https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/08/enough-is-enough-i-dumped-googles-worsening-search-for-kagi/ Skip to content Ars Technica home Sections Forum Subscribe Search * AI * Biz & IT * Cars * Culture * Gaming * Health * Policy * Science * Security * Space * Tech * Feature * Reviews * AI * Biz & IT * Cars * Culture * Gaming * Health * Policy * Science * Security * Space * Tech Forum Subscribe Story text Size [Standard] Width * [Standard] Links [Standard] * Subscribers only Learn more Pin to story Theme * HyperLight * Day & Night * Dark * System Search dialog... Sign In Sign in dialog... Sign in screw yoogle Enough is enough--I dumped Google's worsening search for Kagi I like how the search engine is the product instead of me. Lee Hutchinson - Aug 5, 2025 10:02 am | 277 Artist's depiction of the article author heaving a large multicolored "G" into the fires of Mount Doom "Won't be needing this anymore!" Credit: Aurich "The King" Lawson "Won't be needing this anymore!" Credit: Aurich "The King" Lawson Text settings Story text Size [Standard] Width * [Standard] Links [Standard] * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav Mandatory AI summaries have come to Google, and they gleefully showcase hallucinations while confidently insisting on their truth. I feel about them the same way I felt about mandatory G+ logins when all I wanted to do was access my damn YouTube account: I hate them. Intensely. But unlike those mandatory G+ logins--on which Google eventually relented before shutting down the G+ service--our reading of the tea leaves suggests that, this time, the search giant is extremely pleased with how things are going. Fabricated AI dreck polluting your search? It's the new normal. Miss your little results page with its 10 little blue links? Too bad. They're gone now, and you can't get them back, no matter what ephemeral workarounds or temporarily functional flags or undocumented, could-fail-at-any-time URL tricks you use. And the galling thing is that Google expects you to be a good consumer and just take it. The subtext of the company's (probably AI-generated) robo-MBA-speak non-responses to criticism and complaining is clear: "LOL, what are you going to do, use a different search engine? Now, shut up and have some more AI!" But like the old sailor used to say: "That's all I can stands, and I can't stands no more." So I did start using a different search engine--one that doesn't constantly shower me with half-baked, anti-consumer AI offerings. Out with Google, in with Kagi. What the hell is a Kagi? Kagi was founded in 2018, but its search product has only been publicly available since June 2022. It purports to be an independent search engine that pulls results from around the web (including from its own index) and is aimed at returning search to a user-friendly, user-focused experience. The company's stated purpose is to deliver useful search results, full stop. The goal is not to blast you with AI garbage or bury you in "Knowledge Graph" summaries hacked together from posts in a 12-year-old Reddit thread between two guys named /u/ WeedBoner420 and /u/14HitlerWasRight88. Kagi's offerings (it has a web browser, too, though I've not used it) are based on a simple idea. There's an (oversimplified) axiom that if a good or service (like Google search, for example, or good ol' Facebook) is free for you to use, it's because you're the product, not the customer. With Google, you pay with your attention, your behavioral metrics, and the intimate personal details of your wants and hopes and dreams (and the contents of your emails and other electronic communications--Google's got most of that, too). With Kagi, you pay for the product using money. That's it! You give them some money, and you get some service--great service, really, which I'm overall quite happy with and which I'll get to shortly. You don't have to look at any ads. You don't have to look at AI droppings. You don't have to give perpetual ownership of your mind-palace to a pile of optioned-out tech bros in sleeveless Patagonia vests while you are endlessly subjected to amateur AI Rorschach tests every time you search for "pierogis near me." How much money are we talking? I dunno, about a hundred bucks a year? That's what I'm spending as an individual for unlimited searches. I'm using Kagi's "Professional" plan, but there are others, including a free offering so that you can poke around and see if the service is worth your time. image of kagi billing panel This is my account's billing page, showing what I've paid for Kagi in the past year. (By the time this article runs, I'll have renewed my subscription!) Credit: Lee Hutchinson This is my account's billing page, showing what I've paid for Kagi in the past year. (By the time this article runs, I'll have renewed my subscription!) Credit: Lee Hutchinson I'd previously bounced off two trial runs with Kagi in 2023 and 2024 because the idea of paying for search just felt so alien. But that was before Google's AI enshittification rolled out in full force. Now, sitting in the middle of 2025 with the world burning down around me, a hundred bucks to kick Google to the curb and get better search results feels totally