https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/27/safety-fears-as-external-power-to-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-plant-still-out-after-three-days [p] Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption Skip to navigation Print subscriptions Newsletters Sign in US[ ] * US edition * UK edition * Australia edition * Europe edition * International edition The Guardian - Back to home [ ] * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle Show moreHide expanded menu * [ ]News + View all News + US news + US politics + World news + Climate crisis + Middle East + Ukraine + US immigration + Soccer + Business + Environment + Tech + Science + Newsletters + Wellness * [ ]Opinion + View all Opinion + The Guardian view + Columnists + Letters + Opinion videos + Cartoons * [ ]Sport + View all Sport + Soccer + NFL + Tennis + MLB + MLS + NBA + WNBA + NHL + F1 + Golf * [ ]Culture + View all Culture + Film + Books + Music + Art & design + TV & radio + Stage + Classical + Games * [ ]Lifestyle + View all Lifestyle + Wellness + Fashion + Food + Recipes + Love & sex + Home & garden + Health & fitness + Family + Travel + Money * Search input [ ] google-search Search + Support us + Print subscriptions + Newsletters + Download the app * + Search jobs + Digital Archive + Guardian Licensing + Live events + About Us + The Guardian app + Video + Podcasts + Pictures + Inside the Guardian + Guardian Weekly + Crosswords + Wordiply + Corrections + Tips * Search input [ ] google-search Search + Search jobs + Digital Archive + Guardian Licensing + Live events + About Us * World * Europe * US news * Americas * Asia * Australia * Middle East * Africa * Inequality * Global development An aerial image of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant [ ] The Zaporizhzhia power plant has six reactors and was once capable of powering 4m homes. Photograph: AP View image in fullscreen The Zaporizhzhia power plant has six reactors and was once capable of powering 4m homes. Photograph: AP Ukraine Safety fears as external power to Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant still out after three days Ukrainian officials among those concerned Russia is manufacturing crisis to keep hold of frontline plant Dan Sabbagh Sat 27 Sep 2025 01.00 EDT Share External power to the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant has been cut for more than three days, a record outage that has prompted safety concerns over the six-reactor site on the frontline of the Ukraine war. Emergency generators are being used to power cooling and safety systems after the final power line into the plant was cut on the Russian side at 4.56pm on Tuesday and there is no immediate sign that the line will be reconnected. Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), described the situation as "deeply concerning" on Wednesday and met Vladimir Putin on Thursday but the situation has continued. Western experts and Ukrainian officials fear the Kremlin is manufacturing a crisis to consolidate its grip over the plant, which is Europe's largest, and that Russia is taking high-risk steps to turn on at least one reactor despite the wartime conditions. "Russia is using the nuclear power station as a bargaining chip," said one Ukrainian government official, while a specialist at Greenpeace said the Russian occupation had entered "a new critical and potentially catastrophic phase". Stress tests by European regulators after the 2011 Japanese reactor disaster at Fukushima indicated that a nuclear plant should be able to operate without external power for 72 hours. Going beyond that time limit is untried, Ukrainian sources said. Russia seized the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in March 2022 and its reactors, once capable of powering 4m homes, were put into cold shutdown for safety. Ukraine regards the nuclear plant as its own but the plant has cropped up in negotiations between Donald Trump and Putin. Trump has tried to suggest the US should to take control, while the Kremlin has said it wants to restart all the reactors and connect them to the Russian grid - a task considered feasible only during peacetime. External power has been lost at Zaporizhzhia nine times before. On each occasion the damage was done in Ukrainian-held territory by Russian forces striking energy infrastructure across the Dnipro. The final 750-kilovolt electricity line had run across the river, with Ukraine willing to supply energy to maintain safety. Map showing power lines On Tuesday the line was damaged on the Russian side, about a mile from the plant. The plant's Russian operators said repair efforts were "complicated by ongoing shelling by the Ukrainian armed forces", though Ukraine says it never fires at or around the plant, arguing