https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjr11qqvvwlo Skip to content Watch Live * Home * News * Sport * Business * Innovation * Culture * Arts * Travel * Earth * Audio * Video * Live * Home * News + Israel-Gaza War + War in Ukraine + US & Canada + UK o UK Politics o England o N. Ireland # N. Ireland Politics o Scotland # Scotland Politics o Wales # Wales Politics + Africa + Asia o China o India + Australia + Europe + Latin America + Middle East + In Pictures + BBC InDepth + BBC Verify * Sport * Business + Executive Lounge + Technology of Business + Future of Business * Innovation + Technology + Science & Health + Artificial Intelligence + AI v the Mind * Culture + Film & TV + Music + Art & Design + Style + Books + Entertainment News * Arts + Arts in Motion * Travel + Destinations o Africa o Antarctica o Asia o Australia and Pacific o Caribbean & Bermuda o Central America o Europe o Middle East o North America o South America + World's Table + Culture & Experiences + Adventures + The SpeciaList * Earth + Natural Wonders + Weather & Science + Climate Solutions + Sustainable Business + Green Living * Audio + Podcast Categories + Radio + Audio FAQs * Video * Live + Live News + Live Sport [ ] Home News Sport Business Innovation Culture Arts Travel Earth Audio Video Live Weather Newsletters Watch Live Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act verification rules 7 hours ago ShareSave Chris Vallance Senior technology reporter ShareSave [grey-place]Getty Images Wikipedia logo on a phone screen. The logo is a globe made out of puzzle pieces. On each puzzle piece is a letter of the alphabet taken from a different language's alphabet - for example, there are Greek, Arabic and Cyrillic characters visible as well as Kanji.Getty Images Wikipedia has lost a legal challenge to new Online Safety Act rules which it says could threaten the human rights and safety of its volunteer editors. The Wikimedia Foundation - the non-profit which supports the online encyclopaedia - wanted a judicial review of regulations which could mean Wikipedia has to verify the identities of its users. But it said despite the loss, the judgement "emphasized the responsibility of Ofcom and the UK government to ensure Wikipedia is protected". The government told the BBC it welcomed the High Court's judgment, "which will help us continue our work implementing the Online Safety Act to create a safer online world for everyone". Judicial reviews challenge the lawfulness of the way in which a decision has been made by a public body. In this case the Wikimedia Foundation and a Wikipedia editor tried to challenge the way in which the government decided to make regulations covering which sites should be classed "Category 1" under the Online Safety Act - the strictest rules sites must follow. It argued the rules were logically flawed and too broad, meaning a policy intended to impose extra rules on large social media companies would instead apply to Wikipedia. In particular the foundation is concerned the extra duties required - if Wikipedia was classed as Category 1 - would mean it would have to verify the identity of its contributors, undermining their privacy and safety. The only way it could avoid being classed as Category 1 would be to cut the number of people in the UK who could access the online encyclopaedia by about three-quarters, or disable key functions on the site. The government's lawyers argued that ministers had considered whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations but had reasonably rejected the idea. 'Left the door open' In the end, the court rejected Wikimedia's arguments. But Phil Bradley-Schmieg, Lead Counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, said the judgment did not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State, in Mr Justice Johnson's words, "a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations". And the judgement makes it clear other legal challenges could be possible. Wikimedia could potentially challenge Ofcom's decision making if the regulator did ultimately decide to classify the site as Category 1. And if the effect of making Wikipedia Category 1 meant it could not continue to operate, then other legal challenges could follow. "Wikipedia has been caught in the stricter regulations due to its size and user created content even though it argues (convincingly) that it differs significantly from other user-to-user platforms," said Mona Schroedel, data protection litigation specialist at law firm Freeths. "The court's decision has left the door open for Wikipedia to be exempt from the stricter rules upon review." The communications regulator Ofcom, which will enforce the act, told the BBC: "We note the court's judgment and will continue to progress our work in relation to categorised services and the associated extra online safety rules for those companies." Wikipedia legally challenges 'flawed' online safety rules Online Safety Bill Privacy --------------------------------------------------------------------- Related Some Gaza and Ukraine posts blocked under new age checks Ofcom investigates 34 porn sites over age checks VPNs top download charts as age verification law kicks in --------------------------------------------------------------------- More from the BBC 25 Jul 2025 [grey-place]An unrecognisable man wearing a navy t-shirt and dark blue jeans is sitting on a sofa using a laptop. Around 6,000 porn sites start checking ages in UK Despite the law some remain sceptical about the effectiveness of porn age checks. 25 Jul 2025 24 Jul 2025 [grey-place]A young woman is lying on a sofa looking at her smartphone as a dark brown and white french bulldog sleeps beside her. Another, smaller pet dog is shown lying against her arm as she scrolls on her phone. What the Online Safety Act is - and how to keep children safe online As child safety duties for online platforms begin to take effect in the UK users, here's what you need to know about the Act. 24 Jul 2025 12 Jul 2025 [grey-place]Police stand on the street, beside a police van with live cameras on the roof Will face recognition cameras keep Croydon safer? Fixed facial recognition cameras are being in used in Croydon - but will it make the area safer? 12 Jul 2025 26 Jun 2025 [grey-place]Pornhub's logo displayed on a smartphone, with the company's logo displayed on a white background behind it. Pornhub to introduce 'government approved' age checks in UK It is one of a number of porn sites which regulator Ofcom says will bring in tougher age verification for users. 26 Jun 2025 3 Jun 2025 [grey-place]The French homepage of Pornhub on a laptop screen, showing the company logo Pornhub leaves France over age verification law It's the latest setback for the world's most popular porn site, which is also under investigation by the EU. 3 Jun 2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Home * News * Sport * Business * Innovation * Culture * Arts * Travel * Earth * Audio * Video * Live * Weather * BBC Shop * BritBox BBC in other languages Follow BBC on: * Terms of Use * About the BBC * Privacy Policy * Cookies * Accessibility Help * Contact the BBC * Advertise with us * Do not share or sell my info * BBC.com Help & FAQs * Archive Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.