worth it. Your mileage may vary, of course. Image of google search results Google's AI results are often confidently wrong, especially on technical topics. (The ambient helium spheres on the S-IVB were not used for propellant tank pressurization after the first few Saturn V launches.) Google's AI results are often confidently wrong, especially on technical topics. (The ambient helium spheres on the S-IVB were not used for propellant tank pressurization after the first few Saturn V launches.) Image of kagi search results Kagi doesn't try to fabricate and simply directs you to a site that has the correct information. (Heroicrelics.org is an excellent source for all things historic human space flight.) Kagi doesn't try to fabricate and simply directs you to a site that has the correct information. (Heroicrelics.org is an excellent source for all things historic human space flight.) Google's AI results are often confidently wrong, especially on technical topics. (The ambient helium spheres on the S-IVB were not used for propellant tank pressurization after the first few Saturn V launches.) Kagi doesn't try to fabricate and simply directs you to a site that has the correct information. (Heroicrelics.org is an excellent source for all things historic human space flight.) The other thing that made me nervous about paying for search was the idea that my money was going to enrich some scumbag VC fund, but fortunately, there's good news on that front. According to the company's "About" page, Kagi has not taken any money from venture capitalist firms. Instead, it has been funded by a combination of self-investment by the founder, selling equity to some Kagi users in two rounds, and subscription revenue: Kagi was bootstrapped from 2018 to 2023 with ~$3M initial funding from the founder. In 2023, Kagi raised $670K from Kagi users in its first external fundraise, followed by $1.88M raised in 2024, again from our users, bringing the number of users-investors to 93... In early 2024, Kagi became a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC). What about DuckDuckGo? Or Bing? Or Brave? Sure, those can be perfectly cromulent alternatives to Google, but honestly, I don't think they go far enough. DuckDuckGo is fine, but it largely utilizes Bing's index; and while DuckDuckGo exercises considerable control over its search results, the company is tied to the vicissitudes of Microsoft by that index. It's a bit like sitting in a boat tied to a submarine. Sure, everything's fine now, but at some point, that sub will do what subs do--and your boat is gonna follow it down. And as for Bing itself, perhaps I'm nitpicky [Ed. note: He is!], but using Bing feels like interacting with 2000-era MSN's slightly perkier grandkid. It's younger and fresher, yes, but it still radiates that same old stanky feeling of taste-free, designed-by-committee artlessness. I'd rather just use Google--which is saying something. At least Google's search home page remains uncluttered. Brave Search is another fascinating option I haven't spent a tremendous amount of time with, largely because Brave's cryptocurrency ties still feel incredibly low-rent and skeevy. I'm slowly warming up to the Brave Browser as a replacement for Chrome (see the screenshots in this article!), but I'm just not comfortable with Brave yet--and likely won't be unless the company divorces itself from cryptocurrencies entirely. More anonymity, if you want it The feature that convinced me to start paying for Kagi was its Privacy Pass option. Based on a clean-sheet Rust implementation of the Privacy Pass standard (IETF RFCs 9576, 9577, and 9578) by Raphael Robert, this is a technology that uses cryptographic token-based auth to send an "I'm a paying user, please give me results" signal to Kagi, without Kagi knowing which user made the request. (There's a much longer Kagi blog post with actual technical details for the curious.) To search using the tool, you install the Privacy Pass extension (linked in the docs above) in your browser, log in to Kagi, and enable the extension. This causes the plugin to request a bundle of tokens from the search service. After that, you can log out and/or use private windows, and those tokens are utilized whenever you do a Kagi search. image of a kagi search with privacy pass enabled Privacy pass is enabled, allowing me to explore the delicious mystery of pierogis with some semblance of privacy. Credit: Lee Hutchinson Privacy pass is enabled, allowing me to explore the delicious mystery of pierogis with some semblance of privacy. Credit: Lee Hutchinson The obvious flaw here is that Kagi still records source IP addresses along with Privacy Pass searches, potentially de-anonymizing them, but there's a path around that: Privacy Pass functions with Tor, and Kagi maintains a Tor onion address for searches. So why do I keep using Privacy Pass without Tor, in spite of the opsec flaw? Maybe it's the placebo effect in action, but I feel better about putting at least a tiny bit of friction in the way of someone with root attempting to casually browse my search history. Like, I want there to be at least a SQL JOIN or two between my IP address and my searches for "best Mass Effect alien sex choices" or " cleaning tips for Garrus body pillow." I mean, you know, assuming I were ever to search for such things. What's it like to use? Moving on with embarrassed rapidity, let's look at Kagi a bit and see how using it feels. image of a kagi search with Kagi results for a query. Lee Hutchinson Kagi results for a query. Lee Hutchinson image of a google search Google results for a query. Lee Hutchinson Google results for a query. Lee Hutchinson Kagi results for a query. Lee Hutchinson Google results for a query. Lee Hutchinson My anecdotal observation is that Kagi doesn't favor Reddit-based results nearly as much as Google does, but sometimes it still has them near or at the top. And here is where Kagi curb-stomps Google with quality-of-life features: Kagi lets you prioritize or de-prioritize a website's prominence in your search results. You can even pin that site to the top of the screen or block it completely. This is a feature I've wanted Google to get for about 25 damn years but that the company has consistently refused to properly implement (likely because allowing users to exclude sites from search results notionally reduces engagement and therefore reduces the potential revenue that Google can extract from search). Well, screw you, Google, because Kagi lets me prioritize or exclude sites from my results, and it works great--I'm extraordinarily pleased to never again have to worry about Quora or Pinterest links showing up in my search results. Further, Kagi lets me adjust these settings both for the current set of search results (if you don't want Reddit results for this search but you don't want to drop Reddit altogether) and also globally (for all future searches): Image of kagi SERP options You can quick-tune search results... Lee Hutchinson You can quick-tune search results... Lee Hutchinson Image of detailed kagi SERP options ...or do some more advanced configuration, all right from the results page. Lee Hutchinson ...or do some more advanced configuration, all right from the results page. Lee Hutchinson You can quick-tune search results... Lee Hutchinson ...or do some more advanced configuration, all right from the results page. Lee Hutchinson image of kagi search personalization options Goodbye forever, useless crap sites. Credit: Lee Hutchinson Goodbye forever, useless crap sites. Credit: Lee Hutchinson Another tremendous quality-of-life improvement comes via Kagi's image search, which does a bunch of stuff that Google should and/or used to do--like giving you direct right-click access to save images without having to fight the search engine with workarounds, plugins, or Tampermonkey-esque userscripts. Image of kagi image search results Kagi image search is full-screen and fully functional. Kagi image search is full-screen and fully functional. Image of kagi image search details By "fully functional," I mean "it lets you easily save the images you see," which Google has retreated from for a variety of reasons. By "fully functional," I mean "it lets you easily save the images you see," which Google has retreated from for a variety of reasons. Kagi image search is full-screen and fully functional. By "fully functional," I mean "it lets you easily save the images you see," which Google has retreated from for a variety of reasons. The Kagi experience is also vastly more customizable than Google's (or at least, how Google's has become). The widgets that appear in your results can be turned off, and the "lenses" through which Kagi sees the web can be adjusted to influence what kinds of things do and do not appear in your results. Image of kagi search widget options You can control what kinds of things Kagi includes in your search results. Lee Hutchinson You can control what kinds of things Kagi includes in your search results. Lee Hutchinson Image of kagi search lens options "Lenses" lets you change where and how Kagi searches for things. Lee Hutchinson "Lenses" lets you change where and how Kagi searches for things. Lee Hutchinson You can control what kinds of things Kagi includes in your search results. Lee Hutchinson "Lenses" lets you change where and how Kagi searches for things. Lee Hutchinson If that doesn't do it for you, how about the ability to inject custom CSS into your search and landing pages? Or to automatically rewrite search result URLs to taste, doing things like redirecting reddit.com to old.reddit.com? Or breaking free of AMP pages and always viewing originals instead? Image of kagi custom css field Imagine all the things Ars readers will put here. Credit: Lee Hutchinson Imagine all the things Ars readers will put here. Credit: Lee Hutchinson Is that all there is? Those are really all the features I care about, but there are loads of other Kagi bits to discover--like a Kagi Maps tool (it's pretty good, though I'm not ready to take it up full time yet) and a Kagi video search tool. There are also tons of classic old-Google-style inline search customizations, including verbatim mode, where instead of trying to infer context about your search terms, Kagi searches for exactly what you put in the box. You can also add custom search operators that do whatever you program them to do, and you get API-based access for doing programmatic