https://www.newscientist.com/article/2499647-mathematicians-have-found-a-hidden-reset-button-for-undoing-rotation/ Close Advertisement Skip to content Sign in Search the website [ ] [ ] * Events * Tours * Shop * Jobs Subscribe now Explore by section * News * Features * Newsletters * Podcasts * Video * Comment * Culture * Games * | * This week's magazine Explore by subject * Health * Space * Physics * Technology * Environment * Mind * Humans * Life * Mathematics * Chemistry * Earth * Society Explore our products and services * Events * Tours * Shop * Jobs Subscribe now Subscribe now Mathematics Mathematicians have found a hidden 'reset button' for undoing rotation Mathematicians thought that they understood how rotation works, but now a new proof has revealed a surprising twist that makes it possible to reset even a complex sequence of motion By Karmela Padavic-Callaghan 16 October 2025 [SEI_270234120] Can you undo a spinning top? Shutterstock Imagine spinning a top and then letting it come to rest. Is there a way for you to spin the top again so it ends up in the exact position it started, as if you had never spun it at all? Surprisingly, yes, say mathematicians who have discovered a universal recipe for undoing the rotation of nearly any object. Intuitively, it feels like the only way to undo a complicated sequence of rotations is by painstakingly doing the exact opposite motions one by one. But Jean-Pierre Eckmann at the University of Geneva in Switzerland and Tsvi Tlusty at the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) in South Korea have found a hidden reset button that involves changing the size of the initial rotation by a common factor, a process known as scaling, and repeating it twice. Read more Mathematicians have discovered a mind-blowing new kind of infinity In the case of the spinning top, if your initial rotation had turned the top by three-quarters, you can return to the start by scaling your rotation to one-eighth, then repeating it twice to give you an extra quarter rotation. But Eckmann and Tlusty have shown it is also possible to do this for far more complicated situations. "It is actually a property of almost any object that rotates, like a spin or a qubit or a gyroscope or a robotic arm," says Tlusty. "If [objects] go through a highly convoluted path in space, just by scaling all the rotation angles by the same factor and repeating this complicated trajectory twice, they just return to the origin." Their mathematical proof starts with a catalogue of all rotations that are possible in three spatial dimensions. This catalogue, known as SO(3), can be described using an abstract mathematical space that has special rules and is structured like a ball, with the act of pushing an object through a sequence of rotations in real space corresponding to moving from one point within the ball to another, like a worm tunnelling through an apple. Subscriber-only newsletter Sign up to Lost in Space-Time Untangle mind-bending physics, maths and the weirdness of reality with our monthly, special-guest-written newsletter. Sign up to newsletter New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine. When you spin a top in some complicated way, the equivalent path within the SO(3) space begins at the very centre of the ball and can end at any other point within the ball, depending on the details of the rotation. The goal of undoing the rotation is equivalent to finding a path back to the centre of the ball, but because there is only one centre, your odds of doing this at random are slim. [SEI_269718985] Some of the many paths that can be taken through the mathematical space SO(3), corresponding to sequences of rotations in real space Tsvi Tlusty What Eckmann and Tlusty realised is that, as a result of the way SO (3) is structured, undoing a rotation halfway is equivalent to finding a path that will land you anywhere on the ball's surface. This is much easier than attempting to reach the centre, because the surface is made of many points, says Tlusty. This was key to the new proof. The pair spent a lot of time chasing strains of mathematical reasoning that led nowhere, says Eckmann. What worked in the end was a 19th-century formula for combining two subsequent rotations called the Rodrigues formula and an 1889 theorem from a branch of mathematics known as number theory. Ultimately, the researchers concluded that the scaling factor necessary for their reset nearly always exists. Read more Mathematicians solve 125-year-old problem to unite key laws of physics For Eckmann, the new work is a showcase of how rich mathematics can be even in a field as well-trod as the study of rotations. Tlusty says that it could also have practical consequences, for instance, in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which is the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Here, researchers learn properties of materials and tissues by studying the response of quantum spins inside them to rotations imposed on them by external magnetic fields. The new proof could help develop procedures for undoing unwanted spin rotations that would interfere with the imaging process. The work could also lead to advances in robotics, says Josie Hughes at the Federal Polytechnic School of Lausanne in Switzerland. For example, a rolling robot could be made to follow a path of repeating segments, comprising a reliable roll-reset-roll motion that could, in theory, go on forever. "Imagine if we had a robot that could morph between any solid body shape, it could then follow any desired path simply through morphing of shape," she says. Journal reference Physical Review Letters DOI: 10.1103/xk8y-hycn Topics: * robots/ * mathematics/ * physics Advertisement Sign up to our weekly newsletter Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers. Sign up More from New Scientist Explore the latest news, articles and features The 30-year fight over how many numbers we need to describe reality Physics The 30-year fight over how many numbers we need to describe reality Features [SEI_269502660] Physics Physicists are uncovering when nature's strongest force falters News [SEI_269601323] Physics Swirly lasers can control an ungovernable cousin of magnetism News A tough police detective interrogates a crime suspect with a tattooed face in an interrogation room; Shutterstock ID 1875220249; purchase_order: -; job: -; client: -; other: Mathematics Learning to play nice with other people Regulars Popular articles Trending New Scientist articles 1 Neanderthal-human hybrids may have been scourged by a genetic mismatch 2 The extraordinary influence of the lymphatic system on our health 3 Everything is perimenopause now - but what if it's not? 4 mRNA covid vaccines spark immune response that may aid cancer survival 5 How worried should we be about noxious chemicals from dead satellites? 6 Eye implant and high-tech glasses restore vision lost to age 7 Mathematicians have found a hidden 'reset button' for undoing rotation 8 A distant comet is forming new rings while we watch in real time 9 Breastfeeding causes a surge in immune cells that could prevent cancer 10 A purrfect guide to cats and our complex relationship with them Advertisement Piano End Banner Close Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop Close Download the app Download on the apple apps store Download on Google play Find us on social media * Find us on Instagram Instagram * Find us on Facebook Facebook * Find us on X / Twitter X / Twitter * Find us on Tiktok Tiktok * Find us on LinkedIn LinkedIn * Find us on BlueSky BlueSky Subscriptions * Subscriber benefits * Gift * Student & graduate * Educational * Corporate Support * Contact us * FAQs * About us * Press room * Advertise * Write for us Tools * Events * Science Jobs * CoLab * Syndication * RSS feeds Legal and privacy * Complaint policy * Privacy policy * Cookie policy * Terms & conditions * Cookie Settings (c) Copyright New Scientist Ltd. Back to the top