https://phys.org/news/2025-11-ai-taxpayers-bill.html Phys.org Topics * Week's top * Latest news * Unread news * Subscribe [ ] Science X Account [ ] [ ] Sign In Sign in with Forget Password? Not a member? Sign up Learn more * Nanotechnology * Physics * Earth * Astronomy & Space * Chemistry * Biology * Other Sciences * Medical Xpress Medicine * Tech Xplore Technology [INS::INS] * * share this! * 38 * Tweet * Share * Email 1. Home 2. Other Sciences 3. Economics & Business * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------- November 13, 2025 The GIST If the AI bubble does burst, taxpayers could end up with the bill by Akhil Bhardwaj, The Conversation edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Andrew Zinin [Gaby] Gaby Clark scientific editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process [andrew] Andrew Zinin lead editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked trusted source written by researcher(s) proofread bubble Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain You might not care very much about the prospect of the AI bubble bursting. Surely it's just something for the tech bros of Silicon Valley to worry about--or the wealthy investors who have spent billions of dollars funding development. But as a sector, AI may have become too big to fail. And just as they did after the financial crisis of 2008, taxpayers could be picking up the tab if it collapses. The financial crisis proved to be very expensive. In the UK, the public cost of bailing out the banks was officially put at PS23 billion--roughly equivalent to PS700 per taxpayer. In the US, taxpayers stumped up an estimated US$498 billion (PS362 billion). Today, the big AI firms are worth way more than banks, with a combined value exceeding PS2 trillion. Many of these companies are interconnected (or entangled) with each other through a complex web of deals and investments worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And despite a recent study which reports that 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing, the public sector is not shy about getting involved. The UK government, for example, has said it is going "all in" on AI. [INS::INS] It sees potential benefits in incorporating AI into education, defense and health. It wants to bring AI efficiency to court rooms and passport applications. So AI is being widely adopted in public services, with a level of integration which make it a critical feature of people's day to day lives. And this is where it gets risky. Because the reason for bailing out the banks was that the entire financial system would collapse otherwise. And whether or not you agree with the bailout policy, it is hard to argue that banking is not a crucial part of modern society. Similarly, the more AI is integrated and entangled into every aspect of our lives, the more essential it becomes to everyone, like a banking system. And the companies which provide the AI capabilities become organizations that our lives depend upon. Imagine, for example, that your health care, your child's education and your personal finances all rely on a fictional AI company called "Eh-Aye." That firm cannot be allowed to collapse, because too much depends on it--and taxpayers would probably find themselves being on the hook if it got into financial difficulties. Bubble trouble For the time being though, the money flowing in to AI shows little sign of slowing. Supporters insist that despite the failures, investment is critical. They argue that artificial general intelligence (AGI), the point at which AI acquires human-like cognitive capabilities, will vastly improve our lives. Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights. Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs, innovations, and research that matter--daily or weekly. [ ] Subscribe Others are less optimistic. Commentators including computer scientists Gary Marcus and Richard Sutton have cast doubts on the power of AI to become truly intelligent. In my own research, I highlight the limitations of large language models (LLMs) when it comes to reasoning. Similar conclusions have been drawn at other universities and even at tech company Apple. So perhaps the endless expansion of the AI bubble comes down to how strongly the AI pioneers believe in its future. They've gone pretty far with it, so maybe it makes sense for them to go all in, with a pragmatic kind of faith that keeps the bubble growing. The trouble is that one tech billionaire's act of faith could also be described as a gamble. And it's a gamble they want everyone to join, with taxpayers' money on the table. So if the gamble fails and the bubble bursts, who would bear the costs? Would the UK government cut funding from the NHS or siphon money from a cash strapped education sector? Would it bail out pension funds that had over-invested in AI? One thing is certain. The future being offered by AI firms is not guaranteed. Yet governments and businesses are worried they will miss out if they don't get on board--and there are no safeguards in place to protect taxpayers from the fallout if things go wrong. Provided by The Conversation This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation Citation: If the AI bubble does burst, taxpayers could end up with the bill (2025, November 13) retrieved 14 November 2025 from https:// phys.org/news/2025-11-ai-taxpayers-bill.