things with search. Image of kagi general options A quick run-through of a few additional options pages. This is the general customization page. Lee Hutchinson A quick run-through of a few additional options pages. This is the general customization page. Lee Hutchinson image of kagi appearance options Appearance customization options (and remember, there's always custom CSS!) Lee Hutchinson Appearance customization options (and remember, there's always custom CSS!) Lee Hutchinson image of kagi general search options And the default/general search options page. Lee Hutchinson And the default/general search options page. Lee Hutchinson Appearance customization options (and remember, there's always custom CSS!) Lee Hutchinson And the default/general search options page. Lee Hutchinson I haven't spent any time with Kagi's Orion browser, but it's there as an option for folks who want a WebKit-based browser with baked-in support for Privacy Pass and other Kagi functionality. For now, Firefox continues to serve me well, with Brave as a fallback for working with Google Docs and other tools I can't avoid and that treat non-Chromium browsers like second-class citizens. However, Orion is probably on the horizon for me if things in Mozilla-land continue to sour. Cool, but is it any good? Rather than fill space with a ton of comparative screenshots between Kagi and Google or Kagi and Bing, I want to talk about my subjective experience using the product. (You can do all the comparison searches you want--just go and start searching--and your comparisons will be a lot more relevant to your personal use cases than any examples I can dream up!) My time with Kagi so far has included about seven months of casual opportunistic use, where I'd occasionally throw a query at it to see how it did, and about five months of committed daily use. In the five months of daily usage, I can count on one hand the times I've done a supplementary Google search because Kagi didn't have what I was looking for on the first page of results. I've done searches for all the kinds of things I usually look for in a given day--article fact-checking queries, searches for details about the parts of speech, hunts for duck facts (we have some feral Muscovy ducks nesting in our front yard), obscure technical details about Project Apollo, who the hell played Dupont in Equilibrium (Angus Macfadyen, who also played Robert the Bruce in Braveheart), and many, many other queries. Image of Firefox history window showing kagi searches for july 22 A typical afternoon of Kagi searches, from my Firefox history window. Credit: Lee Hutchinson A typical afternoon of Kagi searches, from my Firefox history window. Credit: Lee Hutchinson For all of these things, Kagi has responded quickly and correctly. The time to service a query feels more or less like Google's service times; according to the timer at the top of the page, my Kagi searches complete in between 0.2 and 0.8 seconds. Kagi handles misspellings in search terms with the grace expected of a modern search engine and has had no problem figuring out my typos. Holistically, taking search customizations into account on top of the actual search performance, my subjective assessment is that Kagi gets me accurate, high-quality results on more or less any given query, and it does so without festooning the results pages with features I find detractive and irrelevant. I know that's not a data-driven assessment, and it doesn't fall back on charts or graphs or figures, but it's how I feel after using the product every single day for most of 2025 so far. For me, Kagi's search performance is firmly in the "good enough" category, and that's what I need. Kagi and AI Unfortunately, the thing that's stopping me from being completely effusive in my praise is that Kagi is exhibiting a disappointing amount of "keeping-up-with-the-Joneses" by rolling out a big 'ol pile of (optional, so far) AI-enabled search features. A blog post from founder Vladimir Prelovac talks about the company's use of AI, and it says all the right things, but at this point, I trust written statements from tech company founders about as far as I can throw their corporate office buildings. (And, dear reader, that ain't very far). image of kagi ai features No thanks. But I would like to exclude AI images from my search results, please. Credit: Lee Hutchinson No thanks. But I would like to exclude AI images from my search results, please. Credit: Lee Hutchinson The short version is that, like Google, Kagi has some AI features: There's an AI search results summarizer, an AI page summarizer, and an "ask questions about your results" chatbot-style function where you can interactively interrogate an LLM about your search topic and results. So far, all of these things can be disabled or ignored. I don't know how good any of the features are because I have disabled or ignored them. If the existence of AI in a product is a bright red line you won't cross, you'll have to turn back now and find another search engine alternative that doesn't use AI and also doesn't suck. When/if you do, let me know, because the pickings are slim. Is Kagi for you? Kagi might be for you--especially if you've recently typed a simple