising in 1984 and 1985 attracted one million, and the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia in 1989 attracted 500,000 participants. [grey-place]Getty Images Having attracted millions of supporters, the People Power demonstrations removed the Marcos regime in the Phillipines (Credit: Getty Images)Getty Images Having attracted millions of supporters, the People Power demonstrations removed the Marcos regime in the Phillipines (Credit: Getty Images) "Numbers really matter for building power in ways that can really pose a serious challenge or threat to entrenched authorities or occupations," Chenoweth says - and nonviolent protest seems to be the best way to get that widespread support. Once around 3.5% of the whole population has begun to participate actively, success appears to be inevitable. Besides the People Power movement, the Singing Revolution in Estonia and the Rose Revolution in Georgia all reached the 3.5% threshold "There weren't any campaigns that had failed after they had achieved 3.5% participation during a peak event," says Chenoweth - a phenomenon she has called the "3.5% rule". Besides the People Power movement, that included the Singing Revolution in Estonia in the late 1980s and the Rose Revolution in Georgia in the early 2003. Chenoweth admits that she was initially surprised by her results. But she now cites many reasons that nonviolent protests can garner such high levels of support. Perhaps most obviously, violent protests necessarily exclude people who abhor and fear bloodshed, whereas peaceful protesters maintain the moral high ground. Chenoweth points out that nonviolent protests also have fewer physical barriers to participation. You do not need to be fit and healthy to engage in a strike, whereas violent campaigns tend to lean on the support of physically fit young men. And while many forms of nonviolent protests also carry serious risks - just think of China's response in Tiananmen Square in 1989 - Chenoweth argues that nonviolent campaigns are generally easier to discuss openly, which means that news of their occurrence can reach a wider audience. Violent movements, on the other hand, require a supply of weapons, and tend to rely on more secretive underground operations that might struggle to reach the general population. [grey-place]Getty Images An elderly woman talks to the Algerian security forces during the recent protests (Credit: Getty Images) Getty Images An elderly woman talks to the Algerian security forces during the recent protests (Credit: Getty Images) By engaging broad support across the population, nonviolent campaigns are also more likely to win support among the police and the military - the very groups that the government should be leaning on to bring about order. During a peaceful street protest of millions of people, the members of the security forces may also be more likely to fear that their family members or friends are in the crowd - meaning that they fail to crack down on the movement. "Or when they're looking at the [sheer] numbers of people involved, they may just come to the conclusion the ship has sailed, and they don't want to go down with the ship," Chenoweth says. In terms of the specific strategies that are used, general strikes "are probably one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, single method of nonviolent resistance", Chenoweth says. But they do come at a personal cost, whereas other forms of protest can be completely anonymous. She points to the consumer boycotts in apartheid-era South Africa, in which many black citizens refused to buy products from companies with white owners. The result was an economic crisis among the country's white elite that contributed to the end of segregation in the early 1990s. [grey-place]Getty Images Nonviolent protests are more likely to attract support from across society. Here a pro-reform protestor faces security forces in Morocco in 2011 (Credit: Getty Images)Getty Images Nonviolent protests are more likely to attract support from across society. Here a pro-reform protestor faces security forces in Morocco in 2011 (Credit: Getty Images) "There are more options for engaging and nonviolent resistance that don't place people in as much physical danger, particularly as the numbers grow, compared to armed activity," Chenoweth says. "And the techniques of nonviolent resistance are often more visible, so that it's easier for people to find out how to participate directly, and how to coordinate their activities for maximum disruption." A magic number? These are very general patterns, of course, and despite being twice as successful as the violent conflicts, peaceful resistance still failed 47% of the time. As Chenoweth and Stephan pointed out in their book, that's sometimes because they never really gained enough support or momentum to "erode the power base of the adversary and maintain resilience in the face of repression". But some relatively large nonviolent protests also failed, such as the protests against the communist party in East Germany in the 1950s, which attracted 400,000 members (around 2% of the population) at their peak, but still failed to bring about change. In Chenoweth's data set, it was only once the nonviolent protests had achieved that 3.5% threshold of active engagement that success seemed to be guaranteed - and raising even that level of support is no mean feat. In the UK it would amount to 2.3 million people actively engaging in