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Explore further AI in an 'industrial bubble' but will benefit society: Bezos --------------------------------------------------------------------- 38 shares * Facebook * Twitter * Email Feedback to editors * Featured * Last Comments * Popular AI math genius delivers 100% accurate results 8 hours ago 1 Ancient condors thrived on Peru's northern coast before retreating to the highlands, study reveals 11 hours ago 0 Chinese team finds a fern that makes rare earth elements Nov 13, 2025 2 Axial Seamount experiment to test real-time eruption forecasts Nov 13, 2025 0 Black hole mergers could give rise to observable gravitational-wave tails Nov 13, 2025 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INS::INS] [gif] Chang'e-6 samples reveal first evidence of impact-formed hematite and maghemite on the moon 4 hours ago [gif] Electrical control of spin currents in graphene via ferroelectric switching achieved 4 hours ago [gif] Rediscovery of lost fish species provides a second chance for conservation 4 hours ago [gif] Bacterial enzyme uses vitamin C to neutralize immune defenses, study finds 4 hours ago [gif] Catalyst turns methane into bioactive compounds for the first time 4 hours ago [gif] Fighting poverty may require cultural wisdom, not just cash 4 hours ago [gif] Even moderate heat waves can depress sea urchin reproduction along the Pacific coast 4 hours ago [gif] HD+ ions cooled to 18 mK yield most precise vibrational-rotational spectra to date 5 hours ago [gif] Shocked galaxy clusters: Unraveling the mysteries of radio relics 5 hours ago [gif] Mosquito reproduction may hinge on E93 gene that links blood meals to energy use 6 hours ago --------------------------------------------------------------------- Relevant PhysicsForums posts Great ebass playing 10 hours ago Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? 19 hours ago Can someone identify this, from some New Orleans piano music? Nov 13, 2025 Most Hard-Driving Music? Nov 8, 2025 Extremely Weird Music Nov 7, 2025 Talent Worthy of Wider Recognition Nov 6, 2025 More from Art, Music, History, and Linguistics --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INS::INS] * Related Stories [gif] AI in an 'industrial bubble' but will benefit society: Bezos Oct 4, 2025 [gif] Yes, there is an AI investment bubble. Here are three scenarios for how it could end Nov 12, 2025 [gif] AI tool predicts when a bank should be bailed out Nov 17, 2022 [gif] Oracle and AMD expand a partnership with deals in the artificial intelligence sector booming Oct 14, 2025 [gif] Q&A: Bailout of financial sector during Great Recession was a bad deal for taxpayers Sep 18, 2020 [gif] What could burst the AI bubble? Oct 11, 2025 * Recommended for you [gif] Fighting poverty may require cultural wisdom, not just cash 4 hours ago [gif] College degree still offers strong financial returns despite student loan debt, study finds 8 hours ago [gif] AI bias in hiring decisions is often copied by human reviewers, study reveals Nov 10, 2025 [gif] Hand gestures that illustrate speech boost persuasiveness, study shows Nov 5, 2025 [gif] The escape room challenge: How one person's narcissism can undermine a whole team Nov 5, 2025 [gif] Rethinking the insurance industry in a warming world Nov 4, 2025 Load comments (0) Get Instant Summarized Text (Gist) AI has become deeply integrated into public and private sectors, making it increasingly essential to daily life. If the AI industry were to collapse, its scale and entanglement could require taxpayer-funded bailouts, similar to the 2008 financial crisis. Despite uncertain benefits and high failure rates in AI projects, there are currently no safeguards to protect taxpayers from potential financial fallout. This summary was automatically generated using LLM. Full disclaimer Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines). Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request [-- please select one -- ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message to the editors [ ] Your email (optional, only if you'd like a response) [ ] Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages. E-mail the story If the AI bubble does burst, taxpayers could end up with the bill Your friend's email [ ] Your email [ ] [ ] I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name [ ] Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message [ ] Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. [ ] Subscribe More information Privacy policy Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account. Remove ads Maybe later Medical Xpress Medical Xpress Medical research advances and health news Tech Xplore Tech Xplore The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances Science X Science X The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web Newsletters [ ] Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us * * * * * * * * Top * Home * Search * Mobile version * Help * FAQ * About * Contact * Support us * Science X Account * Archive * News wire * Android app * iOS app * RSS feeds * Push notification (c) Phys.org 2003 - 2025 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy Terms of use E-mail newsletter [ ] Subscribe Follow us * * * * It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? x Quantcast