question into Google and gotten back a pile of fabricated gibberish in place of those 10 blue links that used to serve so well. Are you annoyed that Google's search sucks vastly more now than it did 10 years ago? Are you unhappy with how difficult it is to get Google search to do what you want? Are you fed up? Are you pissed off? If your answer to those questions is the same full-throated "Hell yes, I am!" that mine was, then perhaps it's time to try an alternative. And Kagi's a pretty decent one--if you're not averse to paying for it. It's a fantastic feeling to type in a search query and once again get useful, relevant, non-AI results (that I can customize!). It's a bit of sanity returning to my Internet experience, and I'm grateful. Until Kagi is bought by a value-destroying vampire VC fund or implodes into its own AI-driven enshittification cycle, I'll probably keep paying for it. After that, who knows? Maybe I'll throw away my computers and live in a cave. At least until the cave's robot exclusion protocol fails and the Googlebot comes for me. Photo of Lee Hutchinson Lee Hutchinson Senior Technology Editor Lee Hutchinson Senior Technology Editor Lee is the Senior Technology Editor, and oversees story development for the gadget, culture, IT, and video sections of Ars Technica. A long-time member of the Ars OpenForum with an extensive background in enterprise storage and security, he lives in Houston. 277 Comments Staff Picks p pavon My main reservation in signing up for Kagi has been their revenue sharing agreement with Yandex. In addition to gradually building their own index and search, Kagi also uses a number of existing search backends, including Bing, Google, and Yandex. And they pay these companies for access, so a portion of your fee is supporting Yandex. I don't want them to censor or exclude Russian content but I don't want to be financially supporting a Russian company either, especially one that has ties to the government. A caveat to this is that at the time the controversy about Kagi supporting Yandex broke out there were actually two Yandexes. The founder of Yandex, Arkady Volozh, left Russia in 2014 when they invaded Crimea, and had started working on making Yandex NV, a Dutch Holding company, more independent of Russia. This accelerated after Russia invaded Ukraine and by July 2024 he had relocated all Russian employees that wished to leave the country, sold off all Russian assets, severed ties with Russia and Yandex LLC, and renamed the remaining company the Nebius Group. The complaints about Kagi supporting Yandex occurred between these two events and it was never clear whether their deal was with Yandex NV or Yandex LLC, and whether Kagi continues to have a revenue sharing deal with Yandex LLC, or if it is now with Nebius. Instead they scrubbed most of the information about what backends they use from their website. August 5, 2025 at 3:02 pm N Notabee Kagi has been so nice and utilitarian, not much different than google a decade+ ago, but that's a good thing. Google used to be a good thing. It is frankly jarring, after using Kagi for a few months, to go back to Google or some other search engine. This has happened to me when trying to show someone else something on their computer, and we duly loaded up Google to try to find a web page I wanted to show them. Just shockingly gross to be confronted with nothing but hallucinating AI slop and ads filling up the initial results screen, and poor quality search results. We've been frogs boiling in the enshittification pot for a while, and it sucks to have to pay for something that used to be free and good, but maybe that's the only way to keep something being good and accountable. August 5, 2025 at 3:27 pm d dbarowy Kagi is great, and a recent Hacker News post directed me to this page, which has a nice blocklist for the most common SEO spammers. Kagi was already good, but blocking all the SEO stuff made it even better. Worth every penny. August 5, 2025 at 4:52 pm Comments Forum view Loading Loading comments... Prev story Next story Most Read 1. Listing image for first story in Most Read: Enough is enough--I dumped Google's worsening search for Kagi 1. Enough is enough--I dumped Google's worsening search for Kagi 2. 2. Is the Dream Chaser space plane ever going to launch into orbit? 3. 3. These are the best streaming services you aren't watching 4. 4. Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked 5. 5. "Red meat allergy" from tick bites is spreading both in US and globally Customize Ars Technica has been separating the signal from the noise for over 25 years. With our unique combination of technical savvy and wide-ranging interest in the technological arts and sciences, Ars is the trusted source in a sea of information. After all, you don't need to know everything, only what's important. More from Ars * About Us * Staff Directory * Newsletters * General FAQ * Posting Guidelines * RSS Feeds Contact * Contact us * Advertise with us * Reprints Manage Preferences (c) 2025 Conde Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Ars Technica Addendum and Your California Privacy Rights. Ars Technica may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Conde Nast. Ad Choices