a movement (roughly twice the size of Birmingham, the UK's second largest city); in the US, it would involve 11 million citizens - more than the total population of New York City. The fact remains, however, that nonviolent campaigns are the only reliable way of maintaining that kind of engagement. [grey-place]Getty Images A couple commemorate the Velvet Revolution of 1989, which helped bring down Communist rule in Czechoslovakia - another example of Chenoweth's "3.5% rule" (Credit: Getty Images) Getty Images A couple commemorate the Velvet Revolution of 1989, which helped bring down Communist rule in Czechoslovakia - another example of Chenoweth's "3.5% rule" (Credit: Getty Images) Chenoweth and Stephan's initial study was first published in 2011 and their findings have attracted a lot of attention since. "It's hard to overstate how influential they have been to this body of research," says Matthew Chandler, who researches civil resistance at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana. Isabel Bramsen, who studies international conflict at the University of Copenhagen agrees that Chenoweth and Stephan's results are compelling. "It's [now] an established truth within the field that the nonviolent approaches are much more likely to succeed than violent ones," she says. Regarding the "3.5% rule", she points out that while 3.5% is a small minority, such a level of active participation probably means many more people tacitly agree with the cause. These researchers are now looking to further untangle the factors that may lead to a movement's success or failure. Bramsen and Chandler, for instance, both emphasise the importance of unity among demonstrators. As an example, Bramsen points to the failed uprising in Bahrain in 2011. The campaign initially engaged many protestors, but quickly split into competing factions. The resulting loss of cohesion, Bramsen thinks, ultimately prevented the movement from gaining enough momentum to bring about change. Chenoweth's interest has recently focused on protests closer to home - like the Black Lives Matter movement and the Women's March in 2017. She is also interested in Extinction Rebellion, recently popularised by the involvement of the Swedish activist Greta Thunberg. "They are up against a lot of inertia," she says. "But I think that they have an incredibly thoughtful and strategic core. And they seem to have all the right instincts about how to develop and teach through a nonviolent resistance campaigns." Ultimately, she would like our history books to pay greater attention to nonviolent campaigns rather than concentrating so heavily on warfare. "So many of the histories that we tell one another focus on violence - and even if it is a total disaster, we still find a way to find victories within it," she says. Yet we tend to ignore the success of peaceful protest, she says. "Ordinary people, all the time, are engaging in pretty heroic activities that are actually changing the way the world - and those deserve some notice and celebration as well." David Robson is a senior journalist at BBC Future. Follow him on Twitter: @d_a_robson. -- Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter or Instagram. If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called "If You Only Read 6 Things This Week". A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Capital, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday. Politics Mathematics --------------------------------------------------------------------- Watch [grey-place]State of the Union: Memorable moments The best (and worst) State of the Union moments A look back on the good, the bad and the sleepy from past State of the Union addresses. Politics [grey-place]Donald Trump What exactly is presidential immunity? Donald Trump claims he should be protected from prosecution but does he have an argument? Politics [grey-place]Grant West Promo Image The first police officer to arrest a US president More than a century before Trump's arraignment, there was another US president who had a run in with the law. Politics [grey-place]Michelle Obama Michelle Obama: 'Fear is a powerful emotion' America's former first lady Michelle Obama sits down with BBC Breakfast's Naga Munchetty. Politics [grey-place]Boris Johnson The rise and fall of Boris Johnson The meteoric rise and dramatic departure of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Politics [grey-place]Sports betting is now everywhere. Is that dangerous? Sports betting is now everywhere. Is that dangerous? Katty Kay speaks with author Michael Lewis about the rise of phone-based sports betting. Sport [grey-place]Wall Street muted Wall Street muted at the end of tumultuous week Noah Hamman, CEO of AdvisorShares, says more volatility in markets is expected in the short term. Opening Bell [grey-place]Es Devlin's powerful art invites a closer look at strangers Es Devlin's powerful art invites a closer look at strangers Through intimate encounters with 50 Londoners, influential artist Es Devlin reimagines how we see home. Arts in Motion [grey-place]The gadgets set to change your daily health check-ups The gadgets set to change your daily health and wellness Tech Now test out new gadgets disrupting the health industry at CES 2026 in Las Vegas. Tech Now [grey-place]Inside the search for South America's most cryptic bird Inside the search for South America's most cryptic bird A small country, a rare bird: inside Uruguay's most haunting