it would be unacceptably risky. The IAEA said it had been told by the Russian operators that there was enough diesel to power the generators for 20 days without fuel resupply. But Grossi said loss of external power "increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident". Seven out of 18 available generators are powering cooling on site but if they were to fail, Ukrainian sources said, there would be a risk that the nuclear fuel in the six reactors would heat uncontrollably over a period of weeks, leading to a meltdown. An accelerated version of this scenario happened at Fukushima because the reactors had just been operating. A 9.0-magnitude earthquake struck Japan and the hot reactors on the site were automatically shut down in response. Emergency generators continued to pump cooling water around the reactor but these were knocked out by a tsunami that followed minutes later. Three nuclear cores at the plant melted down within three days, though the fuel remained contained. Nobody was killed but more than 100,000 were evacuated. skip past newsletter promotion Sign up to This is Europe Free weekly newsletter The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans - from identity to economics to the environment Enter your email address [ ]Sign up Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. after newsletter promotion There are signs that Russia is close to installing a new power line into the Zaporizhzhia plant, running through occupied territories, to resolve the crisis. "They will portray themselves as saviours," the Ukrainian government official said. Analysis by Greenpeace of satellite imagery showed 125 miles of construction from the Russian grid in the occupied Ukrainian city of Mariupol, though it is unclear if a final connection to the power plant has been made. Other satellite imagery showed that the Russian occupiers built a dam across an inlet channel at the site in the summer in order to create a smaller, more secure water source. Greenpeace's nuclear specialists believe there is enough water available for Russia to restart one of the six reactors, to assert that only it can run the site. A week ago Yuriy Chernichuk, the Russian-appointed director of the plant, said the process of integrating the site into the Russian grid was "in its final stages", though a restart of any nuclear reactor during a war would be unprecedented. Shaun Burnie, the senior nuclear specialist at Greenpeace Ukraine, called on the head of the IAEA to intervene. "Grossi needs to immediately tell the Russian government to abandon its plans for reactor restart and to make clear that they alone are responsible for the nuclear safety and security crisis," he said. Neither Grossi nor Putin referenced Zaporizhzhia in limited public statements after their meeting on Thursday. The Russian president told Grossi: "We will do everything we can in order to support your work." Grossi described the meeting as "timely and important". Explore more on these topics * Ukraine * Russia * Nuclear power * Europe * news Share Reuse this content More on this story More on this story * [2212] EU to move forward with plans for drone wall amid Russian incursions 1d ago * [4466] Trump's change in tone is valuable to Ukraine - but more than words are needed 3d ago * [3145] 'Most destructive arms race in human history': Zelenskyy appeals at UN for intervention to stop Russia 3d ago * [5000] Trump says he believes Ukraine can regain all land lost to Russia since 2022 invasion 4d ago * [2405] Zelenskyy accuses allies of 'wasting time' as he prepares for Trump meeting 20 Sept 2025 * [3403] Outgoing MI6 chief says Putin has 'bitten off more than he can chew' in Ukraine 19 Sept 2025 * [2672] Display of firepower in Russia-Belarus war games stirs unease across Europe 15 Sept 2025 * [2212] Romania says Russian drone incursions pose 'new challenge' to Black Sea security 14 Sept 2025 * [2406] Russian drone incursion into Poland 'was Kremlin test on Nato' 15 Sept 2025 * [2851] Ukraine drone starts fire at one of Russia's largest oil plants 13 Sept 2025 Most viewed Most viewed 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. * World * Europe * US news * Americas * Asia * Australia * Middle East * Africa * Inequality * Global development * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning Sign up for our email * About us * Help * Complaints & corrections * SecureDrop * Work for us * * Privacy policy * Cookie policy * Terms & conditions * Contact us * All topics * All writers * Digital newspaper archive * Tax strategy * Facebook * YouTube * Instagram * LinkedIn * Newsletters * Advertise with us * Guardian Labs * Search jobs * Tips * Accessibility settings Back to top (c) 2025 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (dcr)