discovery Discover the World [grey-place]US Futures sink US futures slide as tariff fears trigger sell-off US stocks are opening sharply lower, amid an ongoing sell-off in Europe for fears of a trade war over Greenland. Opening Bell [grey-place]Morocco fossil finds re-write the origins of our species Morocco fossil finds re-write the origins of our species The groundbreaking fossil finds reveal how Homo sapiens are 100,000 years older than previously believed. Humans [grey-place]Chris Pratt's father-in-law Arnold Schwarzenegger goes big on Christmas Arnold Schwarzenegger goes big on Christmas Chris Pratt talks about this year's unique present from Arnold Schwarzenegger that will be hard to re-gift. Film & TV [grey-place]Lina Ghotmeh on crafting the future from the past Lina Ghotmeh on crafting the future from the past Architect Lina Ghotmeh brings her vision to an ambitious project, redesigning the British Museum's Western Range. Arts in Motion [grey-place]Karl Ove Knausgard: The writer who broke the rules Karl Ove Knausgard: The writer who broke the rules The Norwegian author's raw honesty and fearlessness has made him one of literature's most compelling voices. Arts in Motion [grey-place]Can we prepare for the impact of melting glaciers? The lab recreating melting glaciers to forecast sea levels Tech Now visits a Wisconsin lab where scientists model how glaciers melt to better predict sea-level rise. Tech Now [grey-place]Earnings season kicks into gear Goldman Sachs' and Morgan Stanley's results beat expectation Early indications from Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan suggest consumers are continuing to spend. Opening Bell [grey-place]Why Atlanta's culinary scene is getting food lovers excited Why Atlanta's culinary scene is getting food lovers excited The city's food scene is redefining southern hospitality with bold and unpretentious global flavours. World's Table [grey-place]Dissident Iranian filmmaker Jafar Panahi speaks to the BBC Dissident Iranian filmmaker Jafar Panahi speaks to the BBC Acclaimed director Jafar Panahi tells the BBC he sees his films as a historical memory of the realities in Iran. Film & TV [grey-place]Shark thumbnail The undersea mountains where sharks rule Under the surface of the ocean, 100,000 towering mountains dot the Earth. Their violent currents are key to life. Earth --------------------------------------------------------------------- More from the BBC 10 Jan 2026 [grey-place]Carlos Alcaraz jumps to return a ball with his tennis racket (Credit: Getty Images) What are your chances of beating top tennis stars? An unusual tennis competition that pits amateurs against professionals in one-point matches is launching at the Australian Open. 10 Jan 2026 13 Dec 2025 [grey-place]A person trying to pull red festive wrapping paper over an awkwardly shaped gift (Credit: Getty Images) How maths can improve your Christmas wrapping Wrapping awkwardly shaped Christmas presents is always a headache, but here's the formula for perfect gift wrap. 13 Dec 2025 30 Oct 2025 [grey-place]Police officers point while standing on a balcony outside the Musee du Louvre (Credit: Getty Images) Louvre robbery: The maths of museum security An audacious heist at the Louvre saw thieves make off with priceless crown jewels in broad daylight - here is how a decades-old geometry problem can help museums boost their security. 30 Oct 2025 4 Oct 2025 [grey-place]Armand Duplantis hanging off a pole as he lifts off the ground during a pole vault attempt (Credit: Getty Images) The maths behind world records New world records in some sports are remarkably elusive, yet in others they seem to fall regularly. There is a good mathematical reason why. 4 Oct 2025 19 Jul 2025 [grey-place]Lucy Bronze takes England's final penalty kick (Credit: Getty Images) The mathematics of the perfect penalty shootout Professional footballers sometimes use a mathematical strategy to help them score a penalty, or save one - and it all comes down to randomness. 19 Jul 2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Home * News * Sport * Business * Innovation * Health * Culture * Arts * Travel * Earth * Audio * Video * Live * Documentaries * Weather * BBC Shop * BritBox BBC in other languages The BBC is in multiple languages Read the BBC In your own language Oduu Afaan Oromootiin Amharic zeenaa ba'amaarenyaa Arabic `rby Azeri AZ@RBAYCAN Bangla baaNlaa Burmese m[?]n[?]maa Chinese Zhong Wen Wang Dari dry French AFRIQUE Hausa HAUSA Hindi hindii Gaelic NAIDHEACHDAN Gujarati gujraatiimaaN smaacaar Igbo AKUKO N'IGBO Indonesian INDONESIA Japanese Ri Ben Yu Kinyarwanda GAHUZA Kirundi KIRUNDI Korean hangugeo Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Marathi mraatthii Nepali nepaalii Noticias para hispanoparlantes Pashto pStw Persian frsy Pidgin Polish PO POLSKU Portuguese BRASIL Punjabi pNjaabii khhbraaN Russian NA RUSSKOM Serbian NA SRPSKOM Sinhala siNhl Somali SOMALI Swahili HABARI KWA KISWAHILI Tamil tmilllil ceytikll Telugu telugu vaartlu Thai khaawphaasaaaithy Tigrinya zeenaa betegerenyaa Turkish TURKCE Ukrainian UKRAYiNS'KA Urdu rdw Uzbek O'ZBEK Vietnamese TIENG VIET Welsh NEWYDDION Yoruba IROYIN NI YORUBA Follow BBC on: * Terms of Use * Subscription Terms * About the BBC * Privacy Policy * Cookies * Accessibility Help * Contact the BBC * Advertise with us * Do not share or sell my info * BBC.com Help & FAQs * Content Index Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.